by Joe Fitzgerald

The only thing I remember from Howard Fast’s Lavette family saga is from the fourth book, The Legacy. A pragmatic leftist organizer is registering Black voters in Mississippi with two dewy-eyed liberals, and an older couple invites the three into their home. They drink coffee and the two liberals talk about the high-flown principles behind what they’re doing and what great things they hope to do for the Black community in the South.

The pragmatic leftist sees two things wrong. First, the couple is already registered; the organizers should move on to someone who’s not. Second, they’re drinking a week’s worth of coffee from a couple too proud to say anything.

Fast could be heavy-handed in his writing — but he made a good point. The people who thought they were doing the couple a favor just didn’t get it. The dew is in the eyes of proponents of the Bluestone Town Center (BTC) today.

Consider. The chair of the Planning Commission, in what was almost an aside, dismissed the concerns of neighbors of the planned development by saying they didn’t understand what it was like to need housing. The obvious question: how the hell does he know? He has no knowledge of these people other than that they’re opposed to a project he’d already decided to vote for before the meeting began. Somehow he knows what they do and do not understand.

Another planning commissioner said the opponents came from a place of privilege. Same question. How the hell does she know? Two of the strongest opponents of the project grew up in trailers. Our place of privilege is something we worked for.

Finally, a city resident apparently chosen at random by the Daily News-Record says that people opposed to the project don’t understand the need for it. How the hell does she know? That question could also be a reply to her assertion that “[Harrisonburg Redevelopment and Housing Authority] and city staff can address rational concerns and still get things done right.”

Of course, they can. Although it’s worth noting that the concerns raised by two JMU scientists, Eric Pyle on geology and Jeremy Akers on airborne poultry contaminants, seemed like a surprise to HRHA and EquityPlus. HRHA’s chief addressed the health concerns by saying he grew up near a poultry farm and never got sick. Good for him. The geology concerns went unaddressed.

The former HRHA chair, now a city council member, has pushed the project as supplying housing for teachers and police officers. Members of both groups have said privately that they don’t necessarily want to live in the area they serve. Maybe the council members supporting BTC could give both groups a $12,000 annual raise to offset their housing costs. It would cost more than what BTC will cost the city but would have the fringe benefit of making it easier to recruit cops and teachers.

The other new council member, Monica Robinson, said she would reach out to the constituents targeted as needing affordable housing. This is the first time we know of that anyone in the process has suggested that. She’s the first to ask what they want, instead of what the dewy-eyed liberals think they need.

Finally, someone gets it. And those who would lead based on their own ideology are the ones who truly don’t understand the issue.
Let’s hope they don’t drink a week’s worth of coffee as part of their service.

Joe Fitzgerald is a former mayor of Harrisonburg. This column is a follow-up to an earlier column posted January 16. It is republished with permission from his blog, Still Not Sleeping.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

19 responses to “Drink Their Coffee, Then the Kool-Aid”

  1. I wasn’t familiar with the project, so I looked it up. There was a comment at the bottom of the article I found interesting.

    Elduque Jan 31, 2023 10:35am
    City Council, are you listening? The last time one of these controversial “done deals” went against community input (golf course) we got us a brand new council at the next election!

    Here’s the article:

    Bluestone Town Center Proposal Sparks Disagreement As Decision Date Looms

    https://www.dnronline.com/dnronline/bluestone-town-center-proposal-sparks-disagreement-as-decision-date-looms/article_81499142-a372-5596-a7a4-de12e6cd855c.html

    1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      Noticed the golf course abutting the planned development… probably gonna ruin the view from the 9th hole tee, eh…

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        If you ain’t looking at the pin or the ball, you’re not gonna have a fun time playing golf anyway.

        Strange game golf; the objective being to spend 4 hours in an effort to play as little golf as possible.

  2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “The geology concerns went unaddressed.”

    And unidentified herein… what concerns did the professor raise? Just curious, I have no horse in this race…

    1. Thanks for asking. It led me to look it up. That’s one of the biggest reasons this project is problematic. See my comments below.

  3. Teddy007 Avatar

    Nimbys can always find reasons. If one’s political goal is to address every concern, then the project will never happen and in reality, nothing new will happen. The entire point of NIMBY’s is to use the existing system to give incumbent veto power over non-incumbents.

