A Progressive Dirty Trick: Tell Republican Voters that the Democrat is a Republican

by the staff of Liberty Unyielding

Voting is underway in Virginia’s legislative elections, where early voting started on September 22. To try to win a very close race, progressives are telling Republican voters that the Republican candidate is a Democrat, and the Democratic candidate is a Republican. This is occurring in House District 97, which the Virginia Public Access Project rates as one of Virginia’s most “competitive” legislative districts.

The progressive Policy Information Center sent mail to Republican voters in the district telling them that the Republican incumbent, Karen Greenhalgh, is a Democrat, and that Michael Feggans, the Democratic candidate, is a Republican. Here is an image of the mail that was sent:

The Policy Information Center is a facade for Forward Majority, a progressive PAC that claims that “Our democracy is in crisis” because of a “systematic assault” by the “GOP.”

Pundits such as Chaz Nuttycombe say the race in House District 97 is too close to call. Nuttycombe says the Virginia Beach seat is one of three House seats that is a “toss-up.”

It is unclear who will control Virginia’s legislature after this fall’s elections. Democrats have about a 50% chance of taking control of the Republican-controlled House of Delegates, and the Republicans have about a one-in-three chance of taking control of the Democratic-controlled state Senate. The Democrats have much more campaign cash than the Republicans.

The legislature will contain more left-wingers after the election than before, even if Democrats don’t pick up any seats. That’s because moderate or mainstream liberal Democrats are being replaced by left-wing Democrats. The state Senate’s two moderate Democrats are both leaving, one because he was defeated by a leftist in a Democratic primary, and the other because he is retiring. A number of mainstream liberals lost Democratic primary races to leftists.

As was pointed out at Hot Air,

In Virginia, the legislature elects the judges, so there will be a judicial bloodbath if the Democrats win control of the legislature. Many moderate and conservative judges will be replaced by progressives. Even some old moderate Democrats who are tough on crime might be replaced.

…Mainstream liberal Democrats are being replaced by left-wing Democrats, due to the 2023 primary results.

In northern Virginia’s Fairfax County, moderate state judges elected with the support of moderate Democrat Chap Petersen and mainstream liberals like George Barker and Richard Saslaw could be replaced by left-wing judges preferred by incoming left-wing state senators like Stella Pekarsky, who ousted Barker in the 2023 Democratic Primary. Senate Majority Leader Richard Saslaw is retiring, and moderate Democrat Chap Petersen was defeated by progressive Saddam Salim in the 2023 primary. Incoming Democrats like Pekarsky are well to the left of the Democrats they are replacing.

Petersen angered progressives by opposing school closings and mask mandates. He also opposed censorship backed by progressives and supported the mainstream liberal Fairfax prosecutor, who was defeated by George Soros-backed Steve Descano. That in turn led to the left-wing Loudoun County prosecutor, Buta Biberaj, donating money to defeat Petersen (Biberaj prosecuted the father whose daughter was raped by the dress-wearing boy in the school bathroom for his angry outburst at a school board meeting, the father just pardoned by Governor Youngkin).

The other moderate Democrat in the state Senate, Lynwood Lewis, is retiring. That leaves mostly left-wing Democrats. Another mainstream liberal in the state senate, Joe Morrissey, also lost a primary race to a candidate further to his left. As the Washington Post reported, “Northern Virginia shifts to the left with Democratic primary victories.” It was a win for the “progressive wing of the party,” who will “stick it to the [Republican] governor as much as possible,” said Mark Rozell, dean of George Mason University’s Schar School of Policy and Government.

By contrast, the Washington Post noted, mainstream conservatives wonin Republican primaries.

One challenge for Republicans is that unlike in most states, Republicans are more geographically concentrated in Virginia than Democrats are. When Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin won the 2021 governor’s race, he carried only 20 of the 40 state senate districts, because his votes were heavily concentrated in rural areas, and he got only half the vote in suburban areas, where all the close legislative elections occur.

