In the Face of Local Resistance, Can Virginia Meet Its Solar Goals?

by James A. Bacon

Virginia needs to build dozens of square miles of solar panels if there is any hope of reaching the goal of a zero-carbon electric grid by 2045 in Dominion Energy territory and 2050 across the state. The General Assembly can compel the state’s electric utilities to purchase the solar power but it can’t compel anyone to develop the solar farms, especially if local governments are opposed.

Numerous solar projects have been approved — including, most recently, $400 million in a 280-megawatt in Pulaski County, so there’s no question that solar will be a big part of Virginia’s energy future. But are enough projects getting approved?

The odds are looking slim for a $200 million, 149-megawatt proposal by North Carolina-based Strata Solar in Culpeper County. County staff had expressed concerns about the proposed 1,700-acre Maroon Solar power plant, and yesterday the planning commission unanimously recommended denial of the plan, reports the Culpeper Star-Exponent.

Planning Commission member Cindy Thornhill let the Strata developers have it, saying they were in the sales business and trying to satisfy its customer, Dominion, in assisting it in meeting renewable energy goals to receive federal tax credits.

“There are too many what-ifs and too many assumptions. We want protection up front,” she said. “This is our community— it makes us very cautious.”

Meanwhile the Frederick County Board of Supervisor denied yesterday a conditional-use permit for utility-scale solar in a 6 to 1 vote, according to the Winchester Star. Leesburg-based Blue Ridge Energy Holdings had proposed a solar farm on a 320-acre site. Supervisors had approved two solar facilities, but were reluctant to give the OK for a third without having seen the impact of the first two.

“The comprehensive plan says the use of this land should be aimed primarily at maintaining agricultural use,” said Supervisor J. Douglas McCarthy. “This company is neither a farmer of the land in our community, [and] they are not intending to farm the land. They don’t know who is going to own this in the first place. So the first hurdle for me is, in this case, we are not helping a local farmer maintain their land. This is a purely commercial enterprise that they are asking for.”

As of mid-February, Augusta County had rejected 1,000-acre and 560-acre projects, Rockingham County had spurned a 355-acre proposal, and Shenandoah County had turned down a 200-acre project.

Every rejection hurts. There are a finite number of potential sites. Utility-scale solar farms must be located near transmission lines, and developers must be able to find enough contiguous parcels on flat terrain to accommodate hundreds of rows of solar panels. Identifying new sites and assembling the land takes time. Obtaining local regulatory approval takes even more time.

Will Virginia be able to meet its solar agenda on the schedule mandated by the General Assembly? It’s looking iffy right now.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

54 responses to “In the Face of Local Resistance, Can Virginia Meet Its Solar Goals?”

  1. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    John Kerry will come to town to scold us, Greta will Tweet out about recalcitrant Virginia killing the planet, and the Assembly will pass the bills needed force this on us…. 🙂

  2. 1,700 acres would be a rather large solar “farm” in the western piedmont/blue ridge mountain foothills. It would be one of the largest in Virginia. While it is only about 15% the size of the largest solar fields in the world, those “mega-solar” facilities are typically located on vast expanse of flat, otherwise mostly unusable [by humans] desert land.

    I’m not saying the project is not a good one, but I understand why people in Culpeper are concerned about locating a facility of that size in their county..

  3. William O'Keefe Avatar
    William O’Keefe

    That solar farm would provide enough electricity for about 30,000 homes and occupy about 3 square miles. Think about how that would look. And, somewhere there has to be back up power for the times–each day–when there is no sun. Chesterfield County has about 134,000 homes, so it would need five of these unsightly complexes.

    1. Uh huh…

      “[William] O’Keefe served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the American Petroleum Institute (API) from 1974 to 1999.”

      http://www.desmogblog.com/william-o-keefe

      1. William O'Keefe Avatar
        William O’Keefe

        And, your point is? Is there anything in what I posted that is incorrect?

        1. Matt Adams Avatar
          Matt Adams

          No point, it’ just a standard Disqus troll who engages in personal attacks since they can’t formulate rationale arguments.

          It’s exactly why I wasn’t super excited to switch to this comment hosting.

