Independent Journalism – The Special Case of the Virginia Mercury

by James C. Sherlock

I look every day to the Virginia Public Access Project’s (VPAP) VaNews.

I am a donor.

It proclaims:

VaNews will consider ‘original news reporting’ that is published online by print newspapers, broadcast radio and TV stations and outlets that meet our standards as ‘online news providers.’

On that same page VaNews defines qualified “online news providers”, among other criteria, as publications that are “not produced by a political organization.”

Yet it endlessly publishes stories from the Virginia Mercury. Nothing wrong with progressive commentary. God knows Virginia Mercury is one voice in a very large chorus.

But those stories are produced by a hierarchy of political organizations founded by what both Politico and The New York Times have called a progressive “dark money” network.

A tax-exempt not-for-profit political network. Amplified by VPAP’s VaNews.

Arabella Advisors. It all starts, as do so many progressive political endeavors, with Arabella Advisors. Arabella is a consulting company that “has helped hundreds of clients representing more than $100 billion in assets increase their philanthropic impact.”

Their clients increasingly recognize that promising ideas with the power to effect deep social change often require up-front capital, rapid prototyping, and a higher tolerance for risk than governments or the market can provide.

Arabella serves as the hub of what Politico has labeled a progressive dark money network made up of non-profits.

A very wealthy dark money network.

The Sixteen Thirty Fund and the Hub Project. From Politico, more from a story subtitled a “Massive ‘dark-money’ group boosted Democrats in 2018”:

A little-known nonprofit called The Sixteen Thirty Fund pumped $140 million into Democratic and left-leaning causes.

the Hub Project controlled the flow of money for this effort from Sixteen Thirty Fund into states and districts, according to reporting by The New York Times.

From a New York Times story in April of this year:

Long before he emerged as a potential champion of journalism with his bid for Tribune Publishing, the Swiss billionaire Hansjörg Wyss quietly created a sophisticated political operation to advance progressive policy initiatives and the Democrats who support them.

The organization, called The Hub Project, was started in 2015 by one of Mr. Wyss’s charitable organizations, the Wyss Foundation, partly to shape media coverage to help Democratic causes. It now has 60 employees, according to its website, including political organizers, researchers and communications specialists. Mr. Wyss and his charitable foundation are not mentioned on The Hub Project’s website, and his role in its creation has not been previously reported.

The Hub Project’s activities include organizing paid advertising campaigns that criticized Republican congressional candidates in 2018, as well as a series of marches in 2017 that called on then-President Donald J. Trump to release his tax returns.

These funds originate primarily with major left-of-center foundations and individual donors, not with the company Arabella Advisors, and are controlled by the nonprofits, which in turn “hire” Arabella Advisors to consult in exchange for a fee. Many of Arabella’s top officials, including firm founder Eric Kessler and former managing director Bruce Boyd, are current or former principal officers on the nonprofits’ boards of directors.  Between 2008 and 2020, Arabella’s nonprofits paid the company over $182 million in contracting and management services fees.

The Hub Project came out of the idea that Democrats should be more effective in conveying their arguments through the news media and directly to voters. Its business plan, a 21-page document prepared for the Wyss Foundation in 2015, recommended that the group “be solely funded by the Wyss Foundation at the outset” and that it would work behind the scenes to “dramatically shift the public debate and policy positions of core decision makers. The plan added that The Hub Project “is not intended to be the public face of campaigns.” [Emphasis added.]

Hopewell Fund.

Another 501(c)(3) organization that is advised by Arabella is the Hopewell Fund.

Hopewell has told the IRS that it “aimed at advancing public good and achieving equity.” In 2018 it sponsored a number of websites designed to look like standalone nonprofits. One was Verified Virginia.

Lee Bodner is the Board Chair and President of the Hopewell Fund and President of the New Venture Fund.

