A Cautionary Tale

Dominion’s experimental wind turbines off the Virginia coast.

by Bill O’Keefe

The General Assembly, Governor Ralph Northam, and Dominion Energy are proud of their commitment to achieve zero carbon emissions by 2050.  Dominion routinely showcases its planned wind farm 27 miles off of the Virginia coast. Before Dominion and the Commonwealth get beyond the point of no return — governments don’t acknowledge sunk costs, opportunity costs or terminate failed programs — they would do well to closely examine the experience with wind power in Germany.

Germany is a leader in the green energy movement and has installed over 30,000 windmills. The German renewable energy program started in 2000. After 20 years, there is a problem. The German wind power industry is suffering setbacks. Hardly any new turbines are being built, and more and more old wind turbines are being phased out. Some of the problems don’t apply to Virginia since they concern on-shore wind mills but there are lessons to be learned.

Many German wind farms are threatened with shutdown. The German Renewable Energy Act, which has been in force since 2000, guarantees wind turbine operators secure subsidies for twenty years. Without subsidies they are no longer profitable. By 2025, there is a risk of 15,000 MW of wind projects will be lost corresponding to over a quarter of Germany’s onshore wind power.
Technically, it would still be possible to continue wind turbines operating after 20 years. But without guaranteed subsidies many operators are finding it difficult to survive in the power generation market. Even at the current price level — 33 cents per kWh which is more than twice what Virginians pay — they are barely competitive. The German wind industry is appealing to the federal government to provide additional financial support to keep the wind farms running. That should sound familiar. Since Dominion has a guaranteed rate of return on its almost $8 billion investment, today’s 12 cents per kWh will surely escalate when there are cost overruns and the unanticipated costs of rethinking and restructuring the entire Virginia electric power system.

Revising the grid to accommodate growth in renewable energy will involve finding a cost-efficient and reliable way to deal with intermittency. Because of a “low wind spring” Germany’s 30,000 wind turbines generated almost a third less electricity in the first quarter of 2021 than last year, the gap was filled by increased electricity generation from coal power and gas. Germany’s move to  reliance on weather-dependent renewables is quickly running up against limits — issues that all countries exchanging conventional fuels for wind and solar will eventually face. What happens if there is an unanticipated low wind period along the Atlantic coast or if storm /hurricane winds are too strong for wind mills to operate? Or if the General Assembly reverses its mandate? Has anyone seen a contingency plan?

Will public support 20 years from now remain as strong as it is today? Germany’s experience suggests that it might not when the entire set of realities are understood and the climate catastrophe remains at least another decade in the future. Will the Navy remain supportive if this 170-square-mile wind farm interferes with air and ship operations or provideS a convenient hiding area for submarines?

None of these contingencies may come about.  But prudence demands that they be addressed and that the public be clearly informed of how Dominion will respond to a worse-case scenario and what that means for electricity service.  The cost and potential consequences are too big for just good faith acceptance of  Dominion’s advocacy.

William O’Keefe, a Midlothian resident, is founder of Solutions Consulting and former EVP American Petroleum Institute.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

22 responses to “A Cautionary Tale”

  1. Publius Avatar

    The cost of virtue signaling, passed onto the average consumer.
    If the enviro-freaks really wanted clean, inexpensive energy, they would support nuclear. Wind is totally unreliable and really can’t be stored. Solar and hydro are marginally better because they are more continuous/predictable. Dominion gets it return. So we have 3 groups – in order of graft – the windpower consultants/industry (hogs feeding at the trough, Dominion (the house always wins), consumers (suckas!)

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Yeah, safe nukes. Ya know, after the wind turns a turbine blade, you can stand in it and fly a kite… without a radiation suit.

