4th of July Ruminations upon the Income Gap

by James A. Bacon

America, we are being reminded on this 4th of July, was a lot more equal in the time of John Adams and Benjamin Franklin than it is today. Historical research suggests that the Top 1% accounted for 8.5% of the proto-nation’s income in 1776 versus 20% today — a difference that is lamented by the left and the right alike.

There are many possible explanations of why the wealth gap has increased. One is that the income tax rate isn’t nearly high enough. But that won’t fly because the embryonic United States had no income tax at all. Indeed, insofar as the young nation relied primarily upon custom duties for revenue, the tax system was highly regressive.

Another, more plausible reason is that Americans had more equal access to what Karl Marx referred to as the “means of production.” In an overwhelmingly agrarian society, most Americans made a living by farming. And, other than slaves, most Americans owned their own land. Land wasn’t handed out for free — the Homestead Act with its 40 acres and a mule came later. There was no Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Department of Agriculture or Department of Housing and Urban Development. Yet land surveyed, platted, marketed and financed by land speculators was cheap enough that nearly everyone could buy a farm.

Indeed, it is no accident that income equality existed in the absence of large, overweening government. It’s an iron rule of human nature: Special interests seek to wield the power of government to advance their interests over those of the general public (always for the most altruistic sounding of reasons). As the U.S. government expanded its authority over more of the economy, more of the economy became subject to rent seeking. Government today is a massive wealth-redistribution machine. Every element of society — the poor, the rich, the middle-class — gets a piece of the action. But some — think Wall Street bankers and other beneficiaries of crony capitalism — get a bigger share than others.

Finally, I would take note of a little-remarked phenomenon: the decline of civil society. As Alexis de Tocqueville famously observed, in the absence of government, Americans joined all manner of associations and organizations to accomplish collectively what they could not individually. In the early 19th century, Americans had the most vibrant civil society in the world. The steady expansion of government has suffocated civil society — and nowhere is the  paucity more evident than in communities (inner cities, poor rural counties) that depend most upon government transfer payments for income.

As government income-redistribution schemes have displaced not only civil society but in many instances the family, the poor have become the most sociologically atomized, the most devoid of civic institutions and, consequently, the most helpless and hapless, citizens in American history.

A recent New York Times article quotes Thomas Jefferson as writing in 1814:

We have no paupers. The great mass of our population is of laborers; our rich, who can live without labor, either manual or professional, being few, and of moderate wealth. Most of the laboring class possess property, cultivate their own lands, have families, and from the demand for their labor are enabled to exact from the rich and the competent such prices as enable them to be fed abundantly, clothed above mere decency, to labor moderately and raise their families.

Remarkable. America had no welfare, yet it had no paupers. Today, government redistributes hundreds of billions of dollars every year to the poor, yet the number of unsheltered homeless people numbers 250,000. Work has become less demanding physically than when Americans chopped down trees and plowed their fields, yet the number of Americans living upon disability payments now numbers 8.7 million.

Our material condition has advanced greatly in the past 237 years but the spirit of self reliance and mutual aid, subsumed by the leviathan state, has sorely eroded. We are not the people we once were. And with that cheerful thought, I bid you to enjoy your 4th of July holiday!


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

  1. larryg Avatar

    what role did the advent of a progressive tax system have on the wealth distribution?

    Does it no longer do what it was intended to do or do we now reject the legitimacy of the purpose of it to start with?

  2. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    Jim Bacon has a remarkable imagination. He can see the many, many faults of the national government. Yet, he can’t see a single thing wrong with the state government.

    Talk about income redistribution – Richmond is the epicenter of income redistribution. And Virginia was once the absolute gem of these United States. Easily the most successful colony and most successful state in the early days of the nation. Where are we now? Number 40 in 2011 state GDP growth. Where is the state of Thomas Jefferson? Dead last in competitiveness of state elections. One of only four states where anybody or any corporation can donate unlimited funds to politicians. One of only two states where part-time legislators who are practicing attorneys elect the very judges who preside over their cases.

    Wake up, Jim – the national government has no monopoly on corruption. Corruption in government is very much alive and well in River City.

    1. Don said, “Jim Bacon has a remarkable imagination. He can see the many, many faults of the national government. Yet, he can’t see a single thing wrong with the state government.”

      That is a ridiculous statement. I routinely chronicle the failings of state and local government. I just draw attention to different failings than the ones you do.

  3. Hydra Avatar

    OK, Jim, there are many governments in other countries which are as old or nearly as old, as our own and some are more intrusive. Yet in many other countries the multiple of CEO pay to worker pay is on the order of 10 to 40. In the US it is close to 150.

    It appears that the “growth of government” theory has nothing to do with income inequality.

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      Hydra:

      Re: CEO pay. Sort the following article by “utilities” as type of company.

      Who do you think is the highest paid CEO from a utility company on the list?

      http://projects.nytimes.com/executive_compensation

      You know the answer. Of course it’s Richmond-based Dominion, the country eighth largest electrical producer (by MWHrs).

      In fact, it appears that Thomas Farrell II (why do all Richmonders have Roman numerals or initials in their names?) is paid about twice as much as the next highest paid utility CEO.

      America’s largest electrical generator (The Southern Company) pays it’s CEO about 1/2 what Dominion pays Farrell. Yet, The Southern Company generates about twice as much electricity.

