Nantucket Wind Suit May Have Virginia Echoes

Source: Bureau of Ocean Energy Management

by Steve Haner

First published this morning by the Thomas Jefferson Institute for Public Policy. 

A group of Nantucket Island, Massachusetts residents have filed suit challenging the pre-construction environmental review on a massive offshore wind complex planned off its shores. The issues raised may have a direct impact on the similar wind energy project planned off Virginia Beach, which is only now beginning its environmental impact process.

A loose coalition of offshore wind opponents is forming from North Carolina to New England to the Great Lakes to question or challenge the expanding list of proposed projects. The Thomas Jefferson Institute for Public Policy has affiliated with the coalition, with our concerns over Dominion Energy Virginia’s proposed 5,280 megawatt project basically economic.

One of the key organizers of the broad coalition and this Nantucket lawsuit, David Stevenson of the Caesar Rodney Institute in Delaware, will be speaking at the Virginia Energy Consumer Conference on September 16 outside Richmond. Thomas Jefferson Institute is one of the three sponsors. The full conference will be available through streaming.

The umbrella group is using the name “Coalition for Ocean Protection and Safety.” The Nantucket group, playing off the code designation for its local airport, call themselves ACK RATS, with the RATS standing for Residents Against Turbines. The wind developments there are not 27 miles offshore the way it is planned in Virginia.

“Some people oppose the industrial offshore development because it will harm their ocean view. Some people oppose it because it will result in higher electricity rates. Some will oppose it because it will hurt commercial fishing,” stated Val Oliver, co-founder of ACK Rats, in a prepared media statement.

“While those are all valid and true concerns, what motivates us in our opposition to the industrial offshore development is the fact that it will result in the destruction of our ocean floor, its ecosystem, and have a deadly impact to countless bugs, birds, bats, fish, and the critically endangered North Atlantic Right Whale. Saving those species, and especially the critically endangered Right Whale is why we are here today,” Oliver continued.

“The whales belong to all of us and with fewer than 400, of which there are fewer than 100 breeding females left, each one is worth protecting. The people of Nantucket have a long history with these whales, and we have done so much recently to protect this species. It would be a tragedy to see all of them lost in order to build an industrial offshore development,” stated Mary Chalke, co-founder of ACK Rats.

With its Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) still in the early stage, the Dominion project already has the enthusiastic endorsement of the Biden Administration, Virginia Governor Ralph Northam and the Democrats in control of the General Assembly. Threats to any whales (which do cruise Virginia waters) probably won’t shake that. But if the Vineyard Wind EIS fails a federal court review because it was rushed and flawed, that likely will add roadblocks to the Virginia project.

The suit challenges the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) as having failed to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act and the Endangered Species Act.

“Despite preparing an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and a Supplement to the EIS (SEIS), BOEM failed to take the requisite “hard look” at the Vineyard Wind project’s adverse impacts on whales and other marine mammals, fish, sea turtles, birds, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, cultural resources, aesthetics, and other resource categories. BOEM’s two NEPA documents also failed to examine a legally adequate range of alternatives; failed to mitigate the project’s impacts; and grossly underreported the project’s cumulative effects,” the opening summary states.

The suit reads like and cites complaints similar to those in legal challenges to natural gas pipeline projects in Virginia, some of the projects now abandoned. Any successful federal court precedents established in those cases on reversing permit approvals may apply here.

Vineyard Wind LLC submitted a construction and operation plan to BOEM in 2017, seeking to erect 100 turbines about fourteen miles offshore from Nantucket and neighboring Martha’s Vineyard. Plans are in place to expand to other adjoining lease areas and build a total of 600 650-foot-tall turbines in that region.

The Dominion project, which Wednesday announced its formal lease of Port of Virginia space to use as a staging area, plans to produce 2,600 megawatts of energy from its first phase. Massive world-wide economic forces are behind this push, most of them positioned to earn substantial profits from energy ratepayers.

The Virginia State Corporation Commission, basically under orders from the General Assembly to approve the offshore wind proposed by Dominion, has estimated the all-in consumer cost of the Dominion project at more than $37 billion. It accounts for about a third of the $807 annual increase in residential electric bills the SCC has projected by 2030, with the power provided dependent on unreliable wind.

The five-turbine, 30 megawatt Block Island wind project off Rhode Island currently has four of its five turbines off-line as the manufacturer inspects for the kind of stress fractures which are appearing in similar units in Europe. Block Island has been operational on windy days since 2016, but recently the turbines were remaining still on those windy days and some newspaper finally asked why.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

29 responses to “Nantucket Wind Suit May Have Virginia Echoes”

  1. Sounds like the legal tactics fine-tuned by Virginia environmental groups to defeat the gas pipelines are being turned on environmentalists’ favored energy source, wind power. What’s sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. Sue, delay, sue, delay, and sue some more until the project sponsor cries, “No mas!” The only thing the offshore wind opponents haven’t done yet is to find a racial justice angle!

