A Promising Richmond Healthcare Program with Statewide Implications

by James C. Sherlock

Reporter George Copeland Jr. of the Richmond Free Press (RFP) has alerted its readers, of which it claims 135,000, and Virginians as a whole, to a very promising Richmond healthcare initiative.

Richmond’s new Health Equity Fund (HEF) is managed by Richmond and Henrico Health Districts (RHHD), a local agency of the Virginia Department of Health (VDH). Funding decisions will be made in partnership with a Community Advisory Committee for which the HEF is accepting nominations.

So far RHHD appears to have shown excellent judgment.

The Health Equity Fund is a City of Richmond program to spend $5 million in federal American Rescue Plan Act money, so it relates funding to COVID, but that is a bureaucratic necessity. So, while RHHD serves all of Richmond and Henrico, the HEF will consider and fund only projects taking place within the City of Richmond.

But they are doing the right thing regardless of the regulations that come with the money. The programs are community focused and community executed.

I congratulate the RHHD, the mayor and the Richmond City Council for this initiative.

I suggest RHHD, together with the VDH and the Department of Medical Assistance Services (DMAS), collect metrics that can justify expenditures by the state through the Medicaid program to provide continued support to the recipient programs proven to work.

The first three programs funded with HEF dollars as reported by Mr. Copeland are:

to provide bilingual medical assistance and increase its capacity when it comes to testing, vaccinations, and educating patients and the community at large.

to provide crisis and transitional shelter assistance to Richmond residents exiting incarceration who have a history of or an increased likelihood of substance abuse. Assistance will range from harm reduction and social services support, to rental aid and case management.

for a full-time clinician to ensure they can provide their mental health services in RHHD Resource Centers in the city’s public housing and lower-income communities.

HEF program objectives and investments so far demonstrate both elements of Maryland’s enormously successful, popular and cost-effective Health Enterprise Zones (HEZs) program.

It is not surprising.

Dr. Danny Avula, now the state’s Commissioner of the Department of Social Services, was Director of RHHD from March 2016 until February 4 of this year. In January 2021, he was temporarily appointed to fix the state’s worst-in-the-nation COVID-19 vaccine program. He proved very successful in getting that done. The HEF program bears the earmarks of his leadership.

Over time, some of these investments will succeed. Others may not.

There are ways to collect data and compute ROI on these investments that will treat the HEF investments as pilots and provide evidence to support the continuation of the best of them with state money.

I suggest we do it. I hope we already are.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

8 responses to “A Promising Richmond Healthcare Program with Statewide Implications”

  1. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    These are good intentions but they seem to be using one-time money that will end – unless I don’t understand.

    using one-time money for things that require recurring funding are problematical. They “feel good” but they go away.

    and the descriptions are somewhat vague in my mind.

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      It is one-time money, Larry. That is why I have suggested the state treat the investments like pilot programs, collect measurable data on the results of each and use those results to support continuation funding for the most cost-effective of them through the state Medicaid program.

      The best programs can be instituted in other locales that will benefit from them.

    2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      It is one-time money, Larry. That is why I have suggested the state treat the investments like pilot programs, collect measurable data on the results of each and use those results to support continuation funding for the most cost-effective of them through the state Medicaid program.

      The best programs can be instituted in other locales that will benefit from them.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        yep. But they’re not even pilot programs. They’re just spending money here and as I said, the words are generic and vague – they are “good intentions” and not much more.

        If they were actual pilot programs, the data collection would be required and would be collected and used…

        You’re quite the government advocate at times.. especially when money is involved!

        😉

        1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          Especially when poor people are involved and the fixes proposed for healthcare and education are measured against norms.

        2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          When you read my article, you will see that I recommend them as pilot programs if they are not.

  2. Carter Melton Avatar
    Carter Melton

    I wonder if there is a role for the Virginia Heslthcare Foundation here. They have the capability and know how to build credible models, achieve statewide coverage, and successfully raise public-private funding.

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Contact the Secretary of Health and Human Resources through the Governor’s office and pose the question.

Leave a Reply