The Youngkin Plan for Reversing Learning Loss

Aimee Guidera. Secretary of Education

by James A. Bacon

Now that the National Assessment for Educational Progress has provided irrefutable proof of the collapse in learning in Virginia schools over the past four years, the Youngkin administration can move on from the task of persuading Virginians that they have a problem to actually working the problem.

The initiatives that caught the eye of mainstream media reporters are those that have dollar figures attached. Governor Glenn Youngkin has challenged school districts to tap $2 billion in unspent federal COVID-relief funds to hire tutors to work with kids who need help reading. Media reports also took note of an initiative providing $30 million in state funds to help parents defray personal costs in finding assistance.

But there’s a lot more. At the core of the Youngkin learning-recovery program is sharing the wealth of state data with parents, teachers and school districts to drive decision making.

Secretary of Education Aimee Guidera detailed the thinking behind the administration’s seven main initiatives in a Zoom conference hosted by the Thomas Jefferson Institute for Public Policy.

Guidera variously described the learning loss over the past five years as “shocking” and “heart-wrenching” yet not surprising given the widespread erosion of standards under the previous two governors. The loss in learning afflicted every age and racial/ethnic group but was most pronounced among Hispanics and African Americans. While almost every state in the country experienced learning decline, the loss for Virginia 4th graders was three times the national average.

The COVID epidemic “illuminated and exacerbated” challenges that were evident in the data as early as 2017, she said. Here’s how the administration plans to reverse the collapse.

Raise standards. Virginia’s public schools have the lowest definition of “proficiency” among the 50 states when translated into their NAEP-equivalent ratings. Literally the lowest. Virginia needs to raise the definition of proficiency to the highest level in the country, Guidera said. It is likely that raising the “cut” scores — the number of questions that must be answered correctly — in the Standards of Learning tests will result in more students classified as failing… at least temporarily. But she said setting higher standards will bring about changes that will improve learning over time.

Empower parents. Schools can’t reverse the decline all alone. Parents must play a role, said Guidera. However, not all parents have the financial wherewithal to pay for tutors or other help from the private sector. The state will provide $30 million in emergency funds to support a “micro-grant” program aimed at parents. The program will prioritize those “most in need,” she said.

Recruit volunteer tutors. Intense tutoring can help students make up lost academic ground, Guidera said. The state will pursue a variety of partnerships to recruit more tutors. She mentioned specifically a partnership with the Kahn Academy to help with math. Other initiatives will encourage volunteers to sign up as tutors at neighborhood schools and forge partnerships with colleges and universities.

Hold schools accountable. Eighty-nine percent of Virginia schools are fully accredited; not a single school is classified as not accredited. “The system is telling everyone that everything works,” says Guidera. The Governor is challenging the State Board of Education to reinvent accreditation rules to hold schools accountable for abysmal performance.

Recruit and retain teachers. An exodus of school teachers from public schools is hindering the effort to catch up students who have fallen behind. The administration has stepped up recruiting efforts and is working to make it easier for people to enter the profession through non-traditional routes. But as Guidera noted, surveys show that the single biggest reason teachers are quitting is terrible working conditions, which the state has little power to influence.

Provide actionable information. In what Guidera calls a “game changer,” Virginia will be the first state in the nation to provide parents and teachers with “data snapshots” of their children/students based on standardized test scores and other data points. These snapshots will say whether the children are tracking at grade level and whether additional effort is called for.

Create personalized learning plans. Twenty-five school divisions are collaborating with the state on a pilot project to bring parents, students, and teachers together to work on personalized learning plans. “This is transformational,” Guidera said. It was not clear from her remarks how these personalized lesson plans might differ from Individual Educational Plans that schools provide students with learning disabilities.

Restoring learning loss is not something the state can do alone, Guidera said. The state must get buy-in from the quasi-independent State Board of Education not to mention local school districts, many of which have signaled their opposition to the Youngkin administration on hot-button issues involving race and transgender rights. Parents must get involved. Businesses, community groups, and citizens must join the effort. “We need all hands on deck,” she said.

Bacon’s bottom line: The proposals are sound, and they fall within the scope of what the state has the authority to do. But the erosion of order in many public schools makes learning exceedingly difficult — and local school officials set the tone for learning. If the learning environment doesn’t change, there is only so much that the Youngkin initiatives can accomplish. Critical to success will be the administration’s ability to coax ideologically hostile school boards into cooperating on areas of common agreement.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

92 responses to “The Youngkin Plan for Reversing Learning Loss”

  1. Turbocohen Avatar
    Turbocohen

    Some school boards cant get enough money for their Taj Mahal’s and monuments to themselves.. In VB, there is profuse waste on world class buildings where some moderation would leave funds available to retain teachers.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Well, don’t know much about school funding, but government has different colors of money for different purposes and you can’t mix them.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        one-time capital projects money – lasts for one year. Recurring money is ongoing every year for as long as you pay that employee.