Lee … previously served as a Managing Director at Arabella Advisors, leading its engagement with the New Venture Fund and many national nonprofit organizations that Arabella has managed, including the Sixteen Thirty Fund, the Latino Victory Project, and others…. Lee also built strategic partnerships with nonprofits, including the Clinton Foundation and the Nature Conservancy.

On the revenue side, Hopewell in 2020 realized more than $150 million in contributions and grants. One contributor gave $51 million. Another $18 million; four more in the $3-5 million range. It finished the year with $160 million in net assets and fund balances.

It reported $128 million in 2020 expenses, including $80 million in grants. It reported spending $5 million in attempts to influence legislation. It gave $8 million to Acronym, a Democratic get-out-the-vote organization.

As for Virginia grants:

  • Freedom Virginia in Richmond got $320,000. “Freedom Virginia urges General Assembly to override Youngkin vetoes”;
  • New Virginia Majority Education Fund in Alexandria $13,000;
  • Plus Communications LLC in Arlington $100,000. “PLUS Communications was founded in 2011 by three of the nation’s top political and public affairs strategists after working together on dozens of hard-fought campaigns;”
  • The Commonwealth Institute for Fiscal Analysis in Richmond $25,000. “The Commonwealth Institute for Fiscal Analysis (TCI) advances racial and economic justice in Virginia by advocating for public policies.
  • Virginia Interfaith Center for Public Policy $89,200. It “advocate(s) for racial, social, and economic justice in Virginia’s policies and practices.”
  • Virginia 21 Action in Richmond $24,500. A progressive get-out-the- vote organization, it’s target audience is college students. “Virginia21 will provide young Virginians with clear and easily accessible information on candidates, ballot initiatives, issues, and whatever else is needed to ensure that they are well-informed voters;”
  • Whole Woman’s Health Alliance headquartered in Charlottesville is listed as a health company in Hopewell’s Form 990. It runs a series of abortion clinics, including one in Charlottesville. Hopewell granted that organization nearly $1 million in 2020.

Nothing illegal or unethical about any of that. It’s a free country.

But VPAP does not consider Hopewell to be either a political organization or partisan. Some might find that conclusion unusual.

States Newsroom. In 2017, Hopewell launched States Newsroom, a network with initial sites in 15 states. It now has 29 sites and content-sharing agreements with eight other nonprofit newsrooms.

(States Newsroom publishes a daily newsletter on reproductive rights. No kidding. Daily.)

From States Newsroom 

now employ(s) more than 140 full-time editors, reporters, and support staff in 29 states across the country. States Newsroom has established a new, philanthropic business model that focuses on state politics and policy.

It is also a strategic spender.

In 2019, it booked a profit (revenue less expenses) of nearly $5 million on contributions and grants revenue of $7 million. In the presidential election year of 2020, it spent all but $300,000 of contributions and grants of nearly $10 million.

Chris Fitzsimon is the publisher of States Newsroom.

Chris oversees the content and themes of the organization, managing financial resources, and supervising the state editors. He also travels frequently to hire and visit editors and grantees and appears weekly on the TV political talk show NC SPIN. [Emphasis added.]

From 2004 to 2017, Fitzsimon was the founder and original director of NC Policy Watch, a project of the North Carolina Justice Center.

Fitzsimon was also the founder and director of Common Sense Foundation, a now-defunct progressive think tank in Raleigh.

States Newsroom files a Form 990 for all of its affiliates. I note from its 2020 Form 990 Schedule I that it donated $310,000 to North Carolina Justice Center.

Probably a worthy cause.

Courtney Cuff, listed as a $300,000 a year project director on Hopewell’s 2020 Form 990, was listed on States Newsroom’s 990 as Treasurer.

But States Newsroom is not considered a political organization by VPAP. That probably would come as news to the Hopewell Fund. And Ms. Cuff.

Virginia Mercury. States Newsroom subsidiary Virginia Mercury started operations in 2018.

