How Wokeism Is Ruining Medicine

Stanley Goldfarb

by James A. Bacon

The Woke Revolution’s takeover of K-12 schools, the criminal justice system, higher ed, the media, the military, the C-suite, museums, and other cultural institutions has been highly visible, playing out in blogs and the media for all to see. The conquest of the healthcare system has attracted far less attention, though arguably it is the most consequential. After all, human lives are at stake.

Many U.S. medical schools have embraced the idea that American healthcare is systemically racist, that White physicians and other providers are infected with racial bias, that racism accounts for the disparities in health outcomes between Blacks and Whites, and that the only antidote to racism is “anti-racism,” warns Stanley Goldfarb, author of Take Two Aspirin and Call Me By My Pronouns: Why Turning Doctors into Social Justice Warriors Is Destroying American Medicine.

Goldfarb bases his critique on his own experiences as a nephrologist at the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, an extensive review of the academic literature on racial disparities, and his role as founder of Do No Harm, a nonprofit formed to combat racial essentialism in medicine. Wokeness, he argues, is profoundly destructive. By misdiagnosing racial disparities in health outcomes, the anti-racism movement focuses attention on a nearly non-existent problem and distracts from real causes and solutions.

The predictable result: woke medicine will harm African Americans and other marginalized groups it purports to help. In that regard, it is similar to woke K-12 education, where the racial achievement gap is getting worse; woke criminal justice, which leads to more African American homicides; woke colleges and universities, where African Americans feel less sense of acceptance and belonging than in years past; and woke everything else, the poisoned fruit of which is grievance, resentment, and alienation.

Though national in its reach, Do No Harm is based in Richmond, and it is making inroads in Virginia’s medical community. It is an example of the kind of grassroots organizations emerging, like antibodies, in reaction to a harmful invasive ideology. Another organization, the Virginia Medical Freedom Alliance, has formed recently to combat “medical tyranny,” although its focus has been less on Diversity, Equity & Inclusion and more on the suppression of dissenting views regarding COVID-19 policy.

“Replacing rigorous, science-based medical care with ideologically driven demands of activists is dangerous. Woke discrimination hurts the people it claims to help,” says Executive Director Kristina Rasmussen. 

Goldfarb addressed the medical community in Richmond this spring. He returns to Virginia July 12 to speak in Charlottesville. That speech, “How to Save Medicine from Identity Politics,” is open to the public. Click here to register.

I had a chance to interview Goldfarb earlier this week. “Anti-racism” is an obsession of cultural and professional elites that accomplishes nothing useful for minorities, he says. Exercises in moral self-flagellation don’t vaccinate a single Black child or reduce the glucose levels of a single Black diabetic. What the continual rhetoric about White racism does accomplish, he contends, is foster Blacks’ mistrust of the healthcare system.

Blacks tend to seek healthcare treatment later in a medical malady’s progression than do other racial groups. Goldfarb thinks that tendency arises from mistrust. When discussing racial disparities in vaccinations during the COVID-19 epidemic, woke media coverage did not help matters by harping on racial disparities and continually reminding readers about the infamous Tuskegee Institute syphilis trials — which ended 50 years ago — that exposed Black patients to harmful experimental treatments without their knowledge.

To benefit from healthcare, says Goldfarb, “you have to show up.” If you distrust the system, you’re less likely to show up until the malady has developed into a more severe condition that is harder to treat.

Perhaps the most widely publicized racial disparity in healthcare is the fact that Black women are more likely to die from complications stemming from pregnancy and childbirth. Yet poor mothers have access to the WIC (Women, Infants, and Children) program for pregnant women. “All they need to do is find time for a prenatal visit,” says Goldfarb.

Why are poor Black women less likely to make their appointments? Perhaps they find it harder to get off work. Perhaps they have trouble finding a ride to the doctor’s office. Perhaps they forget their appointments. Those tangible obstacles do not stem from racism, Goldfarb says. But they can be addressed. If the goal is to improve medical outcomes for pregnant Black women, mandating implicit bias training for physicians doesn’t accomplish a thing. “If black women aren’t showing up for mammograms, send out vans to give the mammograms!”

A related conceit is that Black people should have Black doctors. While there is evidence the Black patients do prefer Black doctors, there is no evidence that Black physicians actually provide better health outcomes for Black patients, Goldfarb says. If “anti-racist” rhetoric persuades Black people that they will receive inferior healthcare from White doctors, it will aggravate their mistrust of the system. The fact remains that, for the foreseeable future, there won’t be enough Black physicians to serve the Black community.

Aside from such pragmatic considerations, Goldfarb finds the idea morally repugnant. What if White patients adopted the same logic? What if White people said they preferred White doctors? “We don’t want patients seeking doctors of a particular race,” he says. “That’s an un-American idea.”

