A Complete Disconnect from Reality

Barbara Johns, a participant in the Prince Edward County school walkout, is pictured prominently in WTOP’s article.

by James A. Bacon

A group of Black leaders has launched an initiative to preserve the teaching of Black history against what it calls a “whitewashing” by Governor Glenn Youngkin. Black History Is American History, a collaboration of the Leadership Conference Education Fund, the NAACP, and People for the American Way, has formed in response to Youngkin’s promise to rid public schools of “inherently divisive concepts,” reports WTOP News.

“Governor Youngkin’s misguided and ignorant attempt to whitewash history and gag educators only builds on the legacy of discrimination against Black communities, Native communities, and other communities of color across Virginia,” states the initiative’s web page.

Amy Tillerson Brown, education chair of the Virginia NAACP, recounted the history of Barbara Johns and hundreds of Black classmates who walked out of school in Prince Edward County in 1951 in protest against segregated education. This watershed event led to the famous Brown vs. Board of Education Supreme Court case.

“There are some people who might find Barbara Johns’ contribution to civil rights history disturbing, divisive, even,” Brown said, as quoted by WTOP. “This historical reality makes some people uncomfortable, as it requires students to critique the historical circumstances that allowed this race-based inequity.”

I defy Brown to find a scintilla of evidence that Youngkin would forbid teaching uncomfortable facts such as the Prince Edward walkouts in history classes. To suggest that he would represents one of two things: either a deliberate effort to distort the Governor’s intent — a knowing lie — or the product of group-think reinforced by a left-wing echo chamber totally unplugged from reality. In either case, Virginia’s mainstream media plays a critical role in perpetuating the falsehood.

After a lengthy story detailing the allegations, WTOP did its journalistic duty of appending a two-paragraph denial from a Youngkin spokeswoman reiterating the Governor’s position: “We can teach all of our history, the good and the bad, and Virginia’s children will be better for it.”

Despite the Governor’s consistent denials that he would ban teaching of slavery, segregation, and Civil Rights from history courses, the backers of “Black History Is American History” don’t bother to present any evidence for their underlying premise — not one document, not one quote, not one email communication. They ignore Youngkin’s clearly and repeatedly-stated intention to roll back curricula, training and other administrative policies — not the content of history classes — that are predicated on the idea that the educational system is fundamentally racist, with Whites as oppressors and Blacks as victims, and that Whites must acknowledge their privilege.

Yet WTOP acts as a mouthpiece for the initiative, blithely perpetuating a claim that has zero basis in reality. Indeed, reporter Rick Massimo builds on the fabulist construction by providing this context in the article:

Critical race theory, a graduate-level concept taught in law schools, has never been taught in Virginia K-12 schools. An interim report in February on the initial findings of a search for “divisive concepts” identified no instances of the teaching of critical race theory in the classroom, instead pointing to a range of Department of Education materials, memos, a webinar and a math pilot program as examples it said it had identified and rescinded.

Neither Youngkin nor his K-12 chief Jillian Balow claim that CRT is taught in K-12 classrooms!! They say CRT permeates administrative policies, guidelines and training programs… which is what the interim report found! Massimo is not refuting something that Youngkin ever claimed, but a bogus charge repeated endlessly as journalists, politicians and activists quote themselves in circles without citing anything the Governor actually said.

The closest the WTOP story and similar accounts come to brushing up against the truth is this: the Youngkin administration does not want to see the propositions of Critical Race Theory formally embedded in public school curricula, pedagogy and training programs. Given the fact that his critics stress that CRT is not taught in schools, they should have no problem with Youngkin scrubbing VDOE policies and guidelines that they say don’t exist. The obvious contradiction eludes them.

The falsehoods are so grotesque and easily falsifiable one might be forgiven for thinking that the assorted activists, politicians and journalists are deliberately and deceitfully perpetuating a Joseph Goebbels-style Big Lie. But I don’t think that’s what’s happening. I think human nature is more complex. People believe what they want to believe. They seek confirmation of their beliefs and filter out evidence that contradicts them. Given the nature of the Internet and social media, it is easier than ever to live in information bubbles in which one’s version of reality is continually affirmed. The Left spreads falsehoods that it doesn’t know are false.