    1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      The NIMBY criticism is on the mark… until it is in your backyard, of course… lol…

      1. Teddy007 Avatar

        Almost no one is a progressive about their own neighborhood unless they are young, without kids, and planning on moving anyway. The Urban Institute uses a data point of the ratio of 4 y/o’s to 7 y/o to show how many progressives are really not that progressives. When a progressive married couple with children has a child reach the age of four, the question becomes to they send their child to the local public school that is 65% immigrant, to the $10k a year Catholoci school, or the $25k a year Episcopalian school, or move further out into the suburbs where there are homeowners associations and planned communities along with school choice.

        1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          How does the Urban Institute identify political ideology with what sounds like a GIS platform…?

          1. Teddy007 Avatar

            They do not. However, one can match zip code with voting patterns for that zip code. That is how GIS is used for redistricting and is why political scientist have coined the term “the great sorting.” As an side, I heard a talk from one of the quants at the Center for American Progress who pointed out that one form of redistricting (draw the tightest most compat district when possible) would lead to fewer Democrats being elected because of how dense the Democrats are in the urban cores.

  4. Big oversight not to include Pyle’s comments. From https://www.wmra.org/2023-01-19/communities-developers-clash-over-housing-proposals-in-harrisonburg-charlottesville :

    ERIC PYLE: No one disagrees that there could be development in that area. … but just the scale is what sort of knocks everybody back on their heels.

    Pyle teaches geology at James Madison University, and lives near the proposed development. He said that the fractured limestone geology of this area poses a number of hazards for high-density development, including underground pinnacles of rock –
    PYLE:… and they’re just solid things that you either have to blast or you have to use one of those big backhoe-mounted hammers, percussion, just going tap-tap-tap-tap-tap.”
    – as well as underground water flow –

    PYLE: … where you can see sinkholes develop. Just off the property, at the south end of the golf course, you can walk right past a sinkhole.

    1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      Unless groundwater is being used as a drinking water source (I assume it is not) karst really only creates a building foundation hazard. Much of the Valley is karst, btw.

      1. I said nothing about drinking water. Building a 900-unit development on carbonite karst where at least part of the development is in a floodplain seems like a heavy duty risk, especially when sinkholes are already known to exist in the area.

        1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          I did not say you did. I was outlining the risks of developing in karst (aside… carbonate… carbonite is an explosive😳). You are correct that they should not be developing in floodplain but I doubt they are… zoning ordinances should address that. So really this is a geotechnical foundation risk I would really be surprised if that has not been addressed in the application. If it hasn’t been then the PC is negligent in their approval.

  5. HRHA’s chief addressed the health concerns by saying he grew up near a poultry farm and never got sick.

    Anyone who is not convinced by that logic is immune to reason…

    😉

  6. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Oooh, good start for a murder mystery. Lemme see, so the old folks turn out to be an Old Lace and Arsenic couple who using spiked coffee and an fraudulent insurance scheme enrich themselves by offing door-to-door visitors…

    Good luck to you guys. Tough to stop City-backed developers. I like the poultry farm angle. Oh yeah, everyone wants to live downwind from one of those; right up there with hog farms and slaughter houses.

    The biggest mistake I ever made while driving was going up Rte. 13 on the E. Shore past the Tyson’s plant, and not getting the AC vent changed from “fresh” to “recycle” fast enough. First instinct when that stuff hits the olfactory nerves is to open the windows… WRONG.

    1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      The issue to me is if the PC were to nix a planned development because of health concerns from nearby poultry operations, it raises the question of why any houses are allowed near them. To me, if it really is a health concern, a zoning ordinance amendment is called for…

  7. What about the flood risks? How did the developer get FEMA to cave on the floodplain map? From the same WMRA article: “As one city staffer wrote in a 2021 email, almost 70% of the property is in the floodway, and [quote] “we are deeply opposed to narrowing the regulatory floodway without exhaustive justification, especially for residential development.”
    From FEMA Letter of Map Revision:
    COMMUNITY REMINDERS
    We based this determination on the 1-percent-annual-chance discharges computed in the hydrologic model approved in LOMR 16-03-1207P, effective February 6, 2017. Future development of projects upstream could cause increased discharges, which could cause increased flood hazards. A comprehensive restudy of your community’s flood hazards would consider the cumulative effects of development on discharges and could, therefore, indicate that greater flood hazards exist in this area.
    https://map1.msc.fema.gov/mipdata/21-03-0301P-510006.pdf?LOC=e25b74632f2c2074b9b613e64679dfa9
    Maybe they figure the flood waters will drain into the sinkholes…along with a house or two?

  8. HRHA’s chief addressed the health concerns by saying he grew up near a poultry farm and never got sick.

    Anyone who is not convinced by that logic is immune to reason…

    😉

Leave a Reply