A Tale of Three Schools

by Dick Hall-Sizemore

One school allots time in its schedule for students “to engage in critical conversations around topics of race, antiracism, social justice, and inclusion.” Its student handbook endeavors to train a “lens toward fairness, equity, inclusion.”  Diversity training is required for all faculty and staff.   Summer reading included: Stamped: Racism, Antiracism and You by Jason Reynolds and Ibram X. Kendi and White Fragility: Why It’s So Hard for White People to Talk About Racism by Robin DiAngelo.

In its discussion on “building an antiracist community,” the school notes that “discomfort helps us to stretch and grow. Learning how to engage in difficult conversations, to listen respectfully, and to consider multiple perspectives are vital to building a strong educational community and preparing our students for future academic, community, and professional engagement and leadership.”

Another school has expressed its commitment to DEI. During the summer, faculty were asked to read How to be an Antiracist by Ibram X. Kendi and Between the World and Me by Ta-Nehisi Coates. The latter work was also assigned to students during the year.

A third school has an extensive exhibit entitled Endowment of Tears, Hope for Reconciliation. In discussing the “pivotal role of slavery” it focuses on “enslaved persons of the same age as students.” It points out that those youngsters, if they had not been slaves, could have benefited from the education provided by the school. The exhibit declares, “We stand in their debt” and asks “how best to seek reconciliation with the memory of the enslaved and with their descendants.”

These sound like activities that have been decried on this blog. It may have been this sort of thing that Glenn Youngkin was talking about in his campaign when he warned that critical race theory “has moved into our schools” and later said he wanted to root it out. Some thought that these were the types of activities that the Governor had in mind when he made prohibiting “inherently divisive concepts” a goal and set up a tip line, encouraging parents to report such activities.

But I am not concerned. The three schools described are the ones that the Governor sent his children to: National Cathedral School, St. Albans School, and Georgetown Preparatory School. He was even on the governing board of one of them from 2015-2018. Certainly, the Governor would not be associated with, nor send his children to, schools that espoused critical race theory or inherently divisive concepts.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

71 responses to “A Tale of Three Schools”

  1. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    When all the schools teach divisive concepts such as Kendi’s racist theories, what are you going to do? His public school alternative was FCPS – where they play White privilege bingo. He got involved and, I’d guess, tried to change what the schools are doing. When that didn’t work he ran for governor, won, and tried again – this time with more force than being on the governing board of a single school.

    A political novice, Younkin beat a former governor and former head of the Democratic National Party. The biggest swing issue that gave Younkin the win was education. Particularly the teaching of divisive issues such as Kendi’s racist philosophy.

    The good news is that, like “defunding the police” … liberals just can’t stop themselves with insisting on teaching Kendi’s racism in schools. That cost you the governorship and the House of Delegates. You would have lost the state Senate too if it had been on the ballot.

    Keep it up.

    1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      Ummm… Youngkin was on the board of his kid’s school… he had no problems with these topics until he saw political fodder… and still he sends his kids to these schools showing it really doesn’t concern him… (Youngkin is not the type that would EVER send his kids to PUBIC schools… anywhere…).

      Btw, the bingo story was debunked on yesterday’s CRT thread…

    2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      Ummm… Youngkin was on the board of his kid’s school… he had no problems with these topics until he saw political fodder… and still he sends his kids to these schools showing it really doesn’t concern him… (Youngkin is not the type that would EVER send his kids to PUBIC schools… anywhere…).

      Btw, the bingo story was debunked on yesterday’s CRT thread…

      1. Matt Adams Avatar
        Matt Adams

        “Youngkin was on the board of his kid’s school… he had no problems with these topics until he saw political fodder…”

        So Gov. Youngkin didn’t engage against those concepts when his children went there?

        “(Youngkin is not the type that would EVER send his kids to PUBIC schools… anywhere…).”

        Again, what proof do you have of this claim?

