Many meaty stories from the Commonwealth Transportation Board meeting today. It will take me a long time to do them all justice, so, for the moment, I will settle for whetting your appetite with the highlights.

  • The Charlottesville Bypass is dead. It may not be buried — a few ritual oblations remains — but it is lying in the coroner’s office. The McAuliffe administration has tasked a Rt. 29 Advisory Panel, headed by former highway commissioner Philip Shucet, to develop recommendations for improving mobility through the U.S. 29 corridor in the Charlottesville area that fits the state’s current budget parameters. The group will examine a wide variety of options. However, Shucet said, “The bypass is not something we would consider.”
  • Can we get that $300 million back? Transportation Secretary Aubrey Layne announced earlier this week that he has suspended spending on the U.S. 460 Connector on the grounds that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has warned that it may not grant a critical environmental permit. He noted that the state had spent roughly $300 million so far, about $60 million for Virginia Department of Transportation oversight, $100 million for environmental work by the contractor, US 460 Mobility, and another $140 million for the contractor’s “mobilization,” which includes opening and staffing offices in preparation for the work to begin. VDOT will consider alternative routes, including upgrades to the existing U.S. 460. Layne told Bacon’s Rebellion that he could not now say how much of that $300 million could be recovered. “If it’s a different alignment, we’ll have to negotiate with the contractor.”
  • VTrans is reappraising its forecast methodology. The Secretariat of Transportation, which oversees the VTrans long-range planning process for Virginia’s transportation needs, is implementing the biggest overhaul in its forecasting methodology seen in years. Past forecasts of future transportation demand largely extrapolated from previous trends. But Deputy Transportation Secretary Nick Donohue told the CTB that past projections overshot actual demand by a wide margin. This time around, he said, planners would take into account indicators of changing demand such as Americans’ increasing preference for walkable communities, the declining interest of teenagers in acquiring a driver’s license, and the surge in multifamily housing construction.
  • Expand the Washington Metro… or build an extra 110 lane-miles of highway? The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority wants Virginia, Maryland and Washington, D.C., to kick in an extra $6.1 billion to fund its aggressive Metro 2025 capital improvement program, requiring annual average contribution in $190 million a year more from each state by 2021. Expanding the number of cars per train to eight, WMATA Richard Sarles told the CTB, would increase people-moving capacity in the region by the equivalent of adding two lanes to Interstate 66 or building 110 lane-miles of highway.

— JAB


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

8 responses to “Busy Day at the CTB”

  1. Please note that sec layne gave Shucet until may 14 to come up with better, doable projects to address congestion on 29N around Charlottesville in order to use the $200 million already set aside because of the “bypass” fiasco. Since former commissioner Shucet already knows the history, all the research, and is under such a tight time frame in his “charge,” he will no doubt recgnize that building what we call places29 is the smartest use of this money.

  2. Breckinridge Avatar
    Breckinridge

    When next I’m sitting stopped dead cold on I-64 between Jefferson Avenue and Fort Useless Boulevard (and not just on summer weekends), I will console myself with the factoid about teenagers not seeking their driver’s licenses and all that multifamily construction….

  3. Apparently – there is “stuff” going on inside of VDOT now that Connaughton has left the “room”…

    460 has gone down and now the Cville Bypass.. what’s next? the Dulles Airport access road or the Bi County Parkway.

    My view of the part of VDOT that does new roads is not kind.

    how they go about justifying a new road is often just totally convoluted and political.

    the public does not understand how they do business and they apparently don’t give a rip about the public nor the resource agencies like the Army Corp.

    It’s almost like they are a rogue agency inside of VDOT.

    and it makes me wonder if Lane and Shucet know it and are attempting a little house cleaning.

    When you have an agency – that is supposed to be coordinating with other agencies – resource agencies and their response is to construct a strategy to use PPTA or just outright try to do ignore the Army Corp and/or do end runs around them… to try to not do NEPA as it was intended … to attempt to use decade old data as the basis of their “study”… they’ve got issues.

    one or more folks from that part of VDOT needs to seek “other opportunities” and perhaps this is the time where they are being appraised of such.

    What the public wants is an honest, straight forward approach – that they can understand – even if they do not agree with it.

    what they’ve got is a totally arrogant process… that demeans and discounts public input.

    time for change.

  4. Larry- I think you’re right about the “house cleaning” going on at VDOT.

    There is no getting around the feds and I have no idea what the old regime was thinking. I wonder if Connaughton was asleep at the wheel while the “consultants” were driving the bus, and feeding from the trough at the same time (if those two clichés can work simultaneously). Whatever the case, the fact that arguably the two most high-profile road projects in the state were so grossly mismanaged is nothing short of embarrassing, for all involved. Especially since it was just last year when the former governor signed off on a bill to boost transportation spending through tax increases. Virginia’s roads need the funds, I won’t argue otherwise, but it does make you wonder whether this money is in good hands at VDOT. Hopefully the new administration can get things turned in the right direction, we’ll see.

