Wojick on Whales III: The Noisy Driving of Piles

Tethys, wife of Oceanus and mother of the river gods.

by David Wojick

The Virginia wind-versus-whales story has taken a turn for the worse. Worse for the severely endangered Right Whales that is. My research has found what may be some really bad news.

Meet Tethys. Not the real Tethys, the mythical Greek Titan of the sea, but the U.S. Department of Energy’s center for reporting research on the environmental impact of energy technology on sea life, including whales. This is the science side of DOE (where I used to work), not the Ocean Energy development side.

Tethys has some profoundly disturbing things to say about offshore wind and really loud underwater noise. Noise that could well adversely affect the North Atlantic Right Whales.

It is all about pile driving, or in this case tower driving. The hundreds of huge offshore wind towers and substations proposed for Virginia do not have poured concrete foundations like onshore towers do. Instead they are literally driven into the solid seabed by floating pile drivers. The lower part of the tower is designed to be driven.

In fact these driven-in tower bottoms are called “monopiles”. Here is what Tethys says about them, from “Fixed offshore wind.”

The environmental concerns associated with offshore wind farms vary with foundation type. Monopiles, for example, require pile-driving, which produces incredibly loud noises that tend to propagate far in the water, even after mitigation strategies such as bubble shields, slow start, and acoustic cladding are employed.

Note that not only are the wind tower pile driving noises incredibly loud, but the available mitigation technologies do not change that fact.

As a sometime civil engineer, who has worked with much smaller onshore pile driving, I can attest that it is very loud. It ranges from deafening to damaging if proper headgear is not worn. The Whales will have no such protective gear.

Importantly, Tethys says this about mitigation in a discussion titled “Noise”:

Measures to reduce noise impacts in the marine environment include the use of bubble curtains during pile driving and careful siting and timing of construction activities to avoid species’ critical migration routes and times.

So a standard mitigation measure is to time construction to avoid adversely impacting migration. In short, do not drive monopiles during migration. This is exactly what Virginia should do to protect the severely endangered Right Whales, and certainly should be included in the upcoming Environmental Impact Assessment as a mitigation measure.

What no-driving mitigation might cost depends on how much time the 400 or so migrating whales spend in offshore Virginia waters. That it is a relatively long time may be why BOEM has not released data it sought in an earlier outsourced report, subject of my previous post on Bacon’s Rebellion.

Tethys makes it clear that noise from offshore wind is a very serious matter, saying this:

Sound propagates farther and faster in water than in air, which can result in greater consequences for the marine environment. Coupled with the many other sources of anthropogenic noise in the marine environment (e.g., ships, seismic studies), the noise from offshore wind and marine renewable energy devices may impact many marine species. Noise may interfere with marine organisms’ communication, navigation, detection of prey, and ability to interact with their environment, as well as causing attraction to or avoidance of devices. Additionally, some marine organisms may be physically harmed from excessive noise exposure (e.g., tissue and nerve damage).

Noise is bad and driving the towers into the sea floor is by far the worst of that bad thing.

This will also be true for the other monster offshore wind arrays planned along the Mid-Atlantic migration route of the severely endangered North Atlantic Right Whales.

David Wojick, Ph.D. is an independent analyst working at the intersection of science, technology and policy. He has been on the faculty of Carnegie Mellon University and the staffs of the U.S. Office of Naval Research and the Naval Research Lab.  This article was originally published at cfact.org. 


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

68 responses to “Wojick on Whales III: The Noisy Driving of Piles”

  1. We’ll see if the eco-wackos really care about ALL of the earth and its inhabitants… or are they willing to kill whales to get their $7,500 rebate on their $70K EVs.

  2. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    How does it compare to an oil survey? Drilling? Or, the driving of piles on the beach to build beach houses and hotels a scant 30 miles away?

    1. WayneS Avatar

      I’m not saying drilling noises are not harmful, I’d guess pile-driving is significantly louder than drilling,

      With pile-driving on the beach, there is at least some ‘earth’ between the impact noises and the water, which should deaden the noise somewhat.

      It’s obvious we don’t really know exactly how much anthropogenic ocean noises affects sea life.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        You mean the same earth that’s under the water?

        1. WayneS Avatar

          Yes. But as I said, it provides some attenuation. Sound waves emanating directly into water travel very far and are not attenuated anywhere near as well as in solid substances such as sand, rock and soil.

