Packing the UVa Law School Faculty

Risa Goluboff, dean of the University of Virginia Law School

by Ann McLean

Earlier this week UVA Today touted the addition of 17 high-profile professors — packed with former U.S. Supreme Court clerks, Rhodes Scholars, and even a MacArthur Foundation Fellowship genius grant recipient — to the University of Virginia Law School.

“Our new and incoming faculty are either already academic superstars or superstars in the making,” said Dean Risa Goluboff. They are “highly influential voices in their fields whose scholarship will have an impact at UVA Law, both inside and outside of the classroom, and well beyond it.”

The law school’s run of prestigious hires, who include nine women and seven “people of color,” have sparked envious praise on Twitter, gushes the article, written by Eric Williamson, associate director of communications for the law school. “I feel like they must be amassing this incredibly all star faculty for a reason,” one woman is quoted as tweeting. “A new Marvel series? Avengers: Endgame 2?”

The article omitted one salient fact of interest to the broader UVa community — there is no intellectual diversity in the group. Every new hire tilts to the left ideologically. There’s not a conservative among them.

Goluboff, who has written extensively about the injustice of vagrancy laws, is remaking the faculty in her own image. When older professors reflecting a range of legal perspectives retire, Gobuloff brings in like-minded leftists. In the process she is creating an intellectual monoculture that makes a mockery of the university’s commitment to free inquiry.

Here are thumbnails of the seventeen.

  • Payvand Ahdout studied at Columbia Law School, clerked for Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and spent time at the Department of Justice. She concentrates on “habeas cases.” Her work contrasts with the judicial philosophy of “faithfully deferring to the states.”
  • Rachel Bayefsky clerked for Ruth Bader Ginsburg, studied at Yale Law School, taught at Harvard — she and Goluboff both at one time portrayed Ginsburg in a skit — and worked at the Washington, D.C., law firm Aiken Gump. Questioning established legal philosophy, she concentrates on Native American tribes.
  • Jay Butler, who studied at Yale Law School, specializes in international law and corporate social responsibility. He believes in “Amnesty for even the worst offenders.” As Risa Goluboff says of him, he sees the influence of corporations in the multinational environment in “fresh and exciting” ways.
  • Naomi Cahn, who attended Princeton University and Columbia Law School, specializes in family law, trusts and estates, feminist jurisprudence. She has an eye to “evolving understanding of gender identity, sexual orientation, and reproductive technologies.” Her scholarship “explores the cutting edge of family law,” inspiring Goluboff to comment, “Wow.”
  • Danielle Citron, helped Vice President Kamala Harris shape public discussions and make an impact on larger society, concentrating on digital privacy, civil liberties and civil rights, in order to keep a woman’s sex life private, and photos of that life, private. Building a practice in privacy rights, she wrote about “The End of Privacy.” She advised Harris in the state of California for two years.
  • Kristen Eichensehr graduated from Harvard undergrad and Yale Law School. She has worked in the Obama Administration, the State Department, and the law firm Covington & Burling in Washington, D.C. She clerked for Judge Merrick Garland. Her work is on global cybersecurity, foreign relations, and separation of powers. She is married to Richard Re, also hired to the UVa law school faculty.
  • Thomas Frampton, a graduate of Berkeley, with degrees from Harvard and Yale, concentrates on the unfairness of jury selection, with an eye toward “Jim Crow” criminal law and constitutional criminal procedure.
  • Mitu Gulati, collaborates with Columbia University and the University of California-Berkeley on environmental conservation “unfairness,” sovereign debt, and contract law. A graduate of Duke University Law, he aims to have “real-world impact” by helping financially distressed nations restructure international debt.
  • Cathy Hwang, a Stanford Law School graduate, thinks of herself as “a bridge between traditional contract theory and what is happening in the real world.” A mergers-and-acquisitions expert in corporate contracts and deals, she focuses on business law and on what makes deals happen between large corporations. She is “excited to know ‘what is in the water?” at Risa Goluboff’s University of Virginia School of Law as she comes on board the teaching faculty.
  • Craig Konnoth, a graduate of Yale Law School, focused on unifying LGBT law students from across the county as a senior policy maker at Colorado’s Health Data and Technology Initiative’s “Silicon Flatirons Center.” Konnoth works in health care law, law and sexuality. In his jurisprudence, he “goes against traditional medical logic” and believes that this logic was designed “to oppress and discipline minorities.”
  • Kimberly Krawiec, focuses on non-traditional “taboo markets.” She has written on “Reverse Transplant Tourism” and the selling of body parts. “Acceptance is coming, but it is slow,” she says in her piece, “Taboo Trades.” Interests range from marijuana legalization to “blood and other ‘repugnant transactions.’” She has written articles on “repugnance management.”
  • David Law, a graduate of Harvard Law School, has done consulting work for the United Nations. He focuses on courts, constitutions, comparative law. Goluboff heralds him as amazing, as he writes extensively on “The Declining Influence of the United States Constitution.”
  • Joy Milligan, a former Berkeley Law Professor, specializes in race-based economic inequality, civil rights, civil procedure. “There is amazing potential,” she writes to address inequality through the law school curriculum. She clerked for the ACLU’s Immigrant Rights Project and clerked on the U.S. Court of Appeals 9th District. She has argued that government housing projects from 1954 until 1964 were insufficient and misguided. She credits Goluboff with being “fundamental in shaping my understanding of civil rights history.”
  • Richard Re, a graduate of Yale Law School, studied social studies at Harvard University and clerked for Justice Anthony Kennedy on the Supreme Court. He focuses on criminal procedure, federal courts, constitutional law and “Developing Artificially Intelligent Justice.” He is married to Kristin Eichensehr, also coming onto the faculty.
  • Bertrall Ross earned his JD from Yale Law School and his M.P.A. from Princeton. He chaired the “diversity and democracy cluster,” which has hosted “high-profile discussions on … reparations and election integrity and fairness.” He discusses the “vicious cycle of marginalization” in the U.S. and writes about voter suppression. “Mobilization of the poor would not only increase the proportion of the poor in the electorate, but more importantly, would change how representatives perceive the electorate and its demands for redistribution,” he writes. Goluboff is a fan of Ross’s  scholarship and assigns his book, “Measuring Political Power” to her classes.
  • Lawrence Solum, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is a constitutional theorist, with an emphasis on procedure and philosophy of law. Described as an originalist who “is not a conservative,” he has argued that that originalism “sometimes leads to liberal and progressive outcomes.” He is described as “cutting edge” or ahead of his time because some of his research is in giving legal personhood to Artificial Intelligence.
  • Megan Stevenson, a fellow for the Fair Administration of Justice at the University of Pennsylvania Law School, comes to UVa from the teaching faculty of George Mason University, where she teaches about the “unfairness” of setting bail for criminals. Goluboff says she is doing “exciting work in criminal justice — using the latest empirical methods informed by her expertise as an economist.” She has co-authored “Bail, Jail and Pretrial Misconduct: The Influence of Prosecutors.”

