“Too Thin”

The Jackson Arch — before sandblasting

by Donald Smith

The Virginia Military Institute’s hands were tied, it seems. It tried for months to justify leaving an inscription of Stonewall Jackson’s name on an arch at the Old Barracks on VMI’s Main Post. But the school’s leadership couldn’t find a way, so it chose… to take a sandblaster to the  National Historic Landmark.

That’s the conclusion I draw from VMI’s explanation of its decision to expunge Stonewall Jackson’s name from the formerly named Jackson Arch. (See “Retained and Contextualized At VMI” for the full explanation.)

According to the chair of VMI’s Commemorations and Memorials Naming and Review Committee (CMNRC), the original intent of installing a statue of Thomas Jonathan Jackson on the Main Post and inscribing his name on the Post chapel and upon the arch was to honor “Stonewall” Jackson, the brilliant Confederate general. However, only “most compelling” reasons would allow his name to  remain on Jackson Arch today. “The Committee spent months analyzing reasons that might allow the continued display of the Jackson tributes,” said the committee chair, but could not find sufficient justification.

I think Lucky Ned Pepper, the villain in the movie True Grit said it best: “Too thin!”

In the movie, the hero, Rooster Cogburn, is tracking Pepper’s gang through Indian Territory on behalf of Mattie Chaney, a young woman whose father was murdered by a gang member. The gang captures Mattie, and Pepper confronts Rooster, holding young Mattie at gunpoint. Rooster offers Pepper a deal: release Mattie, and he would end the chase. Seeing that Rooster is offering him a weak deal, he replies, “Too thin, Rooster!”

VMI’s justification for why it had to sandblast a National Historic Landmark is too thin. Apparently, VMI determined that Stonewall Jackson’s legacy ultimately is defined by two things: he served the Confederacy, and he owned slaves. Those two facts functioned like a breaker switch, which, when flipped shut, rendered everything else immaterial. That “everything else” includes:

His battlefield excellence. To this day, Stonewall Jackson remains one of the American military’s greatest field commanders. His exploits remain some of the best examples of how to outmaneuver an enemy force and defeat it in detail (i.e., attack its separate parts individually, instead of the whole force at one time).

His exceptional citizenship. VMI’s mission is to create great citizen-soldiers. As a VMI professor, Jackson ran a Sunday School for slaves at a time when it was illegal to teach slaves to read in Virginia. Though confronted on the streets of Lexington and threatened with legal action, he refused to back down! (Nowadays, people back down when faced with mean Tweets!)

His devotion to VMI. An eccentric, Jackson often was a figure of fun in his own classroom. But he was devoted to the Institute. Even after his Civil War exploits made him famous, he expressed a desire to return to VMI after the war. One of his most famous quotes, uttered just before he attacked at Chancellorsville, shows how important VMI was to him: “The Institute will be heard from today.”

By the 2021-2022 Christmas break, when VMI summoned the sandblasters to Main Post, much had changed from the tumultuous days of the fall of 2020. Jackson’s statue was long gone, exiled to New Market. The general’s name had been removed from the Post chapel. VMI officials bent over backwards to refer to him as “Major” Jackson in public, and cast him mostly as an unpopular physics professor. Any smothering aura of “Stonewall” was long gone. The Barnes and Thornburg report on alleged systemic racism at VMI showed that strong majorities of cadets and alumni thought that removing Jackson’s statue had been a mistake. Many feared it was an overreaction, which made the Institute look silly and hypersensitive. (Which is NOT a good look for a “West Point of the South.”) And, in November 2020, the progressive zealots in the Northam administration and the General Assembly who’d been hounding VMI had been sent packing at the polls. VMI had plenty of justification to rethink Jackson Arch’s fate.

The CMNRC said it couldn’t find “compelling reasons” for leaving the arch alone. But, shouldn’t you have compelling reasons before you take a sandblaster to a National Historic Landmark? Couldn’t VMI instead have installed a contextualizing plaque next to the arch? The questions answer themselves.

VMI’s defenders may point to its support of the Stonewall Jackson House in Lexington, and the prominent place Moses Ezekiel’s statue of Jackson now occupies at New Market. Fair enough. But those of us who’ve watched “True Grit” had also seen Fiddler on the Roof. At the beginning of the play, the citizens of Anatevka ask the rabbi if there’s a proper prayer for the Tsar. Of course, said the rabbi: “May God protect and keep the Tsar—far away from us.”

