Virginia Police Shooting Incidents Up 43% in 2022

by James A. Bacon

Along with the surge in homicides and assaults on police officers, the number of police shootings in Virginia jumped 43% last year, according to data from the Virginia State Police 2022 Crime in Virginia report. The shootings resulted in 22 fatalities, up from 18 the previous year.

The increase since 2019, the year before the George Floyd riots unleashed a wave of anti-police denunciations, anti-racism rhetoric, and criminal-justice “reforms” designed to reduce mass incarceration, amounted to 79%.

That raises a critical question: how is it possible that, despite all the media attention, all the police cultural sensitivity indoctrination, all the de-escalation training, and all the other criminal-justice “reforms” in Virginia, officer shootings increased so markedly over three years? Have none of the reforms worked? Or could the left-of-center critics of policing, who have driven the policy changes, be overlooking something?

Police-shooting incidents need to be viewed in a larger context. Although general crime rates have remained stable or even declined since 2019, the number of homicides has spiked by 73% and the number of assaults on officers has jumped 41%. I would suggest that these numbers are related.

The common thread, I would hypothesize, has been media- and politician-fueled rhetoric that has fed the perception among those inclined to criminal conduct that policing, the criminal-justice system, and society in general are systemically racist and illegitimate. If individuals engaged in encounters with the police are fearful that they will become victims of police violence or believe that they are being unjustly targeted for police attention, they are more likely to resist arrest or otherwise escalate confrontations with police.

The total number of criminal “incidents” reported to the State Police has actually declined somewhat since 2019 — from 376,000 to 355,000, or nearly 6% — thanks largely to the decriminalization of marijuana. The rise in police shootings does not seem to be associated with trends in the general crime level.

I suspect the number of shootings is connected rather to the number of assaults on police, which jumped 62% between 2021 and 2022. My colleague Dick Hall-Sizemore has noted that that figure is likely overstated, noting that a change in State Police methodology for aggregating data resulted in “a higher number than reported in recent years.” I have queried the State Police about that methodology change and the impact it might have had on the numbers, so we’ll keep an asterisk by that number. It is worth noting however, that not only has the reported number of assaults on police increased, so has the reported number of both minor and major injuries from assaults.

Whatever the precise numbers, it seems clear that interactions between police and elements of the public have become more contentious.

If the number of assaults on police (subject to revision) increased from 1,787 in 2021 to 2,903 in 2022, it stands to reason that the number of incidents in which police felt compelled to use their weapons, though a small fraction of the total, would increase as well.

In some quarters, the temptation will be to blame the police rather than individuals assaulting police. Left-of-center critics will blame continued racial bias and inadequate police training. One prominent conservative commentator, Heather MacDonald, has suggested that the problem might be traced to the tendency of short-staffed and over-stretched police departments to hire less qualified officers to replace departing veterans. Newcomers in police forces have less experience and, as seen in the Memphis police killing of Tyre Nichols, a few have been hired despite having criminal backgrounds.

We could get a clearer picture if the State Police reported the race of the individuals involved with assaults on police and involved in police shootings. If the increase occurred primarily in the African-American population, it would tend to confirm that police-are-racist rhetoric plays a role. If the jump in assaults and shootings involved Whites as well, it would suggest that we look for other explanations.

Normally, Ruling Class media relish stories like this — a surge in police-involved shootings and killings can easily be interpreted to reinforce the Racial Oppression Narrative. For some reason — perhaps newsroom understaffing — Virginia media have overlooked that storyline. But if police shootings are on the rise, it surely should be a matter of interest to the general citizenry, and the cause of that increase should be a topic worthy of analysis and debate.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

20 responses to “Virginia Police Shooting Incidents Up 43% in 2022”

  1. Nathan Avatar

    Why is crime rising? There are many facets, but here’s one.

    For a glimpse into just how pervasive and toxic the Progressive agenda is, take a look at this article published in the Maryland Law Review Online. I think this is significant because it demonstrates the degree to which virtue signaling has replaced scholarship.

    The article is poorly written.

    The article is poorly sourced for an academic journal. Take note of the references – left leaning news, blogs, one-sided partisan books, bogus interpretations of history (1619 project), etc.

    The author has no understanding whatsoever of firearms, as she seems to believe that all firearms are “automatic.”

