A Simple Statement of Fact about the Public Schools

by James C. Sherlock

I know. Schools. Again.

But Virginia’s schools have been shown to be getting worse faster than those of other states.

Perhaps we should do something.

Read the National Assessment Board’s press release from June 21st. One paragraph drew my attention:

The LTT assessments in reading and math measure fundamental skills among nationally representative, age-based cohorts and have been administered since 1971 and 1973, respectively.

Students were generally making progress until 2012, when scores started declining.

Scores took a sharp downturn during the pandemic. Today, the average score for 13-year-olds on the LTT reading assessment is about where it was in 1971.

Despite the large decline in math, the average score in 2023 remains higher than in 1973.

Declining since 2012 nationwide.

Virginia’s have been declining since 2017. In a hurry.

The Nation’s Report Card, a federal Department of Education program, uses the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), which has been administered since 1969.

Take a look at the national results. Then look at Virginia results. They conform, except Virginia’s are getting worse faster.

Some still remember “Virginia has great public schools.” That was true as late as 2017. Relatively speaking.

But no more.

2017. In 2017, as measured by the NAEP, the difference between Virginia public schools and national public schools in Grade 4 was:

  • In math: nine points higher (a 248 score) than the national average.
  • In reading: seven points higher (a 228 score).

Both were rated above average nationally.

2022. Performance trends in 2022 showed a significant decrease for Grade 4 in math and reading in both average scores and achievement levels from the previous year.

Virginia 4th graders are now average nationally in both subjects.

In grade 8, Virginia students still scored significantly higher in math in 2022 than the national average, but were average nationally in reading.

But even those declines in relative performance do not tell the full tale.

In Virginia,

  • fourth graders reading at or above basic level declined from 74% in 2017 to 60% in 2022.
  • 77% of eighth graders read at or above basic level in 2017.  That declined to 65% in 2022.

In 2023, for which the state results are not yet posted, student long-term performance in both math and reading declined yet again for 13-year-olds.

Reading. The famous reading wars in English-speaking countries were between the teaching of reading with phonics and various non-phonics approaches.

A Congressionally-mandated National Reading Panel was assembled and reported (page 2-92) in 2020 using a meta analysis approach that:

Findings provided solid support for the conclusion that systematic phonics instruction makes a bigger contribution to children’s growth in reading than alternative programs providing unsystematic or no phonics instruction.

The Virginia Literacy Act of 2022 and Gov. Youngkin’s VDOE’s implementation of it is a step forward.

The resulting “Recommended Core Instructional Program Guide” for 2023 critiques even the instructional programs offered by major vendors that are recommended for approval by school divisions.

I suspect that putting programs from the likes of McGraw Hill on the not-recommended list was not in the cards.

But the review does not pull punches. It directly criticizes some of those programs centered around insufficient phonics instruction. VDOE gets it. The side-by-side comparison should deter school divisions from the ones that are weaker.

Well done.

SEL. Social-Emotional Learning (SEL) has really taken hold, with organizations like the Orwellian-named Committee for Children and the influential CASEL, the go-to VDOE reference, pushing it.

SEL is certainly intrusive. See Systemic Implementation.

SEL is woven into all students’ educational experiences. More than a single lesson or activity, SEL is integrated across key settings where students live and learn: classrooms, schools, homes, and communities.

It is also widespread. VDOE reports:

Seventy-six percent of principals and 53 percent of teachers nationally reported that their schools used a social and emotional learning (SEL) program or SEL curriculum materials in the 2021–2022 school year.

Indeed, the 2020 Virginia General Assembly and Governor Northam made SEL mandatory. They proclaimed it would advance excellence, equity, and inclusion.

HB 753, Social-emotional learning, was passed by the 2020 General Assembly. Signed by the governor, it directed his VDOE to:

develop guidance standards for social-emotional learning for all public students in grades kindergarten through 12.

In compliance, the Northam VDOE established a uniform definition of social-emotional learning and developed the Virginia Guidance SEL Standards.

That standards document anticipates:

Higher achievement test scores (+14 percent)

No footnote was offered in support of that prediction.

Now neither the current VDOE list of things the data say about SEL nor the data sources listed in that same document cite improved academic outcomes among its expected advantages.

VDOE recommendations to improve the public schools. VDOE, in response to 2022 House Bill 938, this month publishedRecommendations of the Secretary of Education and the Superintendent of Public Instruction to promote excellence and higher student achievement in response to House Bill 938.”