These new law professors specialize in different areas of law, but they have one thing in common: a readiness to use lawfare to bring about fundamental change to society. Pity the poor law school student who enters the law school based upon its past reputation for excellence only to find stultifying intellectual conformity.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

63 responses to “Packing the UVa Law School Faculty”

  1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “The article omitted one salient fact of interest to the broader UVa community — there is no intellectual diversity in the group. Every new hire tilts to the left ideologically. There’s not a conservative among them.”

    I think you are just seeing the natural bias of intelligence is all…. nothing nefarious…

    1. dick dyas Avatar
      dick dyas

      Oh, I see now. Thanks, Trolly.

      1. Democrats and the Left have long been using the same old trope — Republicans and conservatives are stupid (or worse); Democrats and liberals/progressives are smart (or even geniuses). Nothing new or novel.

        1. DJRippert Avatar
          DJRippert

          Anybody who can look at Ralph Northam and see a genius needs immediate drug counseling.

          1. Brian Leeper Avatar
            Brian Leeper

            I look at Ralph Northam and see 400 years of inbreeding.

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            be that as it may, If Northam could go for two terms, he’d be not easy to beat. Most of blue Va would vote for him rather than Trumpkin.

          3. Brian Leeper Avatar
            Brian Leeper

            Which does nothing to improve my opinion of the average Virginia voter.

            I’d expect that they would vote for a yellow dog as long as it had the right party label.

          4. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Pretty straight forward. If the candidate takes the GOP position on health care , he’s done.

          5. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Pretty straight forward. If the candidate takes the GOP position on health care , he’s done.

          6. Brian Leeper Avatar
            Brian Leeper

            So Virginians are a bunch of single-issue voters, is that it?

          7. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Well no, they like public and higher education much more than Conservatives seem to, they support gays and transgenders, and immigrants, want the dreamers to be able to become citizens, oppose Jim Crow symbols, etc… quite a few actually but health care is a deal killer because so many now work in the gig economy and self employed especially legal immigrants.

            There is a path for Conservatives but they have to actually listen to voters, not kill health care and claim the’ll come up with something later,etc, etc.