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Just ripping on you. The first time I did an ocean passage, my mother voiced her apprehension of going offshore in a 33′ boat. I said, “Don’t worry, Mom, we’ll never be more than a mile from land.”

      2. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Well, assuming it’s equal to sea life noises affecting me; those damn whale songs always start when the 11 o’clock news comes on and I can barely hear the TV. Of course, I suppose they might be police and ambulance sirens.

        1. WayneS Avatar

          You should learn there language. Maybe they are broadcasting more interesting and useful news than the talking heads on TV.

          By the way, have you ever read a novel called Fluke, by Christopher Moore? It’s subtitle is: “I Know Why the Winged Whale Sings”.

          It is a funny, quirky and interesting take on whales and whale songs.

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            I just always assumed it was only female whales. Now, gotta close this window before the spouse sees it, besides she’s saying something.

    2. These monopiles are enormous and have to go very far into very hard material in order to keep those giant windmills straight up in a hurricane. The noise must be incredible given the forces involved. Driving many small piles to hold up a pier or waterfront building should be as nothing in comparison.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        DO you realize that the turbines can be tethered to the ocean floor and that they are “feathered” during high winds.

        https://www.powermag.com/dynamic-export-cables-help-unlock-potential-of-offshore-wind-power/#:~:text=While%20conventional%20submarine%20cables%20are,characterized%20by%20excellent%20mechanical%20strength.

        Also , do you realize that the CBBT was built with pile-drivers and it’s hurricane design is only for a CAT 2?

      2. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        I know. They’re huge. And, I am really not unsympathetic, but in the long run, the building of the farm is a nit compared to what we do to them everyday. “More ground plastic on your krill, Mr. Dick, Sir?”

        Since it’s along the migration route, a pounding hiatus is always an option. You don’t hang pictures at 2AM, now do you?

  3. WayneS Avatar

    I wonder if Bose would be interested in developing noise-cancelling headphones for the whales…

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Whale, isle beef hooked. I suppose if they could do that, then they could develop the hush-a-boom pile driver.

      Vodka and…
      OJ — a screwdriver.
      Milk of magnesia — a Phillips screwdriver.
      ExLax — a pile driver.

  4. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    we got how many offshore oil platforms? Have they been evaluated with respect to their impacts ?

    do folks know the NUMBER 1 killer of right whales?

    ship collisions.

    this reminds me of the earlier claim that wind turbines would “kill” birds…

    none of these “concerned” folks were worried about right whales and ship collisions before wind turbines came along.

    hypocrisy much?

    1. One of the fears I list is that avoiding all this noise could drive the whales into the nearby shipping lanes, thus increasing collisions. The whales might not even be able to hear the ships coming. This is true of operating turbine arrays as well, which research suggests sound like ships.

      There are efforts to reduce ship collisions, like lower ship speed limits within 20 miles of land. But while we need ships we do not need offshore wind. Lining the East Coast with these monsters is ridiculous.

      Note there are also lots of migrating shore birds, other marine mammals, etc. The Virginia Aquarium features whale and dolphin spotting boat rides. Right whales are just the endangered tip of a very large living iceberg.

      I want to see an honest EIA and if the whales are threatened these windmills should not be built. It is that simple.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        re: ” The whales might not even be able to hear the ships coming. This is true of operating turbine arrays as well, which research suggests sound like ships.”

        so they can’t hear either the turbines or the ships but the turbines can scare them into the ships?

        say that again?

        On NEPA, Do you know how NEPA works? It does not render a decision. What it requires is a full investigation and disclosure of impacts. The Agency can STILL decide to go forward despite the impacts or it can (and usually) take steps to mitigate.

        I would expect, for instance, if we did a NEPA on ships and collisions with whales that we’d NOT end up banning ships from the ocean but instead further investigate and understand how to mitigate and reduce impacts.

        That’s the real purpose of NEPA. It does not allow the agencies to not identify the impacts and that’s how the enviros and other opponents trip them up by finding research data that was not incorporated into the NEPA doc.

        Google how NEPA works…

    2. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      The turbines are killing monstrous amounts of birds, including eagles and condors.

      https://apnews.com/article/b8dd6050c702467e8be4b1272a3adc87
      https://abcbirds.org/blog21/wind-turbine-mortality/

      If the mitigation plan is simply to stop construction for X number of weeks twice per year, will that push the completion out and what will that cost ratepayers? Is that in the current plan? I think not.