        Privilege Bingo was not “debunked”, it was an assignment at FCPS. There are plenty of news stories that back that up that aren’t BR. Would you care to retract your statement?

        https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/northern-virginia/privilege-bingo-in-fairfax-co-class-meets-controversy-after-it-includes-being-a-military-kid/2942443/

        https://www.localdvm.com/news/virginia/fairfax-county-schools-facing-backlash-after-high-school-bingo-activity/

      2. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Silence is violence, until of course, you resort to actual violence. The current Republican Party has picked up the John Birch Society Handbook and ran with it.

      3. DJRippert Avatar
        DJRippert

        Maybe you’ve never been on a board. I’m on several. Board members are not dictators. You don’t get everything you want. Unless you were in those board meeting or have seen the minutes you have no Earthly idea what Gov Younkin’s position on the issues was.

        Nothing was debunked on yesterday’s CRT hread because there was no CRT thread. There was an inaccurate comment about he White privilege bingo pertaining to CRT which was never the case. CRT was only invoked by Larry and never mentioned by myself or Jim. Please stop lying.

  2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    Nicely put, Dick. Along with pointing out how this is actually a contrived issue with the goal of driving the political Right to the polls… apparently successfully… I really want to know what the opponents of such discussions and readings find so offensive…?

  3. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Rank hypocrisy is a campaign strategy.

    Kinda like claiming white privilege doesn’t exist and that DE&I is unnecessary…

    “When I enrolled in a PhD program in African history in 1976, I quickly learned, however, that being White was not an asset in my first chosen profession. I got over it and embarked upon a different career.”

    Does this mean the author normally considers being white is an asset? Asset?

  4. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    Good one, Dick! I went to Georgetown Prep and will be attending my 52nd reunion in a couple of weeks. Loved it. And guess who went to St. Alban’s? None other than JAB!

  5. VaPragamtist Avatar
    VaPragamtist

    So have we finally moved beyond the argument that CRT and its intellectual offshoots don’t exist in K-12 schools? If so, then we can debate the content and pedagogy itself. But if not, then we’ll keep going around in circles.

    1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      Just private schools that Conservatives send their kids to…

      1. VaPragamtist Avatar
        VaPragamtist

        So I guess that’s a “no”. Damn. I was hoping we could acknowledge a basic assumption and discuss the heart of the issue. But circles it is.

  6. I’m so glad to hear Dick admitting that CRT-like perspectives are widespread in private schools. It’s even more encouraging to see BR’s left-wing trolls concede the point — with great glee, as long gas they think they can accuse Youngkin of hypocrisy.

    This is no secret. These kinds of things aren’t limited to elite D.C.-area schools. The same perspective are taught downstate at Woodbury Forest, St. Christophers, St. Catherine’s (just the schools I know about) and undoubtedly many others as well. The former headmaster of Collegiate School (in Richmond) moved to an elite school in Atlanta (Westminster, if I recall correctly) and set off a furor with his CRT agenda there.

    Now that the CRT deniers admit that CRT is pervasive in elite private schools, are they still determined to assert that CRT in public schools is just a right-wing bogeyman?

    From a moral and ethical standpoint, here’s the important point: If parents are spending $25,000 to $40,000 a year to send a kid to an elite prep school, they can yank their kid out if they don’t like the curriculum and the environment. They have freedom of choice. Most parents who send their kids to public school don’t have that luxury. They’re stuck. They have no choice. Which, of course, is why the Left in Virginia is so opposed to any measure that would create freedom of choice for parents.

    P.S. Which of the incidents you describe occurred at St. Albans? I’ve lost touch with my high school (which, by the way, was one of the first private schools in the D.C. area to offer scholarships to Black kids in the 1960s, a legacy I am proud of). I suspected that it had gotten very woke, but I hadn’t heard the specifics.

    1. M. Purdy Avatar
      M. Purdy

      Why do you think anyone is conceding the existence of CRT in *public schools* by acknowledging that there is teaching of CRT in private schools? It’s not news that private school curricula, esp. elite private schools and those that are religiously affiliated, are vastly different than public schools.