The Virginia Mercury is an independent, nonprofit online news organization covering state government and policy. The Mercury launched in 2018 to bring a fresh perspective to coverage of the state’s biggest political and policy issues and fill the gaps in statehouse reporting created by a shrinking media industry.

The Mercury is part of States Newsroom, a national 501(c)(3) nonprofit supported by grants and a coalition of donors and readers. We retain full editorial independence and are a proud member of the Virginia Press Association and the Virginia Capitol Correspondents Association.

The Virginia Mercury generally features progressive commentary.”

“Independent.” From States Newsroom. Whose publisher hires the editor of Virginia Mercury. Whose headquarters stories Virginia Mercury regularly republishes. As then does VaNews.

If true, that independence would come as a distinct disappointment to Hopewell Fund donors.

The Virginia Press Association “champions the common interests of Virginia newspapers and the ideals of a free press in a democratic society.”

The Virginia Capitol Correspondents Association is comprised of “print, broadcast, and on-line professional journalists who report on state government and politics in the Commonwealth of Virginia.”

Define free press. And journalism.

And consider why and how Virginia Mercury might report on state government and politics in Virginia.

Philanthropic Non-Profits. State Newsroom is not only ”philanthropic,”,it’s a “non-profit supported by grants and a coalition of donors and readers.”

Those two labels are expected to be self justifying, because, for many, they are. They signal virtue.

  • Mother Teresa was philanthropic;
  • Greta Thunberg is a non-profit person. (Sometimes the virtue signals get mixed in her world. “Under the suggestion and guidance of the BIPOC members” of the group, a New Zealand youth environmental protest group inspired by teen activist Greta Thunberg disbanded, accusing itself of racism.)

People should say what they want, write what they want, and donate to whatever causes they favor.

But Hopewell, States Newsroom and Virginia Mercury are “public charities” only by the grace of the tax code. They are in fact tax-exempt political organizations.

Legal, but you might not tell your mom, or VaNews, you had done that.

Bottom line. Ignore detailed exposés from Politico and The New York Times.   Ignore the Forms 990.

Virginia Mercury says it is both “part of States Newsroom” and independent (except for that hiring and firing of the editor thing).

I’d have to ask them to pick one  But that’s just me.

Virginia Mercury is as independent and non-political as parent company States Newsroom. And States Newsroom is as independent and non-political as the Hopewell Fund.

They certainly claim they are independent, philanthropic even, and non-political.

Clearly VPAP’s VaNews believes them.

The Executive Director of VPAP is the genuine article, a committed free press guy. The Board Chairman is a Democrat and the Vice Chairman a Republican. It really tries to be what it says it is.

VPAP, to whom I donate, tells the IRS its mission is:

To elevate public understanding of Virginia politics and government by organizing and printing public information in ways that are easily accessible to all and free of partisan bias.

So let it be written.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

39 responses to “Independent Journalism – The Special Case of the Virginia Mercury”

  1. Kathleen Smith Avatar
    Kathleen Smith

    I will continue to support the Virginia Mercury and read the New York Times. I also read Virginia Political, Cardinal News, USA Today, the Progress Index, NPR, Reuters, and of course, Fox, CNN, Bacon’s Rebellion. In order to be unbiased, one must be able to listen to all sides and then make an informed decision. God help us if we didn’t. I am glad someone finds the Mercury, like Cardinal News, it is informative.

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      You and I can read what we want, and do, but we should know where they come from. So should VPAP.

      Virginia Mercury products are being reproduced in VPAP’s VaNews under the false flag that the Virginia Mercury is independent and non-partisan.

      The facts prove otherwise.

    2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      You and I can read what we want, and do, but we should know where they come from. So should VPAP.

      Virginia Mercury products are being reproduced in VPAP’s VaNews under the false flag that the Virginia Mercury is independent and non-partisan.

      The facts prove otherwise.

