by James A. Bacon

On Friday, the VDH reported on its COVID-19 page that 30 individuals had been identified as having contracted the coronavirus and 10 had been hospitalized. As of Saturday, VDH was stating that the number of cases had increased to 41, but it no longer provided the number of hospitalizations. The website offered no explanation for the omission. The metric is a critical one, and the public needs to know it.

As we have seen in China and Italy, hospital systems have been overwhelmed as the epidemic progresses. When hospitals run out of beds and staff to treat the afflicted, doctors go into triage mode and let some people die in order to treat those with a better chance of surviving. Virginians have every reason to wonder if a similar fate awaits the Old Dominion. Do we have enough hospital beds? Are we making the proper preparations, such as arranging for overflow facilities?

I addressed that question briefly in a blog post last week, including some numbers for hospitals in Central Virginia. This weekend, I’ve taken a more comprehensive look, and to my admittedly untutored eye the numbers look worrisome.

When the crunch comes, it appears that it will hit Northern Virginia the hardest. Whether you’re counting licensed beds or staffed beds, Virginia’s most populous region has the least hospital capacity of the six regions that Virginia Health Information uses to group hospitals — only 98 beds per 100,000 population.

By contrast, the best place to be is in the state’s Northwestern region, which encompasses a triangle from Charlottesville to Staunton to Winchester (as seen in the map below). That region has 276 beds per 100,000.

Virginia Health Information breakdown of Virginia’s hospital regions

The Demographics Research Group at the University of Virginia estimates that Virginia’s 2020 population is 8.6 million. If the disease follows the same path as it has in many (but not all) other countries, 30% to 40% of the population could be affected. Nobody knows for sure, and estimates very widely. The Governor of Ohio said on television this morning that the percentage could run as high as 70%. But I’m trying to be conservative here to avoid accusations of being an alarmist. A 30%- to 40%-estimate implies that something on the order of three million Virginians could contract the disease. Of those, some 10% could require hospitalization. Again, nobody knows the percentage that will wind up in the hospital, but that’s an educated guess based on what we’ve seen in other countries. In sum, it is not unreasonable to expect that Virginia acute-care hospitals could be required to treat some 300,000 coronavirus patients suffering severe symptoms.

According to Virginia Health Information, Virginia’s acute care hospitals have 17,100 licensed beds. Of those, 14,600 are staffed. In other words, state hospitals have more beds than doctors, nurses, and other health professionals to staff them. (Staffing levels are a separate issue, which I will defer to another discussion.) I can find no data on the number of intensive care units (ICUs) or ventilators, both of which are critical for treating patients with severe respiratory ailments, in the state.

I’m making somewhat arbitrary assumptions here — pick your own values for the variables and make your own estimates — but let’s assume somewhat optimistically that Virginians’ social-distancing practices dampen the geometric rate of increase of the COVID-19 virus and that the surge of patients into hospitals is spread over four months. Let’s also assume that the average patient is hospitalized for ten days, suggesting that a hospital bed can accommodate 12 patients on average over a four-month period. That would imply the need for 25,000 hospital beds — the equivalent of 290 beds per 100,000. That actually understates the case because it doesn’t account for peak demand for beds at the height of the epidemic, but I’m trying to keep things simple here.

Virginia has 17,100 acute care beds total. Nationally, about 70% of acute-care beds are utilized on average. Let’s assume that by restricting the admission of patients for discretionary procedures hospitals can free up 20% of the beds. (Another arbitrary assumption, but I’m trying to isolate key variables here. Feel free to plug in your own numbers.) Based on these assumptions, the number of beds in Virginia available for coronavirus patients would be roughly 8,500 — one third the number needed.

There’s a good-news story and a bad-news story within those numbers. The gap in hospital beds is not spread evenly across the state. The Northwestern and Central regions come close to my back-of-the-envelope guesstimate of how many acute care beds will be needed. The hospital-capacity crisis will likely be less severe in those regions. But the Northern Virginia and Eastern region (mainly Hampton Roads) fall scarily short.

Measured by the number of hospital beds per 100,000 population Northern Virginia’s health system runs lean and mean. The region with three million population has roughly 3,000 licensed beds in acute-care hospitals and it staffs every last one of them. (See the green table above.) Indeed, according to VHI data, Northern Virginia hospitals somehow manage to staff a few more beds than they’re licensed for.

Running lean on the number of hospital beds helps contain health care costs, but it provides little capacity to fall back upon in the case of an epidemic. Northern Virginia has no inventory of empty beds to accommodate a flood of coronavirus patients. With 98 beds per 100,000, Northern Virginia has about one-third the number it needs to handle the epidemic load that I have postulated here.

With 154 beds per 100,000, the Eastern region has about half the number it needs.

To repeat: I have tried to make these estimates conservative. The beds-per-100,000 ratios for those two regions are low by national standards, and even lower by the standards of other industrialized nations. The average number of “curative care” beds for the U.S. as a whole was 277 per 100,000 population in 2016, according to OECD data. Thirty-one other countries had a higher proportion of curative care beds. Italy, for instance, had 317, yet its health care system has been overwhelmed. (I’m not clear what the difference is between a “curative care” bed and an “acute care” bed, so such comparisons must be made with caution.)

Needless to say, the Virginia Department of Health has much more authoritative epidemiology models and better data than I can provide here. Perhaps we can take heart that no public health official or hospital official in Virginia has expressed public concern that there might be an insufficient number of hospital beds. Indeed, Governor Ralph Northam has assured Virginians that the state has a plan in place to confront the virus. However, I have seen no hints in the public domain — announcements, press releases, news articles — that anyone is taking concrete action to handle an overflow of coronavirus patients, should it occur.

