By James C. Sherlock

Richneck Elementary Credit WAVY TV 10

The shooting at Richneck Elementary was a tragedy by every measure.

I am not going to discuss the shooting itself here.

I will instead offer a summary of the school’s state quality data so we can get a sense of the environment in that school.  It is located across I-64 from Fort Eustis in a neighborhood described in The New York Times as “generally safe”.

Fort Eustis hosts General Stanford Elementary, the highest performing elementary school in the Newport News Public Schools system.  In a neighborhood generally considered extraordinarily safe.  Hooah.

Bullets at Richneck?  I note in a report from the New York Post that:

A grandmother of one of Zwerner’s students said another pupil brought “bright gold bullets” to school last week, but it’s unclear if its same youth in custody, FOX3 reported.

I asked the mayor’s office earlier today to confirm or deny that report and inquired at the state level as well, but had not heard back by publication time. We are left to wonder which kid in Ms. Zwerner’s class may have brought bullets to school the week before the shooting.

We know that under the Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS) discipline system, of which Richneck was an early adopter, bullets would have constituted an office-managed offense.  So the principal would have made the decisions.

We can just hope that the grandmother’s story was wrong or, if not, that it wasn’t the same kid.

From Child Protective Services (CPS) in Newport News:

Virginia Law, Chapter 12.1, Section 63.1-248 requires social services departments to investigate all suspected reports of abuse and neglect. Child Protective Services is a specialized continuum of casework services to abused, neglected, or exploited children and families. The focus of the service is identification, assessment, and service provision in an effort to protect children, preserve families, and prevent further maltreatment.

The schools are mandated reporters.

Bottom line on this part of the story:  a six-year-old bringing bullets to school is prima facie neglect.  If that happens, Newport News requires CPS be called.  No exceptions.

Moving on.  But we’ll move on to describe statistically the school which the child who fired the gun had apparently been in for one-and-a-half years, Richneck Elementary. I will skip back and forth with years as supported by the data, so it is worth paying attention to those transitions.

Enrollment in 2022-23 is 558 in grades K-5.  86 in kindergarten, 100 in first grade.  Total enrollment is down from 627 two years earlier.  Sixty-one percent of students are economically disadvantaged, higher than statewide (44%) but slightly lower than the division’s 64%.

Richneck Elementary has a majority of Black and Hispanic students, but not exceptionally so. Students are 22% white and 3.4% Asian, both higher than division averages.

Five percent are English Learners.

Accreditation.  2022 accreditation status presented here is based on performance over a three-year average of school years 2018-22. Last year accreditation was waived.  So this is historical data.

Schools performing at Level One or Level Two on all school quality indicators are rated as “Accredited.”  Here are the accreditation indicators for Richneck.

Level 2 is “near” the state standard or improving.  No judgement is attempted in this report on the state standard itself.

Richneck posted a level 3 (performing below the state standard) math achievement gap for Students with Disabilities with a 26% pass rate compared to 39% statewide.

Let’s translate those historical levels to actual achievement numbers in 2021-22.

Academic Achievement and Gaps. Richneck SOL pass rates 2021-22 vs. Virginia elementary schools statewide were very poor.

English Reading:

  • Richneck: all 61%; economically disadvantaged 51%; Black 44%.
  • Statewide: all 73%; economically disadvantaged 59%; Black 60%. ‘

Math

  • Richneck: all 56%; economically disadvantaged 44%; Black 37%.
  • Statewide: all 66%; economically disadvantaged 52%; Black 49%

Science

  • Richneck: all 57%; economically disadvantaged 54%; Black 44%
  • Statewide: all 65%; economically disadvantaged 49%; Black 46%

Learning climate.

 Chronic absenteeism last year at Richneck was 25% . Newport News Public Schools average was 29%. State average was 20%.

Newport News Public Schools is a Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) division and Richneck was an early adopter.