    The author also has no understanding with respect to laws relating to self defense. (Stand Your Ground does not allow someone who has escaped danger to then go to his car to arm himself, and then decide to return to the location of the altercation. It is also contradictory to claim that the gun went off accidentally and killed someone, AND that he fired it in self defense. Legally, it’s one or the other.)

    Just two incidents were selected to demonstrate the central argument of the article, and the one involving an African American has almost no objective facts that have withstood opposition in court. Why is that? Because the defendant plead guilty.

    Additionally, the defendant’s own account demonstrates that he was guilty of the crime he eventually plead guilty to.

    And lastly, the author’s proposed remedy is to “enlighten” jurors about her fictitious history of the Second Amendment in an apparent attempt at jury nullification.

    IMPLICITLY INCONSISTENT: THE PERSISTENT AND FATAL
    LACK OF SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS FOR BLACK
    AMERICANS IN SELF-DEFENSE CLAIMS AND THE
    IMPORTANCE OF TELLING THE COUNTER-STORY

    https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1088&context=endnotes

  2. walter smith Avatar
    walter smith

    “Without evidence” I am going to posit another theory.
    With the criminal element being released earlier or not charged, the criminal element is out more often with more time to commit crimes. With more crimes, police have more reason for “incidents.” More incidents, by themself, are a cause for more potential shootings, however, it is exacerbated twofold – first, the criminal element has less fear of incarceration, and, second, some less criminally inclined actually fear they are in danger due to highly inaccurate “reporting” about police violence. These factors result in more police shootings, contrary to “the narrative.”

  3. Lefty665 Avatar
    Lefty665

    The first message seems to be that cops should spend more time on the range. Their marksmanship has dropped dramatically. 13 more police shootings and 4 more fatalities.

    That is only half tongue in cheek. When a cop pulls his/her gun and starts pulling the trigger it is already a deadly situation. A cop shooting at someone is not sending a request to “please be more cooperative”.

    Nationally each year for at least the last five or so police shootings of unarmed people have declined. Of the roughly a thousand people killed by cops each year under two dozen are unarmed. In a police confrontation with an armed person the stakes are life and death for everyone in the vicinity. Police straight shooting in those circumstances is a virtue. Are there statistics on how many of the Virginia police shootings involved unarmed people?

    Another statistic to note is that nationally each year more cops are hurt by accidental discharges of their own guns than by hostile fire. Any idea what those numbers are in Virginia?

    1. Teddy007 Avatar
      Teddy007

      There is a world of difference between target shooting at the range and shooting at a moving human being who might be shooting back.

      1. Lefty665 Avatar
        Lefty665

        Really? I’d have never guessed it.

        1. Teddy007 Avatar
          Teddy007

          Then why do so many people suggest that range shooting will improve one’s performance significantly during a gun fight?

          1. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            Because repetition makes it muscle memory.

            In the military we practice over and over, induce stress and repeat. At that point you’re not thinking about the action, you’re simply doing it.

          2. Teddy007 Avatar
            Teddy007

            Actually, in the military, I was amazed as how little shooting at a range that most units did. Most hardcore combat arms officers did private ranges on their own to keep up their small arms proficiency. In a CONUS assignment, how many days a year was a unit on a firing range?

          3. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            “Teddy007 a few seconds ago
            Actually, in the military, I was amazed as how little shooting at a range that most units did. Most hardcore combat arms officers did private ranges on their own to keep up their small arms proficiency. In a CONUS assignment, how many days a year was a unit on a firing range?”

            That is not even remotely true, especially given we just pulled out of a 20 year war.

            Understanding the difference between combat arms and support units is something you should learn before making blanket comments, which are false. Also, don’t be a POG.

          4. Teddy007 Avatar
            Teddy007

            Ok, how many days in a calender year do a infantry, armor, or FA unit go to the range in the course of a year stateside? My guess they would do a two day cycle a couple of times a year because of all of the hassles involved in going to the range with small arms.

          5. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            “Teddy007 9 minutes ago
            Ok, how many days in a calender year do a infantry, armor, or FA unit go to the range in the course of a year stateside? My guess they would do a two day cycle a couple of times a year because of all of the hassles involved in going to the range with small arms.”

            Why would Armor and FA do anything but gunnery outside of their yearly quals?

