Combustable

by Marilyn Rainville

As a retired teacher and mother of two raising a school-aged grandson, I am concerned about what is being taught in the Virginia’s public schools. Two weeks ago, I spoke at a Mathews County School Board meeting to voice my concerns about Critical Race Theory.

The school Superintendent declared that our county does not teach CRT. However, she told me that Virginia does require faculty professional development in the area of “Culturally Responsive Teaching” and “Equitable Practices,” which it links to teacher licensing and annual evaluations. Culturally Responsive Teaching is derived from Critical Race Theory!

A February teacher-training workshop on Equity and Culturally Responsive Teaching in Virginia Beach was leaked to the internet on rumble.com. Several Black presenters were indoctrinating White teachers about racism. Each one repeatedly told the White teachers that they were racist and that all White people are racist. One woman continually tried to persuade the audience to admit they were racist. “One of the most freeing things that White people can do,” she said, “is say ‘of course I’m racist.’”

The Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) VA Ed Equity website has a 50-page program for grades K-12. The Forward is written by Dr. James F. Lane, the Superintendent for Public Instruction at VDOE.

He states that for too long students in our communities of color have faced systemic racism in our schools. He calls for courageous conversations on social justice, systemic inequity, disparate student outcomes and racism in our School communities.

In this Equity Plan, the VA School Boards are directed to adopt an “anti-racism policy.” They are told to identify, remedy and prevent racially inequitable outcomes. Their policy should include the prohibition of racial discrimination.

Ed Equity instructs School Boards to remove language from the Student Code of Conduct that categorizes racial justice movements as “racist,” “hate speech” or “controversial.” These movements include: Black Power, Black Lives Matter and La Raza. The Southern Poverty Law Center is used as a resource to track any racial hate groups. The creation of “Affinity Clubs” is recommended for the “historically marginalized” students in the schools, which would segregate children into separate groups.

VA Ed Equity lists several contributors on its “Acknowledgments” page. I recognized the name Dr. Ibram X. Kendi, aka Henry Rogers, the multi-millionaire author of the best-selling book, “How to be An Antiracist.” In it he states, “the only remedy to past discrimination is present discrimination. The only remedy to present discrimination is future discrimination.” He added, “In order to be Antiracist, you also have to truly be anti-capitalist.”

Kendi also shared this observation: “White supremacists love what America used to be, even though America used to be – and still is – teeming with millions of struggling White people. White supremacists blame non-White people for the struggles of White people when any objective analysis of their plight primarily implicates the rich White Trumps they support.”

Another contributor in VA Ed Equity is the National Equity Project,. a Social Justice organization based in Oakland, Calif., that promotes Equity in all areas of society, including education and the criminal justice system.

This group wants to “acknowledge and make meaning of the historical and ongoing impacts of racism and white supremacy. Not to assign blame, but to inform a new way forward.” The organization also aims to dismantle the inequitable structures that are currently in place. “New liberating systems must be designed with conscious intention and a shared vision for a desired future state.” One projects is entitled ‘”Every Child Deserves a Black Teacher.”

Every parent wants a “Rebel Leader” at home, right? The National Equity Project wants to create them. “Rebel leaders make good trouble… Rebel leaders make inequities visible; disrupt reproductive discourse, practices and policies; and discover new ways to engage and co-design with their communities.”

Equity, Diversity and Inclusion programs have motivated parents across the country to demand that teachers stop indoctrinating their children. They are forcing children to hyper-focus on a person’s color, causing distrust and bias amongst their peers. Ironically, the Black leaders who are pushing this agenda, are very successful individuals — both financially and academically. How did they succeed, if America is systemically racist?

In the recent Gubernatorial Debate, Democrat Terry McAuliffe said he doesn’t believe parents should tell schools what to teach. That is a violation of Virginia Law. Republican Glenn Youngkin, believes in the rights of parents which is stated in the Code of Virginia 1-240.1 Rights of Parents. It states:

A parent has a fundamental right to make decisions concerning the upbringing, education, and care of the parent’s child.

This provision in Virginia Law was passed in 2013 to bring Virginia in statutory compliance with US Supreme Court rulings affirming the rights of parents to determine the education of their children.

