ADDICTED TO AUTONOMOBILES

ADDICTION TO AUTONOMOBILES – AND THE SETTLEMENT PATTERN THAT AUTONOMOBILES SPAWN – IS THE DRIVING FORCE COLLAPSING A SOCIETY THAT HAS BECOME DEPENDENT ON LARGE, PRIVATE VEHICLES FOR MOBILITY AND ACCESS.

General Motors filed for bankruptcy yesterday. This is only the latest in a string of events that document how the Autonomobile Industrial Complex in the US of A is suffering.

How can one explain why some of the largest and most revered Enterprises on the Planet got to this place? (See “Inexhaustible Icon: GM Has Left Its Brand on the Cultural Landscape” in today’s Wapo.)

The simple answer is:

• Households that can AFFORD a new Large, Private Vehicle already have one – or two or three. Not only that but many new cars have three or four years of free maintenance and a 100,000 mile warranty. If one lost 40% of their shelter ‘investment’ and 60% of their retirement nest egg in the past year, why would they buy a new car?

• Households who NEED a new vehicle cannot afford one now that loans do not grow on trees. What those Households NEED is a small efficient vehicle. They ALSO NEED settlement patterns that require far less driving. (See German / American comparison noted below.)

No major Autonomobile Enterprise is offering vehicles that match citizen needs and Agencies, Enterprises and Institutions are not yet evolving functional settlement patterns.

What manner of a Enterprise strategy results in a whole industry sector selling themselves out of a market?

The one that comes to mind is aggressive drug cartels. Sell, sell, sell – push the product until there is almost one left who is not addicted and broke or already has a big stash.

Autonomobile Enterprises have acted exactly like drug cartels. With the help of Agencies (voters LOVE Large, Private Vehicles so long as they do not have to pay the full cost) and workers (unions LOVE high wages), Autonomobile Enterprises have addicted five generations of citizens to cheap energy and big, status-establishing / ego-messaging Autonomobiles.

These Autonomobiles demand a disaggregated and dysfunctional settlement patterns to operate.

After 90 years of selling four wheeled drugs, there is no alternative for Mobility and Access for the majority of Americans.

When the economy hit a rough patch due to dependence on unsustainable growth, unsustainable debt and Mass OverConsumption, citizens found themselves without any need for a new car and / or trapped with settlement patterns that are the inevitable result of Autonomobile dependence.

Bottom line: Citizens of the US of A are addicted to Autonomobiles. (See again US of A / German comparison below)

Many citizens are coming to grips with the reality that they and their Organization have:

1. Created a Global Financial System that has turned investment into gambling

2. Fueled a feeding frenzy that resulted in the Wrong Size House / Wrong Location Shelter Implosion

3. Paid no attention to the imbalance of trade, the widening Wealth Gap or unsustainable debt – public and private.

4. Championed Mass OverConsumption funded by depletion of Natural Capital

In their May newsletter, Ecocities Emerging’s Kirsten Miller makes a nice case for Autonomobiles being “The Sacred Cow of consumption.” (EMR would say the Sacred Cow of Mass OverConsumption) Ms. Miller uses the impact of the Tata mini in India as a jumping off place.

Icons that are ‘sacred’ normally reside in the Social Sphere. The addiction to Autonomobiles is also an Economic Sphere catastrophe and a Physical Sphere impossibility. (See The Large, Private Vehicle Mobility Myth.)

Citizens need smaller, more durable, more easily repaired and FAR more fuel efficient vehicles to bridge the gap until settlement patterns evolve to require fewer vehicles of any kind.

That is not what the current administration is betting on to recover the billions it has invested in GM. They are talking about slightly less consumptive vehicles and no Fundamental Transformation of the settlement pattern. (See today’s WaPo headline: “U. S. Bets Billions on GM’s Resurgence. Also see the two stories under the full page banner headline: “Flickers of Hope for U. S. Economy Belie the Distance From Recovery” and “Obama Unveils Plan for Brief Bankruptcy, Nationalization.”

For a very good summary of why the US of A did not have to get into this predicament see the April 2009 study from Brookings “Making Transportation Sustainable: Insights from Germany.”
The report documents how the US of A could have used far less land for urban land uses and created a far smaller ecological footprint with increased quality of life for all – including the 12.5 Percenters.

The question is: Is it too late to obtain a sustainable trajectory? Without Fundamental Transformation of settlement patterns, conditions will only get worse.