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Well here then, this should give you a smile. As an EE, you should get the references…

            In Honor of “Heady” Lamarr…
            https://www.raritaneng.com/en_US/products/smart-toilet-control-blue-tooth

        2. CB, You’re more than welcome to criticize what other commenters say, but not to call them liars, prostitutes, stupid, etc. That’s not an argument, it’s an ad hominem attack. If you continue in this vein, you will be banned from the blog.

          1. This individual accepts money in return for spreading falsehoods.

            He’s well-known for it.

            If that’s not a prostitute, I don’t know what would be…

          2. Lol! Nevermind…

            “Founded in 1985, the Thomas Jefferson Institute has been a member of the State Policy Network (SPN). The SPN supports the work of some of the most prominent think tanks promoting climate change skepticism including the Heartland Institute, Cato Institute, and Heritage Foundation. The Center for Media and Democracy’s in-depth investigation, ”EXPOSED: The State Policy Network – The Powerful Right-Wing Network Helping to Hijack State Politics and Government” (PDF) shows that SPN and its member think tanks share ties to the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) and the Koch brothers.”

            http://www.desmogblog.com/thomas-jefferson-institute-public-policy

          3. The “CB account” has an established history of doing this. Years back, I mentioned an irrefutable fact at the PBS NewsHour, and out of the blue, wham! There’s “CB”, once again violating Disqus’ policy against Targeted Harassment. Screencapture here: http://gelbspanfiles.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/CB-out-of-blue.jpg

            Me as a prostitute? Oh, yeah.

            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/0e902b733fee3d519037bd046ae958624e57bcb4b8dbadecdb9ef79cfa0489f0.jpg

          4. R. Kooi Avatar

            A Truly Ludicrous accusation!

          5. And you support your assertion … how, exactly?

          6. R. Kooi Avatar

            Ooops. I commented up above…for some reason couldn’t find this request of yours.

          7. Understandable, you’re forgiven. The Disqus system has become more arbitrary in the way it displays comments in the last year or two. I’ve gone back into comment sections where I’m certain I placed a comment, and it isn’t displayed. So, I go into my account page, hit the “View in discussion” link and there it is, with other nearby comments gone missing. Who knows why they do that? Have your lawyers talk to their lawyers. =)

          8. R. Kooi Avatar

            So,
            let’s see if I got this right??
            ….CB responded to your comments on a couple of sites
            and
            oooops….he should be banned, or punished,
            Perhaps YOU should have a chance to spank him/her properly?

            though that is probably not a good idea…’cause then you would have to explain the SMILE ON YOUR FACE and HIS/HERS for weeks…….
            but
            does that sum it up…..
            .. or are you simply admitting an incapability to defend your opinions!
            .
            This is a response to YOUR REQUEST….so please don’t try and get me SPANKED TOO.
            .
            Of Course, I might actually enjoy that from the likes YOU!

          9. Well, I’m impressed. One of you lot managed to get my reply false-flagged as spam. Problem is, what has been seen on da interwebs cannot be unseen. I guess that tangential revelation out of the ClimateGate emails sailed right over your head, yes?

            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/441ccf70a80a2e561c7c9296c5d97f2b0a151f4b3d0e33fab8ddaa65fb4f089d.jpg

          10. R. Kooi Avatar

            I’m not certain why that lengthy comment would be called span??????????

          11. Glad you agree with me that it does not violate Disqus system’s specific definitions of what constitutes “spam.” For those unaware of it, they can be read here:

            https://help.disqus.com/en/articles/1717283-spam

            Any guess from you on who among “CB’s” pals might have false-flagged it, thus putting themselves at risk at being sanctioned by Disqus for abusing that feature?

      2. Excellent. That means he probably knows more than the average person about energy production in this country.

      3. William O'Keefe Avatar
        William O’Keefe

        You have yet to identify anything in my statement that is erroneous. Making pejorative statement instead shows you to be a brain dead ideologue.