No one thinks the rabbi was complimenting the Tsar, and everyone knows that VMI sent Jackson’s statue as far away from Main Post as possible.

If VMI tells us now that, in December of 2021, after everything that had happened in the Stonewall Jackson episode by then, it was still necessary to erase the general’s name from Jackson Arch, that it was compelled to “Call Out The Sandblasters,” we should take them at their word… and then draw our own conclusions as to whether the Institute demonstrated high-quality judgement, grounded on compelling reasons, or not.

I suspect many people will come to the same conclusion Lucky Ned Pepper did.

Donald Smith was raised in Richmond. His mother was born in a house not far from VMI, and family members still live there.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

40 responses to ““Too Thin””

  1. We are doomed to repeat the history we erase.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      We’ll repeat it either way. WEG1WGA.

      1. Richard Genetalia Avatar
        Richard Genetalia

        I disagree. However, in this instance, people like you have no concept of how bad this backlash will be.

  2. Carter Melton Avatar
    Carter Melton

    We all walk through this life with a balance sheet. The real issue isn’t whether or not we have any liabilities, but at the end of the day what’s a person’s net worth. The woke left’s arrogance and lack of insight into human nature cause it to only focus on the liability side.

    I have often wondered how many mothers’ sons came home war alive because their commanding officers, in their training, had access to Stonewall Jackson’s tactical brilliance.

    “No compelling reason”….what a sad joke.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Sure it worked in a triple canopy jungle.

      1. Carter Melton Avatar
        Carter Melton

        You are neither cute nor funny.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Jackson’s “brilliance” stemmed from “local knowledge”, which came in handy in Vietnam. Of course, we weren’t the locals.

          1. Carter Melton Avatar
            Carter Melton

            See above.

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Ya know, maybe you’re right about that ledger sheet stuff…

            “Here God, the Jackson file you wanted.”
            “Hmmm, yes. Have one of his own men shoot him. Karma.”

          3. Carter Melton Avatar
            Carter Melton

            See above.

      2. Carter Melton Avatar
        Carter Melton

        You are neither cute nor funny.

  3. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    When I was a boy I lived in Harrison County, West Virginia where Stonewall Jackson was born and raised. No one there ran around pretending he was God. Of course, Virginia’s attitudes were the reason West Virginia is a separate state.

  4. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    It just occurred to me. VMI has M14 rifles, firing pins, and ammo stored in the armory. There are 1700 students. I assume everyone gets an M14 for reviews and parades. I seem to remember some cannons too. The student body has at its disposal more firepower than any other place in Virginia except maybe Quantico. Would make a great movie. Taps II.

  5. Will VMI and West Point stop teaching about the 1862 Valley Campaign? Chancellorsville?

    Will New Market Battlefield be sold for a Wal-Mart?

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Hmmm, I always thought New Market was a mostly defunct shopping mall.

    2. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      The Naming Commission has deemed the following ships unworthy of their names: USAV Mechanicsville, USAV Chickahominy, USAV Malvern Hill, USAV Harpers Ferry and USAV Aldie.

      The lefties are so dumb. With the exception of Harpers Ferry, the Yankees won every one of those battles for the Seven Days Campaign. The Army of the Potomac was not beaten, George McClellan was.
      https://www.stripes.com/theaters/us/2022-09-19/confederates-renaming-defense-department-7393907.html

      1. “Mechanicsville is the Confederate name given to the Battle of Beaver Dam Creek in Virginia, Chickahominy refers to a Confederate victory that stifled the Union advance, Malvern Hill commemorates a battle that contributed to a successful Confederate campaign, Harpers Ferry honors the Confederate capture of the strategically vital West Virginia town and Aldie is named after a battle that allowed the advance of the Confederate army into Pennsylvania.” That’s not what the article says.

        1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
          James Wyatt Whitehead

          Mechanicsville casualties Federal 361 Secesch 1,484. Yankees won. Jackson and AP Hill’s fault.

          Chickohominy. No battle. Maybe White Oak Swamp could count for that name. Yankees won that one too. Again Jackson was to blame.

          Malvern Hill casualties. Federal 3,00 Secesh nearly 6,000. Lee’s fault. Bad idea to attack.

          Aldie is a clear cut victory for Pleasonton over Stuart. A bitter and overlooked contest.