Yet another unproductive idea is that “fat shaming” is racist. Many Blacks have a so-called Southern diet loaded with starches and fat that contributes to obesity, which, of course, is associated with heart disease, diabetes and other chronic illnesses. In the past, doctors admonished patients to change their diet, exercise and lose weight. But woke ideology considers such recommendations as a form of blaming the victim, hence racist.  The spreading idea of “fat acceptance” does nothing to encourage obese people of whatever race to take charge of their health and fitness.

The corrosive effect of wokeism threatens the quality of education for the broader population as well. Wokeism threatens to undermine the integrity of medical instruction and research. Medical school curricula are teaching more social justice and less hard science. Academic standards are declining. Political and ideological considerations are driving research funding. The future of medicine that Goldfarb describes is worrisome indeed. 

James A. Bacon is executive director of The Jefferson Council.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

105 responses to “How Wokeism Is Ruining Medicine”

  1. Thomas Dixon Avatar
    Thomas Dixon

    I do not believe it is ignorance that allows this wave of destructive influence to fester in our society. It is a lack of the willingness of people who know better, to step up and confront it. Our society suffers more from cowardice than malicious ideologies designed to destroy us.

  2. Thomas Dixon Avatar
    Thomas Dixon

    I do not believe it is ignorance that allows this wave of destructive influence to fester in our society. It is a lack of the willingness of people who know better, to step up and confront it. Our society suffers more from cowardice than malicious ideologies designed to destroy us.

  3. Teddy007 Avatar
    Teddy007

    Be careful complaining about the K-12 racial gap. It narrowed the most in the 1980’s and is claimed to have been due to school integration occurring during that time period.

    1. Correct, the racial achievement gap narrowed significantly after integration of Virginia’s schools. But in recent years it has gone into reverse, negating 20 or more years of progress. Can you clarify what I need to be careful complaining about?

      1. VaNavVet Avatar
        VaNavVet

        Almost everything!

      2. Teddy007 Avatar
        Teddy007

        No one wants to hear about school integration efforts any more. The idea of school choice closing the achievement gap is the exact opposite of integration. But it only takes a couple of minutes of reading to realize that school choice is not really meant to close the achievement gap or to improve the other performance of students. School choice will eventually be more like the 529 savings program, an entitlement program for the upper classes.

        1. You need to stop repeating the NEA talking points and read more than MSM stories about it. School choice is choice for all and doesn’t work if it isn’t. Gov Youngkin’s administration has made it clear that he wants to start school choice in the areas that are most needing it and those areas are high poverty areas like Petersburg. Unfortunately, his opponents keep claiming that his plan is for the rich only.

          1. Stephen Haner Avatar
            Stephen Haner

            I donate to a private school scholarship specifically for low income inner city students who otherwise would never have “a choice.”

          2. Teddy007 Avatar
            Teddy007

            Nonsense. Many programs are called school choice that are anything but choice. Some states it is a saving plan for the parents. So states it is a low value voucher that will not be anywhere near covering the costs of college prep private schools. In some states, school choice includes the ability to attend out of district schools but only if there is an open seat and the gaining school district accepts.
            What Gov Youngkin wants is a system where the more affluent whites in a majority non-white area have an escape valve.

          3. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            “What Gov Youngkin wants is a system where the more affluent whites in a majority non-white area have an escape valve.”

            That’s called a “Real Estate Agent”.

          4. Teddy007 Avatar
            Teddy007

            What is why most conservatives oppose giving students in poor districts the ability to move into “the good districts.” Conn has been trying such a program for years.

          5. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            I’ve certainly never heard any conservative oppose allowing students in poor districts the ability to move into “the good districts.”

            Perhaps you could describe what exactly that means?

          6. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            I’ve certainly never heard any conservative oppose allowing students in poor districts the ability to move into “the good districts.”

            Perhaps you could describe what exactly that means?

          7. Teddy007 Avatar
            Teddy007

            According to the Education Commission of the States, there are two primary types of open enrollment policies:
            Under intra-district enrollment policies, students may transfer to schools within their home districts.
            Under inter-district enrollment policies, students may transfer to schools outside of their home districts.
            Open enrollment policies may be either mandatory or voluntary. Under mandatory programs, districts must allow for open enrollment. Under voluntary programs, districts may choose whether to allow for open enrollment.

            https://www.the74million.org/article/school-districts-often-oppose-open-enrollment-why-thats-a-mistake/#:~:text=Unfortunately%2C%20school%20districts%20often%20oppose,to%20compete%20with%20one%20another.