Arguably, that’s even more frightening than thinking that people are consciously lying. Liars can be exposed. But if everyone lives in information bubbles in which their beliefs are always confirmed, they lose the ability to distinguish the truth from the lies.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

67 responses to “A Complete Disconnect from Reality”

  1. M. Purdy Avatar
    M. Purdy

    “The Youngkin administration does not want to see the propositions of Critical Race Theory formally embedded in public school curricula, pedagogy and training programs. Given the fact that his critics stress that CRT is not taught in schools, they should have no problem with Youngkin scrubbing VDOE policies and guidelines that they say don’t exist. The obvious contradiction eludes them.” Actually, that’s a misstatement of the gov’s position. Youngkin wants to root out *existing* CRT in K-12. This is also specious reasoning. To wit, Youngkin goes on a witch hunt; opponents say witches don’t exist; Youngkin says, OK, then you won’t mind if we go hunting for them. The very nature of witch hunts is that you find them where they don’t exist.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Of course, since they don’t know what CRT (the witch) is, then anything they see that they don’t know what it is, becomes CRT. “It floats just like small pebbles…”

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Of course, since they don’t know what CRT (the witch) is, then anything they see that they don’t know what it is, becomes CRT. “It floats just like small pebbles…”

  2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “I defy Brown to find a scintilla of evidence that Youngkin would forbid teaching uncomfortable facts such as the Prince Edward walkouts in history classes.”

    Here you go:

    https://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?221+amd+HB787AHR

    1. A. Rejected by the House, not the Youngkin administration.

      B. It was a grand-standing amendment that didn’t address a problem that actually existed.

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        A. I don’t recall Youngkin saying, “I have no problems with these amendments!”. Are you saying Republicans in the house are not communicating with their own governor and are voting against him on issues so high on his agenda? That doesn’t ring true.

        B. If the problem does not (or will not actually) exist, then why not approve the amendments and make it official? Trust yet verify… right…?!

      2. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        “Rejected by the House, not the Youngkin administration.”. Uh yep, the Youngkin Administration still’s hopin’.

        “Would” — predictive. Try, that he failed is immaterial.

        Journalists would know that. So to the cancel culturalist.

  3. I agree your comment that “if everyone lives in information bubbles in which their beliefs are always confirmed, they lose the ability to distinguish the truth from the lies.” That to me is the greatest challenge of the day. It’s why we need to read the main stream media, debate these issues in the main stream media, fact-check the main stream media, complain loudly to the main-stream media — not, drift apart in disgust and read the social media feeds within our own bubble. “You’re entitled to your own opinions but not your own facts.”

    That said, there’s a lot of dog-whistling going on in Youngkin’s statements, whether or not he intends it that way, and that has only pushed the statements on both sides of the CRT debate to provocations and shrill name-calling and legalistic statements about “he didn’t quite, actually say that,” not to real engagement.

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      “Dog Whistling” is defined as any statement of opinion one does not personally support. Regardless of source.

      Do you really believe that the authors on BR don’t read the WaPo, NYT, Atlantic, Politico and other organs of the left? They daily inform our reporting.

      Of all of those, I find the NYT under its new editor to be the most credible. I will seldom agree with its editorial and op-ed pages, but it is starting for the first time in years to actually edit what appears in its news sections. It has a ways to go, but management is clearly working on it.

  4. I wrote, “I defy Brown to find a scintilla of evidence that Youngkin would forbid teaching uncomfortable facts such as the Prince Edward walkouts in history classes.”

    Purdy didn’t come close. Larry didn’t come close. Half a Troll actually submitted evidence, though upon inspection it provides no refutation at all. The amendment he referenced would have forbidden the administration from preventing the teaching of certain topics in school — addressing hypotheticals that the administration has not tried to implement.

