Ten Things Democrats Want Taught in Schools

House Democrats voted to demand the “Lost Cause” be taught in public schools.

by Steve Haner

What are the most important facts to Virginia Democrats about American and Virginia history? Ask individuals and you get a host of answers, but the Democrats in the Virginia House of Delegates focused on ten items last week they want to be sure our public schools teach.

The context was the floor debate of House Bill 787, seeking to expunge “divisive concepts” from those schools. Too many students can’t do long division, but divisiveness matters more. It is important to many, I sense. You can read the bill text as it passed here. The Senate will make it history, probably not law.

Before passage, however, the House Democrats as a team offered ten floor amendments on which they wanted recorded votes. That was the point of the exercise, to try to force Republicans to record “nay” votes and then imply in the next campaign that Republicans voted to suppress these topics.

Each of you can reach your own conclusions as to what this says about Virginia Democrats today. I offer slight commentary on only a few of them. Each is framed as a topic not to be kept out of the classroom as “divisive.” They are summarized below and are here in full, where you can identify the patrons of each. Democrats want students taught:

  • Jim Crow and Jim Crow legislation, laws and practices, some of which remained in Virginia code until the 21st century, that enforced racial segregation in the South in the aftermath of the Civil War through the middle of the 20th century.
  • The concept of “The Lost Cause of the Confederacy,” a narrative that promotes the morality and heroism of the Confederacy and the institution of slavery and included the erecting of many Confederate statues to celebrate that movement throughout southern states such as Virginia. (I’m sorry, they do want this taught? )
  • The policies that created and sustain wealth and income gaps by race and gender in the United States.
  • Supreme Court precedents and arguments. (I didn’t hear the floor debate, and don’t intend to, but I assume certain cases were cited.)
  • Ruby Bridges, who as a six-year-old in Louisiana, became the first Black student to integrate an all-White school in the South. (Admittedly, I’m more familiar with the history of Barbara Johns.)
  • The role of the death of Vincent Chin in exposing discrimination and hatred against Asian Americans and galvanizing the Asian American movement.
  • The demographics of American local, state, and federal governments, including how only one of 50 states has a legislature in which over half the seats are held by women.
  • Obergefell v. Hodges, the landmark 2015 Supreme Court case that guaranteed the constitutional right for same-sex couples to marry.
  • The compromises that resulted in the “three fifths” rule that regarded enslaved people as three fifths of a human.
  • The disparate health and economic impacts of the COVID pandemic on people of color.

So first on the list, the single most important topic that must be taught in our schools, is the history of Jim Crow discrimination laws in Virginia and elsewhere, followed by the related Lost Cause narrative.  A full eight of the ten deal with race and historical racism, two deal with gender, and one with gay marriage.

Is this the Virginia they see, the lens they put on their eyes every day, and the lens they seek to put on every school child’s eyes? They believe they created a record embarrassing to the Republicans who voted against adding these to a two paragraph bill.

Maybe. Future voters will judge. But it is also fair to wonder if Democrats have done themselves damage by voting to, in essence, endorse the following possible school lessons enumerated in the bill. For the GOP, that was also the point of this exercise. At the next campaign these positions will be imputed to all of the Democrats by Republicans:

  • One race or sex is inherently superior to another race or sex.
  • An individual, by virtue of the individual’s race or sex, is inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously.
  • An individual should be discriminated against or receive adverse treatment solely or partly because of the individual’s race or sex.
  • An individual’s moral character is necessarily determined by the individual’s race or sex.
  • An individual, by virtue of the individual’s race or sex, bears responsibility for actions committed in the past by other members of the same race or sex.