        Our local school board – to their DISCREDIT would propose to pay teacher raises with carry-over money and the sad part is that not all the BOS knew it.

        But any elected SB/BOS should KNOW after one year the facts of life on one-time vs recurring.

  2. LarrytheG Avatar

    I am amazed and delighted that Kathleen has caught fire!

    So Virginia ranked in the top third of the country for a number of years and then dropped. Trying to figure out what the two prior Governors did or not to cause it. Did they fail to provide tutors or what? If they lowered standards, did the teachers slack off when the standards dropped?

    Tutoring is a nice concept. It costs money, lots of money and how to decide which kids “qualify” along with what parents income means “qualified” such that this does not become a defacto subsidy for kids who are not behind and parents who are not poor.

    Like Dick, I wonder how you get SOL-type data at every grade and more than once a year. Think about the resources needed to do this.

    Interesting that Youngkin and DOE have not much to say about JAB/Sherlocks favorite topic – school discipline.

  3. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    I feel like I am trapped in the movie “Groundhog Day”. In 1994 Virginia’s NAEP scores tanked. 1995 George Allen gives birth to SOLS. 1998 the first SOL test, which most students bombed. In 1999 only 11 percent of Virginia’s schools met the accreditation standards. By 2002 64% of Virginia’s schools met accreditation standards. NAEP and SAT scores moved up. By 2012 the anti SOL test movement is gaining steam and McAuliffe gives us SOL Lite in 2015. The slide begins. I guess it is 1994 all over again.
    https://doe.virginia.gov/boe/reports/annual_reports/2013_appendix_a_sol_history.pdf

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      NCLB – 2001 and NAEP 1969.

      Still need to keep in mind that Virginia did well on NAEP for a long time better than 2/3 of the other states.

    2. Lefty665 Avatar

      Groundhog decades?

        1. Lefty665 Avatar

          I understand Groundhog Day. It seemed the cycles you were describing were more decades than days. Actually it was 25 years from NAEP scores tanking in 1994 to tanking again in 2019. It’s more like Groundhog Quarter Centuries.

          1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead

            How in the hell did we end up right back where we started? I find that the most infuriating fact of all. Billions of dollars spent on education in the past 28 years, and we have so very little to show for it.

          2. democracy Avatar

            You don’t know much at all about testing and test scores do you? Worse, you appear to revel in your ignorance. Sad.

          3. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead

            27 years in the classroom. Taught over 3,000 students. Can’t give us a real name? Are you yellow?

          4. democracy Avatar

            Where, Mr. Jimmy? Are you a Confederate sympathizer?

          5. democracy Avatar

            Mr. Jimmy, when you embrace the United Daughters of the Confederacy and their Lost Cause mythology, and when you make the absurd claim that removing Confederate memorabilia from publicly-owned spaces and places is “historical cleansing.” then you just might be a Confederate sympathizer.

          6. democracy Avatar

            Hey, Mr. Jimmy.

            Aren’t the United Daughters of the Confederacy a major proponent of the Lost Cause mythology? Here’s what American Civil War historian James McPherson said about them and their ilk:

            “I think of such groups as the United Daughters of the Confederacy and the Sons of the Confederate Veterans are dedicated to celebrating the Confederacy and rather thinly veiled support for white supremacy.”

            And you come up with Mr. Ed??

          7. democracy Avatar

            Ahh, more video from Mr. Jimmy. Dude, when you complain about the governor’s (not Youngkin’s) African American History Education Commission recommendations and say that your “purpose in retirement is to expose the Marxism and lies in modern educational leadership,” well, you kind give up the (gray) ghost, no?

    3. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      Nice to have someone around who can provide the historical perspective.

    4. DJRippert Avatar

      McAuliffe had to decide whether he wanted to support the teachers’ unions / associations or Virginia’s children. He made his choice.

      1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
        James Wyatt Whitehead

        It really was that simple. At the time the anti SOL movement was strong and voters wanted this. You really can pin the tail of McAuliffe. That is when nonsense began.

        1. Lefty665 Avatar

          There are a lot of things you can pin on the SOB.