  6. It’s funny, this post demonstrates that many alums feel as though the monuments subcommittee did too much, whereas I think they did too little, especially in light of the federal DoD renaming committee. Go figure…In any event, regarding the Jackson arch sandblasting, I tend to agree that contextualization might have sufficed, albeit it’s all about the content of the contextualization. There’s something similar upcoming with Francis Smith, who IMO shouldn’t be venerated with a statue due to his abhorrent ideas on slavery and race. That said, if they truly intend to contextualize, let’s see how they do it. Will it be an honest rendering of his views or a sandblasting?

    1. Donald Smith Avatar
      Donald Smith

      I’ve had several cadets and alumni, who don’t agree with the current VMI administration’s treatment of the school’s Confederate legacy, concede that the Jackson statue, in its original prominent place on Main Post, could be seen as overbearing. IMO you can make a good case for moving the statue from where it was. But sandblasting the arch? That’s jumping the shark.

      1. I think that’s a legit point of view. I also think that the statue could have stayed on post, perhaps in a museum context down by Cocke Hall, had the move been completely voluntary and totally contextualized. The problem was that VMI failed to get ahead of the oncoming storm and seriously deal with its issues of veneration and slavery. Had they done so, they’d have a lot more leeway in what they can do. In fact, they could have set some really interesting precedent in how to deal with these issues. Instead, I fear they’ve sidestepped the thorny questions and instead focused on more wishy washy things like “original intent.” Bad approach.

        1. Donald Smith Avatar
          Donald Smith

          “they could have set some really interesting precedent in how to deal with these issues. ”

          Spot-on! A school devoted to creating leaders is exactly the place to show, by example, how to deal with difficult issues. That’s the most important kind of leadership—setting an example through the actions you take.

          It seems that the Shapira articles, and the storm that accompanied them, might have overwhelmed the VMI BOV, and it buckled under the pressure. Not a good look for an institution whose mission is to create leaders.

          1. I’m willing to bet that you and I would differ mightily on how best to deal with Confederate iconography:-), but it was certainly worth an open and educated discussion and compromise before things got bad. As has been mentioned, in July 2020 a group of us got together and asked for a commission to be set up to do just that. We were told by the prior admin and BOV to essentially stick it. Even before then, following the Unite the Right in 2017, there was a window of time where action could have been taken to lead on this issue…as we know, they missed a couple of opportunities and were left with nothing but bad choices after that. And they’re still not out of the woods on the issue because of the recent federal renaming committee report. Not good.

          2. Donald Smith Avatar
            Donald Smith

            “I’m willing to bet that you and I would differ mightily on how best to deal with Confederate iconography:-)”

            If you do bet, wager a large sum of money! 🙂

  7. I really don’t understand the obsession with the Jackson statue. I knew that thing’s days were numbered when I was a prospective student in the spring of…2012. The school was and continues to get pilloried by Ian Shapira (who, lets be real, is trying to close the school) if the school had fought harder to keep that statue up, it would’ve been obliterated even more.

    1. I actually don’t think the Wapo is trying to close the school. There have been so many missteps by VMI for the last several years that I’m surprised the lid didn’t get blown off sooner. You add to that mix the toxic regressive attitudes of much of the alumni base–attacking LTC Love and basic implementation of diversity policies that the military has embraced, every public college already has, and the Fortune 500 has implemented for a decade–and we’ll continue to have bad press. That’s not the Wapo’s fault.

      1. Dude, how can read any of the 37 articles written by Ian and not think that? His articles leave out context and repeats the same information time and time again. His most recent piece on the enrollment issue, was most definitely a self-congratulatory article that he published so that he could dance on VMI’s grave. Additonally, the comments within the articles themselves allude to what he’s trying to accomplish. No doubt, the actions of some alumni like Carmen Villani, Bob Morris, etc. don’t help and absolutely contribute to the bad press, but Ian has a vendetta and his reporting some of the worst agenda driven journalism I’ve ever seen.

        Edit: I should also note, I signed on to the initial letter to the BoV way back in 2020 urging them to reconsider VMIs ties to the Confederacy and initially supported the reporting and the investigation. At this point though, Ian is continuing to write about this, because he wants the school shuttered.

      2. Dude, how can read any of the 37 articles written by Ian and not think that? His articles leave out context and repeats the same information time and time again. His most recent piece on the enrollment issue, was most definitely a self-congratulatory article that he published so that he could dance on VMI’s grave. Additonally, the comments within the articles themselves allude to what he’s trying to accomplish. No doubt, the actions of some alumni like Carmen Villani, Bob Morris, etc. don’t help and absolutely contribute to the bad press, but Ian has a vendetta and his reporting some of the worst agenda driven journalism I’ve ever seen.