The expectations are unrealistic. On the day GM filed for bankruptcy that gambling venue call the NY Stock Exchange jumped over 200 points on rumors and shadows. (See WaPo story above “Flickers of Hope…”

Oil is up again on the hope that consumption will increase.

There is also hope of economic recovery is based such solid indicators of economic rebound as a rise in the Indian stock market last week. That is not a reflection of the Blackfeet and the Sioux selling more cattle, it is the response to an election in India that some think will allow the citizens of India to ride the Tiger a little longer.

Irony of irony’s is that for every recession since WW II selling cars and houses has been the cure for economic pain. Now they are the root cause of the Great Recession (See Steven Mufson’s story “Once a Recession Remedy, GM’s Empire Falls” in today’s Wapo.

EMR


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

13 responses to “ADDICTED TO AUTONOMOBILES”

  1. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    “Households who NEED a new vehicle cannot afford one now that loans do not grow on trees.”

    Weren’t you just saying in the previous article that debt was bad?now you are saying it is a necessity?

    Not being able to afford a car and not being able toget a loan are two different things.

    RH

  2. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    “No major Autonomobile Enterprise is offering vehicles that match citizen needs “

    I’m pretty happy with my Prius. It would seem to meet any reasonable need that does not require a van or a truck with more capacity.

    So far it has met my needs perfectly, and I would sayit is overall the best vehicle I ever owned.

    The blanket statement that no enterprise is metting citizen needs must be at least partly false.

    After all, even you own a couple of vehicles that you have previously claimed met your (sanctimonious) needs.

    RH

  3. Larry G Avatar
    Larry G

    One can buy more than a dozen automobiles for less than 20K now days and used car lots are full of fuel efficient models for less than half of that.

    for working folks – if you look at how many miles a year you put on your automobile – most will find that it’s the home-to-work-to-home trip that totals the most miles on the vehicle.

    Some folks who live 50 miles out and drive everyday can and do put 20,000 miles a year JUST in commuting on their cars and spend even for fuel efficient ones – thousands of dollars in gasoline.. oil changes and insurance AND …depreciation.

    getting out of that car for the home-to-work-to-home cycle can result in …a lot less miles and fuel usage – but not cost as even the cheapest transit costs more than driving an automobile for most folks.

    I recently paid $20 for 4 METRO tickets from Springfield to the Smithsonian when I could have driven there and back for about $5 in gasoline.

    ..and those METRO tickets were subsidized by the good taxpaying folks in NoVa to the tune of what..about 40% of the ticket price?

    So EMR – if you want more efficient settlement patterns and for folks to get out of their large private automobiles you have to give them an equivalent alternative.. in time, schedule, convenience and COST.

    Many folks who have modest employment …actually find it cheaper to drive a car than to take transit…despite the fact that, in theory, transit is being subsidized just for them.

    what gets folks out of their cars on I-95 and I-495 is not cheaper transit alternatives but less rush hour hassle… let someone else worry about it while you read, sleep or do your best imitation of a zombie.

    For a mere 15K and $10 a week in gasoline (for a 30+ mpg car) puts another young person on the roads instead of riding transit.

    EMR keeps babbling on and on.. or is it blathering… ???

    no matter.. he goes on and on about the large private automobile but the reality is that those who need cheap transportation have it easily available.

    they don’t have to buy a Queen Mary SUV ..they can do quite nicely with a Honda Fit – and do.

    as do most Germans…

    so we need to get off of the large private automobile “kick” and get real.

    because.. if all the ginormous SUVs went belly-up tomorrow, the next day.. most folks would have a smaller..more fuel efficient version and go right on doing what they are now – commuting and driving….and buying their “stuff” from the WalMart 10 miles away…

    that’s not going to go away.

    and it won’t be the death of civilization either IMHO.

  4. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    "most will find that it's the home-to-work-to-home trip that totals the most miles on the vehicle."

    Well, yeah, but how much stuff do you do on the way home by combining trips. This is a typical Larry mischaracterization. We know that evening rush hour lasts longer because of all the interim or extra trips added to the trip home.

    How do you allocate them to the commute trip?

    I drive a fairly long distance to work, but this weekend I drove my tractor far more than my commuter miles, and that didn't even count the four trips to the farm store(S).

    Sorry, I don't see the point fo such an argument.