      2. democracy Avatar

        DJ, just curious. Did you vote for Trump? Twice?

    5. democracy Avatar

      Psst. Mr. Jimmy appears to have things all backwards.

      Here’s how researcher Gerald Bracey described the NAEP proficiency levels in Nov. 2009 in Ed Leadership:

      “the NAEP reports the percentage of students reaching various achievement levels—Basic, Proficient, and Advanced. The achievement levels have been roundly criticized by the U.S. Government Accounting Office (1993), the National Academy of Sciences (Pellegrino, Jones, & Mitchell, 1999); and the National Academy of Education (Shepard, 1993). These critiques point out that the methods for constructing the levels are flawed, that the levels demand unreasonably high performance, and that they yield results that are not corroborated by other measures.”

      The National Academy of Sciences called the NAEP proficiency standards “fundamentally flawed.” NAEP’s original technical evaluation team reported that “these standards and the results obtained from them should under no circumstances be used as a baseline or benchmark.”

      The General Accounting Office study of NAEP assumptions and procedures and proficiency levels found them to be “invalid for the purpose of drawing inferences about content mastery.”

      And yet Jim Bacon tells readers this:

      “the National Assessment for Educational Progress has provided irrefutable proof of the collapse in learning in Virginia schools over the past four years..”

      This is simply a flat-out lie.

      Bacon is telling his readers – and Glenn Youngkin is telling Virginians – that they should be scared over NAEP 8th grade scores that declined by 8 points and 4th grade math scores that fell by 5. This after a serious pandemic. Bacon and Youngkin are ginning up a panic over small declines in scores that have – basically – little to no meaning.

      Why would they do this? Do they have no sense of integrity?

      Ask Mr. Bacon to print my entire comment instead of hiding it.

      1. Your extended comment arrived in my email box but I don’t see it included in the comments. I have no explanation why. I certainly did not suppress it. I will try to dredge it up in my email files and repost it manually.

        1. democracy Avatar

          I posted it through your blog and am reposting in 2 minutes.

      2. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
        James Wyatt Whitehead

        Though “democracy”s name is concealed he stands revealed exactly as he is.

  4. Bob X from Texas Avatar
    Bob X from Texas

    Kids should not get a summer vacation unless they are up to grade level in reading, writing and arithmetic.
    If they are behind they need to be in school to catch up!

    1. Lefty665 Avatar

      That presumes more of the same environment that let kids fail will help them succeed. That may not be the case. The failure may be as much institution as kid.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Whips, chains, it’s the other Virginia way.

        1. Lefty665 Avatar

          The learning equivalent of the beatings will continue until morale improves.

    2. DJRippert Avatar

      Not a bad idea.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        Problem is , it costs a bunch of money. taxpayer money.

        1. DJRippert Avatar

          Apparently, there’s $2B in COVID funds still available to tap to alleviate the learning loss issues. This sounds like a decent way to start.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            I agree but I don’t think schools will do that for a one- time year without a lot more push from VDOE to do so.

            The ying and yang of this is local control of schools or state-dictated.

            Do we want the State dictating these things like mandatory state-funded summer school no matter what?

            I’d support a regional approach that is independent of school districts but then the state will be responsible for recruiting, curriculum and academic performance directly.

            And it would take a state law to do so.

            Which means Youngkin will need ample support in the GA to move such a proposal forward.

            We don’t have dictators or at least we used to not want them but now….. it seems to be a “thing” with some folks.

  5. LarrytheG Avatar

    Nothing about “LAB” schools in the plan?

    1. Guidera did mention lab schools as well as expanding the tuition tax credit for scholarships as a way to create more school choice, but that was in response to a question. Her main focus was turning around the existing public school system.

      1. Turbocohen Avatar
        Turbocohen

        She cant mention the massive parenting fail. Its YUGE. Kids often come from dysfunctional environments and often do not arrive prepared to learn. Teachers often get bogged down with parenting these kids.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          tis TRUE. But does that mean every kid in that situation is screwed and no hope?

          Seems like we started out in Education with hardly any parents “educated” and they sent their kids to school where they were taught to read and write and do math and those kids grew up “educated” and had kids that they COULD help.

          So.. we’ve reached a point where bad/uneducated parents doom the kids and public education can’t help them?

  6. Lefty665 Avatar

    Youngkins recent initiative to bring all kids up to grade level reading by the third grade started at the right place, the beginning. Let no more kids fall behind at the start.