            When they take the GOP position on health care, they’re pretty much done.

            We’ll see how their latest guy does.

  2. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    Conformity eventually becomes the petri dish for rebellion. Maybe UVA law students will be the next James Dean.

  3. Steve Gillispie Avatar
    Steve Gillispie

    Not much educational diversity either. All from the same 2 or 3 schools. Wonder if the same pattern prevails among the current faculty. Wonder what the societal impact will be of such institutional control and conformity over the teaching and ultimately shaping of US law.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      I dunno, were your professors Huns or Vandals?

      Yeah, and all of them notorious for liberal ideals… like Yale, Harvard, UPenn…

      1. Matt Adams Avatar
        Matt Adams

        You’d first have to know what “liberal ideals” where and how they conflict with your own ideology.

        You and the troll gang have yet to espouse any “liberal ideals”, nor does it appear you have a understanding or grasp of them.

      2. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Your fingers are moving Matt, but I can’t see what you’ve written.

        Hahahahaha.

  4. Steve Gillispie Avatar
    Steve Gillispie

    Congratulation, Ms. McClean. It seems that on BR the value of a posting is directly proportional to the speed of the response time, characters generated, and inanity of commenters who must conceal their names and deflect their gender. For this piece, you are on a roll.

  5. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    First of all, what happened that UVa Law School could bring in 17 new faculty members? Did a bunch of the incumbent faculty die or retire? Did someone drop a boatload of money on the school?

    Secondly, there is nothing in the backgrounds of these faculty members that suggests that they will not train their student to examine both sides of questions and be prepared to argue both sides, as TMT so rightly suggests in important for a law student.

    Lastly, I do not agree that there is “no intellectual diversity” among the new hires and they all tilt to the left. For example:

    Kristen Eichensehr–her “sin” apparently is that she worked in the Obama administration. But, she clerked for Merrick Garland, a noted centrist on the Court of Appeals. Her major area of interest is global cybersecurity. How will that contribute to “stultifying intellectual conformity”?

    Cathy Hwang, a graduate of Stanford Law School, not exactly a bastion of Eastern progressivism. She specializes in mergers and acquisitions. I agree that could be stultifying, but I fail to see any leftist leanings here.

    David Law–a specialist in courts, constitutions, and comparative law. The author fails to indicate why she thinks he tilts left. Perhaps because he is a graduate of Harvard. But so is Neil Gorsuch.

    Richard Re–Clerked for Justice Anthony Kennedy, not exactly a liberal. His area is criminal procedure and federal courts. Whatever his views, he will have to teach his students criminal procedure law in Virginia and the federal courts for them to pass the bar exam. Again, sort of a stultifying subject, but no evidence of intellectual dogma.

    Lawrence Solum, a self-described “originalist” who is not a conservative. That sounds like a definition of intellectual diversity, unless the author thinks all “originalists” should be conservative.

    Finally, there is Megan Stevenson, who comes from teaching at George Mason. Is the author implying that the Antonin Scalia School of Law made a mistake and actually hired a liberal for its faculty?

  6. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    I suspect there is no tolerance at UVa for a new hire in the mold of Ken Elzinga. Educated, erudite, kind and conservative. I took his class 44 years ago and remember it like it was yesterday. His lecture on the economics of beer (Elizinga was and probably still is a teetotaler) was extraordinary.

    I doubt a younger version of Mr. Elizinga would pass the first round of interviews at UVa these days.

  7. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Is UVA doing business any different than they have been?

    I suspect a lot of ordinary folks won’t see these new folks as not the usual UVA type, no?

    We know this. Some UVA grads veer hard right after and the main difference is how loud they have become of late but I don’t think most of the players left or right have changed much.

    Even Casteen was a solid “lefty”!

  8. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Meh. And Obamacare was overturned by ideologues on the SCOTUS.

    Oh wait, no.

    As lawyers fighting in the streets of the circuit and district courts, ideology drives their heels in the choice and vigorous defense of their clients.

    But as the air rarifies in the rooms where the decisions are handed down the distance between left and right becomes thinner than a particular sheet of parchment.

    Don’t fret, Regent will cover its share of facebiters, too.

    1. tmtfairfax Avatar
      tmtfairfax

      Sources on the dark net suggest you are getting $100 a day to post on BR. I think you do a lot more work and should get a raise.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Yeah, but then you also believe Trump won too.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          dark net? pure evil NN… geeze…

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            I’m surprised he didn’t say “reliable sources on the dark net”.