  5. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    "I recently paid $20 for 4 METRO tickets from Springfield to the Smithsonian when I could have driven there and back for about $5 in gasoline."

    Larry is right, If i have to buy even TWO Amtrak tickets, let alone airline tickets, then it is almost always cheaper to drive, uless you are going over 1200 miles or overseas. (And before EMR goes off, that is eve if you include allthe reasonable externalities.)

    We are addicted to autos for a reason: they are the best, most convenient, cheapest, and most flexible transit we have.

  6. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    "When the [Greenville, SC] Southern Connector opened in 2001, the toll road was expected to spark development in the southern part of the city. Boosters said it would carry thousands of cars daily, allowing them to bypass Interstate 85 congestion.

    But eight years later, development hasn't boomed. The four-lane highway carries only half as many cars as forecast. And because toll revenue is far short of projections, the $200 million project has been using its reserves to pay off its debt for six years.

    It's scheduled to go into default in January."

    From Environmental Economics.

    RH

  7. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    "Good news: people who still have jobs are having a much easier time driving to work. Traffic congestion is down as much as 30 percent in 99 of the country’s 100 largest metro areas.

    In Washington, D.C., famous for gridlock of all kinds, traffic has fallen 24 percent during rush hour. San Francisco saw travel times fall 12 percent this year. Thanks, recession!"

    Now, when I have suggested this might be the case i was roundly assaulted by EMR and others. If you want people to drive less, just make them poor. If you want to reduce congestion in an area, reduce (or move) the jobs.

    Now we have the data.

    We can reduce congestion without new oads and without new taxes. "Free, no cost" as Jim Bcon used to say.

    RH

  8. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    "Unlike G.M.’s United States business, operations in emerging markets have been growing. Sales increased 10% last year in Brazil, 9% in India and 6% in China. Recent numbers in some areas are even better — G.M.’s sales in the Asia Pacific region were up 44% in May compared with the year before."

    NY Times

    RH

  9. Can you at least pay SOME lip service to the fact that German Settlement Patterns are thousands of years old? It's not forward thinking that led to their model. . .

    Ich sag's dir, wir Deutschen lieben unser Autos auch. Grossere Autos sind aber verboten, oder mindestens ist die Steuer zu hoch fuer die Volk.

  10. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    "The other day, Phoenix trumpeted that its daily light rail ridership had reached 37,000 boardings per weekday. Since most of those people have two boardings per day (one each direction) we can think of this as 18,500 people making a round trip each day.

    Well, if we bought each of these folks a brand new Prius III for $23,000 it would cost us just over $425 million. This is WAY less than the $1.4 billion we pay to move them by rail instead. We could have bought every regular rider a Prius and still have a billion dollars left over! And, having a Prius, they would be able to commute and get good gas mileage anywhere they wanted to go in Phoenix, rather than just a maximum of 20 miles on just one line.

    ~Coyote Blog "

    This isn;t the first time this kind of "analysis" has been made for light rail.

    RH

  11. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    Speaking of addicted.

    If you have enough money lying around you can now get a hybrid—————–Maserati.

    Or, for a lot less money, you could get a Tesla.

    RH

  12. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    "But the death of the hybrid Malibu isn’t necessarily an indictment of GM’s push for alternative-powered vehicles, like the much-ballyhooed Chevy Volt.

    Turns out, there was a very simple problem with the hybrid Malibu. From the WSJ story: “A base Malibu, carrying a four-cylinder engine, costs about $22,300, and a hybrid version, which uses a battery to help propel the vehicle, is about $4,000 more. Both models achieve 34 miles-per-gallon in highway driving, according to GM.”

    Making the case for hybrids’ bigger price tag is hard enough when they’re actually more fuel-efficient. It’s obviously a lot tougher case to make when the extra $4,000 gets you nothing but a six-letter piety plate on the trunk. "

    From Environmental Capital

    RH

  13. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    "Electric vehicles such as the Chevy Volt are being hyped in Washington as the next leap forward in transportation. They are being embraced on both sides of Pennsylvania Avenue as a way to kick start U.S. auto manufacturing and lower carbon emissions. As a candidate, President Obama pledged to put a a million of the new models on American roads by 2015.

    It’s worth noting, then, that the U.S. government sees so many problems adding them to its 645,000-vehicle fleet."

    From Environmentla Capital

    RH

Leave a Reply