      1. I apologize. You’re so right. There is literally nothing that could convince you that CRT has infiltrated Virginia’s public school system. I doubt that appointing Ibram Kendi as state school superintendent would do the trick.

        1. M. Purdy Avatar
          M. Purdy

          Assertion isn’t evidence. Faith isn’t evidence. The DoE preliminary study couldn’t point to any instructional materials actually used in schools containing CRT. Maybe it’ll come up with some, maybe it won’t. But the fact that this concept and its alleged infiltration takes up so much bandwidth of the Virginia Republican party is a joke and has brought out the real wingnuts to air their grievances.

          1. YellowstoneBound1948 Avatar
            YellowstoneBound1948

            And if there is snow on the ground in the morning, but you did not see it fall during the night, it did not snow. You haven’t tried any jury cases, have you?

          2. M. Purdy Avatar
            M. Purdy

            Maybe the worst analogy I’ve heard this month. Was 1948 the last time you tried a case?

          3. YellowstoneBound1948 Avatar
            YellowstoneBound1948

            And if there is snow on the ground in the morning, but you did not see it fall during the night, it did not snow. You haven’t tried any jury cases, have you?

      2. DJRippert Avatar
        DJRippert

        Liberals insist that CRT is a concept taught in law schools. How is a private K-12 school a law school? Which rationalization are your using now?

        1. M. Purdy Avatar
          M. Purdy

          Primarily it’s taught in law schools and PhD programs. The fact that private schools teach some of the same materials is a big ‘so what.’ Law schools also teach about Const. history, redlining, Jim Crow, John Rawls, Robert Nozick, etc. etc. etc. Some of those books will be part of a curriculum in colleges and elite prep schools, just like CRT theory.

          1. YellowstoneBound1948 Avatar
            YellowstoneBound1948

            No, it isn’t a big “so what.” You didn’t answer his question: How is a private K-12 school like a law school? Do you really think a course on Constitutional Law is similar to a high school course on civics? Do you really see no difference in the intellectual maturity of a 25-year-old and a 16-year-old? Stop preening.

          2. M. Purdy Avatar
            M. Purdy

            I do see an intellectual maturity between a 16 and 25 y.o. But it doesn’t mean that a 16 y.o. isn’t or shouldn’t be exposed to what a college kid is. At some point, we lose our innocence, but apparently not our sense of faux outrage…

        2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
          Dick Hall-Sizemore

          I don’t say they do. Obviously, CRT is not being taught in those private schools because we know the Governor would never send his kids to schools that were spreading CRT.

          1. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            “I don’t say they do. Obviously, CRT is not being taught in those private schools because we know the Governor would never send his kids to schools that were spreading CRT.”

            One of your patented arguments from ignorance.

          2. YellowstoneBound1948 Avatar
            YellowstoneBound1948

            “Assuming facts that are not in evidence,” as this former prosecutor used to say.

        3. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          Yes, you are correct, DEI topics are also being taught in Youngkin’s kids’ schools… and Youngkin seems to be perfectly fine with that…

    2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      I admitted no such thing. Since the Governor is against CRT and his kids are attending schools that stress DEI and assign antiracism authors for reading, I take it that the Governor believes that those activities, much complained about on this blog, do not constitute CRT. In fact, that is the point that I have been trying to make all along–CRT actually is not what conservatives have been complaining about all this time.

      By the way, I see that you are trying to hedge your bets. You have gone from claiming that CRT is being taught to saying that CRT-like perspectives. are widespread. There is a material difference, sort of like saying, “This cubic zircona ring is diamond-like.”

      1. YellowstoneBound1948 Avatar
        YellowstoneBound1948

        You cannot get much on a forward pass when you are throwing off your back foot.

    3. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      I admitted no such thing. Since the Governor is against CRT and his kids are attending schools that stress DEI and assign antiracism authors for reading, I take it that the Governor believes that those activities, much complained about on this blog, do not constitute CRT. In fact, that is the point that I have been trying to make all along–CRT actually is not what conservatives have been complaining about all this time.