      As for Cardinal News, any organization run by LuAnne Rife is going to be a class act. She was the heart and soul of reporting at the Roanoke Times. I have no information that it is linked to a political network.

      1. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        More on Arabella: https://capitalresearch.org/article/is-the-arabella-network-telling-the-truth-about-itself-part-1/

        I’m pretty sure a huge network of climate catastrophe prophets at newspapers and TV stations around the U.S. are equally subsidized, including the fellow at our Richmond paper. Both the Right and Left dark money groups should be forced more into the light.

        Captain, the people behind VPAP are perfectly aware of who is funding some of these outlets and some of the same people fund them and support the agenda that drives the reports. Bacon and I have railed about the double standard so long we’ve just lost the energy to complain. And I’ve largely lost interest in even trying to balance things. I’m not only a VPAP donor but a former board member and was its treasurer. But my writing for this outlet is more biased that the Mercury and thus unworthy. Riiiiight….

        Had David Poole and the VPAP Board made a different decision several years ago, Bacon’s Rebellion would be very different today. Maybe even little to no obsession with dead Confederate generals. The Mercury would have some real competition. Cardinal News is giving it some.

        1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          I am disappointed to hear what you write about VPAP. I sent David Poole a copy of the story. We’ll see what he does.

          1. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            VPAP does not publish blog articles.

          2. LarrytheG Avatar

            Even the ones that claim they are “news”! 😉

        2. LarrytheG Avatar

          Just to keep things straight:

          ” Capital Research Center (CRC) is an American conservative non-profit organization located in Washington, D.C.[2][3] Its stated purpose is “to study non-profit organizations, with a special focus on reviving the American traditions of charity, philanthropy, and voluntarism.”[4] According to The Washington Post, it also discourages donations by corporations and non-profits supporting what it sees as liberal or anti-business policies.[5] It monitors the giving of major liberal donors in the U.S.[3]

          CRC was founded in 1984 by Willa Johnson, former senior vice president of the Heritage Foundation, Deputy Director of the Office of Presidential Personnel in the first term of the Reagan administration, and a legislative aide in both the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives. Journalist and author Marvin Olasky previously served as a senior fellow at CRC.[6]

          In 2011, Politico reported that CRC had received millions of dollars from conservative philanthropists over the years, with a total budget in 2009 of $1.4 million.[7] Donors have included foundations run by the Koch family, the Scaifes, and the Bradleys. As of 2017, CRC had received more than $265,000 from ExxonMobil.[8]

          David Clarke, the former sheriff of Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, is the chair of CRC’s American Law and Culture program.[9][10] In 2017, the CRC launched the website “Influence Watch,” which focuses on identifying funding sources of progressive organizations and initiatives, and of progressive politicians.”

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_Research_Center

          re: ” Both the Right and Left dark money groups should be forced more into the light.”

          To me “dark money” means the donors are not known – and I AGREE with you!

          When you detail chapter and verse who is funding , it’s really not “dark”.

          left and right.

          Donor’s Trust is an example of a dark money group. The folks that fund it as well as the folks that Donor’s Trust essentially forwards fund to – are not identified.

          1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
            James C. Sherlock

            Is there a point?

          2. LarrytheG Avatar

            yes. the difference between funding from known sources and from undisclosed sources.

            And the difference between a view of an objective source versus a source that has leanings.

            e.g. a “conservative” org …”rating” a “progressive” org.

      2. James McCarthy Avatar
        James McCarthy

        Seems like a couple of commenters know where you come from.

        1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          Larry and you, Moe.

      3. Kathleen Smith Avatar
        Kathleen Smith

        Cardinal is a class act. My favorite read in the morning! They now have a weather journalist.

  2. Gibboney Huske Avatar
    Gibboney Huske

    I had recently looked into States Newsroom. They have various left wing donors including the University of Virginia Alumni Association. I want my money back from those guys.

    1. What is your documentation that the UVa Alumni Association backs States Newsroom? That’s an extraordinary claim. If true, UVa’s alumni community know about it.