Republicans have been growing in strength in rural areas where they already won, while losing strength in suburban areas where swing districts are located. That gives Democrats a slight edge in swing seats. So if Republicans and Democrats each get 50% of the vote, the Democrats will be favored to take control of the legislature. The Republican governor, Glenn Youngkin, is fairly popular, but that hasn’t rubbed off on Republican candidates that much.

State-legislative election analyst Chaz Nuttycombe says that Democrats have a 56% chance of taking control of the House of Delegates, and a 68% chance of keeping control of the state senate. That’s taking into account polling data showing Democrats and Republicans neck-and-neck in statewide party preference polls, and Democrats having a fundraising edge.

Republicans’ chances are better than Nuttycombe predicts, but not by a lot. For example, there is probably a 50% chance the Democrats will take control of the House of Delegates, a 40% chance the Republicans will keep control, and a 10% chance there will be a tie, with each party having 50 seats in the 100-seat House of Delegates.

Republished with permission from the Liberty Unyielding website.

 


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

43 responses to “A Progressive Dirty Trick: Tell Republican Voters that the Democrat is a Republican”

  1. Troublemaker Avatar
    Troublemaker

    They are doing the same thing in Fairfax County. Descano, the Soros Attorney, beat another Dem attorney, Ed Nutall in the Dem primary. Since there is no Republican challenger, a group of Descano victims formed a write-in for Nutall in November. The Dems have been telling people the lie that Nutall is a Republican.

    1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      Isn’t that what Larock is doing in SD-1?

      1. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        Pretty much the same. He isn’t just using the term RINO.

  2. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
    f/k/a_tmtfairfax

    When Trump lies, it’s wrong. (I think it’s wrong.) But when left wing Democrats do it, it’s OK. Glad I don’t live in the Old Dominion anymore. Here in North Carolina, Democrats claim to be Democrats, and Republicans claim to be Republicans. How novel!

    1. how_it_works Avatar
      how_it_works

      Here in Virginia they’ll claim to be whatever it is they think will get them votes from whomever they’re lying to.

    2. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      North Carolina seems to have even worse problems!

      “In a hugely significant opinion on Tuesday, the Supreme Court rejected the “independent state legislature” theory pushed by Republicans that would have given state legislatures virtually unchecked power to draw new redistricting maps and pass restrictive voting laws with little to no review by state courts or other entities. “The Elections Clause does not vest exclusive and independent authority in state legislatures to set the rules regarding federal elections,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the 6-3 opinion in Moore v. Harper.”

      https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2023/06/moore-v-harper-supreme-court-rejects-independent-state-legislatures-theory/

      ” The North Carolina Supreme Court, whose judges are elected by the voters in the state, last year ruled that the Republican-drawn map unlawfully disadvantaged Democrats and that partisan gerrymandering violated the North Carolina state constitution. A replacement map was in effect for the November 2022 elections.”

      https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-supreme-court-rebuffs-republicans-dispute-over-north-carolina-electoral-map-2023-06-27/#:~:text=The%20North%20Carolina%20Supreme%20Court,for%20the%20November%202022%20elections.

      1. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
        f/k/a_tmtfairfax

        The Independent State Legislature theory did have some basis in the plain language of the Constitution and history. I do, however, think that SCOTUS made the correct decision in rejecting it as a redistricting plan could be unconstitutional on its face. For example, if it ignored the requirement to have relatively equal districts in population. But I do question a court’s authority to strip redistricting authority from a legislative body.

        The NC Supreme Court struck down a redistricting plan passed by the GOP controlled legislature. That court was controlled by the Democrats (we have partisan elections for judges). However, in 2022 voters elected Republicans to the Court which flipped partisan control.
        The Court then granted rehearing and reversed itself and upheld the redistricting plan.

        Putting aside the legal analysis, both decisions seem political to me. But sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          this kind of thing makes the misleading flying in one district look like small potatoes.