  9. tmtfairfax Avatar
    tmtfairfax

    I feel sorry for today’s students. Exposure to a single side of an issue, social or economic problem, etc., doesn’t give the law student the skills to function as lawyers whatever the areas the student will practice. I’d say that more of my law school professors leaned left than right. But not a single one focused on just one view of an issue or case or used their lectures and questions to indoctrinate the students. One must always be ready to be told to argue this side, that side or both sides of a case or hypothetical case or respond to a point made in contractual notifications.

    And, of course, in an exam, the student damn well better not only identify all of the issues, but also make the best arguments for all sides and not just pick one. Even in cases where it appeared to be a slam-dunk, the test taker sure better identify and explain even the weakest of arguments.

    This failure appears more and more often as I read filings that argue policy and fail to lay out the law and explain it to the decider. Indeed, the FCC’s general counsel had to post an article reminding lawyers that, unless and until reversed, old case law still applies and must be addressed. How sad. And yet, the affected lawyers probably don’t even understand why this was issued.

    How sad for UVA and its students.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Really? You honestly believe that the leanings of the faculty will affect the ideology of the student?

      Wow! Where did you get your degree? The Atilla School of Law?

      1. tmtfairfax Avatar
        tmtfairfax

        Did you, like Joe Biden, flunk 3rd grade? Clearly, exposure to a single viewpoint can affect the ideology of people. Hitler and Stalin were quite good at it.

        By the way, how much do you get paid to post here? I’ve been reading about you on other Internet sites that identify you as a paid disrupter.

        1. Matt Adams Avatar
          Matt Adams

          In the past 111 days he’s averaged ~15 comments a day under this alias. As we know from before when he cried about being “blocked” from another alias, he operates a plethora of them.

        2. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Ooooh, where? I’d like to know. They owe me money.

          You’ve spent too much time idolizing Putin over Biden if you believe Americans are even capable of being indoctrinated. Hell, 90% can’t be housebroken.

          My lawyer once told me, “A good lawyer wins hard cases, a bad lawyer loses easy cases, but a great lawyer couldn’t describe what a courtroom looks like.”

          PS. Provocateur, not disrupter.

          1. Brian Leeper Avatar
            Brian Leeper

            ” Hell, 90% can’t be housebroken.”

            Please don’t confuse the average in Virginia with the average in the rest of the nation.

            Thanks.

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            20 years ago I would have humbly apologized to the other 49, but in the intervening years and with the plethora of videos appearing online from all corners of the country that graphically proves otherwise, I’m afraid I am forced to restate the statistic as is. All I am willing to concede is that 90% may be a tad low.

            I seem to have picked up an exemplar this morning. Well, it’s Friday, and his last opportunity until the next work day.

          3. Brian Leeper Avatar
            Brian Leeper

            Videos are one thing, but it’s actual interactions with the locals that tell the tale.

            I’ve had conversations with several people that have moved out of Virginia and were glad they did.. and found that the population in the state they moved to is more “functional” than what they left behind in good ‘ole Virginny.

          4. DJRippert Avatar
            DJRippert

            I have lived in Virginia the vast majority of my 62 years. However, I have (from time to time) spent extensive amounts of time elsewhere – other states and foreign countries.

            Virginia is very dysfunctional. Virginians, however, are not dysfunctional.

            The problem in Virginia is that too few people understand the history of the state and the mechanisms by which a very few controlled the very many.

            Virginia needs an iconoclast who is willing to tear the remaining vestiges of the Byrd Machine down to the foundation and, metaphorically speaking, burn Richmond to the ground and salt the fields after the inferno subsides.

            Until there is no longer a place in political leadership for the Dick Saslaws and Tommy Norments of the world Virginia will remain dysfunctional.

          5. Brian Leeper Avatar
            Brian Leeper

            I agree with much of what you say. However, someone votes for these politicians. And people generally get the government they deserve.

            I think the problem is that the average Virginian is either too snowed or too proud to admit that there is anything wrong with their beloved Virginia.

            And the situation remains the same. Because admitting a problem is the first step towards solving it.

          6. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Would that be urban or rural voters?

          7. Brian Leeper Avatar
            Brian Leeper

            Not sure that really makes a difference. Both seem to have a penchant for electing lousy politicians.

          8. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Well, which ones prefer the old Virginia?

          9. Brian Leeper Avatar
            Brian Leeper

            I think the saying, “Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss” applies.

          10. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            So all those NoVa voters are also on board with the Plantation Elite like Northam?

          11. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            So all those NoVa voters are also on board with the Plantation Elite like Northam?