      Never has so much stupidity been engendered by a total lie, this claim of catastrophic climate change.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        condors? really? ” Condors can now primarily be found in central southern California deserts, where they roost on rocky cliffs. There are also populations in Arizona, Utah, and Mexico.”

        bzzzzttt..

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Thanks for the article.

            also in your article:

            ” announced a draft plan five years in the making to allow an energy company to kill a small number of condors at a southern California wind farm. To get the permit, which would apply only to condors killed incidentally (as opposed to intentionally), the company would have to fund efforts, costing millions of dollars, to both prevent condor-turbine collisions and ensure more condors are released to the wild.

            California Condors once ranged across North America. But a bevy of human impacts, including shooting, poisoning, egg collecting, and lead poisoning from ammo, largely driven by European colonizers, squeezed the birds into a narrower and narrower range. FWS listed the species as federally endangered in 1967 and launched a captive-breeding program in 1982. ”

            the point here is that many human activities have affected wildlife and birds , not just wind turbines.

            It’s an ongoing issue and the turbine folks are incorporating technology to detect and scare away the birds.

            Similar technology is being investigated for ships that collide with whales.

            I think you Conservative types don’t understand how this works and just fear monger it for effect.

            If we shut down every human activity that harmed wildlife, where would we be?

            Eagles are lost every day to automobiles, to fishing line, to poison, we address the issues but we don’t shut down roads or make fishing illegal or other nonsense.

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            DDT anyone?

          3. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            I know…. The Climate Deniers have become Environmentalists… who knew?

          4. Bubba1855 Avatar
            Bubba1855

            Nancy…don’t stop commenting…I love to hear what have to say, even if I don’t agree. It helps me keep a more balanced perspective.

          5. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            It’s memory. Something others refuse, or just fail, to exhibit.

      2. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Well, if half of those X weeks is when hurricanes are blowing through, it’s a win-win.

        Bird strikes are a problem. Just based on the number that fly into my Florida room windows, I can imagine there will be losses. Okay, I understand how the reflection of the bushes and the trees in my windows might fool them, but you’d think they’d try to avoid the other bird that’s flying straight at them.

        BTW, the hawks in my neighborhood have used my Florida room windows for their “killing field”. They panic the smaller birds and pick up any window strikes off the deck.

        1. WayneS Avatar

          BTW, the hawks in my neighborhood have used my Florida room windows for their “killing field”. They panic the smaller birds and pick up any window strikes off the deck.

          My mother had a cat that did the same thing.

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Our fellow travelers are way smarter than we think.

    3. Merchantseamen Avatar
      Merchantseamen

      B. S. on the ship collisions vs. whales. If a ship runs up on one it is already dead. A carcass that has not sunk to the depths yet to be devoured by other sea life.

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      Australia’s answer to Joe Biden. Confused, elliptical and perfectly willing to put forth incoherent theories.

      The whale died of old age.
      Was it an old whale?
      It would have to be to have died from old age.

      I was appointed to the US Naval Academy in 1965 (the year the buffoon actually graduated from the University of Delaware).

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        You should watch more of their act. I love them. Clarke died a few years back, but during the 90s, they were a staple at the end of news broadcasts.

  5. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    Some of the turbines in the North Sea are actually floating turbines anchored to the sea floor. That could be a solution for big brother Dominion to look into.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      yes. methinks the would-be opponents might have the proverbial cart before the horse in their ardor to find fatal flaws…to stop them.

    2. that’s a new approach meant for deeper water, like off the Pacific Coast.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        talking about off the Atlantic coast also…..

        1. Not anytime soon. First prototypes are in the water now in Europe. Floating wind needs minimum 20MW turbines to come close to being competitive even with subsidies in these early years, which isn’t really ‘competitive’. All energy resources get some type of subsidy, including O&G, which a lot of BR readers tend to overlook, but these big turbines are not ready yet.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            anchored oil platforms have been around for awhile, no?

            and yes, subsidies … for o&g

            the word on offshore is that it could well be the least expensive electricity – yet to be proven, I agree. That’s why what is going in now is more pilot than what some will admit.