Parents, grandparents and concerned citizens need to keep informed and demand transparency. The children need us to be their advocates. We want equal opportunities for all Americans, not equal outcomes.

Marilyn Rainville, a retired teacher lives in Hudgins, a community in Mathews County.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

38 responses to “A Racially Divisive Disaster”

  1. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Well, for one, it’s not CRT, but trying to convince anyone of that is like spitting to wind.

  2. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    CRT is a very effective right-wing campaign and appeals to folks who don’t subscribe to the idea that we still indeed have racism in our society and in our legal and economic structures AND are opposed to acknowledging it in public education – k12 and higher ed. We were just fine with the Happy Slave approach for decades after “separate but equal” and massive resistance but gawd forbid we acknowledge this in education cuz it make some kids “feel bad” about it.

    I DO part company with the “you are a racist, admit it” approach and it may well cost the Dems the election. It’s akin to the idea of busing and will engender similar responses and outcomes.

    The Dems, just like the GOP, when they let their fringe wackadoodles get involved in actual policies crash and burn.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Well, they may not be racists now, but when they get finished with their rants, they will be.

      1. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        You and Larry arguing with each other? The rest seem to be ignoring….Agreed, “CRT” has become shorthand for something else, because shorthand labels and acronyms are useful. What that something else is, however, is a quite real, constant emphasis on race and victimhood and a clear effort to bring the sins of the past down on the heads of our children and grandchildren. These people hate America. For political gain.

        Sent Jim an example of the same process, a fight going on over the naming of the James Webb telescope. Woke astronomers are all up in arms because Webb was a longtime federal official during the (like forever) period when people might get fired over sexual preferences, and apparently somebody was fired at NASA. No sign Webb actually fired anybody. But everybody in authority say pre-1960s enforcing those rules, not on record as a staunch gay rights advocate, must also be cancelled. We can’t name an orbiting telescope after him merely because he was around then.

        NASA told the whiners to take a hike but the battle rages on. When it gets up to the White House, expect a reversal….

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          It’s not a real disagreement. The basic facts are that there is still active racism ongoing. We transport kids to school over roads named for Confederate generals and schools named the same and even military bases named for them.

          If this is not “institutional” what is?

          But the approach being taken under the guise of “training” is just plain wrong in my view. It will not achieve much and actually will engender more strident opposition and division, IMHO.

          And when you have teachers opposed to it – you know it’s in trouble.

        2. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          So call it something else, CRT is taken. I’ll accept “Wokeism” if you’d like. But it ain’t CRT. It ain’t based on CRT.

          It, at the very least, is history. You can argue about how you are offended by it, but you cannot argue that the events did not happen, e.g., Greenwood, yada, yada, yada, that racism doesn’t currently exist, or that our systems don’t continue to favor and perpetuate classism.

          Now, if you want to discuss how that should be covered, I’m certain a fine urbane gentleman, such as yourself, could reason quite well how to explain why black folks were, oh say, routinely lynched in the early 1900s.

          1. Stephen Haner Avatar
            Stephen Haner

            Use Kendi’s preferred “anti-racism.” Deliciously Orwellian. What VDOE is . pushing hard is basically reverse discrimination. The operative phrase: Paybacks are hell.

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            what VDOE is doing is ultimately harmful to their own interests as well as schools IMHO.

          3. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Okay then! Now you’re on. It’s an initial state problem. You can’t get equal results from the “colorblind” system from two different starting points. Kendi’s argument, and practically I agree, is that you can’t give one group a 300 year head start and then shout, “On your marks,…” and expect a fair race even if you’ve leveled the track.

            That was the Idea behind Affirmative Action. Unfortunately, on the post K12 positions, while 25% of whites were entering college, blacks percentages were still stuck in the 1800s, so that even just slanting the last acceptances toward the black students, they still weren’t catching up. Remember AA doesn’t affect the top students, just the last guys in line.

          4. DJRippert Avatar
            DJRippert

            Pervasive Reverse Racism (PRR) would be an adequate description of Kendi’s views.

          5. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            I think Kendi DOES have SOME things right but I part company on how he thinks they ought to be resolved.