Its charter was prescribed very narrowly by the General Assembly to avoid any discussion of school choice.

Bottom line. Overall, the NAEP results are discouraging. A very deep hole has been dug.

For reading instruction, both the Virginia Literacy Act of 2022 and the Youngkin VDOE’s implementation of it are promising and show conviction.

That is the end of the good news.

The biggest declines in NAEP scores — the ones that drag the state averages down — as in every other standardized test set, are among poor minority children.

Those kids are not only statistics, they are children.

The local schools for too many poor minority kids remain abysmal. Some have been getting worse, not better, for years, not just during COVID. Many go from bad neighborhoods to bad schools in bad school divisions.

SEL, designed to help them, so far has proven at best irrelevant to academic learning.

School divisions are dysfunctional in many urban districts, captives of teachers unions, not serving parents and kids. Unlike in many other states, in Virginia those kids effectively have no options to their local public schools. They and their parents have no choices.

Only three actions will help transform their opportunities:

  1. a change to the state constitution mandating school choice, for which options include open enrollment, charter schools and vouchers;
  2. a change to the constitution enabling the state to take control of failed school divisions, as most states have; and
  3. Better enforcement of existing laws. Kids need to be safe in their neighborhoods and schools. They need to actually go to school rather than be chronically absent. Those are all matters for law enforcement and social services under current law, but they are also undeniably school quality and academic outcome issues.

Anything else is magical thinking.

 

 


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

24 responses to “A Simple Statement of Fact about the Public Schools”

  1. VaNavVet Avatar
    VaNavVet

    Magical thinking is believing that the state will do better than the local districts which are closer to the parents. Real progress happens when parents partner with their schools instead of fighting them!

    1. walter smith Avatar
      walter smith

      And real progress happens when schools quit trying to impose concepts antithetical to what the parents want – like SEL/CRT/DEI/Trans/LGBTQ, etc
      There may be a reason parents are fighting their local school districts…even in woke Loudoun…

      1. VaNavVet Avatar
        VaNavVet

        Yes and the reason may be that certain groups are stirring up these controversies for political purposes like the so called “Moms for Liberty” that are funded by dark money for the purpose of motivating the base. The children are the ones that are suffering because of this. Aside from this there are parents on both sides of all these issues but unfortunately in today’s world only your side can be right!

        1. walter smith Avatar
          walter smith

          You are insane. Defend yourself from evil and it’s “dark money,” says the provacateur. Conspiracy theory!

          1. VaNavVet Avatar
            VaNavVet

            I deem that your comment does not deserve an actual response and must surely be deleted by the sheriff.

      2. Fred Costello Avatar
        Fred Costello

        I am amazed that the other commentators on this blog do not see this. The schools do not budge an inch. They classify parents who disagree with them as terrorists.

    2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      God you love the parents who, whether they agree with you or not, do not intervene in progressive projects.

      You express a view limited by progressives to local governments that do what they think is “correct’, even if children are destroyed in the process.

      Local control is not the progressive governing principal, which is federal, and progressive, control.

      It does not for the left in this tailored instance represent a strategy, but rather a situational tactic.

      It lets you present yourselves as supporters of local control, except when it does not align with dogma.

      Thanks for reminding us.

      1. VaNavVet Avatar
        VaNavVet

        You read a lot into a simple statement. In fact, I stated just the opposite that parents should be involved in their schools but in a cooperative not combative way. This is not saying that they need to support all aspects of the situation but that the adults should attempt to find common ground for the benefit of the students. The only dogma expressed here is your believe that parents and teachers and administrators can not work together. After 20 years of living with the dictates that the Commonwealth dreamed up yes indeed I do favor local control which works to allow the solutions to line up with the community. It is not a one size fits all situation. Sadly, you have never worked day in and day out trying to find this common ground.

    3. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      Yep, you know it’s the old top down, one size fits all, big government solutions that Conservatives love so much these days. Time to toss out the old representative democracy concept… it’s time is done.

      1. VaNavVet Avatar
        VaNavVet

        Not surprising that the conservatives adopt whatever fits their purpose at the time.

        1. Lefty665 Avatar
          Lefty665

          “conservatives adopt whatever fits their purpose at the time.”

          That’s called evolution, Dems might want to give it a whirl. ps I ain’t a conservative, but I do embrace things that work.

