by Steve Haner

The elections of a Republican Virginia governor and a new Republican majority in the House of Delegates have not changed Virginia’s status as one of the greenest of Green New Deal states in the country.  Every effort to reverse the course set during the previous period of Democratic hegemony has failed at the 2022 General Assembly.

The massive construction plans for ratepayer-funded solar, wind and battery facilities dictated by the 2020 Virginia Clean Economy Act remain on track. A bill to repeal VCEA failed in the majority-Democratic Virginia Senate. So did a simpler bill that merely restored the ability of the State Corporation Commission to review those construction plans for prudence, reasonableness and cost.

If California moves to ban the sales of new internal combustion engine cars and other vehicles starting with the 2035 model year, as expected, Virginia is still positioned to automatically follow suit. Until then, a growing percentage of all new car sales must be electric starting in 2025. A bill to revisit that 2021 legislation, and do a proper regulatory adoption process, also died in the Senate.

Legislative efforts to remove Virginia from the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative regional compact all failed. A regulatory reversal may still be possible without legislation, but in the meantime the carbon tax remains on every Dominion Energy Virginia bill and works its way into everything touched by electricity costs.

In these waning hours of the regular session, a bill to protect the use of natural gas from local restrictions or prohibitions is struggling in a conference committee. If it fails or passes without teeth, local governments that operate natural gas utilities (such as the City of Richmond) can proceed to close them or restrict new connections. Other localities can use building codes or other regulations to do the same to private natural gas suppliers. The state’s largest and one of its more Democratic localities, Fairfax County, has plans to discourage gas already adopted. It and Richmond won’t be alone.

Within the General Assembly, the partisan divide on this debate is nearly total. The bill to protect natural gas did receive two Democratic votes in the House. Some Senate Democrats voted to restore State Corporation Commission oversight on the reasonableness, prudence and cost of renewable energy generation that is expected to add hundreds if not thousands of dollars to annual electric bills.

But that bill, House Bill 73, did not even receive total Republican support. It failed in the Senate Commerce and Labor Committee 9-5, with four Democrats and only one Republican voting to keep it alive. One Republican, Senator Mark Obenshain, R-Harrisonburg, voted to kill it. Senate Minority Leader Thomas Norment, R-James City County, failed to vote.

The same pair had weeks before voted to kill a similar effort at restoring SCC authority over these projects, that bill coming from one of their Senate Republican colleagues.

Through the session the steadfast position of the House Republicans with lukewarm support from key Senate colleagues has been joined by mostly silence from Governor Glenn Youngkin, who has only only sought to repeal the RGGI carbon tax. The offshore wind and solar bonanza of VCEA, the demands to buy electric cars and covert our homes to all-electric, those will cost average Virginians far more than will RGGI.

Whether they know it or like it, Virginians remain firmly in the grip of those who think fossil fuels are dangerous and must be rapidly retired. We currently depend on those fuels heavily, they are abundant within U.S. borders and national waters, they have delivered reliable economic prosperity, yet they must disappear from Virginia’s future. Replacing them with intermittent and unreliable electricity will be expensive and risky.

Why do Democrats think Virginians want this? Three decades of a steady drumbeat of false or exaggerated narratives about claimed climate catastrophes has sunk in. In a recent poll conducted by Christopher Newport University, anticipating these issues before the 2022 General Assembly, respondents repeated the messages of looming disaster they have been told.

First the pollster asked about various claimed disastrous climate change impacts. More than 40% stated there already are major impacts on Virginia from rising sea levels, harm to wildlife, and more common storms and extreme heat. Another 30% or more claimed there are already minor impacts. Fewer than one-quarter saw no impacts.

There is minor sea level rise, having caused no damage, and the other three claimed extreme outcomes are total fiction. Virginia has experienced little to no change in its climate and certainly no ill effects. But more than half of voting Virginians believe it has, either major or minor.

With the pump fully primed by that first question (a lesson in polling bias), voters were then asked about the priority for state government of “addressing climate change.” About one third set it as a top priority and another third as a medium priority. Similar two-third majorities expressed support for the VCEA and membership in RGGI, including about 40% of Republican respondents.

Missing from some of those questions, of course, was any mention of the cost of converting to intermittent wind and solar electricity, costs which have been estimated and are available. The growing electric bill tax that is imposed by RGGI was never mentioned. Bring those into the poll question and suddenly voters respond very differently. Suddenly their doubts blossom, as a Thomas Jefferson Institute-sponsored poll showed. With the price tag attached, even Democrats disliked RGGI.

But the price tags remain unknown, sometimes hidden and buried, and will now be obscured by government-driven inflation and war-driven commodity price hikes. The mainstream media outlets filled with daily climate disaster claims are silent on the costs or risks of the energy conversions they tout. Abundant evidence that the climate catastrophe narrative is false on some points and debatable on others never makes the local paper or nightly news.