          This kind of thing affects all voters in the state and their ability to have an equal vote in an election. I question ANY legislative or appointed group to do this – to basically affect fair and equal voting.

          I do not think the Constitution of the US ever intended this and we know that the Constitution of the states like Va and NC were corrupt and immoral with respect to Jim Crow and even today, some of what they are doing is similar to what the goals of Jim Crow was IMO.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            ” misleading flying” …
            “misleading flyers”…

          2. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
            f/k/a_tmtfairfax

            It’s not that hard to vote. It’s easy to register. The polls are open for a long time on election day and there are provisions in most states for early and absentee voting. SCOTUS has held that it is constitutional to require a person to show ID, but every state that has an ID requirement allows people who don’t drive to obtain a free ID. Every voter has a right for her/his vote not to be diluted by illegal voting.

            Gerrymandering is as old as the country. Both parties did it and continue to do it. SCOTUS has said that partisan gerrymandering is a political question beyond the scope of the Court’s jurisdiction. Some state courts hold otherwise.

            Northern Wake County, including Wake Forest, tend to vote Republican but the court put much of the town’s residents in House and Senate districts with Raleigh residents who tend to vote Democratic. Is this gerrymandering any better than the GOP-controlled legislature’s gerrymandering?

            Indeed, Democratic gerrymandering (D’s controlled the NC legislature for most of the time since the Civil War) resulted in a law that created county commissioner districts but allow everyone in the county to vote in every district. No GOP seats on the county board. The law was finally repealed this year over Democratic opposition.

            Franklin County, which is just north of Wake County, is strongly Republican. Yet, the court put the entire county into a majority black congressional district. Is this any less racially motivated discrimination than when a legislature puts a county with a large black population in a legislative district with a large non-black plurality?

          3. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            what about this?

            “the Supreme Court rejected the “independent state legislature” theory pushed by Republicans that would have given state legislatures virtually unchecked power to draw new redistricting maps and pass restrictive voting laws with little to no review by state courts or other entities. “The Elections Clause does not vest exclusive and independent authority in state legislatures to set the rules regarding federal elections,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the 6-3 opinion in Moore v. Harper.”

            The “independent authority” theory says unelected can change the rules however they wish without review. Make it harder to vote. More restrictions, etc, basically undo all the things you say they did to make voting easier.

            They could have re-drawn the maps such that SCOTUS would not ruled them illegal but they chose to not do that and see what SCOTUS would do.

            Doesn’t sound like overall the GOP in NC intends to actually have free and fair elections if they could somehow keep SCOTUS out of it.

            I see that as way worse than one flyer in one Va district promoting misinformation.

            NC has some real problems with fair and free voting IMO.

          4. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
            f/k/a_tmtfairfax

            While Maryland didn’t advocate the Independent Legislature theory, it did gerrymander districts to further weaken the GOP. Everyone does it.

            What happened in NC is as follows. The GOP controlled legislature approved new legislative districts. The Democrats and their allegedly good government nonprofits (really just arms of the Democrats) sued. Ultimately, the NC supreme court, then controlled by Democrats, struck the redistricting plan. The NC GOP got SCOTUS to hear the Independent Legislature argument and lost 6-3. Meanwhile, we voted in 2022 and elected new members of the NC supreme court, which, in turn, flipped control to the GOP. The NC GOP requested rehearing, which was granted. The NC supreme court reversed what it had decided earlier upholding the GOP redistricting plan. We will have new legislative districts for the 2024 election.

            I wrote what I thought about the Independent Legislature argument. And I regard both decisions of the NC supreme court as basically political decisions. If one party can do X, so can the other.

            What is so hard about voting? The NC state board of elections provides all the information any voter needs. https://www.ncsbe.gov/voting

            One has to be registered, law everywhere, and meet basic qualifications such as residency in the district, citizenship, etc. One can vote early in person; on election day in person, vote by mail. Absentee ballots can be mailed in, dropped off at polling and other locations or at curbside.