      1. Publius Avatar

        Try a real comment, instead of stupid snark. How are you standing there flying a kite in the middle of the Bay or wherever these things are? Are you the Big Guy, walking on water? Or hunting for whacked birds? Read about disposal of wind turbines and their manufacture? Life has tradeoffs. Nuclear makes the most sense purely from an overall economic perspective. Meanwhile, I’m staying LONG on oil stocks – those cars need juice – gas or electric power – one way or the other

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          You wouldn’t know a real comment if it ate your brain. Oh wait…

          1. Publius Avatar

            Sticks and stones…
            Usual brilliance.

  2. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Maybe provide some references for the narrative here? From what I read, German’s electricity is indeed 30+ cents a killowatt hour and they are depending on natural gas from other countries like Russia and they actually have too much wind power on some days and not enough other days so maintaining a reliable grid is a problem and it won’t get better with more renewables until/unless there is a cost effective way to store the excess when it is available.

    Relying on 60+ year old nuclear designs is also problematic until we see more modern and more safe designs.

    I have seen also have read that Germans use about 1/2 the electricity per capita than we do. There is a direct correlation between the cost of electricity and consumption. The cheaper it is – and the more polluting it is , is perhaps what has actually led to pollution and climate issues.

    But I do agree the essential issue seems to be that right now, a grid cannot be primarily reliant on renewables and to this point fossil fuels and nukes are the alternative and it’s a Sophie’s Choice of sorts.

    What is going on in the Western US and the melting of ice sheets is having an impact on people’s attitudes, and there are fewer and fewer skeptics and more and more folks who believe we CAN and must find solutions to the problem.

    One breakthrough in battery storage, or safer nukes or hydrogen will change everything, and optimistic folks see the future that way. We keep at it until we figure it out. The gloom and doomers are always with us come hell or high water anyhow.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Uh yep. Google “german wind turbines onshore” and you get pages and pages of less-than-1-month old articles on new subsidy-free projects, turbines, installations, successes, and this BR article.

      You have to go back in time a few pages and months for this…
      https://www.cleanenergywire.org/news/german-onshore-wind-growth-achieves-turnaround-2020-still-target

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Apparently, the same players that blamed the Texas collapse on wind power are republishing the same articles with global replace of “Texas” with “Germany”.

  3. … and all of this is BEFORE widespread use of electric cars!

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      “RWE is expanding its renewables portfolio in Germany

      RWE already operates onshore wind farms with a capacity of more than 550 MW (pro rata view) in Germany. The portfolio is being continuously expanded. Currently, the company is constructing the Jüchen onshore wind farm (27 MW) in collaboration with NEW Re and the city of Jüchen. Six wind turbines are being installed on recultivated land, which was previously part of the Garzweiler opencast mine. Commissioning is planned later this year. In addition, RWE is currently building the Evendorf wind farm (11.7 MW) in Lower Saxony and the Krusemark repowering project (19.8 MW) in Saxony-Anhalt. Both projects were successful in German Federal Network Agency tenders last year. In addition, RWE’s Kaskasi Offshore Wind Farm (342 MW) is currently being built 35 kilometres north of the island of Heligoland. RWE is also pushing ahead with innovative hybrid projects, such as a photovoltaic plant with battery storage in the Inden open-cast mine. The battery storage system will serve as a buffer between solar electricity generation and the supply network so that the power feed-in can be even better matched to demand.”

      It’s clearly a failure… that’s why they’re investing mo’ money…
      https://www.evwind.es/2021/06/15/success-for-rwe-in-german-onshore-wind-power-auction/81292

      1. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        Nancy, that’s exactly how Las Vegas works, isn’t it? Next roll will be a winner? With all the subsidies this market is not always rational.

        Uh, and Larry, you are complaining about reactor designs which have been so successful that it actually makes sense to push them out to 80 years? Also Navy reactors with more than 50 years of successful operation? Sure, the newer stuff may be better but with the NIMBY’s and BANANA’s you can’t get them built. In China, but not here.

