RGGI Tax Appears on Dominion Bills in September

Goodreads edition.

by Steve Haner

In a polite but clear “the emperor has no clothes” message, a member of the State Corporation Commission has questioned the need to impose a carbon tax to cut carbon emissions from electric generation by 30%, when the General Assembly has passed another law requiring a 100% reduction with no tax.

Judge Judith Jagdmann concurred with, but added her own comments to, an SCC opinion issued Wednesday that authorized another additional charge on Dominion Energy Virginia bills to cover the carbon credits demanded by the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI).  A party-line vote in 2020 brought Virginia into that compact, and electricity generators have been buying carbon credits already for their coal and natural gas usage.

Effective September 1, Dominion will add a charge of $2.39 per month for every 1,000 kWh of electricity used by every customer in its territory. Most customers use more than 1,000 kWh per month, so for many homeowners it will add $30 or more annually. The usage tax is the same for all customer classes. For commercial and industrial customers with lower base rates usually, this is a major cost increase.  

Membership in the RGGI interstate compact was ordered by the 2020 Virginia Clean Economy Act (VCEA) which also imposed annual targets for fossil fuel use reduction far more aggressive than RGGI has. The word Jagdmann uses in her comments to describe having both is “duplications.” She writes:

The VCEA plainly states that the RPS program requirements for Dominion shall be 100% by 2045. Thus, it remains unclear whether the significant cost required for participation in an additional cap-and-trade program — which is expected to cost customers billions of dollars — are necessary for Dominion’s and Appalachian’s ratepayers to bear in order to achieve the General Assembly’s carbon reduction objectives.

SCC Commissioner Judith Jagdmann

Since RGGI is not about reducing future carbon emissions from electric power plants, what is it about? Money. Raising money for various pet legislative goals. Jagdmann notes that the case record indicates about $3 billion will be charged to Virginians for RGGI carbon credits by 2045. This new charge on Dominion bills will raise about $168 million per year, but Dominion is not the only (just the largest) purchaser of RGGI credits used in Virginia plants.

Appalachian Power Company customers will eventually see some carbon tax costs work their way into their costs, and various merchant generators also need to buy carbon credits to make electricity with coal or natural gas. One way or another, these costs flow to the ultimate consumers.

Future projections of RGGI carbon credit costs are just that, projections. The full opinion includes the following:

Record evidence, including actual CO2 allowance prices in 2021, indicates the $6.84 allowance price used to calculate the proposed Rider RGGI revenue requirement could be too low. However, CO2 allowance prices fluctuate and any price differentials (higher or lower) can be trued-up in future Rider RGGI proceedings.

The June 2021 RGGI auction price was just under $8 a ton, for example, not $6.84. In two auctions Virginia firms have paid $89 million for CO2 allowances, with four auctions per year. The state keeps the money.

Once this revenue stream is created, and all the various state governments bake it into their annual budget, what incentive will they have to let the annual collections drop? A story posted on Bacon’s Rebellion earlier Wednesday linked to an article describing what Virginia will be doing with most of its RGGI cash.

“While there tends to be much discussion of the revenues RGGI “generates” for various programs, RGGI does not create this money,” former Attorney General Jagdmann notes in her commentary.

She goes on in her comments to list all of the ways compliance with the Virginia Clean Economy Act will be adding cost to consumer bills on top of this RGGI tax, including a $45 per megawatt penalty if the utility falls short of the aggressive timetable. Can that also be passed on to customers?

Just last week, the SCC approved another electric bill charge growing out of that 2020 legislation, reported only on Bacon’s Rebellion so far:  The new Percentage of Income Payment Program. This will eventually grow larger on both Dominion and Appalachian Power bills.

In sharing news of today’s opinion, SCC spokesman Ken Schrad noted these are just two of the various rate elements collected by individual charges (“riders”) being considered or adjusted this calendar year. Dominion’s fuel factor went up a bit in July, and its T1 Rider for transmission costs is expected to go down.

“The cumulative effect of 13 different rider adjustments (up and down) through December 1 of this year is expected to result in a $4.84 adjustment to the typical monthly residential bill on and after December 1,” Schrad wrote in an email to Bacon’s Rebellion. Rider RGGI accounts for about half of that overall increase.