More and more parents may cast their vote by fleeing public schools. More and more of us feel for the teachers caught in the middle  This was not the General Assembly’s finest hour on any front. By the time we’re done, probably not the finest 100 hours.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

53 responses to “Ten Things Democrats Want Taught in Schools”

  1. What do Republicans want taught? Record Democrat votes on those issues. For example, would Democrats vote to teach that the Virginia General Assembly is the oldest, still functioning legislative body in the Western Hemisphere? That the Northwest Ordinance, passed DURING the Constitutional Convention, mandated that states created north of the Ohio River be free states and that the Constitution would never have been approved without that? That the difference between a democracy and a republic is an appointed senate and that pure democracy leads to tyranny (e.g., French Revolution)? That Americans suffered a million casualties in World War II to free the world from NAZI socialism? That NAZIs were socialists (National Socialist German Workers Party)? That after the Democrats cut off funding for the South Vietnamese resistance against Communists, Cambodian Communists killed 1 1/2 million people? …

    1. Railpirate Avatar

      Oldest legislative Body: Quick search reveals this is (as expected) part of the state’s history education programme. No one is arguing to change this.

      Northwest Ordinance: Quick search reveals this is (as expected) part of the state’s history education programme. No one is arguing to change this.

      Democracy/Republic: You aren’t correct on the facts yourself here. A democracy is rule by the people. This can be in various methods, for example via a representative parliamentary system. A republic is a state/government run by representatives of a citizen body. The dinstinction you make here is not specifically one that distinguishes a Republic from a Democracy.
      Learning about the specific distinctions between forms of government, including these ones is part of Virginia’s History and Geography Education programmes. No one is arguing to change this, although the republican proposal currently being considered will inhibit schools from citing certain key subjects as examples in how certain types of government structures can affect, for example, civil rights.

      WW2 Casualties: Quick search reveals this is (as expected) part of the state’s history education programme. No one is arguing to change this.

      No-No Germany Socialism: You aren’t correct on the facts here: Nazism simply is not a form of socialism, it is rather one of fascism. Nazism rejects virtually all of the core aspects that make socialism socialism regarding public ownership and socio-financial equality, taking the authoritarian concepts of national socialism and substituting it’s socio-economic “Class war” for a “race war”, and mixing it in with a fascist control structure of the state. It’s one of many cases where the name of a political party is not in line with their functional ideals, either due to political shift or intentional obfuscation, usually for political gain. In this case the latter is true, something you should be aware of had this actually been adequately discussed in your education as it is over here in the Netherlands, and something that’s not unimportant to know given that mislabelling, and the political strategy that surrounds it, are a key part of how the Nazis rose to power to begin with, and thus also a key part of the cautionary tale on how to avoid a party similar to the Nazis rising to power again. The republican proposal will inhibit adequate education on this matter by partially or fully inhibiting proper discussion on various related civil rights matters.

      South Vietnam Funding Cuts: Those cuts (where about half the funding, roughly 3B in todays money, was slashed) happened three years after the military left South Vietnam and Nixon gave up Saigon in his 1973 settlement, basically determining the fate of the war. This is not a key component of history that has notable relevence to be discussed in this manner, nor does it have the implications you are most probably assigning to it.

      Cambodian Genocide: I could not find record of any politician from either party in Virginia ever mentioning the Cambodian Genocide. Likely due to it’s lack of political relevance to Virginia. I cannot answer whether or not teaching about it is part of Virginia’s education programme. I see no particular reason to assume either party would oppose this genocide from being tought about in it’s relevant historical context in relation to the modern day history of south-east and east Asia.

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        “No-No Germany Socialism: You aren’t correct on the facts here…”

        There you go… spoiling a perfectly good and long-standing Conservative misinformation campaign… or as I am sure you would call them in the Netherlands… lies…

        1. Interesting argument to make — that National Socialists weren’t… socialists. Fact: the Nazis, like socialists, glorified the state. Fact: Nazi ideology, permeated every aspect of society. The Nazis propagated a different flavor of socialism, to be sure. They weren’t communist internationalist-style socialists who derived their thinking from Karl Marx, but they were socialists.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            They also told teachers what they could teach.

          2. Railpirate Avatar

            Fact: Glorifying the state doesn’t make you a socialist. That’s something one can do in both socialist and capitalist societies and is a mandate in neither.

            Fact: The fact an ideology permeates every aspect of society is not a hallmark of socialism or capitalism in particular.

            — And about socialism and the Nazi party: You are just plain wrong.