  2. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
    energyNOW_Fan

    Money talks, and the Feds are considering large payouts to the fisherman to buy them off. That “legalized bribery” approach will probably be used wherever possible. That leaves the Ocean bottom extremists as the only opposition. That movement seems a little ridiculous. They are also trying to stop any mining of manganese nodules, which is apparently planned for cobalt etc. values. Obviously there is a need to properly manage resources, but OK set some rules.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      As mentioned, and hardly news, my concerns are over the cost and reliability issues, especially with captive ratepayers on the hook for cost and risk. But that BOEM map was a bit of an eye opener and the level of industrialization of the ocean and ocean bottom does raise some real issues. Look at that map and realize the same energy from a nuke or gas plant would use the land footprint of less than one of those lease blocks. Not the hundreds of such blocks these folks will fill up with towers, cables, underwater structures.

      1. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
        energyNOW_Fan

        Another Fed concern is the super speed pace of development, that the states want to mandate, exceeds the electrical infrastructure to bring such a massive amount of power to shore…assuming the proposed projects go forward.

        1. John Harvie Avatar
          John Harvie

          Gee, wonder if somebody thought of that?

          No problem. Just quickly fund, design, acquire land with ensuing court battles, clear the land or ROW, build, test, and interconnect some more shoreside EHV transmission facilities to accomodate. Shouldn’t take all that long… Piece of cake to those with no technical background.

          Oh, and be sure to bring it ashore in a built-up urban corridor like Tidewater, VA to boot. And one last thing, make sure no one’s sceniec view is compromized while you’re at it.

      2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        “…same energy from a nuke or gas plant would use the land footprint of less than one of those lease blocks…”

        You are forgetting the mining operations (to say nothing of waste disposal on the back end) and the gas well fields and pipelines. Not even close…

  3. The five-turbine, 30 megawatt Block Island wind project off Rhode Island currently has four of its five turbines off-line as the manufacturer inspects for the kind of stress fractures which are appearing in similar units in Europe. Block Island has been operational on windy days since 2016, but recently the turbines were remaining still on those windy days and some newspaper finally asked why.

    This relates to my primary concern about the true cost of electrical power generation via offshore wind. I think the engineers and economic analysts habitually underestimate the operations and maintenance costs for wind turbine facilities in such a harsh environment. I also think they overestimate the life-cycle of these facilities.

  4. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    Here’s a little more perspective

    Almost exactly 10 years ago, a 5.8 earthquake struck Central Virginia. Dominion’s North Anna nuclear station shut down and remained offline until November 2011. So, this stuff happens. Not sure why the Block Island situation is special.

    Also, the Caesar Rodney Institution is part of the right wing, anti offshore wing American Policy Network. So are the Beacon Hill Institute and the Thomas Jefferson Institute.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Mr. Ad Hominem is back! Hey, Peter, we stand by the mailbox waiting for the checks but they never arrive. We’re the poor relation to most of those groups. 🙂 So you can assume we actually believe what we say rather than reflect donor directives…

    2. The wind turbines at Block Island have been in intermittent operation for about five years. The North Anna nuke plant has been in near-continuous operation for 40 years.

      Let’s discuss the reliability histories of these facilities again in 25 years.

      PS – I enjoyed your piece on the governor’s race.

  5. tmtfairfax Avatar
    tmtfairfax

    A couple years ago, my wife and I were driving around much of Oahu. We saw lots of wind turbines on hilltops and lots of signs complaining about the wind turbines ruining the view. Can’t please everyone.

    As far as using the same tools as the enviros, fair is fair. Of course, I’m not a journalist, so I see things more balanced.

    BTW, Peter, your piece on the governor’s race was fantastic. It made me think I was reading the papers 30 years ago.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      TMT , are you also worried about this group using non-profit status for their activities?

      And yes, we both agree on Peter’s article!

      1. tmtfairfax Avatar
        tmtfairfax

        I’ve been consistent. I favor stripping the tax-exempt status from every nonprofit that spends money to lobby or influence public policy with an employee or a hired gun. I don’t care what their ideology is. A nonprofit that uses volunteers can be left tax-exempt.

        And that filthy company Dominion had the 7th power outage at my residence since October 2020. I wouldn’t wish Alzheimer’s on any one, but I’m getting to making an exception for Dominion’s corporate officers.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          So you favor stripping the Thomas Jefferson group that Haner is with?