The most expensive element of VCEA compliance, the largest offshore wind project planned anywhere in this hemisphere, is just starting its run for SCC approval.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

21 responses to “RGGI Tax Appears on Dominion Bills in September”

  1. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    Like, about an hour after I chided Bacon for jumping the gun with a story claiming this charge was already on our bills, an email from the SCC appeared….ain’t it always the way.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Prescient! Absolutely prescient, said the acorn to the squirrel.

      1. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        $3 billion buys a lot of acorns. And’s just what we’ll pay the state through Dominion.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          From little acorns, the mighty oaks do grow.

          1. Unless a squirrel says otherwise.

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Vultures gotta eat, same as the worms.

  2. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
    Baconator with extra cheese

    As the riders increase, more people become eligible for the income payment plan. And the cycle grows and grows and grows.
    Find a way to hide your income folks.

  3. This is just one more tax that our woke media has declined to report. The GOP ought to make it part of their messaging — one more example of stealth tax increases.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Well, Mercury and RTD both did stories. The word “tax” is not used and the RTD goes out of its way to avoid laying this at the feet of the General Assembly Democrats. They quoted Judge J, but not early in their stories (buried the lead…)

  4. tmtfairfax Avatar
    tmtfairfax

    Glad to building that house in North Carolina. Too bad the GA cannot find a way to tax stupidity and dishonesty. The proceeds from taxing the media would fund the Commonwealth without a need for the sales tax.

    Anti-climate change programs will result in the largest-ever transfer of wealth from the middle class to the wealthy. Think about it. Much of San Francisco, including virtually all of the Financial District, sits on land taken from the San Francisco Bay. Much of the eastern most part of Chicago was marsh land that would often be under water. The only parts of Manhattan that had serious flooding after Hurricane Sandy was reclaimed land. How much of Washington, D.C. was a swamp?

    If we applied today’s environmental standards, little, if any, of these areas we are supporting with taxes and fees should not be developed and should revert to their natural state — unbuildable. Why are we protecting them?

    Also, carbon credits and the like are and will be traded just like commodities. The prices will be set by traders and not the costs related to reducing carbon emissions.

    And all is being ignored by our woke journalists.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      NC has not gutted the authority of its utility commission the way the Virginia General Assembly has gutted ours. Dom customers there pay much lower rates!

      1. tmtfairfax Avatar
        tmtfairfax

        We are building in the town of Wake Forest, where the municipality buys wholesale electricity from Duke Power (I believe) and resells to businesses and residents in the town.

        1. I almost took a job in Wake Forest a couple of years ago. It’s a very nice part of NC.

  5. Dominion Energy Math:

    RGGI + PIPP = FTAC

    ———————————————————–

    PS – just in case someone didn’t get it, FTAC means “F– The Average Customer”

  6. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
    energyNOW_Fan

    My point would be the other RGGI states are presumably escaping some of the carbon fees by sending natural gas/oil directly to their homes for heating and hot water. Whereas Virginia is already more electrified with more heat pumps, are we paying carbon penalty for that difference? also not sure how electric imports factor in?

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      “Leakage” has made this a bigger joke than it already was. Power imported from non-RGGI states is not covered, and that is what has happened. All electrons are equal. Dominion’s largest coal plant is in (drumroll) West Virginia. No RGGI allowance needed.

  7. William O'Keefe Avatar
    William O’Keefe

    RGGI is a bureaucrats dream come true. The state decides how much to squeeze emissions and then creates credits for utilities to buy. Why not just have a carbon tax that applies to emissions in excess of the annual emission level. That would be more straight forward and less costly that a bureaucratic scheme that will become ever more complex and costly.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Kind of interesting that even the Usual Suspects are not defending the Democrats on this one. I mean, if passing a law against using coal and gas by a date certain is valid, what IS the point of this tax?

      1. William O'Keefe Avatar
        William O’Keefe

        Money and more power my friend. That’s what governments want and work hard to get more of.

  8. […] exceed that of all the various tax increases imposed.  Two of the new energy taxes, one a carbon tax and the other to fund a subsidy for low income electricity users, begin to raise energy prices this […]

  9. […] Sublette quotes Dominion spokesperson Ray Daudani, who indicates Dominion is reducing its carbon emissions due to RGGI, and then goes on with a gratuitous plug for offshore wind.  Dominion has been reducing its carbon emissions for years, long before RGGI, and there are other demands it do so in state law.  This fact he omits, but a State Corporation Commission judge noted it. […]

Leave a Reply