            The nazi party actually did start off tying it’s nationalist, racist and anti-simitic positions of the party to socialist rhethoric, but after the economic freefall in the early 30s the nazi party ended up working with wealthy industrialists to persue anti-socialist policy. One of the two primary people behind tying socialism to the Nazi party left the party and formed his own party along the ideals he initially tied to the Nazi party campaign. (Otto Strasser.)

            When the Nazis got into power, they almost immediately moved to insert anti-socialist policies, including the abolishment of multiple available systems of private communal ownership of companies and even privating multiple key utilities such as railways and central banks that had been government-owned before.

            Not a year after they got into power, they even made identifying with actual socialism or socialist ideals illegal and started putting socialists in concentration camps, including many of their earlier supporters. That included one of the earlier mentioned key people behind tying the term “socialist” the the nazis: Hitler ordered the killing of Otto Strassen during this time as well.

            If it’s not obvious yet, the Nazis waren’t socialist: By the time they got into power they actively opposed any kind of communal ownership of industry that is central to socialism of any kind.They did excellently fit the definition of fascism.

            Claiming the Nazis waren’t socialists isn’t an “interesting argument to make” – It’s literally the consensus among historians and political experts with expertise on german, german political, nazi and/or WW2 history and is an incredibly easy to support position, with even the most basic understanding of how the Nazis rose to power.

            Given just how much of a cautionary tale that rise to power is, I would implore you to refresh your understanding of the matter if you’ve got some free time to do so.

          3. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            Psst… JAB… I think Railpirate in his answer to you just did a number on the reputation of a good old UVa education… care to counter…??

      2. I wrote a long rebuttal to this. It was rejected as spam! Censorship on DISQUS https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/ed89221db6c81009fe05d40bcda4735e70c8bc2dbaa06658ccc4b07f9bd8929d.png

        1. Railpirate Avatar

          I saw it before it was removed. – I had a response back ready too. I know it’s not nearly everything but I modified some minor things in my original comment to pre-address some of the stuff you had put in there as a bit of a courtesy. If there’s anything else you really do want to still talk about feel free to try again in a day or two in a shorter message. That usually helps.

          One of my responses here to someone else was also “Detected as spam”. – Pretty annoying, especially because it wasn’t and there is no way to appeal it.

        2. I asked Jim Bacon who the moderator is. It’s Jim, but he didn’t remove it and couldn’t find me in the DISQUS account. So who removed it? Someone in China?

          1. I didn’t see your comment. So I have no idea what was in it. But if Jim did not remove it Perhaps someone flag it as spam.

          2. Can commenters flag other comments as spam? I don’t think so.

      3. It’s one of many cases where the name of a political party is not in line with their functional ideals, either due to political shift or intentional obfuscation, usually for political gain.

        Sort of like like “democrat”…

    2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      It would have been good to include the Vietnam War (along with the moratorium movement and anti-war marches) and Watergate on that list. Clearly these are potentially divisive topics. A “NYET” vote from the GOP there as well would have added to the Dems already pretty much crystal clear message.

  2. John Martin Avatar
    John Martin

    ‘At the next campaign these positions will be imputed to all of the Democrats by Republicans:
    One race or sex is inherently superior to another race or sex.
    An individual, by virtue of the individual’s race or sex, is inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously.
    An individual should be discriminated against or receive adverse treatment solely or partly because of the individual’s race or sex.
    An individual’s moral character is necessarily determined by the individual’s race or sex.
    An individual, by virtue of the individual’s race or sex, bears responsibility for actions committed in the past by other members of the same race or sex.”

    And those, of course, would be republican lies

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      As true or false as it will be when Democrats say the Republicans didn’t want anything taught about the Jim Crow era. This whole thing has been an exercise in political theater. But I did want to look up the list of the ten amendments (I heard some of the floor discussion, and saw all the Twitter discussion) and once I had, thought they should be shared. Their list, not mine.

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        “As true or false as it will be when Democrats say the Republicans didn’t want anything taught about the Jim Crow era.”