    You have no evidence — just distortion.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      re: “forbid”. You’re right. He did not forbid. But he certainly did provide and promote a “tip line” for those that thought violations to his EO were taking place.

      If you were a teacher, what would you do given the EO and the TIP line?

      distortion? that seems to be a favored cop out of late.

      we have disagreement. I actually think JAB is the one distorting so let’s agree to not accuse each other of that and deal with the merits of the issue.

      There is no question what Youngkin has done and though the amendment in the house was defeated, it certainly did articulate what some legislators were willing to do in furtherance of the direction Youngkin seemed to be headed and was an issue in the election.

    2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      Actually, you set up a straw man here. Brown never said that Youngkin would “forbid teaching uncomfortable facts”. She said some might find it disturbing and divisive. Do you deny this as an accurate characterization on her part?

    3. M. Purdy Avatar
      M. Purdy

      I didn’t address that point. So by definition, I didn’t come close.

  5. Sure, let’s talk about the tip line. Is Youngkin asking parents to squeal on teachers who teach kids about slavery, segregation, racism, etc.?

    Let’s roll the tape. Here’s what he said on the John Fredericks show, as reported here:

    “We’re asking for folks to send us reports and observations that will help us be aware of things like privileged bingo, be aware of their child being denied their rights that parents have in Virginia and we’re going to make sure that we catalogue it all. It gives us great insight into what’s happening at the school level and that gives us further ability to make sure that we’re rooting it out.”

    Fairfax County Public Schools was criticized Wednesday over an assignment called “privilege” bingo, which told students they were privileged if they identified with characteristics such as being white, Christian, male, cisgender or a military kid, the Daily Wire originally reported. Youngkin has criticized those who “obfuscate” the issue by claiming that CRT does not exist in schools and vowed to rid schools of all its tenets.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      is it THIS guy that Youngkin is appearing on his show:

      https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/6ea205da0c72ccebd08ff58286a29d14782db5a7573b0342fffc632cef0b1257.jpg

      do you think this demonstrates a non-partisan approach to this issue?

      Is there a link to the TIP LINE that states the rules and vets the TIPs and discards the ones that are not valid?

      Where is the list of reported tips and results of inquiry?

      convince that this is not a witch hunt for anyone who wants to use it that way.

      Finally, where is the list of things that CAN be taught?

      Where is Youngkin’s response to the NCAA showing that the things they are talking about WILL BE TAUGHT?

      All Virginians are entitled to an accounting of this if Youngkin wants to demonstrate that his intentions are good and he really wants to calm the divisiveness.

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Then, you also have to include exactly what tips have come in, and what actions they have/haven’t taken. The purpose of a dog whistle…

      Kinda like the pizza parlor basement, or the white vans, or people with empty child car seats, or strollers, etc., etc.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        Careful there… you may be ‘distorting” stuff….

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          The only distortion on this site is the distortion of CRT and channeling Chris Rufo’s BS.

    3. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      “It gives us great insight into what’s happening at the school level…”

      “… but the public will be excluded from this information, of course. We will tell them what their insight will be…”

      Btw, he said nothing to contradict Brown’s position.

  6. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    Ok, liberals …. did this happen or not:

    “Fairfax County Public Schools was criticized Wednesday over an assignment called “privilege” bingo, which told students they were privileged if they identified with characteristics such as being white, Christian, male, cisgender or a military kid, the Daily Wire originally reported.”

    If it happened:

    1. Is it acceptable?
    2. Should it have been reported as divisive?

    All the BS about witch hunts, CRT as a law school concept, etc is ridiculous.

    Here is a real-life example.

    What should happen to the teacher that claims being a “military kid” (among other things) is a sign of privilege?

    assuming his happened, the half witted racist teacher who conducted this “lesson” should be fired on the spot for cause.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      Can you recount the specifics of this?

      When you say it did happen, do you mean Fairfax county schools promoted this idea across it’s system or what?