    Because there are many more of them (grades 4-12), bringing kids who have already fallen behind up to grade level is a different and more labor intensive issue, and harder the further along kids are and the further behind they fall. The first imperative needs to be to keep any more kids from falling behind.

    In the state wide statistics there were several systems that stuck out as successful, some of them rural. Finding out what they are doing right and replicating it might be a good tactic.

    JAB is right, schools cannot hope to accomplish anything if they are not in control of the environment. It ain’t just a problem of poor inner city schools anymore as the recent posting on Albemarle High School demonstrated.

  7. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    These are all good ideas and I doubt if there would be much pushback from “ideologically hostile” school boards. After all, the proposals are not grounded in political ideology.

    It is always good to have and use volunteers, although I seriously doubt if there will be anywhere close to the number of skilled volunteers needed (you can’t just throw anybody in and have him or her tutor kids in math or reading).

    “Data snapshots” sounds like report cards. I realize that grades are suspect, but what other data can be included? Of course, there are standardized test score that could be incorporated, but the SOLs are given only during certain times of the year (usually in the last month or so).

    Personalized learning plans sounds like a lot more work for teachers. More money will be needed to provide these teachers classroom aides to help with the workload.

    The micro grants to hire tutors could help, but that is a one-time fix.

    1. VaNavVet Avatar

      More unfunded mandates with little actual assistance offered. How about micro-grants for the teachers where the money could really do some good.

    2. Kathleen Smith Avatar
      Kathleen Smith

      Dick, this is nothing new. Blah blah blah. I move from Virginia to DC. I make more money and I look good. Title I used to pay tutoring services, but it was not well planned (like this) and did little but start a cottage tutoring industry that died. Petersburg recruits and pays for retired teachers every year, where has that improved test scores to at least average.

      1. DJRippert Avatar

        Frankly, your comments make you a walking advertisement for public school competition (e.g., charter schools). You don’t believe that teachers should be accountable for the meltdown in performance and you criticize every idea for improvement without putting forth any ideas of your own.

        In a competitive public school market, people who believe that the status quo is inevitable can stay in the traditional schools while those willing to try new ideas can head to the alternative public schools. The parents will decide where the tax dollars attached to their children will flow.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          You’re acting like parents are the ones that pay for their kids education , not other taxpayers. 10K per kid. How much does mom/dad pay in taxes ?

          1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
            James C. Sherlock

            DJ is acting like the parents are parents.

            Do you think taxes in this case are like stock, where you own shares of the kids and can vote them?

          2. LarrytheG Avatar

            I think ALL taxpayers have a stake in it. Yes.

          3. DJRippert Avatar

            All taxpayers have a stake in state supported colleges. Let’s set up regional colleges and insist that all students who graduated from a high school in a particular area only attend the monopoly state supported college for that area. Let’s set up neighborhood medical clinics and insist that all Medicaid recipients only go to the neighborhood medical clinic in the area where they live.

            There are lots of situations where general tax dollars are paid to support choice by those receiving the benefits of those tax dollars.

          4. LarrytheG Avatar

            DMV also, right? ABC? But money to pay for non-public services is different.

            Doctors can and do refuse to see Medicaid/Medicare patients and Medicare/Medicaid refuses to pay providers that do not follow the rules.

            Bottom Line – you’re not going to take tax dollars to give to parents to pay for whatever school they want no more than Medicare will do that for any “doctor” you choose either,

            You’re not being clear-eyed here and so is the politics.

          5. DJRippert Avatar

            There is no choice whatsoever in Virginia K-12 public schools. There is some choice in Medicaid providers.

            Sorry, Larry but you are wrong here.

            As far as DMV … you can absolutely go to any DMV you want to in the state of Virginia. There is absolutely no mandate that you only can go to the DMV closest to your house. Same thing with ABC stores. You can go to any ABC store you want.

            Start there. Any child in Virginia can attend any public school in Virginia regardless of where they live. How many public schools in Richmond do you think would close as children went to school in Henrico?

          6. Kathleen Smith Avatar
            Kathleen Smith

            The way the constitution reads, Henrico could refuse them. School choice is important, it should not be treated as a program, but a belief supported by the state’s constitution. Lab schools can easily go away in the next general assembly. We need a permanent solution.

          7. DJRippert Avatar

            I agree and I recognize that Henrico can’t be forced to take students from other jurisdictions. However, that gets to a more fundamental issue with the way Virginia is organized. Why aren’t cities in counties? Why are all of our cities so small? Why can’t cities annex urbanized parts of the surrounding county?

            It’s almost like Virginia’s fundamental governance structure is designed to promote economic and racial segregation.

