Rolling Back Regulations Easier Said Than Done

by James A. Bacon

Virginia has lagged the nation in economic growth and job creation for a decade or more, and Governor Glenn Youngkin has made it a priority, as every governor does, to boost economic development. One of his strategies for rebooting the economy is to prune needless regulation.

“The growing regulatory burden on businesses and individuals requires time, money and energy for compliance. This represents an opportunity loss that inhibits job creation and economic growth,” Youngkin says in Executive Directive Number One, “Laying a Strong Foundation for Job Creation and Economic Growth Through Targeted Regulatory Reductions.”

Accordingly, Youngkin has directed all state agencies under his authority to reduce the number of regulations not mandated by federal or state statute by 25%. He also directs the Secretary of Finance to explore the feasibility of implementing a 2-for-1 “regulatory budget.” (The meaning of the 2-for-1 budget is not defined in the directive, but I interpret it as a call for deleting two regulations for every new regulation promulgated.)

This is all fine and good — I share the aspiration of rolling back the regulatory state — but we have to be realistic. The number of regulations not mandated by federal or state law is miniscule. With the exception of the regulatory diktats issued by former Governor Ralph Northam in response to the COVID emergency (which Youngkin is nullifying by separate executive orders), Virginia governors and state officials can’t impose new regulations by fiat.

Governors do have some leeway in interpreting regulations, and that’s something Team Youngkin undoubtedly will be called upon to do. But if Virginia’s new governor wants fewer regulations, he will have to change the laws that authorize them. That will entail working with the General Assembly and taking on the special interests and advocacy groups that benefit from the rules.

While conducting periodic regulatory reviews is a healthy exercise, past results have been meager. Youngkin cannot content himself with this directive if he expects to make Virginia a more inviting place to invest and do business. He needs to target the laws that have the most debilitating impact on the economy.

A classic case is the Certificate of Public Need (COPN), which establishes high regulatory hurdles for anyone seeking to expand medical facilities in Virginia. That law (and its associated cluster of regulations) gives established healthcare providers a means to block expansion and new investment by potential competitors, be they out-of-state providers, physician groups, venture-backed entrepreneurs, even competitors from across town. The result has been a consolidation of the healthcare sector, monopoly price-setting power for health systems, and a dearth of innovation in the delivery of healthcare services.

No one law does more to cripple Virginia’s economy and quality of life than COPN. As a free-market conservative, Youngkin needs to target this law as part of a broader healthcare reform. But it will take a huge investment of political capital to pull it off.

An even denser thicket of regulations is associated with Virginia’s land use laws. Regulation has restricted the supply of new housing, added new costs to development, and driven up the cost of housing. The resulting affordability crisis is harmful to the poor, and it makes it harder for businesses to recruit employees to Virginia and keep them. The high cost of housing is a major contributor to the state’s net out-migration. But there are reasons for the laws and regulations — from controlling rainwater runoff to protecting homeowners from undesirable land uses — so rolling back the regs entails making difficult tradeoffs.

Clearing housing’s regulatory briar patch, which has grown up over 60 years, is the work of a generation, not a one-term governor. Perhaps Youngkin could identify some narrow-bore housing initiatives that offer high payoffs with modest downsides. Allow homeowners to build granny flats in basements and garages. End local bans on boarding houses and single-room-occupancy facilities. Strike down regs blocking “tiny homes” and container homes. And somehow make these changes palatable to local governments that will resist any abrogation of local powers and threats to their tax base.

Governors can’t enact changes like these by waving a regulatory wand. Virginia’s chief executive must work with allies in the General Assembly to pass laws and run the legislative gauntlet of special interests, which, in the case of housing, ranges from developers and home builders to environmentalists and poverty advocates. But if we want to reduce the regulatory burden on the economy, that’s exactly what we have to do.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

21 responses to “Rolling Back Regulations Easier Said Than Done”

  1. Kathleen Smith Avatar
    Kathleen Smith

    I was just pondering this fact when this post came through. Like Trump, YOUNGKIN has no political experience. He is leading by experience as a successful CEO. Unlike Trump, he’ll learn quickly. Good luck to him.

