A Diversity Director for Every Department

John McLaren

by James A. Bacon

John McLaren is a full professor in the Economics Department of the University of Virginia. He has written dozens of papers and journal articles in his specialty fields of globalization and international trade, and has given keynote speeches in conferences around the world.

He also serves as the departmental Director of Diversity, Equity & Inclusion.

McLaren came to the attention of the Jefferson Council when his name turned up in an email chain involving Keisha John, associate dean of Diversity, Equity & Inclusion for the College of Arts & Sciences. John had written him and other departmental DEI directors to provide feedback on a survey the College was developing to measure the extent of “belonging” experienced by Arts & Sciences students, faculty and staff. (See “UVA Arts & Sciences to Conduct Climate Survey.”)

By itself, the request was not especially onerous. John asked McLaren to “take a few minutes” to complete a brief online survey rating the importance of key themes to be considered in the survey. She also urged him to “share broadly” with others in his department. Their responses would guide higher-up DEI officials as they developed the questionnaire for distribution in the fall. But acting as the econ department’s point man on the survey was only a small part of what his DEI responsibilities include.

Why does that interest the Jefferson Council? Because of the ongoing debate about the size and scope of the DEI administration at UVA.

According to the government-spending transparency organization Open the Books, UVA’s DEI bureaucracy encompasses 235 employees, including temps and student interns. The UVA administration contends the number is more like 55. The discrepancy boils down to a disagreement over whom should be included and who not.

UVA Chief Operating Officer J.J. Davis clarified UVA’s methodology at the last Board of Visitors meeting when she noted that the University includes in its count only employees for whom DEI work comprises 80% or more of their jobs. Conversely, Open the Books published a count of employees omitted from its first study — including departmental DEI directors — for whom DEI work comprises a significant though less-than-full-time portion of their jobs.

One can get a sense of what the departmental DEI job entails from a page on the faculty/staff section of the UVA website, which describes the roles, responsibilities and expectations of DEI directors (DDEIs). 

DDEIs, says the document, promote “diverse, inclusive, and equitable departments.” Collectively, they constitute a “community of advocates and partners” that works with the associate dean for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion at each of UVA’s 12 colleges and schools (13 including the campus at Wise). “They will assist in implementing best practices and serve as a point of contact in their department/program for issues relating to diversity, inclusion, and equity.”

Such issues include but are not limited to:

  1. Hiring and retention of faculty and postdoctoral scholars;
  2. Graduate student recruitment, retention, and curriculum;
  3. Undergraduate student recruitment, retention, and curriculum;
  4. Staff hiring, treatment, and retention; and
  5. Cultivating a diverse, inclusive, and equitable departmental climate.

The document sets out clear expectations for the level of work commitment. The DDEI must:

  • Attend at least two DDEI meetings each semester.
  • Meet individually with the associate dean for DEI once per semester.
  • Provide updates during departmental faculty meetings when appropriate, and at least once a semester.
  • Meet with prospective graduate students during recruitment visits, and all enrolled graduate students at least once a year.
  • Participate as an external member in the chair/director search process.
  • Participate in the faculty search and hiring process. At a minimum, take part in the search-launch meeting, review the position description prior to posting, assist with outreach to diverse candidates, provide feedback regarding the search process, and meet with candidates during interviews. 

To get a sense of how much time McLaren is expected to commit to graduate student searches, there are 80 to 90 graduate students in residence in the economics department. Rules require individual meetings with each of those 80 to 90 grad students yearly. Moreover, the economics PhD program typically takes four years to complete, implying a turnover of 20 or more graduate students yearly and the need to conduct searches to replace them. As not every prospective grad student will choose UVA, the numbers imply that McLaren needs to be involved in significantly more than 20 graduate-student searches yearly.

Practices vary from department to department, but supplementary DEI-related activities can include training, discussion groups, special events, and reviews of departmental procedures. In the email chain, Associate Dean John alluded to departments undertaking “climate” surveys on their own initiative, and McLaren indicated in a message he forwarded to colleagues that the economics department was one of them. 