          8. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
            Dick Hall-Sizemore

            Bingo!

          9. LarrytheG Avatar

            The interesting thing about this is that we tried this before.

            It was called “busing” and all hell broke loose!

          10. LarrytheG Avatar

            you’ve gone off on that city/county tangent again.

            Here’s a list of the independent school districts in the Houston MSA:

            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/22577dfdb88768aeb0112e24c57fa5b206d3961e90556f4957db0c6fe40e3298.jpg

          11. LarrytheG Avatar

            A given school may be sized for say 400 kids and is allocated it’s enrollment by geographic districting.

            A “good” school will get “maxed” pretty easy – and a poor school emptied.

            You can’t magically increase the building size nor the staffing at the “good” school so easily.

            Try to put this concept down on paper in practical terms.

            That’s what Va/VDOE/Youngkin would have to do for such a concept.

            Not easy.

          12. LarrytheG Avatar

            it’s not a simple thing at all. Just think that …say a Henrico school is a “good” school and a whole bunch of low-income Richmond kids want to go there. How would that work?

          13. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
            Dick Hall-Sizemore

            I have often thought of this scenario, especially when folks start talking about school choice. Let kids attend any public school they wish, notwithstanding jurisdictional boundaries. The main effect would be on the boundaries, primarily due to transportation issues. For example, kids who live in North Richmond could just as easily go to Henrico High School, which is near the Richmond/Henrico boundary as John Marshall in the city.

            There would be many objections to such a scenario, but the one with the most justification would be the protest that Henrico tax payers are paying to educated Richmond kids, while the city gets to keep the property tax revenue produced by the residences of those Richmond kids who choose to attend Henrico schools. That could be remedied by authorizing Henrico to send Richmond a bill and by diverting Richmond’s SOQ funding for those kids to Henrico.

          14. LarrytheG Avatar

            I’m okay with “choice” as long as the school is certified as an accredited public school, accepts ANY demographic but especially the kids at low-performing schools AND they do the same SOL testing and prove they are better.

            We can be in violent agreement.

            But you’re NOT going to give tax money to any parent to spend on any school they want regardless of the above stipulations.

            Not wrong about that at all.

            You’re living in LA LA Land if you think parents are going to get tax money for whatever they choose to spend it on.

          15. DJRippert Avatar

            The parents would have to “spend” their tax money on a public school. But there would be more than one public school available in every given geography.

            Agree with the SOL testing requirement.

            However, disciplinary policies might vary by school. For example, an alternate public school might insist that all cell phones be locked up in the student’s locker at the start of school and not retrieved until the school day was over.

          16. LarrytheG Avatar

            In other words, some schools might kick out some kids for various different reasons that real public schools cannot do?

          17. democracy Avatar

            Ever hear of the “social contract” DJ?

            If so, do you believe in it?

          18. DJRippert Avatar

            How does it work for publicly supported higher education? Students decide which publicly supported college or university they want to attend. The public colleges and universities with more interest make a case for expansion. Those with less interest shrink or close. The students decide where to attend although all taxpayers pay to support public higher education.

            The only two differences between the competitive structure for colleges and K-12 are:

            1) There is no competition at the K-12 level, at least not in Virginia and …

            2) As minors, the children wouldn’t make the choices themselves.

            How would you feel if the government set up neighborhood medical clinics for Medicaid recipients and told those folks that they MUST only go to their assigned neighborhood clinic because all taxpayers pay fr their medical care? If that were ever proposed, liberals would absolutely lose their minds over how unfairly poor people were being treated by denying them medical choice.

          19. LarrytheG Avatar

            If all taxpayers are paying – then it’s a decision at that level.

            How would I feel if Medicaid or Medicare folks were directed to certain providers?

            It’s already that way in some respects.

            There is no unfettered “choice” when others are helping to pay.

          20. DJRippert Avatar

            Seriously? Medicaid recipients are assigned a specific medical clinic where they must go for treatment? No choice at all? Because that’s what happens in Virginia’s public schools. And students at state supported colleges and universities are assigned one college or university where they must attend? No choice at all?

            Don’t be silly.

          21. LarrytheG Avatar

            They can go to the ones that Medicaid approves IF that doctor is actually an accredited real doctor and that doctor accepts Medicaid for payment.

            College requires payment and that is a choice because it IS YOUR money and YOUR debt.

            Come-on guy, you’re messed on here… this is the kind of wild-azzed politics going on today,

            get real. You’re NOT going to give parents tax money to spend as they please.