  2. Moderate Avatar

    When I hear and read his regulatory reduction calls for action, I think he’s just recycling prior calls – and effectively saying that they did not do the job, but not saying how HIS effort WILL. Those who oppose regulations have a habit of enacting regulations that force their perspective. I’m tired of hearing about cutting regulations. That political saw has been around forever.

  3. tmtfairfax Avatar
    tmtfairfax

    The new administration needs to follow the state administrative procedure act to amend or revoke rules that were established under the same law.

  4. LarrytheG Avatar

    I question the idea of just arbitrarily picking and choosing which regs should be done away with – without some process that seeks to quantify the aspects that are counter to a desired good.

    Without such a process, it becomes more of a symbolic exercise of “how many bad regulations” have been done away with – a virtue signaling exercise if there ever was one.

    There should also be an understanding that regulations are built from laws – to conform to the intent of the law and several regulations may well come about as a result of the law. Figuring out comprehensively the impacts and effects is something the GA staff do at the time the legislation is proposed, and a similar process ought to be followed to justify removal.

    Finally, regulations ARE by their nature – top-down just like EOs and other dictates from Richmond are.

  5. LarrytheG Avatar

    Regulation is a standard boilerplate with Conservatives. They gotta promise it as part and parcel of Conservatism.

    Regulations are written from laws. People like Haner and Sizemore will probably tell you that the law by itself can’t be practically implemented in most cases. It has to be implemented via regulation – often written by the agencies that actually carry out the law and regulations.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      As they are created, so might they be repealed. The process of asking “do we still need this?” should really be constant, or at least on a schedule. Both Democrats and Republicans have made big promises in this area but the problem is the work is detailed, tedious and makes few headlines, and eventually you hear from whoever it was wanted the damn fool reg put in to begin with.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        I have no idea of the process of writing a regulation… I assume there is one and folks who do it that know how…. 😉

  6. david Beauregard Avatar
    david Beauregard

    Governor Younkin has reached the Governorship through being highly aware of the prevailing concerns of The People and hard work. He should be willing to give the details of rolling back regulation the same effort.

  7. tmtfairfax Avatar
    tmtfairfax

    I don’t know the specifics of Virginia law regarding rulemaking, but I’ve been involved in federal and some state proceedings for more than 40 years. The agency that wishes to add, remove or modify a regulation must provide a statutory basis for its action, propose reasons for the action, and seek comments on the rule changes. Then, it must generally address the comments filed and justify its action.

    In 1996, Congress passed the Telecommunications Act of 1996 that, in part, requires the FCC to review its regulations periodically and modify or repeal those that are no longer needed in a competitive market. The FCC has done this quite a few times under both GOP and Democratic chairs. Where new problems arise, such as robocalls, the FCC has added to its regulations, quite often in response to new legislation.

    A fair conclusion is that there are more FCC regulations affecting consumer protection and revised Universal Service Funding and substantially fewer telecom regulations dealing with market competition. On the non-broadcast radio side, there have been huge reductions on the regulations that restricted the use of frequencies to only a few services. With video competition, the cable TV and broadcasting rules have been relaxed.

  8. LarrytheG Avatar

    If not mistaken, proposed laws and regulation requires an economic impact analysis:

    https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title2.2/chapter40/section2.2-4007.04/

    § 2.2-4007.04. Economic impact analysis.
    A. Before delivering any proposed regulation under consideration to the Registrar as required in § 2.2-4007.05, the agency shall submit on the Virginia Regulatory Town Hall a copy of that regulation to the Department of Planning and Budget. In addition to determining the public benefit, the Department of Planning and Budget in coordination with the agency shall, within 45 days, prepare an economic impact analysis of the proposed regulation, as follows:

  9. Needless regulations deleted during C-19 crisis:
    1. Alcohol to go — didn’t result in an increase in DWI.

    2. Most recently, exemption of healthcare regulations with regard to caregivers [no need for doctor supervision letter for PAs, allowing nurses with out-of-state licenses, etc.] — does this regulator deletion cause inferior care? or does it get rid of needless bureaucracy?

