State Sen. Tammy Mulchi (R-Mecklenburg)    Photo credit: Mecklenburg Sun

by Dick Hall-Sizemore

A recent special election in Southside Virginia is a stark illustration of  how a small special interest group can exercise out-sized power.

In mid-December, long-time state Sen. Frank Ruff (R-Mecklenburg), announced he was resigning from the Senate, shortly after having been re-elected to a seventh term.  He had received a diagnosis of cancer in October and was facing a strict regimen of treatment.  Gov. Glenn Youngkin set Jan. 9 as the date for a special election to fill the seat.

Ruff’s announcement caught most people by surprise.  According to the reporting of David Poole in the Mecklenburg Sun , two people who were not surprised by the announcement were Tammy Mulchi, Ruff’s legislative aide, whom he endorsed in his resignation announcement, and Kirby Burch, the leader of the Virginia Hunting Dog Alliance.  Both got advance notice from Ruff of his impending resignation announcement.

Ruff’s Senate district is home to some of the state’s largest hunting dog clubs, whose members use hounds and other breeds to track and run deer and bear.  The primary legislative concerns of the members are to defend their statutory right to allow their dogs to run at large and to go on private land without permission to retrieve their dogs.  As hunting has decreased and housing developments have increased, so have the complaints about hunting dogs running across people’s property increased.

As a result of their advance tips, by the time Ruff released his announcement, Mulchi had had time to create a campaign website and have an announcement of her candidacy ready to release.  Similarly, Burch had time to establish election captains in each of the eight jurisdictions included in the district.

The Ninth State Senatorial District is the largest, area-wise, in the state.  It is solidly Republican and winning the nomination is tantamount to winning the general election.  Rather than schedule firehouse primaries in multiple locations throughout the district to enable as many Republicans as possible to participate in the process, however, the district Republican committee chose to hold the primary at the volunteer firehouse in Drakes Branch, in Mecklenburg County.

On a cold Tuesday night, 800 Republicans jammed into the firehouse to nominate a candidate for the general election from among the five persons running. As Poole describes it, “There were so many people the balloting tables had to be set up outside on a night when the temperature dropped into the mid-20s. Inside the building there were not enough seats, forcing many people to stand throughout the six-hour meeting…. As voting on multiple ballots dragged on and temperatures plummeted, people began to drift away. Burch said hunters came dressed for the weather and that most of his members stayed until the bitter end. After midnight, as voting in the fourth and final ballot got under way, more than one-third of the participants had left.”

On the fourth ballot, Mulchi won the nomination, 278 votes to 226 votes for her nearest competitor.  Burch estimated that 254 of Mulchi’s votes came from the hunting dog enthusiasts.

So, that’s the story of how 254 hunting dog owners were able to put a Virginia State Senator in office.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

19 responses to “A Doggone Tale”

  1. walter smith Avatar
    walter smith

    Even though she may be a shoo-in, shouldn’t the caption be State senator nominee?

      1. walter smith Avatar
        walter smith

        Wow! They wasted no time! (But you said it was a shoo in…)

  2. Not Today Avatar

    What are her policy positions? Or is that too old fashioned?

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      I don’t know. That was not the point of the article.

  3. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    Great story Mr. Dick. Loved it! Not surprised. Hunting with dogs has long been bled into the DNA of this region. A few years back I tagged along on a deer hunt with dogs. It was epic. The hunters had GPS collars with cameras on the dogs. It was a blast! The hunt ranged from Busy Bee all the way to Union Level. Interestingly this issue crosses the color line.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jV6NFvDW4xk

  4. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    Great story Mr. Dick. Loved it! Not surprised. Hunting with dogs has long been bled into the DNA of this region. A few years back I tagged along on a deer hunt with dogs. It was epic. The hunters had GPS collars with cameras on the dogs. It was a blast! The hunt ranged from Busy Bee all the way to Union Level. Interestingly this issue crosses the color line.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jV6NFvDW4xk

  5. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    When Republicans said the support “property rights”, I didn’t know they meant their right to my property…

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      These statutory provisions were put in before 1994, the earliest year included in the Legislative System. I don’t have ready access to trace the legislative history of the provisions, but I suspect they go way back to when rural Democrats ruled the legislature. Furthermore, there was a bill in 2022, introduced by a Republican delegate, that would have required to attempt to contact landowners before pursuing their dogs across private land. It passed the House on a bi-partisan vote (all the opposing votes were from Republicans). It died in a Senate committee with several Democrats voting against it. In summary, Republicans can’t be blamed exclusively for these statutes.

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        But Democrats do not claim to be the party which defends “property rights” and did you not just write a piece stating that representation in a deeply Republican district was apparently decided by who will defend the rights of hunters to other people’s property? Just saying it looks like they defend property rights, unless they really want to use your property.

        I wonder what happens if the bear/deer is trapped by the dogs on one’s property or if a wounded animal comes onto my property? Do the hunters also have the right to enter my property with guns to shoot it without asking? What happens if I feel threatened by such action? Castle doctrine? For that matter, what happens if a property owner feels threatened by the dog or a pack of dogs?

        1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
          Dick Hall-Sizemore

          According to the statute, fox and coon hunters may follow their dogs onto prohibited property. Hunters of other game may enter prohibited property to retrieve their dogs but may not carry fireamrs or bows and arrows onto that property. I leave it to you to guess the odds of hunters leaving their weapons behind.

          I don’t know if we have the castle doctrine in Virginia. Generally, one is allowed by law to defend oneself if threatened. However, the response probably should be proportion to the perceived threat. Practically speaking, if you shoot a hunting dog, you better have a damn good reason.

        2. how_it_works Avatar
          how_it_works

          § 18.2-136. Right of certain hunters to go on lands of another; carrying firearms or bows and arrows prohibited.
          Fox hunters and coon hunters, when the chase begins on other lands, may follow their dogs on prohibited lands, and hunters of all other game, when the chase begins on other lands, may go upon prohibited lands to retrieve their dogs, falcons, hawks, or owls ***but may not carry firearms or bows and arrows on their persons or hunt any game while thereon***.

  6. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
    f/k/a_tmtfairfax

    Dick, a very interesting article.

  7. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    Kirby has always been a force to be reckoned with.

  8. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Wait. Less than a month to hold an election? That dog don’t hunt.

    Well, were I a Democrat/Indy who had the gumption to challenge, I’d campaign to those Republicans who might feel cheated. Maybe an endorsement from Michael Vick? That’s Hokie country.

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      Legislation enacted last year requires that an election to fill a General Assembly vacancy that occurs betweeen Dec. 10 and March 1 be held no more than 30 days after such vacancy occurs. https://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?231+ful+CHAP0306&231+ful+CHAP0306

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        After his vision failed, Dad once made the mistake of sharpening the spine of a knife.

      2. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        Need to dig to remind myself of the details, but not that long ago the GOP was screaming about a Democrat governor delaying a special that was certain to add a GOP vote to the Senate. Vacancies should be filled post haste.

    2. Teddy007 Avatar

      To call it an election was a stretch. However, incumbents trying to will their seats to friends, staffers, or relatives has a very long history in politics.

      A good populist position should be “No More nepo babies!”

Leave a Reply