        2. Kathleen Smith Avatar
          Kathleen Smith

          I am an advocate of school choice. Teachers need to be accountable too. Why are teachers who continue to fail kids still employed?

          I have ideas of my own: but I am amazed at the rhetoric politicians who have no stake in the game come up with ideas that have been deployed for years. Don’t use students and parents for your resume

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            Can a teacher be fairly judged and on what basis?

            If a teacher has 25 kids and 20 of them score high on SOLs and 5 score badly verses another teacher than has 25 and 24 of them pass but with mediocre scores?

            Whatever way it is done – it WILL cause teachers to teach to that standard. Right?

        3. democracy Avatar

          read my comment above, if Jim Bacon allows it to be seen…

          1. democracy Avatar

            Apparently Mr. Bacon refuses to allow readers to see my comment. Sad.

    3. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Student tutors. Pay ’em somehow. Nothing teaches a struggling 6th grader like an advanced 7th grader. Kids learn from peers like nothing else. Take sex education for example. No wait. Not that.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        It’s the key to students getting in to TJ in NoVa. Those that have the money get the good tutors.

    4. democracy Avatar

      “After all, the proposals are not grounded in political ideology.”

      Ahahahahahahahahaaa.

      Are you serious?

  8. Kathleen Smith Avatar
    Kathleen Smith

    Retaining teachers while beating them up is contraindicated. Kahn has been around for awhile. There is nothing transformationally new about the personalized learning plans. If she had ever been in a school as a teacher, she would know that data rooms already exist where everything about a kid who is not making it is posted. She will take credit for all of her seven points, use it for her next job making six figures, and give no credit to educators who are now without her mandates doing the work.

    1. VaNavVet Avatar

      Right so the fix is to beat up on teachers and schools while telling the parents that their kids are failures. What could possibly go wrong? Not at all clear that this is the best way to coax districts to join in.

  9. Kathleen Smith Avatar
    Kathleen Smith

    My kind of accountability system: Set the bar, not multiple bars, in our case SOL pass rates, high. You make it or you don’t. That simple. Either my kid is passing the bar or not. Not some wishy, washy, how can I spin the data to look good and boost my resume system. My school met the bar or it did not. Nothing less.

    1. DJRippert Avatar

      And if the school where parents are forced to send their kids doesn’t meet the new, higher bar? Wait a few years to see if a) the administration is held accountable, and if the old administration is fired, then … b) give the new administration some time to make the changes they recommend?

      By then, your kid has lost the opportunity for a decent education.

      There needs to be be public school competition with immediate transfer capability.

      The penalty for schools that can’t make the higher bar is simple – they close.

    2. DJRippert Avatar

      And if the school where parents are forced to send their kids doesn’t meet the new, higher bar? Wait a few years to see if a) the administration is held accountable, and if the old administration is fired, then … b) give the new administration some time to make the changes they recommend?

      By then, your kid has lost the opportunity for a decent education.

      There needs to be be public school competition with immediate transfer capability.

      The penalty for schools that can’t make the higher bar is simple – they close.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        Does that include the “choice” schools also?

        1. DJRippert Avatar

          Yes, of course.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            So they’re also SOLs?

      2. Kathleen Smith Avatar
        Kathleen Smith

        Amen to that

  10. Kathleen Smith Avatar
    Kathleen Smith

    Do you know what happens to a cart that is pulled by seven horses in seven different directions? It falls apart. Our accountability system is this kind of cart. Her plan maybe as well as too many politicians with too many ideas will pull the plan apart.

  11. James C. Sherlock Avatar
    James C. Sherlock

    I share Jim’s general assessment, but I would like to stress one of the initiatives as potentially a bigger game changer than we may think.

    It is the unpaid volunteer tutor program.

    I did that for five years in an elementary school in Virginia Beach. I loved it. I recommend it to every parent and grandparent – and those without kids of their own.

    In today’s environment, it can perform a dual function.

    It will, first and foremost, help kids learn. It can also help the broader public understand the working conditions that the teachers face – good or bad.

    When I tutored math, I worked in the classroom with the teacher three days a week. We set up five desks in a corner where I could work with kids who had fallen far behind. We worked in our corner while the other kids were on computers working on math that my group had no chance with because, for example, they could not multiply in the fifth grade. When I helped with reading, we did it in the library or at lunch, with the kids bringing their lunches back to the classroom.

    I said it was fun. It was also very satisfying. I could see them learn and test them to prove it.

    The conditions in that school were exemplary. But every school has kids who have fallen behind, often in that school because many that I worked with had transferred from elsewhere.