          2. Sure, but the value density of the product coming out of an oil rig for outweighs a wind turbine.

        2. not anytime soon. too early for US east coast. It will happen on left coast first.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            perhaps, but it certainly is an option …

  6. James Kiser Avatar
    James Kiser

    Also consider the loud thrumming noise wind turbines make when operating not only will this be year round disturbing all wildlife including seabirds but it will also interfere with sonar operations of the US Navy. Enemy subs will probably make use of this noise as a shield against discovery.

    1. Lefty665 Avatar
      Lefty665

      Good question. What is the level and impact of the ongoing 24/7/365 operating noise?

      Chronic operational noise versus the acute noise of pile driving is a separate question. Any vibration in the base structure will translate into noise in the water all the way from the surface to the sea floor.

  7. It’s nice you are concerned for the whales. There’s over 15 GW of offshore wind in Europe. DOE has expressed a legitimate concern, but check European research to see if there’s a problem that’s been uncovered there. If would be good to get some hard data from a PhD.

    But this is a non issue. The simple mitigation is not pile during migration and when there are whales present. US Navy does it all the time prior to training exercises in California.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      https://windeurope.org/about-wind/daily-wind/electricity-mix

      So check that out, ARL. Per that website yesterday was as good OSW day in the North Sea, but look little of Europe’s electricity comes from that source, teeny tiny compared even to onshore wind. They clearly are not rushing down this road that Biden is so committed to.

      1. I’m not following. That chart shows roughly between 5 and 8 GW of online capacity. That’s roughly 2-3% of the covered region. That’s pretty significant. An equivalent amount in the US would be over 200 GW. Europe is way, way past where we are.

        Here’s an article from worldoil.com talking about global offshore wind (floating and fixed) growth. China and Europe leading the charge. US is following and will pay a heavy price from a future competitive perspective; nothing better than importing more manufactured goods from China and Europe.

        https://worldoil.com/magazine/2022/april-2022/features/global-offshore-wind-capacity-achieves-record-growth/

    2. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      https://windeurope.org/about-wind/daily-wind/electricity-mix

      So check that out, ARL. Per that website yesterday was as good OSW day in the North Sea, but look little of Europe’s electricity comes from that source, teeny tiny compared even to onshore wind. They clearly are not rushing down this road that Biden is so committed to.

  8. I’m not contradicting Wojick here, just trying to add to the knowledge base. When I went on the Dominion boat tour of the two experimental turbines a year or two ago, the subject of the whales came up. I noted two things: Dominion acknowledged that it would not be able to engage in the noisy pile driving during the whales’ migration season, which would have an impact on the construction schedule, and it talked very positively about the potential for air-bubble “curtains” to dampen the noise beyond the curtain. Bottom line: Dominion acknowledges that the problems are real. Dominion also sounded confident that it could mitigate the sound issue… which may or may not be the case.

    1. Matt Adams Avatar
      Matt Adams

      I’m sure they can mitigate it to what they think is negligible, however sonar proves you can only do so much.

      I think the aquatic life will suffer some damage from the reverberations from the pile driving.

  9. Bubba1855 Avatar
    Bubba1855

    Hey…all ‘public’ policies have consequences…almost all have unintended consequences. The ones that get heard have activists. Who speaks for the whales?

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Dory.

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Dory.

  10. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    Thanks for this discussion. In one of your earlier installments, I (and others) asked what were the specific dangers posed to whales by the installation of the turbines. Noise is a legitimate issue.

    Many conservatives get really upset when liberals and environmentalists use a threat to an endangered species to block projects. It would indeed be ironic if opponents of offshore wind and supporters of natural gas could use a threat to an endangered species (whales) to block the wind turbines. At the same time, supporters of offshore wind turbines on this blog are doing their best to downplay the potential danger to whales.

    This discussion of the endangered status of right whales reminds me of my favorite Star Trek movie, The Journey Home, in which Captain Kirk and crew have to go back in time to 20th century Earth to get a couple of humpback whales to save the future Earth because the whales are extinct in the future.

    1. YellowstoneBound1948 Avatar
      YellowstoneBound1948

      As everyone knows, FDR established the Tennessee Valley Authority, which dammed the Tennessee River over several decades. The entire project was a model of American industry and engineering. The River was tamed, unemployment plummeted, and local residents by the hundreds of thousands installed electric lights and were spared the annual flooding.