        Edit: I should also note, I signed on to the initial letter to the BoV way back in 2020 urging them to reconsider VMIs ties to the Confederacy and initially supported the reporting and the investigation. At this point though, Ian is continuing to write about this, because he wants the school shuttered.

        1. Well, first thanks for your awesome support. Had that 2020 letter been taken seriously, we wouldn’t be here. But alas, here we are. I appreciate that alums and others feel targeted by the Post. But as they say in the ratline, if you don’t want to be targeted, don’t be a target. If VMI ceased to be a story, it wouldn’t be pursued. But VMI has persisted in being a story, because of its past decisions (or lack thereof), messaging, vocal alumni base, and other longstanding issues. Just last week the federal renaming commission released its final report w/r/t Confederate memorials. It turns out the report and its reasoning are at odds with what VMI has done to date. That will be a story, and one of its own making. That’s not on media.

          1. owen dunlap Avatar
            owen dunlap

            Mike – the federal DOD renaming commission did not have the situation of being part of the Confederacy and fighting in battle in the Civil War as a school unit – as requested by the government of Virginia at the time – and being shelled and burned down as part of that war . I think VMI should be allowed to make these decisions on their own — you may not agree with the way they approach every issue but you have to ask yourself – would you rather they do everything you think they should do and the way you think it should be done – if that results in a permanently fractured alumni base?

            OMD’83

          2. I agree that VMI has a tough job. But its deep ties to the Confed. are all the more reason to shift its mission and focus altogether, which The Citadel has done a good job of over the last decade. I know that they’re trying to do so incrementally and I hope it continues. Realistically, though, how long can its policy w/r/t the Confederacy stand at odds with DoD’s, as a Senior Military College no less? It’s unsustainable and will just end with more bad press, more difficulty, more infighting down the road. The U.S. military and DoD now have a uniform bipartisan policy with respect to commemoration of the Confederacy–namely, none at all. It’s not my policy; my intent is just to avoid a pretty obvious minefield ahead.

          3. MisterChips Avatar
            MisterChips

            VMI has been targeted at least since the 80’s. Sometimes you can’t help being a target. VMI was different, it was adversarial, spartan and single sex. That made it a target without regard to any merits in that system. As in Salem, MA, we should have worried more about the witch burners and less about the witch. I would have preferred a little more courage and return fire from the BOV. They cowered in fear and sacrificed Gen. Peay to appease BRF Northam.

        2. owen dunlap Avatar
          owen dunlap

          The articles are slanted and have an agenda for sure – but almost as bad as they are -the headlines are worse – and really / in this age of twitter and social media- isnt that all that matters? – you think the folks that share and retweet these articles actually pay the WaPo for access and read the article and do research after they read or do you think they just retweet and say ” close it” ?

          Question – real question ( i dont know) – in all his race focused articles about VMI has he ever mentioned the 36 year old COW program which takes place at VMI ( run by and all credit to Gene Williams ’74 first AA on the VMI BOV)

          1. It is possible to have the COW program and still have racism at the school. I’m not sure how those two things are mutually exclusive, especially seeing how Gene himself was a signatory to the Senior African American Alumni letter that posted on this site and discusses racism experienced at the school: https://www.baconsrebellion.com/african-american-alums-support-vmi-general-wins/

          2. owen dunlap Avatar
            owen dunlap

            i agree – not mutually exclusive – and if you read my post i never implied they were – please point out where i said or implied they were – my point would be if you are going to do numerous articles and a deep dive into VMI and discussions of race and accusations that the school has ” systematic racism” – would you not think that Gene would have been interviewed/ quoted whatever his experience was/is as a cadet/ past member of the VMI BOV / currently working on the COW program on VMI post? If he was/ if COW was- fine / If not then to me its an example of the type of reporting we are getting from the WaPO

          3. I actually have no idea whether he was interviewed/contacted or not by the Wapo. I would bet he was, but I don’t know. My point on COW and racism (systemic or otherwise) being not mutually exclusive is that just by not including a discussion of something like COW doesn’t mean that the articles don’t have merit or are even particularly “unbalanced.” COW is a great program. But changing the media narrative will take considerably more effort than pointing to a terrific program or even an Episcopal saint, especially when media cycles for the last year plus are all about alumni opposition to DEI. That’s not a Wapo-driven narrative…