In sum, the drain on faculty productivity from DEI-related responsibilities is substantial, and their fractional work obligations should be counted in determining the cost of DEI. The Jefferson Council is not interested in either maximizing or minimizing the headcount and salary cost for political advantage. We want an accurate count so the Board of Visitors can make an informed cost-benefit analysis of the UVA’s commitment to DEI.

James A. Bacon is contributing editor for the Jefferson Council. The views expressed here are his own.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

40 responses to “A Diversity Director for Every Department”

  1. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    1) That’s how they’ve recruited grad students since I went to grad school. I submitted an application with ltrs, transcripts, etc., met with 3 faculty members including the Dept. Chair. It was an interview. I was notified I was accepted the next week. What’s new?
    2) those 5 numbered items are done and have been for years. So?
    3) You set out to calculate DE&I hours. Don’t identify any, and then claim it is “substantial”.

    I guesstimate 10 maybe 15 hours on specific DE&I items in your bullets per semester, i.e., the first 3 bullets. The last 3 bullets imply nothing specific to DE&I and are the duties Dept. Chairs have done historically.

    That is not substantial in a 14 week semester by any definition of the word.

    Here’s an idea: Call him and ask what level of effort he devotes to DE&I.

    Don’t stack wet straw so deep.

  2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “Rules require individual meetings with each of those 80 to 90 grad students yearly.”

    So… maybe 100 hours per year (assuming he wouldn’t already be meeting with them – that is probably a bad assumption). Out of 2080 work hours per year (at 40 hours a week) that’s a maximum of 5% of their time (likely much less than that). Hardly “substantial” and creates no new costs as these personnel are already university employees.

    “We want an accurate count so the Board of Visitors can make an informed cost-benefit analysis of the UVA’s commitment to DEI”

    Certainly doesn’t seem like it.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      The university employs over 28,000 people. So, let’s take the university 55 DEI employees. What’s that as a percentage of total manpower? 0.2%. Okay, now BR’s 235. 0.8%.

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        Hardly a “…massive expansion of the DEI bureaucracy…” as JAB claimed in the prior “article”… but groundwork must be laid…

          1. DJRippert Avatar
            DJRippert

            Thank you for posting that article. Somehow, despite not being a subscriber to the NYT I was able to read it. That has helped confirm my decision to not subscribe to the NYT.

            What was the point of the article?

            Moreover, how does that article possibly pertain to the topic of this blog?

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Yes, yes. Make a theory and bend the facts to fit.

      2. DJRippert Avatar
        DJRippert

        Ahhh … the bureaucrat's eternal argument …. we're already a giant, overblown bureaucracy so what's a little more? And … the debate is always framed in percentages rather than dollars.

        The alternative is the dollars per student view. How much does the DEI program cost per student per year? How much does supporting the men's golf team cost per student per year?

        Cloistered bureaucracies like UVa don't suddenly become unaffordable because they made some big decision. No, they have slow but steady mission creep. Over the many years, much gets added but little gets removed. Meanwhile, the costs of attending UVa keep exceeding increases in household income in Virginia.

        And then one day you find,
        Ten years have gone behind you,
        No one told you when to run,
        You missed the starting gun.

        Time for UVa to start running on the affordability problem.

        I don't care of they start with DEI, the men's golf team, or any other activity peripheral to the core mission of providing a top-tier, modern, AFFORDABLE education for Virginians.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          Doesn't cost them anything if their family income is less than 100K, right?

          1. DJRippert Avatar
            DJRippert

            And you think that a family of four living in Arlington, VA making $120,000 per year is rich enough to afford UVa's runaway costs?

            Instead of fixing their runaway cost problem, UVa's administrators become unelected tax legislators intentionally overcharging some students so they can intentionally undercharge other students to fund their grossly incompetent and willfully negligent failure to contain costs.