        They could have easily passed the amendments if it was false…

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          Wow! All the GOP really needed to do was forbid teaching false information? 😉

          oh wait………

    2. Yet you consistently defend (or obscure) those very propositions when we highlight them on this blog.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        Nope, I highlight the rank hypocrisy from Conservatives on issues. They were fine with Happy Slave but not teaching the truth. That’s what this is all about. Can’t teach the truth if it makes the kids feel bad… so report the teacher to the “authorities” to stop her/him.

  3. Railpirate Avatar

    “Is this the Virginia they see, the optical lens they put on their eyes
    every day, and the lens they seek to put on every school child’s eyes?”

    Literally all of the matters in this list are key components or relevant factors that need to be able to be discussed in order to give an adequate education of Virginia’s modern history irrespective of the ideological spin any particular party would potentially provide to education. And furthermore, the restrictions on various demographic discussions make entire segments of geography impossible to adequately teach about and don’t even get me started on classroom discussion of real world events.

    I am from the Netherlands and kind of ran accross this article by chance. I don’t know if y’all do something like this over in the US, but here we have news programming aimed at kids which breaks down basically any major news in a kid-friendly way. Most schools will watch and discuss these subjects as a critical part of learning about society, the world and developing social perspectives and disagreements collectively in a healthy manner. An approach like this would become basically impossible with the law being proposed here. – Heck: Any attempt to address this side of education becomes basically impossible because it mandates the whitewashing out of certain subjects out of any related material.

    The Republican party is literally destroying key components of education here and trying to whitewash massive parts of important history out of education and then (sadly rather succesfully) trying to present it as if they’re trying to save kids from indoctrination and want to give parents “choice” back.

    Sorry, what? The choice to forbid swaths of education from mentioning key components of it’s subjects to a point it’d compromise already poor US education standards further by whitewashing parts of their own modern history out of discussion? The choice to de-facto forbid schools from discussing real world events as appropriate and necessary for development by blocking a wide-array of subjects from being talked about?

    Proposals like this one from the Republicans, make me feel like I am reading the onion rather then actual news.

  4. LarrytheG Avatar

    The Dems were largely responding to the idiocy of the GOP bans on what can’t be taught.

    It’s pretty clear that some folks actually do NOT want the facts of racism taught because in their minds it makes white folks look “bad’ and we surely don’t want kids of white folks feeling guilty about it or heckfire , see that we actually still have remnants of racism as well as persistent generational damage from earlier racism.

    The GOP’s approach: ” Well, teach the facts but be extra careful cuz if you make white kids feel bad and they go home and tell their parents, we’ll have you investigated”.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      I think I may have just discovered part of Disqus’ problem. It’s awash with bots hawking dating sites.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        I got the email notification of your post on this blog post, when i click on “View post”, it takes me to an entirely different blog post and a response to me from someone else. it’s totally screwed up and I’m wondering why.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Look at the profiles of the persons who are upvoting your posts, sometimes within seconds of you making the post.

          For all the problems it is better than WordPress.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            here is an example of what I am seeing in
            the email notification of your last post:

            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/0fb7e9a059d5221d72f68e38d1b49bfa5d6467686a951152f3ecb2bdbac44127.jpg

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            I don’t use email notification. But that looks like what appears on my Disqus Notification tab. Obviously, when they create the email, they do so with bad links. If the links in your email don’t send you to the correct page, I wouldn’t use them.

            In fact NEVER click any link in an email PERIOD.

          3. LarrytheG Avatar

            Disqus notification tab? where is that?

          4. LarrytheG Avatar

            I do not click on the vast majority of links and the ones I do , I copy the link address to notepad and look at first.

          5. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Uh yep. That’s her. Well, one of her 1000s of profiles

      2. LarrytheG Avatar

        This one I DID get properly via email notification but the notification still says “View post” instead of REPLY – which took me straight to the BR thread. This one generates a disqus dialog with a reply line that i can key in, totally outside of BR itself.