      Give some links – authoritative ones – not right wing stuff.

      who made this claim? how was it verified?

      was this one teacher who screwed up or is it the entire Fairfax County school system?

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        This is the second time he posted about it… come to think of it, someone wrote a BR article about it.

        It’s an exercise in empathy. Something severely missing in the GOP.

    2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      Do you deny that growing up male, white, and Christian in American provided entree into privileges denied to others not so situated?

      1. I agree that I grew up privileged.

        I was privileged that my parents loved me, raised me with sound values, and made sacrifices to give me a good education.

        When I enrolled in a PhD program in African history in 1976, I quickly learned, however, that being White was not an asset in my first chosen profession. I got over it and embarked upon a different career.

        1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          “I was privileged that my parents loved me, raised me with sound values, and made sacrifices to give me a good education.”

          Yes, if only the disadvantaged blacks had parents who loved them…. sheesh!!

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Uh yep. His whiteness is blinding.

            “He’s tall, white, and we think his hair will silver nicely.”
            “Definitely UVa material.”

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            love and good values.. yep.. pretty sure lots of parents do that – rich and poor, black and white.

            but what about parents who got good educations and as a result a good job that allowed them to pay for their kids college?

            Is that a privilege not all kids have? Is it so hard to agree that’s possible?

        2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
          Dick Hall-Sizemore

          When I was at W&M, there may have been some Black students, but I never encountered them. (It was an even smaller school that it is now.) Everyone knew that the female students were smarter than the males. They had to be in order to gain admission because there were fewer slots alloted for females. (That was back before there were coed dorms.) I admit that I don’t know if the religious affiliation helped regarding college, but, if I could have afforded it, not being Jewish would certainly have helped me join the Country Club of Virginia.

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            And James River Country Club, if you were so inclined. Well into the 1990s nothing but white lawyers and judges who said, “Really? There are no Blacks, Hispanics, or Jews as members?” I hadn’t noticed.”

            As for W&M, by the late 70s the complexion charged. At least, the Taiwanese exchange students helped.

        3. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          “When I enrolled in a PhD program in African history in 1976, I quickly learned, however, that being White was not an asset in my first chosen profession. I got over it and embarked upon a different career.”

          One where it wasn’t an asset? Just about anything else, eh? You as much as said it.

          See. Now there’s the difference. White privileged kid sees being white as not being an asset in a choice whereas black kids would have found being black as a disadvantage everywhere.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            blind to that also… apparently or unwilling to admit it…

      2. DJRippert Avatar
        DJRippert

        No, I don’t agree. Asian Americans are both better educated on average than White Americans and make more money. Not sure how that happens with the so-called White Privilege.

        In my 35+ years of working for big corporations I never had a minimum percentage of White men that I had to get and keep on the payroll. I did have goals for every other group – women, Blacks, Hispanics, etc. Part of my annual bonus was tied to meeting those goals.

        As for religion, Jewish people comprise 1.9% of the US population but 14% of US physicians. Hindus, Muslims, Buddhists and Mormons are over-represented among US physicians relative to the overall population. The only under-represented religions? Protestants and Catholics.

        https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1490160/

        White privilege is just another hallucination of the left.

    3. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Or, you could walk a mile in someone else’s shoes… try a stiletto heel.

      1. Lefty665 Avatar
        Lefty665

        Now that’s trans portation.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Maybe. What do you really know about him?

          “On the internet, no one knows you’re a dog.”

          1. Lefty665 Avatar
            Lefty665

            Nothing, his was “Content unavailable” but I’d guess it was LarrytheG(olden – the lights are on but nobody’s home).

            My comment to you was a word play related to stiletto, transportation and walk a mile in someone else’s shoes. Not much of a joke, but it was casual, nothing more and I liked that I could make the double entendre just by adding a space. However, I don’t generally think of stilettos as casual footwear.

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            ‘Twas an excellent pun.

