School Choice Tax Credits Reduced in New Budget

by Steve Haner

The famous phrase about no one’s life, liberty or property being safe while the legislature sits probably arose after somebody got burned by an out-of-control conference committee. It just happened again to Virginia’s private schools, who had a popular scholarship tax credit program chopped Wednesday.

The Education Improvement Scholarship Tax Credit (EISTC) is available for donations to support free or reduced tuition for the lowest income Virginia students, those who otherwise would never have a way into a private school. It dates back to Governor Bob McDonnell (R). 

Out of the blue, a language provision appeared in the House Bill 30 conference report to reduce the statutory cap on annual EISTC awards from $25 million to $12 million, with the remainder allocated instead to the Neighborhood Assistance Tax Credit. That $12 million is then earmarked for “education proposals for approval by the Superintendent of Public Instruction.”

So, $13 million from the private educational realm is transferred back to the public schools’ control. A statute was simply overridden by the small group of conferees, who then wrapped it in a must-approve omnibus bill not subject to amendment. As you already know, the conference report has now passed.

You can smell the tar being warmed and hear the fence rails being whittled as advocates for school choice demand that the money be restored by Governor Glenn Youngkin (R). He can seek an amendment to that final bill or veto the entire item, which would restore the status quo ante.

From the conservative group Middle Resolution’s member alert:

Virginia Democrats ran Virginia for the past eight years and ​they refused to allow any expansion of education choice. Additionally, they tried to repeal the EISTC, targeted for low-income children. Now there is an attempt to essentially remove 50% of the potential funding for children who deserve a chance to go to a better school.

Never has there been more interest in providing education opportunities for all children following the disastrous Covid shutdown. And for children who have little to no choice and need assistance, those opportunities are now being reduced or eliminated in this biennial budget.

We urge you to contact Governor Youngkin’s office TODAY and urge him to restore the full funding for the Education Improvement Scholarship Tax Credit program. It’s time to stand up for every child in the Commonwealth and bring true educational freedom to Virginia.

And from the Thomas Jefferson Institute president Chris Braunlich:

The program is under fire in the budget conference report, negotiated in secret and approved by the General Assembly (it could not be amended on the floor). An amendment that was snuck in cuts the program to $12 million, even though it was growing at 20 percent a year and offering educational opportunity to thousands of students across Virginia….

I do not believe Governor Youngkin was aware the General Assembly was going to do this. I know Lt. Governor (Winsome) Earle-Sears was not aware.

The tax credit offered is quite generous, 65% of the donation. Give $1,000 to one of these funds (and I support one, I should note), and you get a $650 credit on your state income tax.  A credit is better than a deduction as you can claim it even when you take the standard deduction. You also get full value on a credit unlike a deduction ($57.50 back on $1,000 donated).  So the $1,000 donation costs you only $350, even less if you can also take a federal deduction.

The tax credit has to be applied for through the school, but the paperwork is easy. The school I support, Anna Julia Cooper Episcopal, serves the most challenged Richmond area neighborhoods and every student it has benefits from the scholarship program, it claimed in its appeal for calls to the Governor.

The entire $25 million allotment has not been used in prior years, but more than $12 million was used in 2021. The plans were to expand the promotion efforts as part of the coming move toward more school choice. Set the cap below the level of utilization and the tax credits could be prorated smaller.

Prior to its unexpected appearance in the final conference report, the idea of reducing the EISTC cap apparently was not under discussion. The only bill and related budget amendment from a member dealing with it I could find was to increase the cap a bit. This proposal also mentioned both tax credit programs, EISTC and Neighborhood Assistance, but seeking to increase both. It passed the Senate but failed in the House.

No proposal to reduce EISTC was in either the House or Senate budgets as they passed in March and were handed off to the conferees’ gentle ministrations.

But a conference committee is a power unto itself, not limited to the parameters of either original bill. People who know the process often intentionally wait until then to make their move, handing their ideas quietly to staff or a legislator, leaving no trail. The same people now energized would have been all over the conferees had they known. So nobody told them.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

28 responses to “School Choice Tax Credits Reduced in New Budget”

  1. Kathleen Smith Avatar
    Kathleen Smith

    And the budget bill also puts $100 million to university lab schools. The BOE has until Dec 22 to establish regulations for lab schools. I hope one of the requirements is NOT that students selected must be public not private school students. This would mean those same scholarship students that are not able to remain in a private school would not be eligible. I am really furious about the EISTC. Politics should not replace common sense that supports students! Give and take is what the budget session is and always will be.

  2. Acbar Avatar

    “Out of the blue” — and nobody knows who put such an amendment forward?

  3. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    Typical smoke-filled backroom politics in Richmond. Harry Byrd must be looking up and smiling.

    1. WayneS Avatar

      I see what you did there…

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Given you live in the DC area, he’s still better off.

  4. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Air conditioning was the worst thing invented when it was installed in legislatures.

  5. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    There you go again. Social engineering Republicans using the tax codes to promote behavior.

    Oh boy, you get a tax credit for your donation, and that credit is paid by me. It sucks.

    1. Matt Hurt Avatar
      Matt Hurt

      If this tactic were only used by Republicans…..

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        When did they not? Look for buzzwords involving small buiness or unwed, etc.

  6. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    This is another example of making policy in the budget, although there is a nexus to spending.