Richneck was no stranger to weapons and violence, but as an elementary school did not approach the dangers of Newport News middle and high schools.

In 2021-22, Richneck reported the following under the category Behaviors that Endanger Self or Others:

  • Assault: Intending to cause physical injury to another person – 2
  • Assault and Battery: Causing physical injury to another person – 1
  • Striking Staff: The use of force against a staff member when no injury is caused – 2
  • Threatening, intimidating, or instigating violence, injury or harm to a staff member or members – 1
  • Threatening, intimidating, or instigating violence, injury or harm to another student(s) or other(s) – 1

Those numbers put Richneck in the low middle of the Newport News elementary schools in that year.

Richneck reported weapons offenses in three of the five years prior to 2021-22. Some of the weapons offenses numbers in other Newport News schools on that spreadsheet in non-shutdown years will get your attention.

No weapons offense data are available for 2021-22

Finance.  In 2021-22, Newport News Public Schools spent considerably less per pupil ($10,852) than the average Virginia school division ($12,492), and a bigger percentage of that expenditure on other than instruction (38.2%) than the state average (32.6%).

Newport News provides a far lower percentage of its school expenditures from local funds (25.8%) than the average division (46.9%).

Teacher quality.  Student-teacher ratio in 2019-20 in Newport News K-7 was 14.37 to 1.  Statewide it was 12.97 to one in that same year.  Provisionally licensed teachers were the same 8.1% as the state percentage.

Out-of-field and Inexperienced Teachers were 2.1%, statewide 1.1 % that same year.  In Title 1 schools, those percentages were 0.8 Newport News, 1% statewide.

Half of Newport News teachers had a masters degree and 14% a doctoral degree. Those together totaled about the same as statewide.

ESSA.  The Every Student Succeeds Act data are years out of date, as they are statewide due to suspended collection during COVID.

School readiness. Newport News Kindergarten Students’ Public Preschool Experience in 2021-22 (46%) was much higher than the state norm (29%), though COVID dropped both down to that point.

Kindergarten students meeting full literacy benchmarks (83%) in 2019-20 virtually matched the state average (82%)

Bottom line.  Richneck is an average elementary school in an underfunded,  poor-performing, violence-prone division.

It would be generally daunting for a first grader, softened hopefully by his teacher and classmates.

Abby Zwerner had a great reputation as a teacher.

But one of her first graders shot her, reportedly intentionally, with what The Virginian-Pilot is reporting was his mother’s gun.

The questions about the report from a kid in Ms. Zwerner’s class that another kid was showing bullets in school days before the shooting – true or false?  And if true was it the kid that later shot her? – will hang over this story until answered.

Today I could not get either answer at the state level or from the Mayor’s office.  I honestly don’t think either office knew the answer.

Perhaps tomorrow.

 


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

42 responses to “The Shooting at Richneck Elementary – Part 2 – the School”

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Net of these children’s experience in Newport News Public Schools in general and this elementary school in particular, you absolutely have to be kidding.

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        Well, we have listened to you run on and on about how minority schools have suffered under decreasing test scores since Covid (you know because of DEI initiatives) and here we have one with increasing scores….

  1. Kathleen Smith Avatar
    Kathleen Smith

    This is a six year old. I have a lot of concerns, but I am not going to pass judgment on a child until the full story is given. It will take awhile. I hope the teacher will return to good health. The community has many questions that the school and division will answer.

  2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
    James C. Sherlock

    This entire article was about the dreadful state of Newport News schools in general and this one in particular. Most are only paying attention briefly because there was a shooting. So I thought it important to provide this perspective rather than let Newport News be a disembodied prop.

    One commenter picked up on it and somehow saw light at the end of the tunnel. I see need for transformational change.

    But maybe I missed something.

    1. James McCarthy Avatar
      James McCarthy

      Ya got the point of commenter criticism. Yes, you missed a great deal insisting upon your view about the dreadful state of Newport News schools suggesting that as a cause of the shooting. To paraphrase James Carville, “It’s the availability of guns.” In this case, the negligent parent failure.