If hospitals are turning away patients for elective procedures, they are doing so without fanfare. A good modeling system should be able to predict when the epidemic will reach a critical stage — say, early April. I have not heard hospitals appeal to the public to reschedule elective procedures during that period. Meanwhile, if hospitals and public health authorities are lining up space, cots and medical equipment for pop-up facilities like those seen in China, they are doing so quietly behind the scenes. I, for one, would feel reassured to know that efforts are taking place to deal with a worst-case scenario. Such precautions would seem to be mandatory in Northern Virginia with its low ratio of hospital beds. The fact that we’re hearing nothing should make you queasy. Either we’re experiencing a failure in the plan or a failure to communicate.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

10 responses to “Not Nearly Enough Hospital Beds”

  1. Reed Fawell 3rd Avatar
    Reed Fawell 3rd

    I am no expert here, obviously. But best I can discern, the percentage of those infected will likely be far greater than those who require hospital beds, much less ICU care. Another words an estimated number of 10% hospital bed patients projected among those infected is likely to be a far higher projection than will become reality, and far fewer even then will require ICU care, if (and this is big if), the general population follows government and health care prevention protocols, which are of critical importance. Thus these protocals should be enforced by all means necessary to insure this virus does not reach crisis proportions, especially among the vulnerable elderly with underlying preconditions.

  2. djrippert Avatar
    djrippert

    I don’t trust China’s data or Iran’s. I do trust South Korea and Italy. Those two countries tell very different stories at the moment. The South Koreans had about 5,000 cases measured from the 12th day after the 100th case was detected. Today it’s been 23 days and they have 8,000 cases. Growth but not exponential growth. Italy had about 5,000 cases on day 12 after the first hundred were confirmed. Just like South Korea. Today the Italians are on Day 20 and have over 21,000 cases. On their day 20 the South Koreans had 7,750 cases. From day 12 to day 20 the South Korean cases grew by about 50% while the Italian cases grew by more than 400%.

    Today is America’s Day 12. As of 3:30 am this morning we have 2,700 cases.

    Which way will America’s trajectory go – like that in South Korea or like that in Italy? Given that South Korea was the most heavily tested country and we lack testing supplies in the needed volume I suspect we are more likely to look like Italy.

    https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/peteraldhous/coronavirus-updating-charts-us-world-compare

    1. Is America more like South Korea or Italy?

      In the context of social distancing, are Americans more like South Koreans or Italians in our proclivity to ignore public health warnings and defy efforts to encourage social distancing? Are we more a communitarian society or an individualistic society? Do we praise conformity or do we bash it? Do we praise personal virtue and self control or do we mock it?

    2. Reed Fawell 3rd Avatar
      Reed Fawell 3rd

      “Given that South Korea was the most heavily tested country and we lack testing supplies in the needed volume I suspect we are more likely to look like Italy.”

      I suspect answer to that question largely depends on us. Italy may well prove a perfect storm scenario for modern western country, given facts that country got a very slow start (first in line so to speak so relatively little practical warning), heavy unexpected inflow of infections flying in from Asia (given US shut down its borders from there), Italy’s 2nd largest elderly population (where all deaths recorded) in World behind only Japan, and the Italians highly dense and social lifestyle.

      1. djrippert Avatar
        djrippert

        Maybe so. But the South Koreans have an average age of 41.8 (vs US of 38.2 and 45.4 in Italy) and they live a dense and social lifestyle too. In fact, South Korea’s population density is twice that of Italy’s. They hit 100 cases 3 days before Italy and they seem to have the matter more or less in hand. The most noteworthy aspect of South Korea’s efforts was a very broad based and fast testing program.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          re: ” The most noteworthy aspect of South Korea’s efforts was a very broad based and fast testing program.”

          How does that happen in South Korea and not here?

          Here’s what we are doing here:

          https://fox40.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2020/03/AP20075535801673.jpg?w=2000&h=1440&crop=1

          this is what happens when you don’t have enough test kits.

          One guy is infected but everyone gets crowded into the same room with him.

          What kind of sense does that make?

  3. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    The basic issue is that any bed you have in reserve is going to cost money.

    So how many do we want to have in reserve – all the time and what is that cost and do taxpayers pay for it or do the hospitals incorporate that cost into their charges?

    Saying that we have to have enough beds in reserve for a worst case scenario needs to be traded off for how much it will cost – and the beds are not the least of it – you need staff also and other equipment.

    The military and FEMA have a lot of this stuff and we actually see it deployed sometimes.

    Need to recognize also that when CDC fails at it’s primary mission of building test kits early on – that the consequences of that are the need for more hospital beds and staffing.

    So, is this a failure of government?

    1. djrippert Avatar
      djrippert

      The English have an active contingency plan for the British Army to build out tent-based mobile hospitals near large nursing / retirement homes. Not sure if they’ve started doing this yet but the plan has been publicly discussed.

      And yes … this is a failure of government. From the lack of test kits to the slow response in Virginia to no apparent contingency plan for additional hospital beds in Virginia’s most populous area. A complete failure of government. Let’s just hope we get lucky because that’s basically where we are – hoping for luck.

  4. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    If the American people THINK that we’re going to lock down – and they might be thinking that right now – they’re all going to rush out and trample each other at the food stores.

    Yes.. no matter how odious it sounds, we are a HERD little different than the hooved kind. That’s the “real” us these days.

  5. djrippert Avatar
    djrippert

    Virginia may have its first hot spot in James City County. Apparently there are 10 cases of Coronavirus there. Northam encourages people to stop going to bars and restaurants on the Peninsula.

    https://wydaily.com/local-news/2020/03/15/northam-bans-gatherings-of-100-discourages-going-to-peninsula-restaurants-bars-as-1st-coronavirus-death-hits-james-city-county/

Leave a Reply