The physics behind our climate remains a controversial mystery. Inertia is something all can understand.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

42 responses to “Virginia Remains a Green New Deal Mecca”

  1. Ronnie Chappell Avatar
    Ronnie Chappell

    All of the whining about high gasoline prices and its impact on working class Americans demonstrates these initiatives will implode when their cost and daily pain become apparent to consumers and voters. Eventually, today’s magical thinking will give way to the real hardships caused by these policies. Everyone wants to go to heaven. No one wants to die.

  2. One day Virginians will wake up to the fact that the greenies want to take away their back-yard gas-fired grills, their gas-fired leaf blowers, and their gas-fired fireplaces. THEN they’ll be pissed. But it will be too late.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Gas powered leaf blowers, chainsaws and weed-eaters should all be banned, gathered together and lit afire!

      We’d all be healthier using rakes, axes and scythes plus have our hearing.

      I used to love the colors autumn. Now I loathe nature’s call to “Gentlemen, START YOUR ENGINES!”

  3. tmtfairfax Avatar
    tmtfairfax

    Glad the moving van comes later this month. I got my sign-up bill from the local electric coop in NC. Climate change programs will result in the largest transfer of wealth from the middle and working classes to the wealthy in U.S. history.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      You know what’s funny? We take several trips to NC every year AND they have WAY MORE solar farms than we do….. Happy MOVe to you! Keep blogging and let us know how NC is working out for you after the move!

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Wait’ll he moves in, puts on his glasses and finds out that what he thought was a view of the lake is just a sea of panels…

        1. tmtfairfax Avatar
          tmtfairfax

          Need to walk to see the lake but the woods are out the front door, just across the street.

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Good for you. Flatlant or mountain?

  4. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Terrible, terrible things are about to happen to Virginians but they are too stupid to pay attention and stop it and/or they have been duped by the climate myth…

    yadda yadda yadda.

    yes indeed….

    but since voters are so stupid, elections don’t matter anyhow…. right?

    right!

  5. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    One of the things one might ask if they really want to understand is what do Canadians, and Europeans who already pay 4-5 and more dollars a gallon for gas? Oh wait, they already have real rail and transit!

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Larry, no.

      Doing what others have had success at doing is cheating… and as such is a violation of the Bogan Honor Code.

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Larry, no.

      Doing what others have had success at doing is cheating… and as such is a violation of the Bogan Honor Code.

    3. how_it_works Avatar
      how_it_works

      There is real rail and transit in the USA. You just won’t find it in Spotsyltucky or places like it…and you probably NEVER will.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        not like rail in Europe and Japan where you can go virtually anywhere on regular timeframes, including to their versions of Spotsylvania.

        1. how_it_works Avatar
          how_it_works

          There is no “their versions of Spotsylvania” in those countries.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Yes there is, rail coverage for both urban, rural and in-between.

            If you wanted to go between two cities like DC and Richmond – the Europe and Asian rail would have multiple daily runs and stops in between – LIKE in Spotsylvania where Amtrak COULD do the same but does not.

          2. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            You mean about how like you can go from DC to Baltimore to New York?

            Maybe the real problem is that nobody wants to go to Richmond.

          3. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            or past Richmond to Charlotte and similar?

            that kind of problem?

          4. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            He doesn’t understand what is required for rail transit, nor does he understand the geographical differences between the US and Europe. He never will and he’ll argue till the cows come home otherwise (even when confronted with the facts).

          5. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            He doesn’t understand that, as just one minor difference, Germany has 3 times the population density of Virginia.

          6. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            In a Country that is 1/2 the size of Texas.

            I’ve attempted to have this discussion before her blocked me, he refuses to listen to anyone regardless if that’s their area of expertise or not.

          7. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Note how folks are exiting Ukraine….

    4. how_it_works Avatar
      how_it_works

      There is real rail and transit in the USA. You just won’t find it in Spotsyltucky or places like it…and you probably NEVER will.

  6. David Wojick Avatar
    David Wojick

    I have to disagree. VA stopped being a GND state when the Reps won the House. It is now a split state, so neutral. No GND stuff passed both houses.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Where you are wrong is that the GND agenda will continue in force due to the stalemate. VCEA build out, RGGI tax, California Emission Rules, etc. Unless you expect the Gov and the House to disregard actual laws, which I do not. Maybe there will be a reversal if the Senate flips in 18 months, but that’s a while and no guarantee.

      There were some bills to accelerate the process which failed, and that’s something positive I guess. McAuliffe would have signed them.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        Since these maps change, might be an interesting election!

        you forget, there are a LOT of people in Virginia that DO believe the science despite the minority.

        1. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          https://wattsupwiththat.com/2022/03/09/co2-emissions-hit-record-high-in-2021/

          If so, they should be afraid. Very afraid. The CO2 will not go down but only up in their lifetimes. Me, I know its no real problem.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            well no, they’re not afraid per se, they’re concerned because they do believe the science and they do believe we have to take action over time.

            somewhere along the line, you guys started to reject science, not just climate ….

            what you THINK you KNOW? never doubt? not even a non-zero thing?

            I have to say, when it comes to things like health – our own or the earth – those who see things as zero risk seldom are right.

            We’re all gonna die but we ought not do it stupidly.