      By the way, I see that you are trying to hedge your bets. You have gone from claiming that CRT is being taught to saying that CRT-like perspectives. are widespread. There is a material difference, sort of like saying, “This cubic zircona ring is diamond-like.”

    4. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      St. Albans was school no. 2. The link provides some of the context.

    5. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      “If parents are spending $25,000 to $40,000 a year to send a kid to an elite prep school, they can yank their kid out if they don’t like the curriculum and the environment.”

      And Youngkin did not… ergo… he is actual fine with these topics and discussions… for HIS kids and not on the campaign trail…

      1. Matt Adams Avatar
        Matt Adams

        Argument from ignorance.

        1. YellowstoneBound1948 Avatar
          YellowstoneBound1948

          You are so right. You have to wonder whether Eric has any children in any of these elite schools. He may not know that parents start working on their child’s admission when the child is just six months old. They are that competitive, and openings are almost non-existence in the middle grades and high school. Eric seems to think that a parent can just “yank” his child from school and, apparently, transfer the child to a similar school. That is so unrealistic.

  7. Kathleen Smith Avatar
    Kathleen Smith

    Glad the three schools are doing what they do, I think? So confusing. Maybe it is the way the topics are introduced, not the topics as CRT proposes they be taught?

  8. walter smith Avatar
    walter smith

    How do you know you are over the target?
    When the Leftist types squeal like little piggies.
    I was too busy yesterday to address the K-12 opposition to CRT, which doesn’t exist!!!!! in K-12.
    So, if it doesn’t exist in K-12, why do you object? Vociferously! It’s like objecting to people using the term “groomer” and then hear Disney execs admit it.
    I proudly graduated from Woodberry Forest in 1975 and UVA in 1979. My sons graduated from Woodberry. One son graduated from UVA in 2011, when I first heard something a little alarming. He was an “American Studies” major and there was a small mini-ceremony for maybe 30-40 students. At that time, he told me that he and one girl (sorry to offend) were the only ones who liked America and NONE of the professors did.
    Then George Floyd happened and the bottom fell out and everything spilled into view, followed by Covid and the revelations of the lack of teaching occurring in K12.
    Woodberry sent out a mea culpa over George Floyd and its “painful” history. I’m sorry – a school founded in 1889 that has educated thousands of young men, under Christian principles, history was “painful” …how?
    A school that voluntarily integrated in the late 1960s. Whose newly integrated classes I attended with racial harmony?
    Oh… the founder was in the Civil War… That would have been kind of hard not to between Orange and Culpeper… And the land was owned by James Madison’s brother, and he owned slaves! Ignore that he fought in the Revolutionary War and the War of 1812 (while his brother was President. Where’s the white privilege in that? He was the President’s brother. Shouldn’t he have played his nobility card to avoid service?) You know what NO STUDENT cared about from 1971 to 1975? Who owned the land and that the founder had fought in the Civil War. You know what we did like? Meeting other boys from all over the US, but about 40% from VA and 40% from NC and many from small towns like mine – Warsaw VA. And more of the “painful” history? The “Residence” – the ancestral Madison home was designed by…Thomas Jefferson…oh, the horror!
    Anyway, post-Floyd, I began to look into the poison being taught. This stuff is pushed by the NAIS (National Association of Independent Schools). The private schools use NAIS accreditation as shorthand that they are fully-approved and “elite.” I want Woodberry and all other similar schools, certainly any “under Christian principles” (like Woodberry’s Mission Statement says) to drop NAIS indoctrination as a stamp of approval.
    Then I watched my daughter’s high school education end due to Covid, watched her delay UVA for a year in the hope of normalcy, and had the time to fully investigate what is going on and it is poisonous. (Some might say divisive…)
    So I can fully believe Youngkin had no idea CRT was being taught at those schools. I had no idea what was going on at Woodberry. Do you know Woodberry has NAIS liaison? And that liaison does NAIS training? Check out the resources in the NAIS website…
    I have a friend who teaches BIOLOGY at Exeter. After George Floyd, he was instructed, as were all Exeter teachers, to build social justice into the curriculum. But it’s not being “taught.”
    But the Lefties are correct in one respect…the CRT DEI religion is not “taught” – it is indoctrinated from above with the worldview the teachers are required to use for their courses. I have the “culturally responsive training” all State employees MUST take. “Special” places like UVA, with permission, can create their own “culturally responsive training.” I’ll be happy to send you either one or both. Please spare me your cries. Let me know when you agree that Emma Weyant is the NCAA WOMEN’S champ in the 500 freestyle…
    Meanwhile, people are now awake to what is happening and we disagree with that worldview. Sorry, not sorry. And let me know if you want the indoctrination slides! I have the documents via FOIA, not a link, otherwise I’d give you the link…