      However, nearing the end of the long project, there was one major hiccup.

      In building the Tellico Dam — a magnificent structure — a tiny two-inch fish was discovered in the water. We are talking about the infamous and rarely seen “snail darter.”

      Would the snail darter shut down the project? Read on, pilgrim.

      The emergence of the snail darter would be a perfect test case for the brand new (1973) Environmental Protection Act!

      Before long, construction came to a grinding halt, even though the snail darter had no commercial, ecological, or recreational importance. At the time, $100 million of your tax dollars had been spent building an unfinished hulk in the middle of the Tennessee River.

      (It was presumed that the snail darter was endangered. No one really knew. The snail darter was removed from the endangered species list last year.)

      In my opinion, delaying final construction of the Tellico Dam was indefensible. It was worse than that. It was madness.

      So, yes, I evaluate any attempt by the regulators to impose rules that favor one species at the expense of the human species. Especially when lunacy is involved.

      And, of course, I support the Right Whales, even though I am an uncaring, insensitive “conservative”!!!

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Personally, I find them quite tasty on a cracker in a white cream sauce. Suitable substitute for a sardine.

        1. WayneS Avatar

          Snail Daters or Right Whales?

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Spotted owl.

          2. WayneS Avatar

            Have you ever had Moo Goo Gai Panda?

            It’s my favorite Chinese food.

      2. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        I remember the snail darter thing and pretty much agree but point out, it was a new law and it has evolved and in most cases today, there are more practical outcomes.

        For instance, we do not stop bridge building in rivers, but we do limit activity during breeding and migration.

        The Salmon out west are still largely extinct in the rivers that feed the Columbia because of those dams which are not coming down despite cries from some to do so.

        The loss of “wetlands” is now approach by the creation of artificial wetlands known as “wetland banks”.

        Finally, NEPA, folks should learn about it. NEPA in and of itself does not block anything. The fundamental purpose of NEPA is to require a thorough and complete disclosure of impacts so that an “informed” decision can be made by the agency conducting NEPA. That Agency can even disregard impacts – as long as they do document them. It’s when the agency fails to document impacts that they end up in court – that’s where environmentalists do their “work” and it’s easily avoided if the agency actually does document the impacts.

        On the Right Whales. If we actually did a NEPA that including the paths of ships and the racket made by other pile-driving activities – do you think we’d decide there could be no ships or platforms in that area at all?

        If they do have impacts similar to wind turbines might – why have we not done something already so that the wind turbines would be subjected to similar rules instead of treating them as if they are the first impacts to be discovered.

        Conservatives often seem to care little about most of these issues. They are opposed to NEPA when it blocks what they support and they are in favor of NEPA when it might block something they oppose.

        Quite a bit of hypocrisy IMO.

  11. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    So good to see you are so concerned about pile driving for offshore energy production… that should pretty much nix all future offshore oil platforms then…

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      Climate Deniers turned environmentalists…. weird… and hypocritical?

  12. Lefty665 Avatar
    Lefty665

    Anyone know what other aquatic life migrates? Lobsters, sea anemones, assorted fishies, plankton?

    1. WayneS Avatar

      Salmon.

      Shad, sturgeon.

    2. WayneS Avatar

      Salmon.

      Shad, sturgeon, herring, white tuna.

      Old sailors.

      1. Lefty665 Avatar
        Lefty665

        Changes in attitude, changes in latitude:)

  13. WayneS Avatar

    I thought this article was interesting. It hints at a construction method to secure platforms to the ocean floor without pile driving. It also covers some research being performed off the northeast shore of the U.S.

    Apparently, the noise is considered less of an issue off Europe’s coast because whales do not migrate through the waters where their offshore wind farms are located.

    https://www.npr.org/2019/12/05/782694371/offshore-wind-may-help-the-planet-but-will-it-hurt-whales

    1. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
      energyNOW_Fan

      Key point in the NPR article:
      “Environmentalists …. believe the risks posed by climate change, to ocean life and all life, are so vast that they justify whatever risks to local habitat might come from offshore wind farms. They’re hopeful the trade-offs will be minimal.” Hopeful: that nothing is worse than fossil fuels, hopeful that the economy will flourish, hopeful America will remain a strong Country, but willing to risk those things to get their way.

Leave a Reply