    2. Cathis398 Avatar

      exactly this. the point was clearly to say that these 10 items should not be removed from schools because they are “divisive,” not to promote them, put them first, or eliminate other topics. These are the topics that are under threat of removal from the governor’s EO, and the Dems wanted to go on the record that these are real important facts of history that nobody should be able to remove from the classroom.

      and not to put too fine a point on it, but obviously the point of item #2 is to be able to teach that the Lost Cause is a myth the South developed about the Civil War, not the truth.

      that’s always been an interesting aspect of the governor’s EO, as the Lost Cause (taught as truth) is one of the most obviously divisive concepts taught anywhere, seems at least in spirit to violate the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that Youngkin cites–and is, based on my own discussions with current undergraduates, still taught in Virginia K12, although thankfully much less frequently than it was a decade ago, when it appears to have been widespread.

    3. Cathis398 Avatar

      exactly this. the point was clearly to say that these 10 items should not be removed from schools because they are “divisive,” not to promote them, put them first, or eliminate other topics. These are the topics that are under threat of removal from the governor’s EO, and the Dems wanted to go on the record that these are real important facts of history that nobody should be able to remove from the classroom.

      and not to put too fine a point on it, but obviously the point of item #2 is to be able to teach that the Lost Cause is a myth the South developed about the Civil War, not the truth.

      that’s always been an interesting aspect of the governor’s EO, as the Lost Cause (taught as truth) is one of the most obviously divisive concepts taught anywhere, seems at least in spirit to violate the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that Youngkin cites–and is, based on my own discussions with current undergraduates, still taught in Virginia K12, although thankfully much less frequently than it was a decade ago, when it appears to have been widespread.

    4. Cathis398 Avatar

      exactly this. the point was clearly to say that these 10 items should not be removed from schools because they are “divisive,” not to promote them, put them first, or eliminate other topics. These are the topics that are under threat of removal from the governor’s EO, and the Dems wanted to go on the record that these are real important facts of history that nobody should be able to remove from the classroom.

      and not to put too fine a point on it, but obviously the point of item #2 is to be able to teach that the Lost Cause is a myth the South developed about the Civil War, not the truth.

      that’s always been an interesting aspect of the governor’s EO, as the Lost Cause (taught as truth) is one of the most obviously divisive concepts taught anywhere, seems at least in spirit to violate the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that Youngkin cites–and is, based on my own discussions with current undergraduates, still taught in Virginia K12, although thankfully much less frequently than it was a decade ago, when it appears to have been widespread.

  5. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Meh. It is better by far to discuss the events and details of a subject, any subject, than to prevent any discussion at all.

    Contrary to the Republican position, History is not a “settled science”.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      This is just a modern version of the Happy Slave idea. Gawd forbid we teach about how racism was actually embedded in our society, much less the continuing damage to generations of descendants of those who were harmed.

      Leave it up to the GOP on how to deal with facts and realities, one reason why disinformation and conspiracy theories are so popular with them also:

    2. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      🙂 Agreed. The divisive arguments are all the fun.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Hell yeah! That’s why we’re here. It is reprehensible that we might deny to our children the opportunity to learn through discourse and discussion in the same method we do here. Or don’t, as the case may be.

  6. LarrytheG Avatar

    One thing that should be taught that is critical today is how to vet information, determine it’source and the authenticity and reputation of the source, to find and research comparative information and sources.

    And what teachers can do is give links to subjects where the links are to authoritative sources with reputations for facts and truth.

    We especially need that for science these days.

    If you listen to some folks, we can’t believe the govt or credentialed research scientists but instead blogs like wattsupwiththat.com that disputes basic science from credentialed scientists from around the world, govt and private.

    And in math, a course about modelling… clearly some folks never got properly educated on that either!

  7. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    “Take your AR-15 out of the bush and into the class with our new series of Bushmaster — the School Master. Customized rifles come in your school’s colors with your team’s logo emblazoned on the stock. Approved for sale in all Virginian school bookstores.”

  8. I don’t have a problem with any of the 10 things listed by Dems being taught in school. I would have a HUGE problem if those propositions were all that was taught without any factual context or acknowledgement that there were other ways of looking at the issues. The Dems seem to be implying that the Rs refuse to recognize the existence of slavery or segregation. That may be true for a handful of naive Rs, but overall it’s a bald-faced lie.