    1. YellowstoneBound1948 Avatar
      YellowstoneBound1948

      Another superb entry. Thank you for taking the time.

      1. walter smith Avatar
        walter smith

        Thanks for reading it!
        It was very long, but I wanted to let people know just how pervasive this poisonous ideology is. It is everywhere. Even in the “elite” private schools. I would say the NAIS accreditation is to public K-12 as California lunacy is to the rest of the country. It’s the canary in the coal mine…

  9. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Rank hypocrisy is a campaign strategy.

    Kinda like claiming white privilege doesn’t exist and that DE&I is unnecessary…

    “When I enrolled in a PhD program in African history in 1976, I quickly learned, however, that being White was not an asset in my first chosen profession. I got over it and embarked upon a different career.”

    Does this mean the author normally considers being white is an asset? Asset? I wonder if there are situations where minorities think of being “not white” is an asset, or at best, not a disadvantage?

    1. M. Purdy Avatar
      M. Purdy

      I think that’s the only way you can interpret that. How about the author who says that there’s no white privilege b/c Asians are more educated and have higher per capita income? I guess the whole massive increase in violence against Asians is just jealousy…

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Maybe it’s the result of private schooling?

      2. DJRippert Avatar
        DJRippert

        Who is committing the violence against Asian people? Please cite facts and references.

    2. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      If “White Privilege” exists then why are Asian Americans better paid and better educated than White people? You liberals just can’t seem to answer that question. Or, are Asians actually White people in your mind?

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Well, if you’d just admit that it’s because they’re genetically superior, I’ll agree.

      2. M. Purdy Avatar
        M. Purdy

        This is brazenly faulty reasoning. People can succeed in spite of prejudice and the deck being stacked against them. It doesn’t prove that the discrimination does not exist in the first place.

        1. YellowstoneBound1948 Avatar
          YellowstoneBound1948

          Just as your reference to the article (in your commentary above) was brazenly dishonest. You figured no one would take the time to read it. I did. It says nothing about White Privilege or white crimes. You wanted to leave the readers here with the impression that Whites were committing crimes against Asians. You failed.

          1. M. Purdy Avatar
            M. Purdy

            No, not the case at all. The post above said cite your sources for anti-Asian hate. I cited one (there are many), and you interpreted that it had to do with white on asian violence. It didn’t, and you’re just a big sensitive guy, aren’t you?

  10. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    I’m sorry, I was distracted. I was busy watching this hopelessly mired-in-racism country appoint its third person of African heritage to its Supreme Court, the two previous including one liberal and one conservative. What are we talking about?

    Oh, yeah. Well, we have no idea what Youngkin thinks of any of this, do we? One might conclude his familiarity with CRT has bred his contempt. But those three schools, from what I know, embody White Privilege if it exists anywhere, joined by Liberal Guilt in abundance, so I actually would have been stunned if they weren’t wrapped up in this movement. Now Dick, Eric and Nancy can return to their previous position that there is no such ideology being taught anywhere ever.

    1. Matt Adams Avatar
      Matt Adams

      If it weren’t being employed all it’s proponents would be quiet as church mice. The fact that there is such massive pushback would clearly indicate it’s being employed.