    4. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      here’s the Big Deal the Daily Wire “reported” on back in January :
      https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/980fd922856ab700c89bdf0729446c97fc1dc97139af6cd2b9cd139ebf5c93a5.jpg

      “The screen shot you reference comes from an approved FCPS English Curriculum lesson that is centered around students selecting a “choice” test and examining in detail the author’s perspective on a wide-range [sic] of issues. Students are asked, in the lesson, to read critically and think critically about the author’s perspective on several fronts including the author’s privilege that may or may not be present in the work. Students are then asked independently and self reflectively to juxtapose their thoughts regarding any perceived privilege they think they may have and how they would potentially rewrite portions of the text. Students are not asked or required to report out their self-reflections. This lesson is an adept vehicle to push student thinking to challenge the author’s thoughts/conclusions and to sharpen their ability to critically read selected texts.”

      https://www.dailywire.com/news/fairfax-schools-tell-children-of-military-members-that-they-have-privilege

      The lesson is NOT asserting that whites have privilege at all – but rather asking students to give
      their view of the author of the Bingo – basic premise with Bingo that some folks might have more privilege than others, something they can agree or disagree with in their own articulation.

      It’s clearly asking the students to think critically about the issue and to articulate their thoughts.
      This is what you want kids to learn to do – to think critically, to develop their own thinking and express it so others can see it and share their views.

      It’s totally wrong and dishonest to claim this is teaching CRT this is what is being claimed in right-wing media and was in BR and now is claimed as justification for Youngkin’s “tip line”.

      It’s very much a very dishonest false narrative that DJ is hanging his hat on here.

      It’s NOT OK to dishonestly represent issues and to then use that as justification for things like a “tip line” IMHO.

      1. DJRippert Avatar
        DJRippert

        NOBODY claimed that this was teaching CRT. NOBODY. Not me, not Jim Bacon. Stop lying!

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          Coulda fooled me. so what is wrong with this that you complained about it?

          1. DJRippert Avatar
            DJRippert

            I grew up in Fairfax County. I graduated from Fairfax County Public Schools (i.e. Groveton High School, now Called West Potomac High School). There were plenty of White kids living in the large trailer parks that lined Rt 1. There were plenty of Asian kids (and some Black families) living in expensive homes closer to the river. The White kids from the parks were not privileged because they were White.

            Asians in America are better educated and make more money than Whites, on average. Where is this mythical White privilege in that case?

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            High income Asians typically do better academically but low income Asians do not. NoVa has a high percentage of high income Asians that you do NOT see in other parts of Va where academic results for Asians that are not high income are not near so different.

            It’s a sound-bit premise IMHO.

            I’ve asked you several times about TC Williams and whether or not he was a segregationist and why the school with his name changed names.

            Do you have an answer – an opinion?

          3. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            DJ – if your father/grandfather had a decent education and as a result a good paying job that enabled him to pay to send you to college –

            do you think there are kids whose parents were not well educated and as a result did not have a good-paying job and as a result could not afford to send their kid to college?

            Do you think that happens?

        2. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          DJ, you said this: ” Should it have been reported as divisive?”

          Have you read Youngkins EO as to what he defines as “divisive”?

          Do you think that what he defined as “divisive” is in opposition that what CRT asserts?

          1. DJRippert Avatar
            DJRippert

            What is used as the basis for ass-clown incidents like privilege bingo is Kendi’s anti-racism screeds. The only way to combat past prejudice is future prejudice, etc.

            Is that CRT, per se? No.

            Is that divisive and inappropriate? Yes.

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            is that CRT? Have you been reading BR and other conservative media about this?

            It sure as heck appears to me that Kendi has said exactly that the way to combat past discrimination IS future discrimination.

            You disagree with that?

            Do you think the BINGO exercise is asserting that?

            Ya’ll seem to not truly understand OR you do but simply refuse to debate on the merits – IMHO.

            In my view the BINGO exercise is VERY appropriate for engaging students to THINK about the “privilege” issue. It seeks to have them read and understand it AND to then give THEIR view and their reasoning.