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      You have hit, indirectly, on the one area in which the Youngkin administration could go a long way toward improving business opportunities by eliminating regulations–professions and occupations. The Commonwealth regulates a slew of occupations. Think barbers, real estate agents, martial artists, landscape architects, and the list goes on. The law gives general and broad authority to each licensing board to establish license requirements. A large segment of the regulations in this area is designed by practitioners to limit entry and competition.

      1. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
        Baconator with extra cheese

        Surveyors must spend 12 years under a licensed surveyor before they can become professional surveyors. That by far has to be one of the most ridiculous professionals regs. It kept me from taking up the career as a young man.

  10. LarrytheG Avatar

    Here’s a thing that happened that makes me wonder about regulation.

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/803092a4cb7a1ef871c14b3745051c01020f7b37ad8ac0162dd50a5a5f4e679d.jpg

    https://www.wfxrtv.com/news/local-news/roanoke-valley-news/fourth-person-dies-after-2021-hepatitis-a-outbreak-tied-to-famous-anthonys-in-roanoke-attorney-says/

    My understanding is that a restaurant worker had hepatitis A and ended up infecting a dozen or more people with four of them dead.

    I wonder if this is a failure to enforce a regulation or something that had not regulation.

    either way – one might think that this is an area where regulation is warranted, i.e. the health and safety of citizens.

    Is there a cost to a regulation for this? Yes. Now tell me how the cost of a regulation imposed on thousands of restaurants compares to 4 deaths. Tough call?

  11. James McCarthy Avatar
    James McCarthy

    James, your readers are signaling that regulatory rollbacks are puffery even for those, like Steve Bannon, carp about destroying the administrative state. At this point in American history since creation of the first federal agencies, tired claptrap about rollbacks is, well, tired. Rollbacks by elected officials also ignore the multitudes of regulatory court challenges and lobbying efforts preventing or amending them. BR ought to be above cajoling readers with this red herring.

  12. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    This post is a nice dose of reality. I don’t think the outlook is quite as bleak as you make it, however. Even among regulations that have been enacted in response to legislation, there are ones that possibly could be eliminated. They might be outdated; they might even be unnecessary to implement the underlying statutory authority. If the aim is to reduce costs to business, as it seems it is, then there are regulations that could be amended, without repealing them, to reduce costs.

    The last major effort in this field occurred under McDonnell. The report setting out the findings identified 931 regulations that could be repealed and 678 subject to amendment, and over 100 regulatory actions. The report can be found at

    https://dpb.virginia.gov/forms/20140107-1/RRIReport122013.pdf

    There was another action undertaken by the last administrations. It was some sort of pilot study, coordinated by DPB. It began before I retired in 2019, but I can’t remember the details of it. The Governor’s EO referred to it. I have not been able to find any report of that activity and have submitted an inquiry to DPB about it. Whatever information I can get, I will pass along.

    1. vicnicholls Avatar
      vicnicholls

      Thanks Dick. Should be an interesting read.

  13. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    Will Youngkin sign the new regulations needed to establish a legitimate marijuana marketplace in VA? The question remains…

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      only if twice as many existing regulations are removed.

      😉

  14. Three insights into bureaucracies……

    85% of 1923 USG agencies still existed in 1973

    Federal law required the U.S. Agriculture Department to keep field offices within a day’s horseback ride to everyplace in the US

    Until the mid-1990s, U.S. Customs forms asked ships
    entering American ports to list the number of cannons on board,

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      right. but these are not the ones that folks want removed usually. They want the ones removed that cost them time and money – even if it protects others from abuses and such. It’s a perennial thing with Conservatives and even libs who like to posture for would-be votes.

      I’m all for removal of “bad” regs. But there needs to be a process for determining what is or is not beyond what someone or an industry claims.

Leave a Reply