        3. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Webb didn’t do anthing Joe McCarthy didn’t do. What have we named after Joe? What should we name after Joe?

          BTW, thanks for arguing against teaching about racism in US history by providing an example of systemic classism in US history.

          1. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            Joe McCarthy was right ( and he didn’t even start the hunt), he just went about it the wrong way and went against Eisenhower.

            https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/1996/04/14/was-mccarthy-right-about-the-left/a0dc6726-e2fd-4a31-bcdd-5f352acbf5de/

          2. Stephen Haner Avatar
            Stephen Haner

            Wow, what a piece of fallacy gymnastics! Galuzkian…

          3. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Well, let’s just say that Alan Turing wouldn’t agree. Webb’s policy in State negatively impacted some very brilliant scientists, among others, for decades and spread throughout every government agency and contractors.

            Never understood the need to name things after people. Better we should name people after things.

        4. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          A good friend, one of the few men who I would both buy a drink and have on my boat, is a retired NASA engineer from the 60s. Tough old bastard keeps hanging in there.

          When the movie “Numbers” came out, I mentioned that I thought it was a cool movie and well done. His response was “bull$#!t!”
          I asked “Was she not a real person?”
          Yes.
          “Did she perform orbital mechanic calculations by hand?”
          Yes.
          “Did the black women depicted exist?”
          Yes.
          “Were they segregated in the building behind Bldg 1162 where their white counterparts worked?”
          Yes.
          “Then it wasn’t all bull$#!t, was it?”

  3. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    These people who show up at school board meetings and write opinions and articles screaming, “No CRT in our public schools,” are like the guy who says to his doctor, “Doc, I wanna be castrated.”

    “Well, okay, all done. While the anesthetic is still in effect, would you like to be circumcised too?”

    “That’s the word!”

    Learn the terms, then come back and we can discuss it.

    1. Just because the Va DOE puts other labels on it doesn’t mean it’s not based on an application of Critical Race Theory as it’s been promoted in schools.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        So as soon as you are challenged, it’s suddenly NOT CRT, but “based on CRT” instead. You don’t know what CRT even is.

        VDOE did not put the label on it. You and yours have misappropriated the CRT label. It’s not based on CRT. You’re just wrong. And willfully so.

        I’ll just wait for your next backpedal.

        1. The key factor in Critical Race Theory is intersectionality. “An intersectional race equity lens” is a way “to illuminate how intersecting axes of power and inequality operate to our collective and individual disadvantage” for people of color according to authors Sumi Cho, Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw and Leslie McCall. (Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw is one of the founders of critical race theory.)
          https://stonecenter.gc.cuny.edu/files/2013/05/mccall-toward-a-field-of-intersectionality-studies-theory-applications-and-praxis-2013.pdf
          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kimberl%C3%A9_Williams_Crenshaw

          Are you denying that an “intersectional race equity lens” is being applied to how teachers are to teach and what methods they are to use in teaching? Crenshaw herself has said that the practice and framework of CRT asserts that racism is embedded in the legal system and government policy as opposed to individual prejudice and she refers to it as an ideology, not just a decades-old legal theory.

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            BTW, Crenshaw’s explanation of intersectionality by way of her original example…

            “Intersectionality was a prism to bring to light dynamics within discrimination law that weren’t being appreciated by the courts,” Crenshaw said. “In particular, courts seem to think that race discrimination was what happened to all black people across gender and sex discrimination was what happened to all women, and if that is your framework, of course, what happens to black women and other women of color is going to be difficult to see.” https://www.vox.com/the-highlight/2019/5/20/18542843/intersectionality-conservatism-law-race-gender-discrimination

            As you can see, her objective was to take laws (specifically civil rights) and examine how laws designed to protect against discrimination for several groups applied to persons who were members of two or more groups.

            God help a handicapped transgender hispanic woman who turns out to be gay afterwards, or as the bumpersticker says, “Nuke the unborn gay baby whales for Jesus”.

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Kinda hard to take you seriously when your links (authors) and (founders) takes one to a Greek lottery page. You should be more careful with your copy and paste.
            Your first sentence is a copy&paste from Wikipedia. You should just read the rest of the Wiki page https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_race_theory

            I have no idea what the meaning of your two run together quotes is at all, but there is no indication the authors of CRT put that meaning to those quotes.