          4. Sally Port Avatar

            If Ian Schapira and the WaPo are secretly (or blatantly) trying to bring VMI’s existence into question, shame on them, obviously, but a fascinating inquiry is Ian Schapira’s ownership/
            board seat, whatever with Heaven Hills Distillery and his uncle (or cousin) Max Schapira, a W&L alumnus, president of Heaven Hills, and potentially an active W&L alumnus- where’s the coverage of W&L by Ian? Or, is Ian a publicity admitted hypocrite for his blind eye to W&L and the reading public is OK with that?
            Alumnus here, son of an alumnus, first class with women, veteran, attorney- my only substantive comment is enough already. Treat this like we did the Supreme Court decision. Take the orders and execute, near to perfection…”the VMI way.” We’re acting like a PT formation on a Saturday afternoon, marching sloppy and bumping into each other…close ranks. The substance and mission and products of VMI will not change because VMI has always emerged stronger after an attack. Jackson was a West Pointer, and those alums are talented, but obnoxious and annoying- so no more West Pointer statues on post, we have our own venerated alumni to memorialize. Francis H. Smith- West Pointer too.

          5. Can you explain what it is you think Shapira’s hypocrisy actually is? Heaven Hills didn’t own slaves, didn’t profit from slavers, didn’t fight for slaves, nor did his family. I hear this argument from time and time and it’s just a red herring. The place was started in the 1930’s by immigrants from Eastern Europe. And your W&L point is also lost of me. As an example, I know a few W&L grads and they all happen to support the effort to remove Lee from the name and sever all ties with the Confederacy. Just because one is a grad doesn’t mean that you automatically support the Confed. To wit, Ty Siedule, one of the most prominent members of the federal naming committee, is also a W&L grad and scourge of Lost Causers everywhere.

  8. Guy Wilson Avatar

    Just a few facts I would add. Jackson was so well regarded by the Black community that they asked him to buy a slave with a special needs child from an unsympathetic owner, and this he did. The other few slaves were personally attached to Mrs.Jackson, who brought them to the marriage to widower Thomas. The same faith that animated him to teach Black youth to read and to understand the Bible, also accounted for his bravery in battle and, no doubt, his view of slavery. His dogmatic Calvinism included an absolute belief in the sovereignty of God. As God had set the date of his death, He also had ordained slavery until a time which would end it. Had not God ordained 400 years of slavery for the Israelites in Egypt before He led them out? Jackson, who sometimes prayed long over his troops while they slept, was indeed considered eccentric. He ignored bullets whizzing all around him, only to be brought down by friendly fire. His last words, ” Let us cross over the river and rest under the shade of the trees.” Jackson never resigned his professorship at VMI, and so was still on the faculty rolls when he died. His famous quote alluded to the fa t that his staff was largely VMI men, including g his acade.ic boss, Col. Preston. Few reflect on the fact that his defense of the Valley was also a defense of his VMI, Lexington and his family. Context is helpful, and the easy dismissal of Jackson for not being a VMI grad by the Naming Committee was indeed thin, as is the modern idea that the War was all about slavery. Lincoln’s brilliant stroke was to make it so with the Emancipation Proclamation. It wasn’t just about the South. Suddenly the influence e of Abolitionists in the North had the moral imperative and support to fight bigotry, slavery and segregation in the North and the Territories. We should study the war, not cancel it. By doing so we will learn much about ourselves.

    1. “…the easy dismissal of Jackson for not being a VMI grad by the Naming Committee was indeed thin, as is the modern idea that the War was all about slavery.” Part of this statement is dead on, the other part is way off. The justification for removing Jackson from VMI was thin and poorly reasoned, as you point out. The worst part is that it dodges the question the subcommittee was supposed to address. Namely, that the greater justification is that he fought destroy the United States in violation of his officer oath for one of the worst of all possible causes. As for the latter part, the war was most definitely about slavery. The justification for secession is deeply rooted, if not entirely based, in preserving slavery as the foundation of southern society. It’s written all over the place, and the leadership made it clear over and over again in writing and deeds. Mind you, I’m not passing moral judgment on Jackson. Lots of good people (if he was one) fight for bad causes; it just raises an even better lesson for VMI cadets and future leaders–choose your causes wisely and think critically about your leadership.

Leave a Reply