      1. “It’s the availability of guns.”

        NOVA is interesting as it is the interesection of 3 very different gun control philosophies – VA, DC, and Md.

        Va has the least restrictive laws, Md more restrictive and DC the most restrictive. According to your statement, Va should have the most gun crime, but it actually has the least. Year after year, Va tracks at the national average for homicide, with Md about 60% higher and DC about 300% of the Va numbers. That shouldn’t be possible if ‘It’s the availability of guns’.

        Comparing DC (population 715,000) to Fairfax County (1,250,000), last year (2022) DC had over 200 murders, Fairfax about 20.

        How do you explain your theory’s failure to predict reality?

        1. Not Today Avatar

          Most of the weapons used in DC crimes come from VA. https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-is-awash-in-illegal-guns-how-do-you-think-they-get-there/2019/10/07/01493180-e934-11e9-85c0-85a098e47b37_story.html

          Most guns used in Baltimore crimes come from out of state as well: https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/section/community/iron-pipeline-gun-violence-out-of-state-traffickers/

          Virginia gun sellers/traffickers are exporting weapons to other states.

    2. I predicted in part 1 that the left would jump to gun control rather than have a discussion of the cultural issues such as you presented here. I’m sorry to see I was right.
      You only take flak when you’re on target.

      Please, Keep up the good work.
      non illegitimi carborundum

  3. M. Purdy Avatar

    A six-year-old had access to a firearm, brought it to school and shot his teacher. I don’t know, maybe you should write something about our idiotic lack of gun laws and how the Virginia GOP intends to block new laws, or even roll back the limited laws we already have on the books.

    1. What kind of law would have prevented this? Please be specific.

      1. James McCarthy Avatar
        James McCarthy

        Foolish question. No law prevents the behavior or conduct of people. Nor does the potential of punishment including the death penalty.

      2. Not Today Avatar
        Not Today

        Laws are about more than prevention. They’re also about deterrence. Losing your kids and personal freedom if ammo or weapons obtained from you are brought to school or used in commission of a crime would be a powerful deterrent to lax storage in homes and businesses.

      3. M. Purdy Avatar

        How about making parents liable for not locking up weapons and ammo with children under 18 in the house, which is exactly what Virginia Senate Dems are proposing.

      4. Not Today Avatar
        Not Today

        Laws are about more than prevention. They’re also about deterrence. Losing your kids and personal freedom if ammo or weapons obtained from you are brought to school or used in commission of a crime would be a powerful deterrent to lax storage in homes and businesses.

    2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Should, could and did are three different things. Use the search feature of this blog above you on the left and search “sherlock guns” and see what you come up with.

      1. M. Purdy Avatar

        I like your post from November. Good proposals, none of which would have applied to the case at hand. But good nonetheless.

        1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          400 million guns. You think you can “control” them with more laws.

          I think some modifications to laws might help at the margins, but I would rather spend my time trying to find ways to raise and school children better so that not so many would use them for ill purposes.

          Different strokes.

          1. M. Purdy Avatar

            False choice. Access to and irresponsible use of firearms is a nationwide problem, and addressing them doesn’t prevent one from improving education.

          2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
            James C. Sherlock

            If you think you are going to eliminate “access”to those weapons you are delusional.

            Irresponsible use is what can actually be targeted by improving schools, especially for the populations most at risk to use them to commit crimes.

          3. M. Purdy Avatar

            Right, I’m delusional. Not the policymakers who’ve haven’t really tried anything, but think it’s impossible for whatever reason. I think you can pass a law to criminalize parental negligence in allowing children access to guns, among probably two dozen other common sense laws that would limit access to firearms by certain folks. But something like that would take common sense, which isn’t something that our monomaniacal leaders in Richmond care about.

          4. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            Like the broken clock, score one correct point.