            Isn’t this what you want kids to do ?

          3. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            the “bingo” exercise presented the idea of the BINGO and then asked the students to articulate their attitudes and opinions towards it – in other words to think critically aout it.

            It was NOT presented as something “true” that they should belief – not at all.

            Ya’ll are just making stuff up out of whole cloth here – stawmans….if you will. shame on you and all who are doing this.

      2. DJRippert Avatar
        DJRippert

        Here are the first two paragraphs of the article you reference …

        “A Fairfax County (Virginia) Public Schools curriculum has students play “privilege” bingo, giving them privilege points if they are white, male, employed or “involved in extra curricular [sic] activities,” or “feel represented in the media.”

        It also says one has “privilege” if they are a “Military Kid,” drawing shock from parents who pointed out that children of military members must move away from their friends constantly, not see one of their parents for months on end, potentially deal with post-traumatic stress disorder, and risk becoming orphans.”

        Who cares if the course is “approved”? That only heaps more shame on FCPS. This is typical of the liberal scum who infest FCPS. Being in a military family confers privilege?

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          Did you read what students are supposed to do in that exercise?

          Were they not asked to read and understand the Bingo then give their reasons why they agreed or disagreed with the premise?

          Is that an advocacy for accepting the premise as correct or true?

          You and JAB and other “conservatives” seem to not be able to engage an issue without name-calling and pejoratives and personal attacks (not usually you).

          How can you make any semblance of a reasonable argument that any credence at all when you call people of the opposite view “liberal scum” or “leftists”?

          What exactly are you trying to achieve when you debate this way?

  7. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Right here in BR, it has been claimed that public schools ARE teaching CRT. In fact, it was used an an election strategy.

    And when Youngkin says we will not teach “inherently divisive concepts” AND provides a TIP line to report ‘violations’ – what does anyone think that means?

    Tell the truth here JAB.

    What teacher in their right mind is going to teach the truth about Virginian’s racial history with Youngkin and his TIP line waiting?

    Only the willingly ignorant are going to believe that we can teach the truth without consequences.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Well, Larry, he claimed CRT was being taught, and they claimed it was Marxist,… but that was when they didn’t know what CRT is.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        I’m agog. How many blog posts have we seen in BR about CRT claiming it IS being taught both by blog authors and commenters.

        It’s like it never happened.

        1. You’re agog because you have demonstrated a consistent, willful ability to misinterpret, misconstrue and misrepresent what other have written.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Just me? The idea of trying to marginalize me personally doesn’t wash if there are others with
            similar views of you and BR …. gig is up JAB. Others see what I see in your posts, even Acbar is seeing dog-whistles.

          2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            Says the man who put words into Brown’s mouth that she never said…☝️☝️

          3. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            and is a regular “feature” here in BR and if you point it out, you’re “distorting’ words…

            my my

  8. Lefty665 Avatar
    Lefty665

    “either a deliberate effort to distort the Governor’s intent — a knowing lie — or the product of group-think reinforced by a left-wing echo chamber totally unplugged from reality.”

    I choose group think on the basis of the old maxim, roughly – don’t blame mendacity when simple stupidity provides a good explanation.

    Certainly some heated discussion here. I prefer “woke racism” to CRT, DEI, etc. It is a broader frame of what is wrong and as a religious cult is inclusive of many of the aberrations we are experiencing today.

    Woke racism is profoundly demeaning to black people in that it maintains as a matter of faith that black people, alone among all the groups in America, are so defective they cannot succeed until all whites abase themselves and confess to systemic racism and embrace racist anti-racism.

    Woke racism drags us off into these bizarre battles about whether backing away from racist CRT, DEI, et al means that schools are going to teach about happy nigras grateful to massa for letting them slave in the fields. What utter nonsense.

    Woke racism prevents us from actually doing something about fundamentally working to improve life for all. That is doing things like teaching all kids to read. That will give kids more opportunities to have productive lives than all the cult crusades combined.