            Why don’t you just provide your link and I’ll help you try to understand the bull$#!t you seem willing to swallow. Otherwise you’re just spewing nonsense.

            But to answer your question, given that you’re babbling, “yes, I do deny that.” Nonsense.

            “Let me be Ishmael, let the ship be The Pequot, let the captain be Ahab, and the whale be as named in the title.” Oh, lookie! Herman Melville was a mathematician!

          3. Can’t explain the misdirect on the link, but took it from the link and put it out in the open and it works correctly now.

          4. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Thank you for fixing the links, especially an unfirewalled version of the paper.

            Yes, I deny that is being done. Please read the paper and especially concerning your last quote. You’ve taken words out of the paper and added “for people of color” which is not what the authors were implying.

            The article is on using intersectionality in scholarly studies.

            For anyone who cares the phrase in question is on page 795 of the journal (about 20 pages into the article)

            So, what college training did you receive in out-of-context quoting? UVa? Must’ve been.

        2. As soon the name of an unpopular concept is discovered, the name is changed… This is neatly explained in a comment when the Social Security Administration was looking for a less offensive term for ‘mental retardation’: One commenter, although appreciating SSA’s effort to use non-offensive terms, expressed the view that doing so is a waste of agency resources because of the “euphemism treadmill.” He noted that the terms “mental retardation” and “mentally retarded” were created in the mid-20th century to replace other terms that had become offensive. By the end of the century, however, the new terms were also used in derogatory ways. The commenter predicted that the current change to “intellectual disability” is “merely another attempt to create a term without a prejudicial history . . . and that this term will . . . eventually be used as a pejorative and require more agency resources to change again.” He recommended keeping the current wording.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Yeah, I know. But, it’s just as good and it’s mine. Plus, it makes people wonder if they had it wrong.

      2. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        What’s in a name? Well, if Giuseppe Verdi had been born in America, he’d have been Joe Green.

  4. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Steve,
    I see your poodle has down-thumbed every post. Does he get a biscuit?

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      maybe working up to a full bowl meal?

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Hey! Did you see? A 4.5 ton EV Hummer! Bet that bad boy can destroy some asphalt roads and NOT ONE DIME in gasoline tax!

        Can’t understand why Steve is so… so… anti-EV, anti-climate change. Wonderful opportunity for him to avoid his favorite tax altogether.

  5. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    For those of you freaked out about the CRT concept of intersectionality, allow me to refresh your memories,
    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e4/Venn_diagram_gr_la_ru.svg/1992px-Venn_diagram_gr_la_ru.svg.png
    Now go get an Algebra book and read the Chapter on Sets.

    1. Matt Adams Avatar
      Matt Adams

      The intersection of Greek, Latin and Cyrillic have nothing to do with Algebra or sets.

  6. Carson Martin Avatar
    Carson Martin

    The author (and many in this country) don’t seems to understand that the origins of true deep beliefs, biases, and ideologies are not apparent to those who hold them, they are not taken on by choice, they are the emergent property of lived experience. So not only do they cover their own tracks, they are nearly unshakable. Examination of the cultural origins of our most comfortable beliefs is only the start of the process of changing those beliefs, but, if you are unwilling to even examine those warm and fuzzy ideas, deeply entrenched in emotions (not the least of which is respect for those who taught you those beliefs and obfuscated those cultural origins through ignorance or malice from the start) and personal history, you cannot even begin to change. That is what those programs are about, and that is the real fear of the Anti-CRT crowd, they sense on some level that unpacking those foundational structures will cast them in a very bad light indeed.

    1. Of course ‘lived experiences’ shape our attitudes, but the assumption that we all need to change our beliefs or attitudes is ridiculous. Just understand what you believe and where it comes from…

      1. Carson Martin Avatar
        Carson Martin

        This is a strange way of announcing you are now disavowing conservative political viewpoints. But welcome to the left!

  7. James C. Sherlock Avatar
    James C. Sherlock

    37 comments, 18 of them “Nancy”s. He clearly finds himself engaging. So what is your real position on CRT, Nancy. An anxious nation awaits.

Leave a Reply