            Voters must show ID to vote in person, although a person without an ID (which are free from the state for non-drivers) can cast a provisional ballot. Absentee voters need to make a photocopy of their photo ID and enclose it with the ballot.

            How is this hard to do? If I get on an airplane, I need to show photo ID. If I travel by Amtrak or most intercity buses, I need to show a photo ID. Indeed, I had to show a photo ID to return a defective cable modem to Spectrum.

          5. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            then why is gerrymandering and related so bad if everyone has a vote?

            Why does SCOTUS reject the GOP-drawn maps in NC and other states?

            not complaining about voter ID…I support it but I also support making voting as easy
            as possible…

            An independent legislature without SCOTUS would take us back to Jim Crow type
            voter suppression IMO.

          6. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
            f/k/a_tmtfairfax

            SCOTUS rejected Alabama’s maps based on the Voting Rights Act, which addresses race. In 2019, SCOTUS held that federal courts did NOT have jurisdiction to review claims of political gerrymandering because that was a political question reserved to other branches of the government and the states/

            Some state courts have held that state law may prevent political gerrymandering in some instances.

            Glad we agree on voter ID requirements.

          7. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            how do you think the Voting Rights Act came to be in the first place? Would we need it again with the “independent legislature” theory?

    3. how_it_works Avatar
      how_it_works

      Here in Virginia they’ll claim to be whatever it is they think will get them votes from whomever they’re lying to.

      1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
        James Wyatt Whitehead

        Amen. I am essentially voting for who is going to hurt me the least.

    4. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      Who says it is OK for “left-wing Democrats” to lie?

      1. Left-wing democrats.

        1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          On this site…?

          1. Lefty665 Avatar

            You especially and several more.

        2. Stanwood Avatar

          If you keep punching this straw man he’s going to fall apart and then what can you complain about?

    5. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      Meanwhile we have this recent comment to this piece from a commenter on the Right…

      “Fight fire with fire.”

      So not only excusing but encouraging…

      My thought… this is becoming increasingly common in election year shenanigans. Don’t know how one would stop it… informed voters just need to be wary of widespread disinformation.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Informed voters are by definition wary.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          so… if you’re misinformed… and vote anyhow… oh wait!

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            You’re a Republican.

      2. Turbocohen Avatar
        Turbocohen

        Typical left wing reaction, eric.. Fight fire with fire refers to guarding against grass or forest fires by deliberately raising small controllable fires, aka ‘back-fires’, to remove any flammable material in advance of a larger fire and so deprive it of fuel. You can interpret what you wish but the right way to deal with political misinformation/disinformation is to expose the crony $.

        1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          Sorry but the origin of an idiom does not equate to the actual common meaning and usage of the phrase. In this case, however, your fire-fighting example is not even the origin. That would at least go back to 1595 when Shakespeare wrote King John. There was an excerpt that read:

          “Be stirring as the time; be fire with fire;

          Threaten the threatener and outface the brow

          Of bragging horror.”

          Which really has nothing to do with fire fighting.

          Nonetheless, when we say the phrase “fight fire with fire,” we mean to counter or confront a problem using similar methods or tactics as your opponent did. It’s usually in response to what someone else has done toward you.

          I agree with you it is far better to publicly expose such disinformation attempts and resist the temptation to adopt those tactics oneself in answer.

        2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          Sorry but the origin of an idiom does not equate to the actual common meaning and usage of the phrase. In this case, however, your fire-fighting example is not even the origin. That would at least go back to 1595 when Shakespeare wrote King John. There was an excerpt that read:

          “Be stirring as the time; be fire with fire;

          Threaten the threatener and outface the brow

          Of bragging horror.”

          Which really has nothing to do with fire fighting.

          Nonetheless, when we say the phrase “fight fire with fire,” we mean to counter or confront a problem using similar methods or tactics as your opponent did. It’s usually in response to what someone else has done toward you.