        2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          400 million guns. You think you can “control” them with more laws.

          I think some modifications to laws might help at the margins, but I would rather spend my time trying to find ways to raise and school children better so that not so many would use them for ill purposes.

          Different strokes.

    3. James McCarthy Avatar
      James McCarthy

      Gun control laws adopted now cannot plug the gap and potential harm from the millions of weapons currently in the possession of Americans. Liability statutes requiring insurance can cover some costs, e.g., medical, police, lost wages, permanent injuries and death, now absorbed by the public through taxes. Law suits against government institutions resulting in multi- million dollar award shouldered by the public can be mitigated by liability insurance.

      1. M. Purdy Avatar

        Criminal liability for those who sell firearms or whose kids commit crimes through parental negligence would also help. Ditto civil liability for gun dealers and manufacturers. I also think it’s imperative to sure up mental health laws, including bringing back involuntary commitment. Also outright ban certain firearms, including assault-style rifles.

        1. James McCarthy Avatar
          James McCarthy

          According to a USAToday item, the student’s mother legally purchased the weapon and may be liable for a misdemeanor for unsafe treatment and subject to a $2500 fine.

          1. M. Purdy Avatar

            Right, but the legislature could criminalize it. But that would take some bipartisan efforts, which we know isn’t in the cards.

          2. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            A misdemeanor is a crime. Such has not nor did not deter the conduct.

          3. M. Purdy Avatar

            Slap on the wrist. I’m thinking felony.

          4. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            Not likely to mitigate shootings in schools.

          5. M. Purdy Avatar

            One brick does not a wall make. It’ll take a slew of legislation. (Is this going to get deleted too, BTW?)

          6. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            Maybe if you have shown that you are unsafe with your weapons, this needs to be a felony so you no longer can legally purchase weapons…

      2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
        James C. Sherlock

        Mandatory insurance is both registration and tax by another name. It will result in either confiscation from or lawbreaking by poor people who need to defend their homes.

        It is meant by its proponents to have all of those effects.

        The ploy is too cute by half, McCarthy. You imagine yourself clever. Rethink it.

        Americans are not the rubes you have convinced yourself they are.

        Treat them like adults and you will get a better response.

        1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          “It will result in either confiscation from or lawbreaking by poor people who need to defend their homes.”

          I missed the whole automobile confiscation part of our history…

        2. James McCarthy Avatar
          James McCarthy

          In usual fashion, you have attempted mind reading and failed. Mandatory auto insurance is the analogy, not your failed insight alleging registration and taxation. Auto liability insurance, like homeowner insurance, is both a social safety and economic safeguard.

          Your many complaints about costs to government shouldered by taxpayers can be mitigated in part by firearm liability insurance to cover medical, police, and victim injuries. Such insurance could also reduce present expenditures absorbed by victim compensation programs.

          I don’t at all consider myself as clever as your ideological presentations disguised as public policy proposals. Can you truly believe that poor people possess weapons to defend their homes and uninsured firearms in their possession is rationale public policy?

      3. Not Today Avatar
        Not Today

        Mandatory gun-insurance for owners/operators is part of the solution but I also think we need to penalize ammosexual adults who don’t have biometric locks or safely store their weapons away from juveniles.

        1. James McCarthy Avatar
          James McCarthy

          Insurers could offer premium reductions for such safety features. Absence of minimal safety procedures can be a basis for denial of coverage as well.

        2. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Mandatory gun insurance could be sold on The MarketPlace along with Healthcare insurance.

          If priced by risk, the Republicans would push an advanced premium credit for anyone making under $500,000

          1. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            The Dillon Rule permitting local jurisdictions to require mandatory liability insurance might be the first obstacle.

        3. How would persons who cannot legally own a firearm because of prior felony convictions obtain the insurance? Or would they get a free ride? This is an important issue because the majority of violent crime is committed by repeat offenders.
          Also, how many would apply knowing that the application would indicate they were a felon in possession of a firearm – a felony?
          If the violent criminals are excluded, isn’t this just a way to Jim Crow the law abiding?