          2. DJRippert Avatar
            DJRippert

            That doesn't address the runaway cost issue. Play it out. If the costs of attending UVa continue to escalate beyond the increase in median income they will end up having to subsidize almost everybody. So, they'll charge students whose parents make $1m per year $200,000 per year to attend UVa so they can subsidize students whose parents make $300,000 per year?

            UVa is a legend in its own mind (and I graduated from UVa!). It is rated lower today than it was 25, 30, 35 years ago. It's no longer the top rated public university. As fewer and fewer students pay not only their true costs but extra in order to subsidize other students, competition for those few students from really wealthy families will greatly increase. UVa is not sufficiently prestigious in order to compete for a very few students from very wealthy families.

          3. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            So, do you think the rich are “ok” with paying big to get their kid a UVA degree? They must be, right? It’s kind of hard playing this grievance thing with regard to the rich!

        2. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Who says they are overblown? Most of their operating expenses are private funding; the State is ~6%, and they are on par with other universities of similar size. They rank well too.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            the actual per student DEI cost is probably 25 cents or some such! 😉

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            A lot less than the football team.

          3. DJRippert Avatar
            DJRippert

            My understanding is that the only two college sports that make more money than they cost are men's basketball and men's football.

          4. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            And yet, not enough.

          5. DJRippert Avatar
            DJRippert

            Not enough to cover all the other sports. That's my understanding.

            So, what would a business do?

            Keep the winners (men's basketball and football) and drop all the rest (unless they can raise the money outside of tuition and fees to break even).

            Since I don't find intercollegiate sports to be fundamental to a college education, I'd be fine with dropping all the money losers. Apply the savings to a reduction in tuition and fees.

            Yeah, yeah, I know … Title IX.

          6. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            So what would any other business do? Uh yep. Eliminate sports. You cut losses. You sell or spin them off and stick to the core. And Title IX wouldn’t have anything to say about it.

            There’s a bonus. Violent crime on campus would drop… by a lot.

            Football is an alumni thing.

          7. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            shhhh

          8. DJRippert Avatar
            DJRippert

            Let's take Jim's number – 255.

            Let's assume $200,000 per year in costs per person (fully loaded, includes benefits, pension, etc)

            255*$200,000 = $51,000,000

            Number opf undergraduate students at UVa – 17,496

            Cost per undergraduate student per year: $2,914.95

            Repeat the process with your own numbers if you'd like.

          9. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            You're saying the DEI stuff costs each student 3K a year?

          10. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            And you ran a business?

          11. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            “Let's take Jim's number – 255.”

            Your first mistake…

          12. DJRippert Avatar
            DJRippert

            I don't care how much the state is funding UVa. The state owns UVa. That's all the legal, political, or moral authority needed for the state to tell UVa what to do and how to do it.

            It's not funding but costs. If the costs of attending UVa continue to rise faster than the median incomes in Virginia, UVa becomes less and less affordable. Those costs have been outpacing inflation for decades. Yet, there is no apparent concern among UVa administrators about those costs.

            As far as other universities …. they are subject to the same fundamental laws of economics too. Some are already feeling the pain. West Virginia University is dropping majors (i.e., cutting costs) as they face a serious financial squeeze.

            https://www.insidehighered.com/news/business/cost-cutting/2023/05/03/slimming-down-stay-afloat

            The math doesn't work. Anytime anything has price increases above the rate of inflation, that thing becomes less affordable. As it becomes less affordable (i.e., more costly) fewer people buy it.

            WVU is learning that fewer people want to buy its ever-more-expensive product.

            I assume your theory is that the demand for UVa's "product" is so inelastic, UVa can charge any price they want and still be fine.

            I doubt it.

            Here's the analysis that needs to be done:

            Take the cost of attending UVa from 30 years ago (1994). Take the cost of attending UVa today (2024). Calculate the percentage difference. Do the same with median household income in Virginia.