          1. VaNavVet Avatar
            VaNavVet

            Most people call it progress in thinking. It would be nice if the reactionary side of the aisle did embrace things that work. Do you want to progress or conserve? Too many folks today are evolving their thoughts back to the 1950’s.

          2. Lefty665 Avatar
            Lefty665

            “Do you want to progress or conserve?”

            Yes.

            “Too many folks today are evolving their thoughts back to the 1950’s.”

            If only the Dems would do that and re-embrace the ideals of the New Deal. They would become the majority party again instead of a gaggle of identity politics factions struggling to reach 50.01% consistently.

          3. VaNavVet Avatar
            VaNavVet

            You mean the party that consistently wins the popular vote for POTUS.

          4. Lefty665 Avatar
            Lefty665

            The 2016 race was decided by fewer than 100k votes spread over 5 states. The 2020 race was decided by fewer than 50k votes in 3 states. The 2000 race was so close it was decided by the Supreme Court. Either way those identity politics driven elections swing they are extraordinarily close votes.

            Popular vote totals are piled up by dingbats in California. Fortunately for us today our founders foresight shielded us from mobs in populous states.

            The idiocy of identity politics has at times been practiced by both parties. The current Dem embrace built on racism is a particularly virulent strain. Watching it contest with the Repubs as they grapple with embracing the old Dem populist base would be fascinating if it was not so traumatizing.

        2. Lefty665 Avatar
          Lefty665

          “conservatives adopt whatever fits their purpose at the time.”

          That’s called evolution, Dems might want to give it a whirl. ps I ain’t a conservative, but I do embrace things that work.

      2. Fred Costello Avatar
        Fred Costello

        Top down in the Democrat Party approach, not the Conservative approach. Look at what happened to Chap Petersen and George Barker for not always following the Party line. Conservatives foster subsidiarity.

        1. Lefty665 Avatar
          Lefty665

          Thank you for teaching me a new word. “subsidiarity” – government power ought to reside at the lowest possible level.

          I always knew that was Virginia’s idea of how things ought to work, but never knew there was a word for it.

        2. Lefty665 Avatar
          Lefty665

          Thank you for teaching me a new word. “subsidiarity” – government power ought to reside at the lowest possible level.

          I always knew that was Virginia’s idea of how things ought to work, but never knew there was a word for it.

        3. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          Top down is exactly what Sherlock is advocating. Taking control away from locally elected school board representatives.

  2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    The Recommended Core Instructional Program Guide is a start, but I would have preferred that it come out strongly and explicitly pushing the use of phonics. Since these are recommendations, school districts are free to ignore the recommendations and go their own merry way.

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      That is currently what the Virgina Constitution specifies.

    2. Matt Hurt Avatar
      Matt Hurt

      There are many ways to skin a cat, and at the end of the day what we really need to worry about is whether or not the cat is still wearing its skin. For years, folks have been chasing the magic instructional bullet that will cause all students to learn everything without much fuss. While phonics will certainly help students call words from the page, and provide a foundation for reading comprehension, action from the General Assembly and hand selected curriculum won’t necessarily provide the desired outcomes.

      The pending changes to school accountability may help to some degree. This will focus on whether the cat has a skin or not, and disregard how it was removed (which is less of a concern).
      Obviously accountability is not a silver bullet, but in this instance, more is better than less. For several years, accountability has been watered down at the school and at the educator level.

      At the end of the day, those educators who believe that their kids can be successful will continue to make them so. The big problem is how to convince others that it can be done. If anyone can solve that problem, please let me know.

    3. Matt Hurt Avatar
      Matt Hurt

      There are many ways to skin a cat, and at the end of the day what we really need to worry about is whether or not the cat is still wearing its skin. For years, folks have been chasing the magic instructional bullet that will cause all students to learn everything without much fuss. While phonics will certainly help students call words from the page, and provide a foundation for reading comprehension, action from the General Assembly and hand selected curriculum won’t necessarily provide the desired outcomes.

      The pending changes to school accountability may help to some degree. This will focus on whether the cat has a skin or not, and disregard how it was removed (which is less of a concern).
      Obviously accountability is not a silver bullet, but in this instance, more is better than less. For several years, accountability has been watered down at the school and at the educator level.

      At the end of the day, those educators who believe that their kids can be successful will continue to make them so. The big problem is how to convince others that it can be done. If anyone can solve that problem, please let me know.

Leave a Reply