          1. Not Today Avatar

            I’m not sure law abiding and Jim Crow go in the same sentence but I can take a stab at the rest.

            First, violent criminals aren’t going to buy insurance anymore than uninsured motorists are going to stop having car accidents. That’s a false choice. Just because you can’t stop all accidents doesn’t mean you don’t take steps to prevent uncompensated harm. Sadly, a sizable number of gun deaths (perhaps the majority) are not perpetrated by known criminals but by so-called ‘law abiding people’ who wouldn’t hurt a fly…until they kill a person. These deaths occur simply because the guns are there. In THOSE cases, actuarial concerns and screening would go a long way toward reducing the risk/supply of guns. Current reports suggest that all of those pandemic gun purchases are a big part of why we’re seeing increased crime now. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/01/gun-sales-murder-spike/621196/

            Second, the ATF can, if allowed, significantly reduce black market arms sales to unqualified buyers/criminals by surveilling and arresting/closing the businesses of those who ‘lose’ large numbers of guns and sell to straw buyers. They were hamstrung by inadequate funding, outdated systems, and legislative prohibitions on researching/tracking guns used in crimes for nearly 20 years but a new report issued in the last year provides a much needed data update and roadmap. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-announces-publication-first-volume-national-firearms-commerce-and

            Previously, probably early 2000s data, the vast majority of guns used in crimes were tied to a handful of shops in areas with lax gun laws within 2-4 hrs of major metros.

          2. From your response it appears that you are eager to Jim Crow the law abiding. Let me explain my Jim Crow reference. The democrat party found a group of people, blacks, were doing something they (the dems) didn’t want them to do: voting. The dems wanted to outlaw this activity, but it was constitutionally protected. Therefore the dems legislated a series of impediments (literacy tests) and fees (poll taxes), designed to interfere with the exercise of the right. The same is being done to gun owners today by the same party for the same reasons – bigotry. As with Jim Crow, you attempt to make a right into a permission.

            Your plan continues that shameful legacy. You admit that the violent criminals will not purchase insurance. By admitting that, you admit that your plan shifts the costs you want to recover to persons not likely to cause the expense – Jim Crow.
            A 2 fer – punish the innocent, without affecting your core constituency. And, bonus points, it will have no effect on the problem, so you can repeat again and again, taking more rights each time.
            There are other persons in other groups whose actions impose costs on society. Are you going to legislate against them? Drug users, those who drop out of high school and go on welfare, etc? Will you go after them? I doubt it.

            None of the ATF’s problems justify taking or interfering with the rights of the American people – yet you try to do that.
            The Atlantic article is laughable. The authors admit that the data they use is incomplete and doesn’t provide enough evidenct to substantiate the conclusions they want us to draw. They say repeatedly that the claim is not quite proven. Then they argue that correlation is causation by using obfuscation. Their main argument is ‘it must be this because what else could it be’. Well it could be the things they cavalierly dismissed in the first sentences – BLM, defunding police, etc. Add the thousands of violent prisoners freed because of covid. Critics of the policies predicted the outcome we got, so now the left has to find a way to avoid blame – enter the Atlantic.
            The biggest hurdle is that gun purchases went up drastically under Obama WITHOUT a corresponding rise in crime? Kinda shoots down your argument.

            In another reply, I pointed out that Va, with less restrictive gun laws has much lower homicide rates than MD or DC, both of which have much more restrictive laws. Fairfax County (pop 1,250,000) had ~20 murders last year (2022) while DC (pop 715,000) had over 200 murders. Explain how that happened.

            Common sense gun control was holding those who commit a crime responsible. We moved past that years ago. Now the left wants nonsense gun control, where the innocent are punished so the left can virtue signal.

Leave a Reply