        1. You’ll have to forgive the “CB account” for being pointless when it hurls hits Disqus policy “Targeted Harassment”-violating links to Desmog profiles of people. It’s done that against me for years with Desmog’s worthless profile of me ( http://gelbspanfiles.com/?p=5240 ), while never once proving I’m paid by anyone to spread lies. If you want to have some fun with “CB”, ask why it can’t reconcile its inexplicable inconsistent usage of UK spellings of words — you may get down votes from “CB” about that ( https://www.cfact.org/2021/02/22/where-is-global-warmings-missing-heat-coming-from-part-1/#comment-5292097507 ), but never any explanation.

          FYI, I once again utilized your long-ago 1998 quote at the Living on Earth radio show about that Walker memo in my dissection of the latest AGW lawsuits (4th paragraph from the end in my screencapture link for “I repeat, neither solicited”): http://gelbspanfiles.com/?p=11592

  4. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    1.7 miles on the side of a square. Surrounded by berms – JUST LIKE the stone quarries that are all over Virginia that will never be farmed again.

    this is pure nimby. Consider how many acres of farmland were “destroyed” to build a lake for the North Anna Nuclear Plant!
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4ba5c5ada4609057a87dfb3c14304abb362055a40ee4f67eed7838bdf021a4fc.jpg

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Aha! Something where Larry will LOVE the use of eminent domain — to save the world!

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        Nope. Serious confusion again. Property rights allow and private owner to develop their property according to laws and regs that apply equally without selecting out something to treat differently. If a private property owner can do a quarry – and the can – then why not something similar?

        And eminent domain is for a PUBLIC Purpose – in other words, you don’t take land for a PRIVATE purpose.

        So , no confusion, just clarity.

    2. Larry, I don’t know who is hosting your photos/pictures but my firewall won’t let me look at any of them.

      Can you spare a thousand words?

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        “your” firewall? uh so sorry… 😉

    3. 13,000 acres.

      By the way, how’s the fishing in the middle of that giant solar farm in Spotsy? Are the solar farm-front lots selling really well?

      EDIT: Further research indicates that the nuke plant uses 3,400 acres of the lake, while the rest is a money-making recreational facility and tourist attraction for the localities which border on Lake Anna.

      Do you think there’ll be much call for a restaurant or campground centered around a solar farm?

      1. Matt Adams Avatar
        Matt Adams

        At $75.4 billion dollars for 13,000 acres it best be world record holding fishing.

        Edit: Clarifying that’s a rough estimate to outfit the 13,000 acres with solar panels instead of the Lake for the Reactor.

        1. Where do you get $75.4 billion? Lake Anna didn’t cost anywhere near that amount of money. I’d be surprised if VEPCO paid more than $10 million for the land in 1968, and the nuke plant was about $3.9 billion. That leaves about $71 billion unaccounted for.

          Edit: Okay. Got it.

          1. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            It was a rough estimate on what it was cost to fill that area instead with solar panels (which Larry seems to prefer over Nuclear).

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            How was Lake Anna obtained? Willing transactions or eminent domain?

      2. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        The point was/is, that it USED tO BE FARMLAND and it was “destroyed”. right? So ANY farmland taken for other non-farmland uses means we “destroyed” it forever? YEP!

  5. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    If it wanted to get really serious about this, the General Assembly could pass legislation making solar panels a permitted use in any zoning classification. Such legislation would make for interesting politics.

    1. That would be fun to watch.

      1. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        On the calendar right before the bill mandating electric vehicles, and right after the one ending the use of natural gas for home heating.

        1. That would make for of an excellent legislative session…

          😉

    2. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      It has done that for several types of uses already. right/

  6. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
    energyNOW_Fan

    People do not realize that fossil fuels pack an enormous amount of energy into small a weight/volume. Liberals say fossil fuels are completely unnecessary, are poisoning us, and destroying the planet. So we will need solar panels everywhere, every roof, every forest, every farm. You name it, it needs to have solar panels on it. Get over it.

    1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      If we had solar on every house, we would have far less need for a power company.

  7. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    The right place is Accomack or Northampton. Northam’s backyard even better.