      I also find it humorous that the largest proponents of this ideology are quick to chastise others for their “ill-gotten gains” but aren’t lining up to relinquish their own “ill-gotten” gains.

  11. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    “From what I know . . .” these schools are bastions of White Privilege:Steve Haner. You must of course know how much I respect your deep knowledge on a wide range of topics. But when it comes to Georgetown Prep, you are out of your depth. I attended from 1966 to 1970. I had Black classmates. My guess is that Virginia’s public schools were pretty much still segregated at that time.. One such classmate went on to become a highly regarded oncologist in DC. Bright kids? Yes. White Privilege? Not always. BTW, have you ever been to Georgetown Prep? If you haven’t why do you feel confident in putting it down? Wasn’t William & Mary back then White Privilege? I wouldn’t offer a comment on that.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Admitted. I’ve known others from St. Albans but few if any from from Georgetown Prep, and painted with a broad brush. Thanks to my wife being faculty I’ve had a good hard look the Saints here. Some black students, certainly, but a bastion of privilege (and wealthy black kids are certainly advantaged if not privileged.) As to W&M when I entered almost 50 years ago, certainly it didn’t reflect the population demographics, and actually in those days many of us were consciously avoiding UVA, U of R, Hampden Sydney, etc. W&M was far less preppie, in the word of the day.

    2. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Admitted. I’ve known others from St. Albans but few if any from from Georgetown Prep, and painted with a broad brush. Thanks to my wife being faculty I’ve had a good hard look the Saints here. Some black students, certainly, but a bastion of privilege (and wealthy black kids are certainly advantaged if not privileged.) As to W&M when I entered almost 50 years ago, certainly it didn’t reflect the population demographics, and actually in those days many of us were consciously avoiding UVA, U of R, Hampden Sydney, etc. W&M was far less preppie, in the word of the day.

  12. Virginia Gentleman Avatar
    Virginia Gentleman

    Great read Dick — the righteous right is so quick to criticize something called “Critical Race Theory” but are never willing to define it. It is hard to claim or defend whether CRT is taught in public schools because every single person can define it however they want. Having a conversation about how slavery impacted our history can be uncomfortable to some and then be defined as CRT while others may see no harm in it and defend that CRT is not being taught. But as long as the critics keep up their political attack on the teachers and assume incorrectly what their intentions are – you can count on the fact that more and more teachers are going to disappear.

    1. Matt Adams Avatar
      Matt Adams

      The 1619 project doesn’t teach how slavery impacted our Nation, it spun a narrative contrary to historical fact and that is something the author has finally admitted.

      History impacted our Nation just as it’s impacted every other Nation in the world. Teaching the idea that because of someone’s skin color they were either one of two groups a) oppressed or b) oppressor is directly contrary to the Civil Rights movement and anything that Dr. King ever said.

      1. Matt Adams Avatar
        Matt Adams

        The 1619 Project is used as a basis for teaching DEI.

        So instead of contending that others don’t know what they are talking about and or can’t define it. Perhaps you should take your own advice?

        1. Virginia Gentleman Avatar
          Virginia Gentleman

          I never contended that others don’t know what they are talking about – just that they can’t define it – that is a big difference. And your attempt to define it by somehow suggesting that the 1619 Project has been discredited lacks logic. And what advice did i give that I should take? I am not the one trying to ban teaching of something that has not been defined. I have read CRT defined as “diversity and inclusion”, “racial essentialism”, “rooted in Marxism”, or “a social construct, enforced by those in power (white men)”. So, when you don’t define it, you can basically claim it is anything that touches on black history that makes people feel uncomfortable. And God forbid white people feel uncomfortable.

          1. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            Oh really? I guess this quote never happened?

            “the righteous right is so quick to criticize something called “Critical Race Theory” but are never willing to define it. It is hard to claim or defend whether CRT is taught in public schools because every single person can define it however they want”

            “And your attempt to define it by somehow suggesting that the 1619 Project has been discredited lacks logic”

            That statement is nonsense and it’s evident you don’t know what logic is.