          1. tmtfairfax Avatar
            tmtfairfax

            If Haner’s group is paying anyone to influence public opinion, I would favor ending its tax exempt status. I’d nail every trade association and think tank in America.

  6. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    re: North American Right Whales – yes… I’m glad someone is looking into this…. ” The North Atlantic right whale is one of the world’s most endangered large whale species, with less than 400 individuals remaining. … Entanglement in fishing gear and vessel strikes are the leading causes of North Atlantic right whale mortality.”

    Sounds like there are other threats besides just wind turbines… I wonder if this group is really serious about protecting them and will highlight these other threats.

    Let me make a wild guess… not so much…

  7. William O'Keefe Avatar
    William O’Keefe

    In addition to all of these objections, the Dominion project is unlikely to be the most cost-effective risk based options in two decades. I doubt that the General Assembly bothered to conduct a thorough technology review of the most promising options.
    Dominion doesn’t care as long as it can stick rate payers with the bill. This is just another Baptist and Bootlegger scheme.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      I agree about Dominion. What is the rest of this actually about?

      1. William O'Keefe Avatar
        William O’Keefe

        You wouldn’t understand.

    2. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Of course the GA didn’t look under the rug, but what is worse they also prevented the SCC from doing so in what would be a fairly open, public process with everybody testifying under oath and under penalty of perjury, and no decision maker on the take from a donor.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        All TRUE and I’ve always agreed but what is the rest of this that TJ has gotten onboard with?

        Sounds like TJ has joined the partisan wars.

        Not entirely shocked but noted.

      2. William O'Keefe Avatar
        William O’Keefe

        Amen to that. The GA was blatant in rigging the process. Does corruption’s chickens ever come home to roost?

    3. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Of course the GA didn’t look under the rug, but what is worse they also prevented the SCC from doing so in what would be a fairly open, public process with everybody testifying under oath and under penalty of perjury, and no decision maker on the take from a donor.

  8. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    Steve H. Please tell me how the two points in my comment are not true. If so, I will ask Jim to take them down and apologize.

    (TMT and Larry. I appreciate the compliments)

  9. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    I agree the same EIS should apply to offshore wind that was applicable to the pipeline. One problem is going to be that we know relatively little about the ocean floor, so predicting impacts is going to be difficult. However, it seems a stretch to say that the the columns and cables for the platforms will pose a risk to fish. They seem to thrive on such artificial reefs.

    I found this statement to be especially rich with irony: “The people of Nantucket have a long history with these whales.” They certainly do. A large part of the reason that right whales are near extinction is that folks from Nantucket hunted and killed them extensively. After all, the right whale is called that because “it was the right whale to hunt—it moved slowly and would float after being killed.” https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/rtwhale.html

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      Oh excellent point! Haner should have known that as well as TJ.

      Conservative types sometimes don’t really seem to understand environmental impacts.. they just try to ape the process…

    2. A large part of the reason that right whales are near extinction is that folks from Nantucket hunted and killed them extensively.

      I got a bit of a sardonic chuckle out of that as well. Perhaps the people of Nantucket are trying to make amends for the actions of their forefathers.

  10. […] A group of Nantucket Island, Massachusetts residents have filed suit challenging the pre-construction environmental review on a massive offshore wind complex planned off its shores. The issues raised may have a direct impact on the similar wind energy project planned off Virginia Beach, which is only now beginning its environmental impact process.,, The umbrella group is using the name “Coalition for Ocean Protection and Safety.” The Nantucket group, playing off the code designation for its local airport, call themselves ACK RATS, with the RATS standing for Residents Against Turbines. The wind developments there are not 27 miles offshore the way it is planned in Virginia. >click to read< […]

  11. Cassie Gentry Avatar
    Cassie Gentry

    It’s really funny how “environmentalists” come in so many flavors that there is always a faction available to litigate against any and all alternative energy projects. One faction hates fossil fuels, but others hate wind, solar, hydro, and of course nuclear. The result is nothing gets built except in Texas which is covered in wind farms (free enterprise loves those federal subsidies) whose output is unassimilable with the Texas grid. Meanwhile, wind projects are stonewalled and suddenly rural solar farms are fought, while in Virginia luddites stonewall a natural gas pipeline and in Maine they’re killing off a powerline to bring clean hydroelectricity from Canada to New England because you know the powerline will destroy all of Maine’s pristine western wilderness. This all results in gridlock and nothing’s getting built, all the while the govt. is pushing for all electric cars by 2035, but where’s the juice for them going to come from?

Leave a Reply