    The explanatory bullet for the amendment says that some ($13 million?) of the EISTC is unused, while the Neighborhood Assistance Act program is over subscribed. I don’t understand how these tax credits programs work. I need some education.

    For the scholarship program, taxpayers can get a credit of 65 percent of a donation of $500 to $125,000 to a qualified scholarship program. However, the annual total of tax credits issue for any fiscal year may not exceed $25 million. What would happen if the Tax Dept. sometime after June 30 totaled up all the tax credits issued for fiscal year 2022 and found that it exceeded $25 million? Would it go back and proportionally reduce the tax credit you received for tax year 2021 and send you a bill?

    The tax credit program for the Neighborhood Association Act program is different. Business organizations have to submit proposals for approval in order to get a tax credit. The amount of tax credits that can be allocated or approved is limited to $8 million. Apparently, the program is “first come, first served” and there have been some proposals submitted that could not be approved because all the $8 million had been allocated to earlier applicants. Is my understanding of this correct?

    Is there any data available on the total tax credits provided for the scholarship program in recent years? Is there any data available on the amount of Neighborhood Assistance tax credit allocations that were applied for in recent years? Based on the explanation given for the budget amendment, it was more than $8 million. If the total for tax credits available for the scholarship program is reduced to $12 million, how would that affect me next year if I want to claim a tax credit for a $1,000 donation to a qualified scholarship program?

    1. Kathleen Smith Avatar
      Kathleen Smith

      The Department of Ed has the data. 15% of the Richmond Catholic Diocese students use the scholarship.

      From the diocese:

      It is our goal at the Diocese to enable every family who wants to send their children to a Catholic school to do so, regardless of their family’s income. THE most important way we have done this since 2013 is by participating in the Education Improvement Scholarships Tax Credit Program (EISTC). Last year we awarded $4,565,308 in scholarships to 1,345 students through the McMahon Parater Scholarship Foundation. This means that nearly 15% of our 9,200 students rely on EISTC to attend their Catholic school.

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Maybe the $25M is an order of magnitude greater than has ever been claimed and is unlikely to be an issue.

      But if it is, I wonder if they recalculate the percentage for everyone, institute a First Come, First Served, or Little Guy First method.

      Obviously, they can ALWAYS bill you for the excess credit given this year unless you die, or leave the State.

      BTW, just to be sure, is this an above the line or below the line tax credit. I assume it’s an above the line. But, if it’s below the line, then it would be issued as a refund that could be adjusted before going out, like Obamacare, but without the “advanced” feature.

  7. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    I hope that all those advocates for school choice realize that one half of the team that came up with this budget provision was the Republican chairman of the House Appropriations Committee.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Oh, they know, they know. Yes indeedy.

      With most of these credits, if they are oversubscribed, the amounts are prorated down. That 65% could go down to 50% or less. Others as you note are first come, first served, and no more once they run out. If anybody asks me, 65% is far higher than it needs to be. But if that’s the rule, I’m not going to turn it down. Ka-ching.

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        So, even if this provision were to remain in the budget, when you fill out your tax return next year, you will still get a 65 percent credit for any qualified donation. How would the Dept. of Taxation implement the new cap of $12 million if the total credits claimed on returns and baked into the calculations of tax owed exceeded $12 million?

        1. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          Instead of a letter awarding a specific credit amount you get notified to wait until the new year, when the credit amount will be calculated. That would work.

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            1099-TC with a negative number.

  8. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Is there any irony that Haner used to play in the same swamp and then got bit himself?

    😉

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Swamps drain down into the muck on the bottom.

    2. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Good gig for him.

    3. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      I considered posting something about this. That group, under Don Finley, was an unabashed promoter of higher education, along with higher appropriations. It did not garner many headlines, with Finley preferring to work behind the scenes, but it wielded much influence. With Cox, the group will continue to have someone at the top with deep connections to the General Assembly and its money committees. It remains to be seen if he will continue the largely non-skeptical attitude toward high ed.

      1. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        Just more rent seeking? I had no idea….

      2. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        sounds Republican. Sounds not so different than what Youngkin has been saying.

        What specifics do they primarily advocate for?

        What does business want Virginia to do with regard to higher ed?

        1. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          Produce more graduates in the right fields without crushing debt.

    4. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Swamps drain down into the muck on the bottom.

  9. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    The Swamp giveth and the Swamp taketh away

    yeah, SOMEBODY KNEW! 😉

  10. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Standard Deductions are to reduce record keeping — period. Tax Credits are designed to force all taxpayers to fund legislators’ and certain taxpayers’ pet projects — period.

    One should be zip code and income dependent based on local tax revenues. The other should be eliminated completely.

    Your State Standard Deduction should be calculated in such a manner to cover your local and state taxes (not including income tax), e.g.,, RE, PP, sales, gasoline, etc., etc., so that for 95% of the taxpayers the amount will exceed the sum of these taxes in the given region. The Federal Standard Deduction should be this amount plus allowance for state and local income taxes.

    Other deductions, theft, professional, mortgage interest, medical, etc., should be limited to amounts that are deemed to be uncontrolled and crushing. For example, medical deductions exceeding 7.5% of income, or mortgage interest not exceeding some percentage, i.e., maximum income tax rate, of a capped interest paid. In any event, high income taxpayers should not be subsidized with deduction at a rate more than for low income taxpayers.

Leave a Reply