          I agree with you it is far better to publicly expose such disinformation attempts and resist the temptation to adopt those tactics oneself in answer.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            yep… are we gonna see both sides engage more and more in disinformation/misinformation?

            oh goodie!

  3. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    I’m shocked, SHOCKED that this sort of thing goes on in politics!

    Why I have NEVER heard of such a thing…

    And certainly not in Virginia!

  4. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    Agreed. The mailer was intentional. A knowing lie.

    It may or may not matter, but the focus on parental rights in education is a strong bid to win over those suburban swing voters. And the push for early voting is another power move to shift the math. The game remains wide open. Democrats working to fuzz the lines is another good sign.

  5. Lefty665 Avatar

    Was there more in the mailer than screwing up the R and D labels under the pictures? If not that comes under the heading of never assert malice when simple stupidity is a reasonable explanation.

    This also is flat wrong: “The state Senate’s two moderate Democrats are both leaving” Creigh Deeds, and several others are pretty moderate.

    This is no better: “Another mainstream liberal in the state senate, Joe Morrissey, also lost a primary race to a candidate further to his left.” Anyone who would regret the removal of scumbag Joe Morrissey by any opponent or call him a “mainstream liberal” is not worth reading.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Creigh was crowded pretty hard into the left column in this last primary. He’s drunk the Climate Kool Aid deep. The country boy of old is hard to find. I still kinda recognize my old friend in there…

      1. Lefty665 Avatar

        Not many politicians I admire, but Deeds is one of them. My interactions with him over the years have all been right straight up. Still got my Deeds Country T shirt.

      2. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
        James Wyatt Whitehead

        Remember when Deeds was somewhere in the middle and surprised the hell out of Terry in the primary? Deeds seems so different now. Wonder if Bob and Creigh are still friends? They had some epic contests.
        https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/2ff0f340ad8d707b30909c259574a79d2d95a556b982df89258b8cbfb65ee8d8.jpg

    2. vicnicholls Avatar
      vicnicholls

      Yes there was more.

    3. Has the Policy Information Center issued a retraction and sent a corrected email?

      If not, then it was intentional.

      EDIT: Or, it’s not what it appears to be.

      Numerous searches with various word combinations have yielded nothing about this “Policy Information Center”. So I wonder who they are. This, plus the fact that I get an error every time I try to go to the “Liberty Unyielding” website have aroused my suspicions. I was hoping to find something at that website to back up the claim: The Policy Information Center is a facade for Forward Majority, a progressive PAC.

      1. VaPragamtist Avatar
        VaPragamtist

        I’m having the same issues looking up the “Policy Information Center” and “Liberty Unyielding”. Apparently this article is the only one on the site that works.

        Moreover, if you click the Facebook icon on the Liberty Unyielding site, you come to their Facebook page. The last post was what appears to be a “farewell” article from October 2021. All of their articles (from the headlines) appear to focus on national-level politics. Their X (formerly known as Twitter) account is also defunct.

        I hope the BR staff look into this and ensure that only articles from at least quasi-reputable sources are reposted here.

  6. Turbocohen Avatar
    Turbocohen

    Fight fire with fire.

  7. VaPragamtist Avatar
    VaPragamtist

    “The progressive Policy Information Center sent mail to Republican voters in the district”

    Do we know for certain that the mailer was sent to only Republican voters?

    If sent to Democrats as well, wouldn’t that compel uneducated Democratic voters to accidentally vote for the Republican?

    Without seeing the rest of the mailer (adding additional context about the message), it’s impossible to tell. It’s also strange that the author very closely crops the mailer to only show the org name and the mistake. Does the mailer continue to identify the candidates by the wrong party?

  8. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    A Virginia Dirty Trick Done Dirt Cheap… short change VSU $1/4B over 30 years… “if you take a small amount, maybe they won’t notice.”

  9. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    It’s Virginia… an antiquated locale to be sure. Maybe the D stands for “Dame” and the R for “Rake”?

Leave a Reply