    And as far as VA kicking in more money to WMATA- let’s make sure the Silver Line gets built on time and within budget. “Then we’ll talk”, as they say…

    1. I need to make clear also – and again – that the other parts of VDOT are exemplary in their mission – we have one of the best, most cost effective, maintained and operated road systems in the entire 50 states.

      but for more than a decade.. approaching two decades, the part of VDOT that builds new location roads has embarked on a strategy to evade and avoid doing NEPA studies and have gotten away with it sometimes especially when they use PPTA so they can label much of the analysis as “proprietary”.

      and the thing about NEPA is that most folks think it is an environmental document that can (and is sometimes) used by NIMBY’s to slow down and derail a controversial projects – but environmental is only one part of NEPA.

      NEPA requires a statement of Purpose and Need. This is much more than some pretty words because in NEPA – the analyses not only has to show how their preferred option effectively fulfills the purpose but it also requires alternatives to do the same and then all alternatives compared across the board. It allows the public via their elected officials to include alternatives they would like to see included and it includes alternatives the resource agencies would propose to avoid natural resources, and finally it includes alternatives that may show less impacts on the built environment – like hospitals, schools, parks,, etc.

      It does not quite get to the ROI that Jim Bacon advocates but it does require a substantiative analysis that will yield actual benefits vice puffery and actual impacts rather than minimizing them.

      Not to hammer only VDOT, NEPA has fallen out of favor with other states also and is feared as a project “stopper” for special interest roads and roads of questionable premise.

      NEPA is a Federal rule and if the State wanted to use only State funds to construct a road – they can avoid or minimize the influence of NEPA but as I’ve pointed out – NEPA is a comprehensive analysis that really does take a hard look at the purpose, the alternatives, the benefits and impacts and it has a well known protocol that consultants offer as a standard product. Just hire the company and turn them lose to do the NEPA.

      Finally, NEPA does not require that the “best” alternative be picked. NEPA only requires the analyses. The sponsoring agency is free after NEPA to pick any of or none of the alternatives in NEPA – but what they cannot do after a NEPA document is created – is … ignore it… once the public and the resource agencies have seen it – and that’s the problem that VDOT has with it.

      it generates a lot of useful information about the viability and cost-effectiveness of various alternatives – and some folks in the road building business have never agreed that the public should be involved at that level and that’s it’s primarily an engineering discipline and getting non-engineering people involved just screws up the process.. makes it hard, more complicated and worst of oil – the engineers have to justify their actions!

      NEPA, by he way is not only done just for roads. Many proposals from many agencies go through NEPA – like, for instance, how to manage water flows on western rivers or build a new dam, etc.

      It’s fundamentally – a requirement to do a cost-effective, cost-benefit study for a major proposal.

      If they had actually done one for Cville, it would have included at least 4 alternatives – the bypass, the base case (do nothing but look at downstream impacts), the Places 29 and likely an eastern Bypass.

      and at the end – rather than speculation about Places 29 – there would have been facts and analysis in comparison to the other alternatives.

      NEPA can also be as simple as a FONSI – Findings of No Significant Impact (FONSI) but in order to make that claim – as a conclusion, it must be agreed to by the resource agencies, the public and FHWA.

      I understand the frustration of VDOT but the reality is that since they embarked on this course of action to evade doing NEPA – their performance in addressing new roads – has been not particularly wonderful.. as we basically have ended up with many projects that have twisted and turned and never really moved forward – or moved to a point – like US 460 and the Cville bypass where they just grind to a halt.. and many millions of dollars have been burned in the process.. great for consultants, bad for taxpayers and payers of the fuel tax.

      1. Just curious, Larry, what is the history of NEPA compliance in, say, NC, where everywhere you look there is (or has recently been) major highway construction. Doesn’t that suggest that NEPA is a hurdle, not a show-stopper?

        1. NEPA in NC involves the resource agencies like the Army Corp from the get go.

          NEPA does not dictate the decision – the agency who proposes the action does and it can be without full concurrence of the other agencies. FHWA has approved projects that had objections from resource agencies.

          But FHWA won’t generally approve a proposal if they feel the NEPA process has been faulty – for instance.. using 20 year old data in an analysis.

          In NC – last I heard – if the resource agencies are opposed to a path -it’s known early on because they are explicitly involved early on – and compromise paths are sought.

          wetlands is not necessarily a show stopper either.. if the purpose and need are deemed critical – and there are no ‘practical alternatives’ – they can go forward.

          but the important thing is not even necessarily the natural environment – it can simply be – will the proposed action actually deliver the claimed performance? Is it cost-effective? are the benefits higher/better than the impacts?

          US 460 and Cville Bypass had obvious issues .. and people are forgetting that neither was killed.. both are thinking about other alternatives – which is the purpose of a NEPA-type analysis.

          I personally do not think “Places 29” is going to fix Rt 29 for folks who don’t live in Cville and are trying to get through it… but I don’t think putting a road through the residential areas of the Cville area is going to work either unless it’s chock-a-block with sound walls and similar … I still wonder abou other alternatives.. we have belts that swing out 5-10 miles away from urban areas to get around them… why not Cville? That’s essentially what they did down Lynchburg way.. and that’s not flat terrain either.

  5. […] are starting to see that VDOT has a road fat crisis, proposing waste project after waste project instead of reviewing what the root causes of the congestion is. This comes both from a fundamental […]

Leave a Reply