    But you get a sense of the school when you are tutoring, and can perhaps help the teachers bring their messages about working conditions to the broader public and to the school board.

    I strongly recommend the tutoring path. You will be amazed how good it makes you feel.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      You deserve credit and thanks for your contribution in that endeavor.

      I would also say that being good at math is not the same as teaching it. Two different but important skills in education.

      Volunteers with less skill can still help kids read for kids that don’t have learning issues that require a specialist.

      But teaching math so kids understand it and can build on it to go on to higher math is not a common skill at all.

      1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
        James C. Sherlock

        Being able to multiply is a common skill. So is being able to download printed multiplication tables and assigning the learning of them, 2 thought 12 tables, one at a time. And downloading 5-minute timed tests that sort out those who learned their multiplication tables from those who are counting on their fingers under the table.

        I, and their teachers, found that if they could not multiply by the end of the third grade, of course they could not divide, and they would have no chance in learning math going forward.

        As for reading, of course I was not a reading specialist. But I could take two or three kids at a time and listen to them read out loud. The teachers assigned the books. I was just there so they could practice with someone who could help them when they stumbled. We also worked on vocabulary. Again, the teacher would provide a list of words, and I was there to ask them to try to explain what they meant, whether they knew the roots of the words, that sort of thing.

        It is lack of learning in the early grades that are the basis of every learning problem.

        I did not have to be Aristotle. I just needed to prepare, be there, pay attention tho them and try to help. I think I did. And it was a terrific experience.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          In the lower grades, totally agree. Math is much more mechanical. Reading – if they have a learning disability needs to be detected and dealt with by a specialist.

          PALS – identifies the specific deficits and guides what kind of help is needed.

          Paras are extremely important and useful beyond their tutoring skills I am told.

    2. MisterChips Avatar
      MisterChips

      I just happen to hear this podcast this morning on my way to school.
      https://www.econtalk.org/roland-fryer-on-educational-reform/
      Tutoring was one of the innovations that showed some promise and I definitely agree. Even students who mostly understood the material benefited from the interaction and additional motivation a tutor can provide.

      I tutored a student in trigonometry today and always love my small group or one on one sessions. It’s a much better way to learn and teach.

      1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
        James C. Sherlock

        I agree with you. I think unpaid volunteer tutoring, presented to the people of Virginia as a way to help, can make a major difference, and help pull the system back together.

  12. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    In some respect the worst thing that can happen in the school system is the very thing for which we strive — homogeneity. But, that’s not to say that chaos is better. We need experimental education. Constantly.

  13. Posted on behalf of “democracy”:

    Oh, dear god. Jim Bacon just wrote a propaganda piece for Glenn Youngkin. And a BAD and uninformed propaganda piece at that. Let’s investigate.

    Here’s how researcher Gerald Bracey described the NAEP proficiency levels in Nov. 2009 in Ed Leadership:

    “the NAEP reports the percentage of students reaching various achievement levels—Basic, Proficient, and Advanced. The achievement levels have been roundly criticized by the U.S. Government Accounting Office (1993), the National Academy of Sciences (Pellegrino, Jones, & Mitchell, 1999); and the National Academy of Education (Shepard, 1993). These critiques point out that the methods for constructing the levels are flawed, that the levels demand unreasonably high performance, and that they yield results that are not corroborated by other measures.”
    The National Academy of Sciences called the NAEP proficiency standards “fundamentally flawed.” NAEP’s original technical evaluation team reported that “these standards and the results obtained from them should under no circumstances be used as a baseline or benchmark.”

    The General Accounting Office study of NAEP assumptions and procedures and proficiency levels found them to be “invalid for the purpose of drawing inferences about content mastery.”
    And yet Jim Bacon tells readers this:

    “the National Assessment for Educational Progress has provided irrefutable proof of the collapse in learning in Virginia schools over the past four years..”

    This is simply a flat-out lie.

    Bacon is telling his readers – and Glenn Youngkin is telling Virginians – that they should be scared over NAEP 8th grade scores that declined by 8 points and 4th grade math scores that fell by 5. This after a serious pandemic. Bacon and Youngkin are ginning up a panic over small declines in scores that have – basically – little to no meaning.

    Why would they do this? Do they have no sense of integrity?