            Beyond that those are augmentations to battalions along with support. The shooters are Infantry and regardless what you “guess” they do a lot more shooting then “a two day cycle a couple times of year”. Getting a range is not a hassle, the training calendar is set a year in advance sometimes more.

          6. Teddy007 Avatar
            Teddy007

            Once again, how many days a year are on the training calender to do anything but qualify with one’s small arms in an infantry unit or even a combat engineer unit or an MP unit. And one does not need to cut and paste this response. That is the point of using Disqus.

          7. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            “Once again, how many days a year are on the training calender [sic] to do anything but qualify with one’s small arms in an infantry unit or even a combat engineer unit or an MP unit. And one does not need to cut and paste this response. That is the point of using Disqus.”

            That’s not even a quantifiable question. It is completely dependent upon the command group, their training schedule, their MTOE and their mission.

            Again, you’re also mixing and matching MOS’s. A 12B isn’t an 11B, 11C or 11D. The 11 series denotes infantry, elsewise they are not infantry (person other than grunt).

            No, the purpose of Disqus is a commenting hosting platform, it doesn’t preclude me from copying your inane posts and replying to them. However, just for that simple fact I’ll continue the practice just to know that upsets you. Perhaps in doing so, you’ll learn how to spell.

          8. Nathan Avatar

            “Then why do so many people suggest that range shooting will improve one’s performance significantly during a gun fight?”

            Because you have to walk before you can run.

            New shooters aren’t just learning one thing. There are dozens of shooting skills that need to be so ingrained that they happen automatically without thinking or looking.

            In a self defense situation, you need to be able to focus on the threat – the dude who’s trying to kill you.

            When faced with the very real potential of impending death, there’s no time to look down to figure out how to draw your weapon, how to hold it, where to put your fingers, how to bring it to your eye, etc.

            Once you’ve mastered the basics, then it’s time for more realistic training.

            One option for civilians is IDPA. You should check it out. They will let you observe for free.

            https://www.idpa.com/

          9. Lefty665 Avatar
            Lefty665

            was there, you just missed it.

            As Matt notes, building muscle memory and patterns of use that become habitual and ingrained even when under stress.

            It’s really pretty simple if you think about it. Sort of like practicing thinking by exercising with logical problems or becoming a better hitter through batting practice.

            It ain’t rocket science.

    2. Nathan Avatar

      Lefty665:
      “The first message seems to be that cops should spend more time on the range. Their marksmanship has dropped dramatically. 13 more police shootings and 4 more fatalities.”

      Many officers aren’t particularly good marksman. Some officers that I have worked with on the range only practice when it’s time for their annual qualification. Don’t get me wrong. Some individual police officers are very highly skilled with firearms. But unfortunately, most are not.

      Lefty665:
      “Another statistic to note is that nationally each year more cops are hurt by accidental discharges of their own guns than by hostile fire.”

      Again, the sad truth is that many officers are very poor with gun safety. The gun comes with the job, and far too many officers get careless. I can provide examples if needed.

      1. Lefty665 Avatar
        Lefty665

        The deal with accidental shootings is that almost all cops handle guns every day, but very infrequently encounter hostile shooting (most officers never in their careers).

        A very low incidence of accidental shootings with very high daily handling of guns results in more accidental shootings than extremely infrequent hostile shootings.

        1. Nathan Avatar

          You called them “accidental discharges” above. I am a certified instructor and can tell you that a better term is “negligent discharge.”

          When a gun goes off unexpectedly, someone screwed up.

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5uEW02TbuhU

          1. Lefty665 Avatar
            Lefty665

            You are absolutely right, my sloppy phrasing. Thanks for the correction.

            The issue is lots and lots of opportunities and low incidence screw ups.

  4. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “The common thread, I would hypothesize, has been media- and politician-fueled rhetoric that has fed the perception among those inclined to criminal conduct that policing, the criminal-justice system, and society in general are systemically racist and illegitimate. If individuals engaged in encounters with the police are fearful that they will become victims of police violence or believe that they are being unjustly targeted for police attention, they are more likely to resist arrest or otherwise escalate confrontations with police.”

    The common thread, I would hypothesize, is that cops are more aggressive in their interaction with the public due to politician-fueled rhetoric that there is an attack on cops and that they are therefore in greater danger during their interaction with the public. The result is a drive by cops to unjustly target their attention, escalate interactions, and use violence as the first rather than last resort.

Leave a Reply