    Governor Youngkin wants to eliminate teaching of “divisive concepts.” Do the ankle-biters on this blog understand the difference between a historical “fact” and a “concept?” Youngkin has repeatedly said that we need to teach about slavery, Jim Crow and segregation. The relevant question is how we interpret those facts.

    Do we adopt the 1619 view that the United States (and Virginia) were born in the original sin of slavery, and that there is nothing worth knowing about our history other than the litany of oppressions against Indians, slaves, women, gays, and transgenders? That’s a divisive concept.

    Or do we recognize that the entire world was mired in hierarchy and oppression in 1619, and that the Americans (preceded to some degree by the Dutch and the English) were the first to climb out of it, that Americans were the very first to articulate universal principle that all mankind was entitled to those natural rights, and that they created a form of government that allowed the United States to evolve toward the country it is today?

    Or do we teach that there are multiple frameworks for interpreting history, as in fact there are?

    The divisive concepts derived from Critical Race Theory (or whatever you want to call it) that Steve enumerates above are in fact divisive. They are not facts. They are interpretations of facts. And to inculcate those concepts without also teaching other ways of viewing the world, and in contradiction to the values and views of a majority of the population, is a form of indoctrination. It is a moral abomination.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      you teach the facts not try to “explain why”. That’s your problem JAB. As soon as you, as a teacher, decide to “explain” how slavery was “accepted” and “normal for that time”, – you’ve gone way too far. One cannot “explain” without getting into subjective territory.

      You teach the facts and let the student absorb them, and over time, start to establish their own view about it.

      And if you consider doing that to be “divisive” – that’s not too different than teaching things like the Holocaust and consider that to be ‘divisive’.

      We do not agree. We can do that without making personal attacks. right?

    2. LarrytheG Avatar

      JAB. How do you “explain” slavery or Jim Crow on an individual teacher basis without introducing subjectivity?

      For instance, you seem to want it “explained” that those things were “common” back then, as if that changes what they really were. There are no good ways to “explain” slavery or Jim Crow – only just various different individual perceptions colored by their own views.

    3. LarrytheG Avatar

      A reasoned and articulate response. Would like to hear JAB and others he hangs with -to respond.

      re: ” 5. Teaching about the racist and discriminatory parts of US and world history in an honest manner, including how they affect our world today, is not divisive concept derived from CRT. It’s literally just history education as it pertains to civil rights and demographics. That’s not indoctrination.”

      Totally true and correct but Jim apparently thinks it needs to be “explained” or ‘interpreted” and of course from his point of view.

      This is why you don’t want Govt doing what Yougkin and other GOP are doing. This is exactly how Virginia textbooks had “Happy Slave” in them.

      1. Railpirate is a troll who says he lives in The Netherlands. But thinks he knows more about what is being taught in Virginia than we who live in America do.

  9. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “So first on the list, the single most important topic that must be taught in our schools…”

    Haner, where did they say these are presented in order of importance? Further, where did they say these were the most important topics to teach or even that they wanted to teach them at all. They were simply asking the House GOP if they would allow these topics to be taught. They certainly got their answer. If the GOP had its way, any teacher who dares bring up the topic of Jim Crow (for example) in history class would be subject to parental reporting on the Governor’s CRT hotline. Remember, the Dems are not the ones dictating to teachers what they can and cannot teach in the classroom. That would be Conservatives and the House GOP could not have been more clear on these particular topics. Up next… “Ban Maus!!”

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      exactly!

    2. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Eric, their list, numbered amendments, written in advance and filed with the clerk. I don’t think they’d dispute my assumption that the first two were indeed the top two. Maintaining race animosity is their only political ace left.

      And I don’t think I was praising the underlying bill.

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        Well, at least you acknowledge it was an assumption on your part. Maybe you should have asked for clarification before you printed your assumption as fact.

        Whether you support the underlying bill or not is immaterial to your attempts to distort or rewrite the amendments to fit your narrative.

  10. […] of Jim Crow, segregation, and the “Lost Cause” of the Confederacy (see Steve Haner’s “Ten Things Democrats Want Taught in Schools“) — is that someone somewhere actually proposes banning the slavery, segregation and racism […]

Leave a Reply