  8. John Harvie Avatar
    John Harvie

    If you will permit a comment from FL an idea percolating here is to farm certain crops that do better not in direct sunlight in the shade of solar panels. Supposedly less irrigation is required. Admittedly FL’s growing season is longer but you never know…

    https://www.futurity.org/agrivoltaics-farming-solar-panels-2152772/#:~:text=Farming%20crops%20under%20solar%20panels%2C%20a%20process%20called,especially%20in%20regions%20susceptible%20to%20heat%20and%20drought.

    1. I’ve seen that, too. It’s an interesting attempt at a solution to the lack of “green” at solar farms. It looks like it will help offset the loss of plant-life, but I don’t see it being too widespread due to the hand labor necessary to plant and harvest the crops.

      1. John Harvie Avatar
        John Harvie

        I believe the crops were primarily hand harvested anyway. Would be interesting to know if it also would be cooler underneath for the workers. Lots of crops are grown under a close mesh netting cover here already.

  9. Paul Sweet Avatar
    Paul Sweet

    A very large (200 acres, 20 MW) solar farm was built just off Rt. 60 in Buckingham County a couple years ago, and when I drove past it a couple weeks ago it looked like they were expanding it. I don’t know if the expansion is part of the 200 acres, or in addition to it.

    1. There is one about that size in Fluvanna County as well.

      EDIT: Pardon me, the one in Fluvanna is smaller – a little less than 50 acres. It sure looks big from the air, though.

  10. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Wanna help SW Va? Let folks who own property there – develop it for a use that benefits them and the county taxes instead of having silly NIMBY stuff done “officially” by so called Planning Comissions and NIMBYs.

  11. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    Competition, tax incentives, and tradable green energy credits make residential solar systems financially attractive. Getting close to adding to my home. Not trying to go off the grid but if I can reliably eliminate my power bill for 25 years, it is a compelling argument.

  12. Rafaelo Avatar

    • acres required for 1 MW (megawatt) solar generated power: 10
    • acreage required to replace Virginia’s fossil-fuel generators: +/- 400,000
    • total cropland in Virginia: 3 million acres
    • pasture land: 2.3 million acres
    • rooftops suitable for solar panels in Virginia: 25%
    • Virginia power needs supplied if rooftops covered in solar panels: 20%
    • real reason it isn’t happening:

    “Since the 1880’s, electricity has been generated at central power plants and distributed through a network of wires to customers. There are economies of scale in electrical generation and distribution, and in Virginia two utilities (Dominion and American Electric Power) have service area monopolies that provide electricity to most of the state.

    If power generation was highly decentralized, with solar panels on rooftops of individual homes generating enough power to meet most household demands, then the revenue flowing to those utilities would be diminished. . . . Utilities fear that a large percentage of customers will install solar cells and reduce their purchases of electricity . . . Reliability standards [e.g. meetng surge demand, and nightime requirements] require utilities to keep expensive generation capacity available, such as a power plant fueled by natural gas.”

    From: http://www.virginiaplaces.org/energy/solar.htm

  13. Rafaelo Avatar

    • acres required for 1 MW (megawatt) solar generated power: 10
    • acreage required to replace Virginia’s fossil-fuel generators: +/- 400,000
    • total cropland in Virginia: 3 million acres
    • pasture land: 2.3 million acres
    • rooftops suitable for solar panels in Virginia: 25%
    • Virginia power needs supplied if rooftops covered in solar panels: 20%
    • real reason it isn’t happening:

    “Since the 1880’s, electricity has been generated at central power plants and distributed through a network of wires to customers. There are economies of scale in electrical generation and distribution, and in Virginia two utilities (Dominion and American Electric Power) have service area monopolies that provide electricity to most of the state.

    If power generation was highly decentralized, with solar panels on rooftops of individual homes generating enough power to meet most household demands, then the revenue flowing to those utilities would be diminished. . . . Utilities fear that a large percentage of customers will install solar cells and reduce their purchases of electricity . . . Reliability standards [e.g. meetng surge demand, and nightime requirements] require utilities to keep expensive generation capacity available, such as a power plant fueled by natural gas.”

    From: http://www.virginiaplaces.org/energy/solar.htm

Leave a Reply