      The third largest electricity producer (AEP) pays their CEO about 1/2 what Farrell gets paid. The Tennessee Valley Authority, a federal authority, generates the fourth most electricity and manages to do so while paying its CEO about 1/4 what Farrell makes. The fifth largest producer (Nextra Energy, formerly FPL) pays its CEO a bit more than half what Farrell makes. The sixth largest company, Excelon, checks in between half and two thirds of the Dominion CEO – depending on the year. Entergy, in seventh place, paid its CEO just over half of Farrell’s take.

      Of course, only Virginia, Oregon, Utah and Missouri have no caps on campaign contributions to state politicians.

      Dominion slathers money on Virginia’s politicians and Dominion’s top dog walks away with about twice as much compensation in 2010 as the seven CEO at bigger power producers.

      Jim Bacon will tell you this is a coincidence.

  4. Hydra Avatar

    Work has become less demanding physically than when Americans chopped down trees and plowed their fields, yet the number of Americans living upon disability payments now numbers 8.7 million.

    =======================================

    Mainly because they no longer die at age 47 due to overwork, and also due to advances in medicine and improeved health care. Go look at the bones of some of those folks: they were worn out.

    If I had lived in the good old days you describe, I would have been dead n my late twenties, and dead again in my late forties. Instead, I survived both those battles and I will live to be (ultimately disabled) in my seventies.

    1. Wrong. Very few people died of “overwork.” They died mainly because of infectious disease and other medical maladies that the science of the time was unable to solve.

      I’m sure you would have been dead in your late twenties. I would have been dead in my 30s, of a burst appendix. But that is utterly beside the point… unless you are saying that, in the absence of the leviathan state constructed around rent seeking and transfers of wealth, medical progress would have inexplicably come to a halt.

  5. Hydra Avatar

    As Alexis de Tocqueville famously observed, in the absence of government, Americans joined all manner of associations and organizations to accomplish collectively what they could not individually.

    ============================================

    Yet we all know how evil collectivism is (unless it is corporate collectivism). If there are things that need done collectively, what is wrong with government doing them?

    1. Very simple. Voluntary associations of individuals joining to pursue collective action are… voluntary. Collective action under the auspices of government, inevitably requiring the exaction of taxes, is involuntary.

      “Collectivism” isn’t evil because it pursues collective ends. It is evil because it is by its nature coercive.

  6. larryg Avatar

    ” “Collectivism” isn’t evil because it pursues collective ends. It is evil because it is by its nature coercive”

    so organizations like the Boy Scouts, Veterans of Foreign Wars, Chess Clubs are “coercive” ?

    The US Army is “coercive”

    I see some mismatches here in word meanings……

    by your definition – all governance is “coercive” even private versions.

    the opposite of this is anarchy, right?

  7. Larry, evidently you neglected to read the previous two sentences: “Voluntary associations of individuals joining to pursue collective action are… voluntary. Collective action under the auspices of government, inevitably requiring the exaction of taxes, is involuntary.”

    Boy Scouts are voluntary. VFW is voluntary. Chess clubs are voluntary.

    The U.S. Army , by its nature as the agent of the state providing for collective security, is coercive. Any comparisons with boy scouts are spurious and argumentative!

  8. larryg Avatar

    okay.. mea culpa.

    Is your mortgage company “coercive” when they make you buy homeowners insurance?

    Is the State “coercive” when they make you buy auto insurance?

    Is the locality “coercive” when they make you buy a dog tag or business license?

    the “coercive” word basically implies that govt is wrong/bad/liberty-sucking because it is “coercive”….

    Any and all government is in fact “coercive” but the word is not used uniformly to describe any/all govt but instead specific rules and regs that are disliked by certain people.

    so they’ll pay their property taxes then claim that the tax on alcohol is “coercive”.

    I find that basically discriminatory and inflammatory when it’s used to attack SOME things but not others even though both are equally “coercive”.

    it’s a bomb-throwing word that often comes from those who oppose govt.

  9. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    Jim Bacon’s point regarding disability payments seems well taken:

    http://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/statcomps/supplement/2011/6c.html

    While people getting “worn out” and dying young may have dramatically affected the number of people on disability in the 1800s, it is hard to understand the increase from 1983 to today. In 1982, 3.3 disability awards were made per 1,000 insured workers. By 2010 that number had soared to 7.0.

    The real run up seems to have started in about 1990.

  10. larryg Avatar

    the disability payments problem is not only real – the disability fund in SS is broke because of it.

    but I let Jim skate on the phrase “voluntary association” and “coercive”

    Unless you are going to live on your own island never to leave it – as a hermit – you are going to engage in “voluntary associations” in any of the 200+ countries in the world.

    There are “rules” for everything, govt, private, corporate, and “voluntary”.

    The most benign govt in the world, the least intrusive govt in the world exercises “coercion” and you can usually leave that country if you don’t like their brand of “coercion” (not all but most).

    So what’s the real point of using the word “coercive” in the context of ANY kind of governance in the first place?

    Since ALL of govt, by definition is “coercive” in ALL of it’s actions – why do we select out SOME of their actions as being more “coercive” than it ought to be – ESPECIALLY when not everyone agrees with that when it comes to things like health care and other entitlements?

    Isn’t this just another partisan-tinged rant coming from one group who don’t like the “coercive” rules the other group …likes and wants?

    What is the likely outcome of a dialogue on that basis?

    Usually, often, it ends up with the one side telling the other “just wait til our guys get in charge” and until then we’ll just block everything.

    the best thing that could happen to the US would be for the Conservatives to split into two parties as they have in other countries and then for governance to occur by coalitions of the 3 groups – a Parliamentary type of Governance.

Leave a Reply