    The central focus of public education could and should be democratic citizenship. The Founders (like Jefferson) were advocates of public education as the means to promote the common good. It – the idea that public schools should teach democratic citizenship – stretches back to Aristotle:

    “… the training in things which are of common interest should be the same for all. Neither must we suppose that any one of the citizens belongs to himself, for they all belong to the state, and are each of them a part of the state, and the care of each part is inseparable from the care of the whole…each government has a peculiar character…the character of democracy creates democracy, and the character of oligarch creates oligarchy, and always the better the character, the better the government.”

    In fact, the Founders envisioned a democratic society “in which the common good was the chief end of government.” They agreed with John Locke’s view that the main purpose of government –– the reason people CREATE government –– is to protect their persons through, as historian R. Freeman Butts put it, a social contract that placed “the public good above private desires.” The goal was “a commonwealth, a democratic corporate society in which the common good was the chief end of government.”

    But Republicans today do NOT believe in any of that. Instead, they believe in and follow a racist serial liar who is an insurrectionist and seditionist.
    The democratic social contract is – as we are witnessing – under direct attack by conservative Republicans. At its core, this attack is an assault on democratic values, on equality and “liberty and justice for all.” At its core, it relies on an ugly racism that casts whites as “the victims.”

    The attack on public schools, sometimes disguised as “parent rights,” is orchestrated. It’s being funded and set into motion by groups like the Council for National Policy, a far-right “religious” group that had outsized-influence with the Trump administration.

    Ginni Thomas, the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, and a seditionist, is a member of the Council for National Policy. Current and former CNP members include Cleta Mitchell, the Trump lawyer who was on that call to the Georgia Secretary of State demanding that he find Trump more than 11,780 votes, and Charlie Kirk, head of Turning Point USA who bragged about bussing tens of thousands of people to the January 6th ‘Stop the Steal’ rally and insurrection. Two of the top peeps at the Federalist Society, Eugene Meyer and Leonard Leo, are also CNP members. Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett were high priorities for the Federalist Society and for CNP.

    Prior to the 2021 Virginia campaign for governor, The Washington Post reported this:

    “Youngkin surged in the late weeks of the race by tapping into a deep well of conservative parental resentment against public school systems. He promised to ban the teaching of critical race theor y, an academic approach to racial history that’s not on the Virginia K-12 curriculum….the conservative news media and Republican candidates stirred the stew of anxieties and racial resentments that animate the party’s base — thundering about equity initiatives, books with sexual content and transgender students on sports teams.”

    The NY Times put it like this:

    “the past half-century of American political history shows that racially coded attacks are how Republicans have been winning elections for decades…Youngkin dragged race into the election, making his vow to ‘ban critical race theory’ a centerpiece of his stump speech and repeating it over the closing weekend — Race is the elephant in the room.”

    UVA political analyst Larry Sabato described the Youngkin Critical Race Theory strategy this way:

    “The operative word is not critical. And it’s not theory. It’s race. What a shock, huh? Race. That is what matters. And that’s why it’s sticks. There’s a lot of, we can call it white backlash, white resistance, whatever you want to call it. It has to do with race. And so we live in a post-factual era … It doesn’t matter that [CRT] isn’t taught in Virginia schools. It’s this generalized attitude that whites are being put upon and we’ve got to do something about it. We being white voters.”

    White voters — especially low-education white voters responded. Youngkin won 76 percent of non-college graduate whites. And Youngkin got way more of the non-college white women votes (75 percent) than McAuliffe. Check the exit polls:

    WHITE WOMEN COLLEGE GRADS
    VA 2020: 58% Biden, 41% Trump
    VA 2021: 62% McAuliffe, 38% Youngkin
    WHITE WOMEN NON-COLLEGE
    VA 2020: 56% Trump, 44% Biden
    VA 2021: 75% Youngkin, 25% McAuliffe

    There are LOTS of important things that Bacon could be writing about; lots of things he might credibly report on, but the phony scare about NAEP scores is certainly NOT one of them.

    Can Bacon’s Rebellion not do better than this?

    PS: Yale historian David Blight, who has won all kinds of awards for his historical research, including a Pulitzer Prize, said this recently about the current political environment:

    “Changing demographics and 15 million new voters drawn into the electorate by Obama in 2008 have scared Republicans—now largely the white people’s party—into fearing for their existence. With voter ID laws, reduced polling places and days, voter roll purges, restrictions on mail-in voting, an evisceration of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and a constant rant about ‘voter fraud’ without evidence, Republicans have soiled our electoral system with undemocratic skullduggery…The Republican Party has become a new kind of Confederacy.”

    This is NOT the side that Jim Bacon should be on. Nor should anyone who believes in the Constitution and the American Republic.

Leave a Reply