        Most of us will be able to pay the higher electric bills and the higher cost of everything else because of them. Poor folk are now going to get yet another subsidy, this one for power bills. Who gets it in the hind end? Middle class…which is why now in Biden’s America government provides financial giveaways to families with 150K in taxable income.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          No, no, Steve. We’re at the point where we haven’t hit the jackpot, but we’re starting to play with the house’s money. That’s what “subsidy free” means**. Read the articles.

          Little steps for little feet.

          ** well, we aren’t. Germany is.

          1. Stephen Haner Avatar
            Stephen Haner

            Ah, ONshore. Well, maybe but that is very different than offshore. Not seeing that proposed in Virginia because the NIMBY’s explode at the idea of the turbines on mountains. But where onshore is being installed in the US, look for subsidies and the REC sales and not straight cost of service. Bit of apples and oranges, there, Nancy….

            For the umpteenth time, I have no problem with a fair portion of our generation from these sources if properly financed. People who think that means we can dump other reliable baseload are freaking idiots, dangerous morons. Look carefully and you can see the smarter Decepticons talking now about “net” zero, admitting what must happen.

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            My bet is that Steve would not want a power generation site near him. Is that NIMBY?

          3. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Ooh, oooh speaking of deceptions… the daughter is trying to buy a house. Her agent told her, “sellers are not accepting offers unless the buyers waive inspections.”

            I confirmed this with my neighbor who is a realtor. In this buying craze many are waiving, but she said “Tell your daughter stick to the inspection. Don’t waive.”

            More to the point, in 1964, I went to the World’s Fair in NYC. I saw, and actually remember seeing, the AT&T videophone. I saw attempts to bring videophones to market in the late 80s. In the early 2000s there was an Israeli ADR on the OTC developing video-payphones.

            All that effort was a waste, and layed to waste by the internet and the porn industry (for developing video compression techniques). We all have videophones and none of the AT&T effort and techniques are used. But it was a nit. Big whoop.

        2. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          If I were the only way wary of 60-old designs, Steve might have a point. But that’s not the case.

          My bet is that if one were proposed new Steve, he’s not exactly welcome it and for good reason.

          1. Stephen Haner Avatar
            Stephen Haner

            Try again, a bit garbled….Plenty of valid sites for new stuff with good buffers from residential, or rebuild on existing sites. I sure wouldn’t mind a nice buried pipeline in my general vicinity (as there is one just across Patterson Avenue.) A new nuke plant would eliminate the need for, oh, something like 1000 turbines or a county-sized solar field, so siting might prove easier.

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            A new nuke within say 10 miles of you?

            😉

            How about it?

  4. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    I’m not sure I would bet against Germany on technology given their successful history.

    They do have issues involving the intermittent nature of renewables and it’s not possible to not use fossil fuels at all right now.

    That’s just a pragmatic and realistic view.

    Despite lies and propaganda , Texas proved just how vulnerable a 90%+ fossil fuel grid is. They blamed the massive outage on what 10% wind, frozen turbines but not the 90% frozen gas plants?

    Even the WSJ that started with lies about it , finally got around to telling the truth.

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/texas-freeze-power-grid-failure-electricity-market-incentives-11613777856?st=sk843vsdl7a2zms&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink

    But the folks who generate “cautionary” tales about Germany apparently have little to say about Texas and fossil fuels? 😉

    1. Yeah, Larry, Germany is doing such a great job of decarbonizing it’s economy that it is building a pipeline to important Russian natural gas. Explain to me how that works.

      While you’re at it, explain to me how burning wood pellets imported from the United States decarbonizes the German economy.

  5. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
    energyNOW_Fan

    It would be a little surprising that the onshore wind in Germany is facing economic problems, whereas onshore wind is much cheaper than the offshore wind the US Northeast ocean states are so enamored with.

    This weekend we were driving I70 I76 and we noticed the huge American flag (at the Blue Goose Market in Hancock MD) was completely furled (no wind at all). So we guessed in advance the wind turbines in Somerset PA might be off. Sure enough, the turbines were not spinning.

Leave a Reply