      1. Gibboney Huske Avatar
        Gibboney Huske

        It is on their website under supporters: https://statesnewsroom.com/support/

  3. James McCarthy Avatar
    James McCarthy

    Unless proven otherwise, the claim of “independence” likely refers to editorial policy as opposed to funding. The two notions can co-exist without a Red Under the Bed. While BR defines itself as non-partisan, it is hardly in the business of actively securing content or material from the liberal spectrum. A brief review of the blog’s advertising posts speaks to yet another tilt in that spectrum. As a practical reality, all need be pleased that a number of not for profit efforts have been launched to preserve local news reporting.

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      “likely refers to”. Good one counselor.

    2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      I am pleased that, for example, Cardinal News was launched. That is a real investigative news service that was a local initiative. States Newsroom is a product of political investments. Unapologetic political investments in presenting the progressive case. VaNews, that says it does not want biased material, does not seem to recognize the difference. So I have pointed it out to them. We’ll see what they do with the information.

      1. VPAP will do nothing with your information. Haner and I have raised all the same issues in the past (although I’ll credit you with finding out which specific foundations have funded The Virginia Mercury). VPAP briefly ran news articles that Haner and I wrote, but it backtracked on the grounds that because we both also write opinion pieces, that taints our reportage on news articles. No word on why that same problem doesn’t disqualify Jeff Schapiro.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          One thing BR COULD DO in trying to convince VPAP would be to label each blog post as “commentary” or “news” and then let VPAP look at the ones labeled “news” to decide.

          I think doing that would change the tenor of BR as well as the tenor of comments.

          And it would also let readers understand what BR’s own position is with regard to what it considers “news”.

          1. Haner and I tried doing exactly that — labeling stories as “news” or “commentary,” and writing our news articles as news, leaving out overt commentary. David Poole accepted our news articles for maybe a month, but he was overruled on the grounds that Haner and I wrote both “news” and “commentary,” and that VaNews readers might find it confusing. We got tired of fighting it because we knew that some people on the VPAP board didn’t want to provide visibility for Bacon’s Rebellion under any circumstances, and just reverted to what I like to refer to as informed commentary backed up by reporting and research.

      2. LarrytheG Avatar

        re: ” VaNews, that says it does not want biased material”

        not sure they say that and how would they do it anyhow? Look at the content policy.

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      We agree, Larry. That is why I quoted them.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        I thought looking at the whole policy was a more complete context.

  4. Lefty665 Avatar

    You make what seems a clear case of partisan intent by an interlocking network of organizations and quote extensively from articles about and statements by them.

    Curiously, the only mission statement you reference is VPAP’s. 501c-3 not for profit organizations must have a charitable purpose. That is commonly expressed in their mission statements. Those charitable purposes are likely not consistent with the axe you are grinding. Honest reporting would state those charitable purposes that qualify organizations as 501c-3 tax exempt and compare them with their statements and actions.

    You stated of States Newsroom: “In 2019, it booked a profit (revenue less expenses)” Your familiarity with 501c-3 organizations means you very likely know that statement is false. Not for profits have “increases” or “decreases”, not “profits” or “losses”. By law “increases” in fund balances are required to be used for the charitable purpose of the organization, not paid out to stockholders or otherwise dispersed as “profits” are in a for profit company. Your statement seems deliberately misleading and pejorative.

    It is too bad that you have chosen, once again, to make a judgement and preach to the faithful by making an argument that is no less biased than those you criticize.

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Charitable purposes are what the filers say they are. There is no oversight. Last year I checked, the IRS received 225,000 Forms 990. The mission statements could recite Chaucer.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        where are they required to expend “profits” on charitable sources?

        just asking.