            Extrapolate the cost increase at UVa (using the last 30 years) for another 30 years. Do the same with median income in Virginia.

            How many families will be able to afford the full costs charged by UVa in 2054?

            The number of families who can afford college will continue to shrink. Eventually, there will be few enough families able to afford the full costs of college for even the 25th best college.

            UVa maintains the pretense of affordability by levying a tax on the wealthier parents to pay for the less wealthy parents.

            At the rate of tuition increase above inflation continues, UVa will run out of parents wealthy enough to pay the full costs UVa wants to charge.

            To paraphrase Maggie Thatcher – eventually you run out of other people's money.

    2. Randy Huffman Avatar
      Randy Huffman

      You forgot to add all the other responsibilities involved with DEI. Plus, 2,080 is the standard work year, but also includes time off for Vacation, Holidays etc. Clearly this list of responsibilities falls into the substantial category Jim was talking about. Not 5%…..

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        Jim listed the requirements of the position and it is at most 100 hours – NN has credibly made the case that it is much less. That is about 5% of a full time job and is not substantial at all. Jim knows this, I’m fairly sure, but he has a narrative to build.

        1. Randy Huffman Avatar
          Randy Huffman

          10-15 hours a semester, how is that credible given the list above?

          1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            By far, the biggest time suck on that list is this:
            “Meet with prospective graduate students during recruitment visits, and all enrolled graduate students at least once a year.”

            According to NN, this is already a requirement of the job without DEI responsibilities.

          2. Randy Huffman Avatar
            Randy Huffman

            DEI is not an administrative task, its a religion.

          3. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            I guess we are done then… 🤷‍♂️

  3. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    1) That’s how they’ve recruited grad students since I went to grad school. I submitted an application with ltrs, transcripts, etc., met with 3 faculty members including the Dept. Chair. It was an interview. I was notified I was accepted the next week. What’s new?
    2) those 5 numbered items are done and have been for years. So?
    3) You set out to calculate DE&I hours. Don’t identify any, and then claim it is “substantial”.

    I guesstimate 10 maybe 15 hours on specific DE&I items in your bullets per semester, i.e., the first 3 bullets. The last 3 bullets imply nothing specific to DE&I and are the duties Dept. Chairs have done historically.

    That is not substantial in a 14 week semester by any definition of the word.

    Here’s an idea: Call him and ask what level of effort he devotes to DE&I. Weren’t you some kind of an investigative reporter?

    Don’t stack wet straw so deep.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Oooh, oooh. I just thought of something the Department Chair where I taught had to do on top of all that. He had to sign off on supply cabinet restocking and send notes if you were using the copier too much.

  4. Any objective metrics for success or failure, other than the number of meetings one must attend?

  5. Marty Chapman Avatar
    Marty Chapman

    I am not sure "Department Director" is the most descriptive title. Historically speaking "Kommissar" or "Inquisitor" might be more appropriate.

  6. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    Jim – does the Jefferson Council look at what other states are doing with their higher education policies?

    Wisconsin (which, I believe, runs a state-wide university system) is giving the chancellors of their colleges and universities a 15% bonus for retention. While I don't think UVa has a retention issue, it certainly has a cost issue.

    Maybe tieing the bonuses of Ryan, et al to cost containment might help.

    https://www.highereddive.com/news/wisconsins-public-university-leaders-will-get-a-15-bonus-if-they-meet-r/721035/?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Issue:%202024-07-11%20Higher%20Ed%20Dive%20%5Bissue:63799%5D&utm_term=Higher%20Ed%20Dive

  7. Clarity77 Avatar
    Clarity77

    Ever wonder why universities who have abolished DEI are ascendant in the academic rankings while ones like UVA are swirling down, down, down into the toilet?

  8. Chip Gibson Avatar
    Chip Gibson

    DEI is an illegitimate evil cast upon a faltering Nation. Must be expunged immediately, DEI staff reduced to zero. Reparations granted for the extensive damages done.

Leave a Reply