Abuser Fees and Unintended Consequences

Peter Galuszka has tackled the issue of abuser fees for the Road to Ruin project in his article, “Abuser Fees or Abusive Fees?” While he covers some of the same ground as the Mainstream Media — primarily the fact that the fees don’t apply to out-of-state drivers — he also hones in on an aspect of the unfolding debate that continues to go under-reported: The unintended consequences.

We know the intended consequences. Abuser fees for dangerous driving is supposed to raise about $50 million for transportation funding. It is also supposed to make drivers think twice before engaging in reckless behavior, with the hoped-for benefit of reducing the number of traffic accidents. Because traffic accidents are a major contributor to traffic congestion, the abuser fees should reduce congestion.

Fortunately, it should be easy to find out if the intended consequences transpire or not. Will the incidence of speeding, DUI and other forms of reckless driving decline? Will the number of traffic accidents fall? The numbers are readily available.

But it’s the unintended consequences that concern me. Will more motorists decide to contest their tickets in traffic court? Will traffic courts get more crowded? Will more drivers fail to pay their out-sized fines? Will more Virginians be driving on suspended licenses? Will more of those drivers get arrested and thrown in jail? I suspect that those numbers may be difficult to come by.

Let’s assume that the abuser fees raise the full $50 million they are postulated to raise. How much will it cost in additional court costs and state trooper time to process an increased number of disputed tickets? How much will it cost to house people in jail when they’ve been arrested for driving on a suspended license? And, assuming that many of those people are not like Paris Hilton with rich daddies to fall back upon, who will support their families? How much money will the state spend on welfare?

Add up all those ancillary costs, and how much will abuser fees cost the state in ways that nobody’s counting? Will the sum amount to more than the $50 million raised for transportation? Will the Commonwealth, in effect, be robbing Peter to pay Paul — mugging Virginia motorists along the way? We’ll never know because no one is tracking the data.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

9 responses to “Abuser Fees and Unintended Consequences”

  1. Brian Kirwin Avatar
    Brian Kirwin

    Jim, under current law, reckless driving and DUI are punishable by up to 1 year in prison and/or a $2,500 fine. They are both Class 1 misdemeanors.

    If adding these fees dissuades people from committing Class 1 misdemeanors, fantastic. But the fees are less than the punishment already allowed for these offenses.

  2. Possibly Inconvenient Truth Avatar
    Possibly Inconvenient Truth

    How much added congestion will there be from people slowing down to the 55 mph speed limit on arterials? Will slow drivers increase traffic accidents?

    How many drivers with suspended or revoked licenses who keep driving will no longer have insurance?

    How many people will get killed or injured in high speed chases as more drivers attempt to escape draconian penalties?

    The law causing more lawlessness is a common theme in American history. Prohibition and the drug wars are two that come to mind.

    This ties in with E M Risse’s Autonomobility issue because it is lawlessness in the major cities that drives families to the suburbs to escape the crime.

    This July 2nd BBC article highlights the toll of the ongoing drug war. Could this be a factor in the migration of uninsured Mexicans to the US?

    “2007 is turning into the year of grim statistics for Mexico.

    Take the figure of 1,000 dead dominating the headlines here.

    It is not a figure about road accidents or fatal diseases. These are deaths in what are being called the “narco wars” – the fight between the country’s drug cartels and the security forces.

    The killing rate runs at five a day – and the combined forces of the army, federal police and local police do not seem able to stop it.”

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6250200.stm

  3. Tobias Jodter Avatar
    Tobias Jodter

    I guess I am not sophisticated enough to understand how this bill worked(s) but I am reading today that residents of NOVA are also planned to be hit with a $0.40/$100 Grantor’s Tax on all home sales. This would need to be authorized by NVTA? Seems to me that’s the real outrage about to be perpetrated on an unsuspecting public.

  4. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    with regard to higher penalty laws and stricter enforcement.. I read something the other day that claimed that red light cameras actually INCREASED the numbers of rear-end accidents at traffic signals.

    The theory, if one believes it, is that the guy in front – the “hiteee” lost his guts faster than the guy behind him – the “hitter”.

    Here’s an idea – each car has a sensor that is activated when a moving violation occurs… speeding, DUI, running red lights, etc .. and the lights on an offending vehicle start flashing and there are convenient pull-offs for folks with these flashing lights to pull off and have the lights deactivated while the police write them up for the offense.

    Oh.. and the best part .. you can pay with credit card or EZ Pass.

  5. Jim Duncan Avatar
    Jim Duncan

    What exactly is the argument against a gas tax?

    It seems that an additional nickel gas tax would be a far more broad-based and progressive tax on everybody driving in the Commonwealth versus this “abuser tax” plan.

  6. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    We didn’t want a gas tax, so this is what we got instead. It’s a guaranteed sure-fire way to make the gas tax more palatable.

    Except it needs to be more like 50 cents than a nickle.

  7. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    Ohhhhh.. a POX on Bill Howell and the no-mo-taxes less we turn into John Chichester RINOs ….house of pain.

  8. Ray Hyde Avatar
    Ray Hyde

    I see that Loudoun is going to court to prevent the imposition of new taxes by NVTA.

    Meanwhile, the Fauquier paper is gloating over the fact that their residents will benefit from improvements they don’t have to pay for because the taxes don;t apply.

  9. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    what will happen if the new Transportation Authorities are ruled illegal?

    I can see some fairly interesting twists and turns if that happens.

Leave a Reply