      2. Lefty665 Avatar

        Wrong again Sherlock, you are indeed no Holmes. There is oversight. It is the IRS. The IRS determines if a applicant for 501c-3 status qualifies as a tax exempt not for profit organization. If they do not believe the charitable purpose, commonly expressed in mission statements, qualifies as a legitimate charitable purpose the organization does not get 501c-3 status. If you do not understand that you have no clue what 501c-3 or not for profit means.

        You have not included the charitable purpose statements that the organizations are created to advance from the organizations you criticize. You present no contrast between what they profess and what they do. It’s all just your judgemental opinion. You may be right, but there is no way to tell from what you wrote.

    2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Charitable purposes are what the filers say they are. There is no oversight. Last year I checked, the IRS received 225,000 Forms 990. The mission statements could recite Chaucer.

    3. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Dear God, Lefty. Slow day?

      Biased argument? Clear case of partisan intent is proven in the case of states newsroom and its subsidiaries. Citing more cases won’t make it any less so.

      1. Lefty665 Avatar

        The difference between not for profits and for profits is real, it is not “writing for accountants”. Deliberately using the wrong terms is pejorative and judgemental. It could also indicate your failure to understand the difference.

        A for profit can do anything it pleases while what a 501c-3 not for profit does must be related to its charitable purpose. Your entire post is based on criticism of what they have been doing that is immaterial for a for profit while never presenting their charitable purpose as not for profits. If you actually understand the difference then you have been deliberately misleading.

        They may well be partisan, but your “reporting” is no less biased and sheds no light on the issue.

        I believe you could do better but chose not to. Disappointing.

  5. Well…

  6. Comment posted on behalf of Peter Galuszka:

    Jim S. You’d be better off writing about stuff you know about such as the Navy and medical care. I plodded through this lengthy tome and still don’t know what it is about. You search a few open records and try to pass that off as “investigate” reporting.

    Full disclosure, I have written several pieces for the Virginia Mercury mostly on elections and redistricting. I was paid for this. I sensed no particular “editorial” spin. In fact, I was told to keep it straight.

    You fail to make the link between supposed financiers telling States Newsroom what the print. What you are saying is total BS. You keep bitching about how journalism has slipped but you don’t acknowledge that in the good old days, good old boys twisted the coverage. Think of the Bray families and the Richmond Times Dispatch. Please don’t lecture me on this, because I was working there at the time and was a witness.

    As far as secretive owners, consider the good old days when families, such as the Battens of Norfolk, ran a private company. I worked for them, too, and thought the Pilot was a good peter and that it was more aggressive than the RTD.

    I celebrated my 48th in journalism this past June. You should be glad that someone like Hopewell is trying to keep reporting alive. Instead we get a soporific tome from a right-wing point of view.

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Hopewell “is trying to keep reporting alive”? I am at a loss for words.

      1. Lefty665 Avatar

        “You’d be better off writing about stuff you know about such as the Navy “

        Looks like I’m not the only one who has found your “investigative reporting” and “deep dives” shallow, biased, and judgemental.

        Sure Admiral, tell us about the Navy. Maybe you’ll do some “investigative reporting” on running destroyers into super tankers, a “deep dive” into running submarines into the sea floor, a scorching report on burning up assault ships at the dock, and the fiasco of littoral combat ships. Don’t forget the corruption of the Navy by Fat Leonard.

        Those are all Naval topics that are material to the security of our nation, and arguably more so than whether some not for profits have strayed from their (unreported by you) charitable purpose. Serendipitously the common theme of incompetence may be familiar to you too.

  7. vicnicholls Avatar
    vicnicholls

    I dumped VPAP a long long time ago. VM is leftist/progressive and I don’t trust their stories to be news but opinion.

  8. DJRippert Avatar

    Bob Holsworth used to write an excellent blog called “Virginia Tomorrow”. As I recall, most or all of the blog was just links to stories of interest across Virginia. I used to read it daily.

    Maybe BR needs a “What’s happening across Virginia” section that just lists the title of the news article, a short summary and a link to the source.

Leave a Reply