          12. Brian Leeper Avatar
            Brian Leeper

            What other choice did they have?

          13. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Republicans like Gillespie, Corey Stewart, Amanda Chase – all who rural Va would vote for…. no?

          14. Brian Leeper Avatar
            Brian Leeper

            Fact is Northam could have run as a Republican and gotten votes from the other side. Which ought to show that voters don’t vote for the person, they vote for the label.

          15. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Now that’s a BOLD statement! 😉

          16. Brian Leeper Avatar
            Brian Leeper

            What other choice did they have?

          17. Brian Leeper Avatar
            Brian Leeper

            I think the saying, “Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss” applies.

          18. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Well, which ones prefer the old Virginia?

          19. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
            Dick Hall-Sizemore

            Obviously, you do not subscribe to the adage that “To be a Virginian, either by birth, marriage, adoption or even on one’s mother’s side, is an introduction to any state in the Union, a passport to any foreign country and a benediction from Almighty God.”

          20. Brian Leeper Avatar
            Brian Leeper

            That’s just a fine demonstration of cultural narcissism.

          21. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead

            Burning Richmond to the ground. That has been tried already. April 1865. What sprouted up out of the ashes turned into the Byrd Machine. Just a leaner meaner version of the old Whig Party of Virginia.
            https://uploads1.wikiart.org/images/currier-and-ives/the-fall-of-richmond-va-on-the-night-of-april-2d-1865-1865.jpg!Large.jpg

          22. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Indeed and Jim Crow.

          23. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Clearly THOSE people didn’t move to Dallas or surrounds.

          24. Brian Leeper Avatar
            Brian Leeper

            None of them moved to any Southern state.

          25. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            “Provocateur”

            Requires intelligence and knowledge on topics, you’re just a troll devoid of both.

          26. DJRippert Avatar
            DJRippert

            Trollvocateur?

          27. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            That or “sockvocateur” would be adequate description, lords knows how many alias he operates to gaslight.

  10. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    First of all, what happened that UVa Law School could bring in 17 new faculty members? Did a bunch of the incumbent faculty die or retire? Did someone drop a boatload of money on the school?

    Secondly, there is nothing in the backgrounds of these faculty members that suggests that they will not train their student to examine both sides of questions and be prepared to argue both sides, as TMT so rightly suggests in important for a law student.

    Lastly, I do not agree that there is “no intellectual diversity” among the new hires and they all tilt to the left. For example:

    Kristen Eichensehr–her “sin” apparently is that she worked in the Obama administration. But, she clerked for Merrick Garland, a noted centrist on the Court of Appeals. Her major area of interest is global cybersecurity. How will that contribute to “stultifying intellectual conformity”?

    Cathy Hwang, a graduate of Stanford Law School, not exactly a bastion of Eastern progressivism. She specializes in mergers and acquisitions. I agree that could be stultifying, but I fail to see any leftist leanings here.

    David Law–a specialist in courts, constitutions, and comparative law. The author fails to indicate why she thinks he tilts left. Perhaps because he is a graduate of Harvard. But so is Neil Gorsuch.

    Richard Re–Clerked for Justice Anthony Kennedy, not exactly a liberal. His area is criminal procedure and federal courts. Whatever his views, he will have to teach his students criminal procedure law in Virginia and the federal courts for them to pass the bar exam. Again, sort of a stultifying subject, but no evidence of intellectual dogma.

    Lawrence Solum, a self-described “originalist” who is not a conservative. That sounds like a definition of intellectual diversity, unless the author thinks all “originalists” should be conservative.

    Finally, there is Megan Stevenson, who comes from teaching at George Mason. Is the author implying that the Antonin Scalia School of Law made a mistake and actually hired a liberal for its faculty?

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Dick, it’s possible that there were mass retirements pushed by the quarantine. But 17 is 3x the size of my department at W&M.

      I’m somewhat in amazement of ourselves. We ended slavery in the Civil War, defeated the Nazis in WWII, buried the Commies in the Cold War, and immediately enslaved ourselves to the notion that half of our country are Nazis and the other half are Commies. We are exceptional.

  11. Merchantseamen Avatar
    Merchantseamen

    Just becasue you have a piece of paper from a prestigious school, does not mean you are intelligent and capable of critical thinking. All it means you put in the time to study and memorize. There is not one innovator in the bunch. All they will do is preach to each other and their students how great they are and how bad America is.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      Welcome to the scrum. Get involved! 😉

      America is not “bad” because we want to acknowledge the good, bad and other. Wanting the truth is good. Choosing denial is a losing proposition longer term.

Leave a Reply