          2. Stephen Haner Avatar
            Stephen Haner

            I’ve consciously sought out both sides. Science is first and foremost data. The data are clear:
            1) no appreciable warming except some local outliers. Warmest recent US period 1930s.
            2) sea level rise has no relationship to current CO2 emissions. Started eons ago.
            3) actual deaths from extreme weather are WAY down, way down.
            4) no acceleration of extreme weather events, and in many cases they are become less common. We have the best data since the satellites came along.
            5) even some places where the glaciers are doing well, but again, their shrinkage has been going on for hundreds of years.
            6) cold kills. Heat is generally good for crops, etc. CO2 has increased and the Earth is greener for it (NASA data.)
            7) corals doing fine. Polar bears doing fine. Antarctica adding ice cover.

            Just like the religious fundamentalists, the climate fundamentalists refuse to accept the geological record! Pretty funny, really. They refuse now to recognize Medieval, Roman warm periods, warmer than now. Squeeze them right out of the hockey stick.

          3. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Are you looking at the same data that the 90%+ scientists who you disagree with?

            Would you challenge any other science in this same way , i.e. that you, without any background, can read and understand the data better than most of the world’s scientists?

            How about the Ozone Hole science?

            is that also wrong?

          4. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            Or lead or ddt… smh…

      2. David Wojick Avatar
        David Wojick

        How much it is “in force” remains to be seen. And even then there is very little to these rules in the short run. Being neutral is a lot better than being pro-GND. Think of all the nutty stuff that did not pass this session. In the long run VCEA cannot work so there is no threat that it will actually happen.

      3. tmtfairfax Avatar
        tmtfairfax

        Climate change regulations will result in the largest transfer of wealth from working and middle class to the wealthy.

  7. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
    energyNOW_Fan

    I just realized that Toyota is now running out of Federal tax credits for plug-ins. You have until June to get a plug-in Hybrid Prius or RAV4 at $4500-$7500 off (depends on battery size). Tesla and GM have already reached their federal credit limits. Biden admin wants to further increase and extend the massive subsidies for buyers, but so far has not done so. Happy we have a RAV4 Hybrid (no-plug) vehicle in times like this. Regular no-plug hybrid is a great option being ignored by the big battery fans. Anyways without massive fed credits, Virginia is going to have a hard time forcing plug-ins. The good thing is some makers such as Ford F150EV still have fed credits. Ford says it has every intent to charge extra for regular cars and make plug-ins cheaper to buy with the profits from regular cars. Add that to massive federal subsidies to EV buyers, what’s not to like?

    1. Matt Adams Avatar
      Matt Adams

      The lack of charging network Infrusture that will add days to your trip. It’s always wonderful, when Uncle Sugar picks winners and losers.

      1. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
        energyNOW_Fan

        Charging station expansion funding was funded in the first “bipartisan” bill that was passed.

        1. Matt Adams Avatar
          Matt Adams

          So it’s was “funded” but they aren’t a reality (most likely will never be), that still doesn’t negate the charge time. Which I think makes it preposterous to push at this point.

          Even using a Tesla Supercharger station the last 10% takes 8 hours. We haven’t even begun to look at the studies on battery drain due to cold / hot weather or the price. In VA it’s hard enough for someone who isn’t well off to purchase a new car because of PPT, there needs to be a lot of things done before companies start price gouging for gas vehicles.

          1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            Actually, I know of a major oil corporation that is repurchasing (in a big way) gas stations they once divested out of to specifically install charging stations. If big oil is behind it (and they are believe me) it will indeed happen.

          2. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            Interesting, I haven’t seen that occur anywhere outside of Shell in England. Could you point to an article regarding that in the US? Also, they are diversifying, as they see that they are being demonized for oil production of course they’d want to make money in other ways.

            It will remain to be see if the $5 billion allocated in the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law will do much to dent the lack of charging network we have. I believe a Tesla Supercharger Station costs roughly $250,000 to install, so that works to be 20,000 stations give or take given other charges.

            My opinion on the time it takes to charge still stands though, they really aren’t a great option for long overland travel. You’d spend more time charging than you would actually traveling and you’d have to make your route based upon supercharging stations.

          3. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            I can not comment further on those plans because they are not public. I can’t even divulge the company. You will have to take my word on this one… it will make the news eventually.

            Yes, those supercharger stations are expensive (now) which is why really only major oil (now called “energy companies”) has the resources to build this infrastructure.

            I think these charging stations still take like 20 minutes per charge… that’s a lot of shopping time for the associated stores.

            It does remain to be seen, that is for sure…

          4. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            Roger that.

            The current problem with the charging station, even the Tesla Superchargers is that yes for 80% of the battery you aren’t spending too much time. It’s that last 20% where it takes you 8 hours and if you’re going cross country or even a 500 mile trip you’re going to want to full charge.

            Perhaps necessity will drive innovation in that respect. Perhaps battery tech will advance and allow for a more rapid charge and also reduce temperature variation impacting battery charge and life-cycle. Who really knows at this point, the future will tell. I just think it’s a fools errand to run far and fast away gas powered applications, especially given the geography of our country.

Leave a Reply