    “if everyone lives in information bubbles in which their beliefs are
    always confirmed, they lose the ability to distinguish the truth from
    the lies.”

    Well said JAB, and sadly where most of America lives today.

  9. James McCarthy Avatar
    James McCarthy

    Seems to me it is the Right that defends indefensible positions. No possibility to expose Rightie liars in that situation. Except for howling “Marxist” there has been no substantive criticism of CRT. It’s alleged potential for damage to children remains just that — alleged, speculative. Youngkin’s moves on the topic are or were purely political opportunism. His opposition to the teaching of inherently divisive concepts is pure crockery. The screed that spawned the comments on this thread has been thoroughly parsed and exposed as one person’s opinion.

  10. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    CRT has become a catchall phrase for all the cultural changes in society that conservatives oppose.

    https://twitter.com/realchrisrufo/status/1371540368714428416 Whatever he thinks it is, Glenn Youngkin says it “has moved into our schools,” and he vowed to get rid of it. https://video.foxnews.com/v/6266654686001#sp=show-clips

    “Inherently divisive concepts” is such a vague term that it could mean anything to anyone who did not like what was being said.

    So, I applaud the group of Black teachers. I say, stop talking, and go to teaching. Teach about Barbara Johns. Teach about how she had to be sent out of state to live with relatives after the student strike because her parents feared for her safety. Teach about how their house was burned down. Teach about how race was a predominant factor in every aspect of Virginia society during the 20th century. Teach about how the effects of segregation are still embedded in society today. Teach about how, less than sixty years ago, it was against the law in Virginia for people of different races to get married. But, at the same time, teach about how far Virginia has come since the mid-60s. The first elected Black governor in the country. A Black man chief justice of the State Supreme Court. A black woman elected lieutenant governor. Don’t worry about the tip line. We will see how good the Governor is to his word that he wants the bad taught along with the good. Now, if those things being taught make some people uncomfortable and they report you on the tip line and DOE or the Governor try to make you back off, then we, including Bacon’s Rebellion, will know what the governor really meant when he advocated banning ”divisive concepts.”

    1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      Yeah, get fired from your job for teaching history as it really happened… and still BR will excuse the divisiveness of Youngkin and his compadres…

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        If someone actually did get fired, or not have his contract renewed, for those reasons, it would make for one hell of a lawsuit.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          and still playing out…..

          This is another reason why VEA exists and Youngkin is now helping them recruit…. 😉

  11. oromae Avatar

    A simple google search reveals the tenets of CRT were indeed in use in indoctrinating Virginia public school students.

    In 2015, then-Governor McAuliffe’s Department of Education instructed Virginia public schools to “embrace critical race theory” in order to “re-engineer attitudes and belief systems.” They explicitly endorse CRT.

    Under the Northam administration, Superintendent of Public Instruction James Lane sent a memo to Virginia public schools endorsing “Foundations of Critical Race Theory in Education,” calling it an “important analytic tool” that can “further spur developments in education.”

    On Feb. 22, 2019, a memo from James F. Lane, Virginia’s superintendent of public instruction, promoted critical race theory in detail.
    “More recently, CRT has proven an important analytic tool in the field of education, offering critical perspectives on race, and the causes, consequences and manifestations of race, racism, inequity, and the dynamics of power and privilege in schooling.

    This groundbreaking anthology is the first to pull together both the foundational writings in the field and more recent scholarship on the cultural and racial politics of schooling. A comprehensive introduction provides an overview of the history and tenets of CRT in education. Each section then seeks to explicate ideological contestation of race in education and to create new, alternative accounts. In so doing, this landmark publication not only documents the progress to date of the CRT movement, it acts to further spur developments in education. “

    1. WayneS Avatar

      Will you please be kind enough to post links to the instructions and memos you cite in your comment?

      Thank you.

      1. oromae Avatar

        I’m not looking that up again.

Leave a Reply