            “And what advice did i give that I should take?”

            Huh?

            “So, when you don’t define it, you can basically claim it is anything that touches on black history that makes people feel uncomfortable”

            It’s been defined, it’s defined in Kendi’s work. Which concludes that if you’re white you are an oppressor and if you’re black your oppressed. You’re not talking about history and I question if you have an iota of a clue about history.

            “And God forbid white people feel uncomfortable.”

            This has nothing to do with comfort, it has everything to do stating that the “I have a Dream” speech is BS. Because that’s what it is stating.

            Finally, please stop starting sentences with conjunctions. It’s making my head hurt and I can still hear my 8th grade English teacher screaming.

          2. Virginia Gentleman Avatar
            Virginia Gentleman

            “Because that’s what it is stating.” Perhaps you should have listened to your 8th grade teacher. And you still haven’ defined CRT. And yes both of those sentences started with a conjunction.

          3. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            Starting a sentence with “because” it’s acceptable if it’s a complete sentence.

            I did, given you can’t seem to formulate a sentence properly, I’d presume you just don’t understand the words.

          4. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            You seem very familiar with “whataboutism”, also very, very short of knowledge of much else.

    2. oromae Avatar

      I addressed the facts of CRT in Virginia schools yesterday. I’ll reprise it here for the benefit of any who may otherwise take your statements as factual.

      A simple google search reveals the tenets of CRT were indeed in use in indoctrinating Virginia public school students.

      In 2015, then-Governor McAuliffe’s Department of Education instructed Virginia public schools to “embrace critical race theory” in order to “re-engineer attitudes and belief systems.” They explicitly endorse CRT.

      Under the Northam administration, Superintendent of Public Instruction James Lane sent a memo to Virginia public schools endorsing “Foundations of Critical Race Theory in Education,” calling it an “important analytic tool” that can “further spur developments in education.”

      On Feb. 22, 2019, a memo from James F. Lane, Virginia’s superintendent of public instruction, promoted critical race theory in detail.
      “More recently, CRT has proven an important analytic tool in the field of education, offering critical perspectives on race, and the causes, consequences and manifestations of race, racism, inequity, and the dynamics of power and privilege in schooling.

      This groundbreaking anthology is the first to pull together both the foundational writings in the field and more recent scholarship on the cultural and racial politics of schooling. A comprehensive introduction provides an overview of the history and tenets of CRT in education. Each section then seeks to explicate ideological contestation of race in education and to create new, alternative accounts. In so doing, this landmark publication not only documents the progress to date of the CRT movement, it acts to further spur developments in education. “

      1. Virginia Gentleman Avatar
        Virginia Gentleman

        It has to be true if it can be googled.

        1. oromae Avatar

          So the quoted parties didn’t say it?
          Your reply amounts to gobbledygook.

          1. Virginia Gentleman Avatar
            Virginia Gentleman

            There is no evidence that anyone in either administrations suggested that teachers should teach students CRT – even though you can’t define it.

          2. I just provided evidence straight from their own mouths.
            Truly, you must live in some alternate reality.

          3. Virginia Gentleman Avatar
            Virginia Gentleman

            No you didn’t. You presented “evidence” that suggested teachers should be aware of racial dynamics. Nothing directs them to teach students. You really need to work on your reading comprehension. And you still can’t define it.

          4. Quadrupling down on Stoopid.
            First time I’ve ever seen it.
            Cry more.

          5. Virginia Gentleman Avatar
            Virginia Gentleman

            Apparently Republicans believe it is ok to marry
            a child, force women to deliver a rapist’s baby, give children guns, refuse to provide hungry kids a meal, but God forbid they read a Judy Blume book, wear a mask, or talk about race, gender identity or sexual orientation.

          6. Drivel.
            I didn’t intend that you actually cry more, but here you are.

    3. YellowstoneBound1948 Avatar
      YellowstoneBound1948

      You and your fellow malcontents are on the ropes, at last. This is why you now resort to splitting fine hairs.

Leave a Reply