            Unfortunately, school districts often oppose robust open enrollment proposals. The reasons range from fear of being “overwhelmed” by nonresident, and presumably less affluent, students to concern that an exodus will siphon resources, force school closures and spur districts to compete with one another.

          8. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            What school districts are actually run by conservatives? That’s a serious question.

          9. Teddy007 Avatar
            Teddy007

            Most of them in the U.S. considering the red county/blue county paradigm. Does anyone believe that the school boards in the majority of school districts in Virginia are not conservative? Trying to be clever is never a good look.

          10. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            Well, I live in Northern Virginia, and none of them up here are run by conservatives, yet, as far as I know, none have inter-district enrollment policies.

            EDIT: So maybe it’s not just conservatives who don’t support this and you’re full of it.

          11. Teddy007 Avatar
            Teddy007

            There are 134 county like governments in Virginia. And yet, if the six in Northern Virginia are liberal that makes all of them liberal/progressive. Try harder. And it is for sure that Fall Church Public Schools does not allow for inter enrollment since they defend their school district constantly.

            From Fairfax County Public schools: However, an enrolling parent may request a student transfer for their child in grades kindergarten through 12 to attend a non-base school. Student transfers will be considered if the school capacity, grade-level capacity, and the school curricular program at the requested school will permit, as determined by FCPS.

          12. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            They allow intra-district entrollment, but they sure won’t allow inter-district entrollment.

            I looked at the INTRA-district enrollment policies of Fairfax (presumably run by liberals), Fauquier (presumably run by conservatives), and Spotsylvania (presumably run by conservatives), and they are all very similar.

            None have a policy allowing INTER-district transfers that I found.

          13. Teddy007 Avatar
            Teddy007

            The gimmick in Fairfax County is how parents use the AP/IB brands to get away from majority minority high schools. If one lives in the zone for Justice High School then one asks to have one’s child move to an AP school. If one is at Mount Vernon, one asks to move one’s child to an IB school. When Fairfax County Public Schools changed the zones for South Lake High school, all of the Nice White Parents who did not want their children going to South Lake used that scheme.

          14. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            Based on the policies I saw, such gimmicks would work in Spotsylvania and Fauquier counties too, suggesting that this isn’t caused by partisan politics.

          15. WayneS Avatar

            What school districts are actually run by conservatives?

            I’m not sure. I live in a rural “red” county with a [mostly] conservative Board of Supervisors, but a school board that is [mostly] liberal.

          16. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            Someone once told me that school boards know how to do two things:

            1)Spend money
            2)Ask for more

            I can’t say I’ve seen much to contradict that notion…

          17. Not Today Avatar
            Not Today

            Low-income parents are prosecuted for enrolling their kids in wealthy districts. https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/434051-story-of-mother-sentenced-to-jail-for-enrolling-child-in/

          18. WayneS Avatar

            Connecticut state government:

            Governor: Democrat

            Senate: 24 Democrats, 12 Republicans.

            House: 98 Democrats, 53 Republicans

            And you claim it is conservatives who oppose giving students in poor districts the ability to move into “the good districts.”?

            Perhaps you should revisit that.

        2. Nathan Avatar

          That’s simply not true. Let’s look at Indiana’s program as an example. Indiana’s Choice Scholarship Program allows students in low- and middle-income families to receive vouchers to attend private schools.

          Opposite of integration?

          Participants are 9.5% Black and 5.3 % multi racial. The state is 9.4 % black and 3.3% multi racial.

          An entitlement program for the upper classes?

          Over 28% of participants have household income of less that $50,000 per year.

          https://www.in.gov/doe/files/2022-2023-Annual-Choice-Report-0504.pdf

          1. Teddy007 Avatar
            Teddy007

            Here is the eligibility. A family of four has to make less than $166k. And I love the sibling track. That is usually a sign of a cut out for the politically connected.

            https://www.in.gov/doe/files/3-Choice-Track-Eligibility-Overview.pdf

          2. Nathan Avatar

            But you won’t respond to the specifics of your original criticism will you?

            Lower income children and minorities are benefiting disproportionally from this program. The statements you made about integration and the rich don’t hold water.

            Why are you against giving low income and minority parents options?

            Barrack Obama had options, and he choose to send his children to a private school. But he doesn’t support giving similar options to others.

            Elizabeth Warren is also against school choice, but sent her children to private schools.

            The list is endless.

            Democrats are bought and paid for by the NEA and teachers unions.

          3. Teddy007 Avatar
            Teddy007

            Only if the lower income children and minorities can find a school that will accept them and whre the costs is covered by the voucher. The value of the voucher is always set well below what the top college prep private schools cost. Most of the vouchers will end up paying upper middle class families some of the costs of private schools that would never accept poor children to begin with (unless they are great athletes).

            Also, high school at Sidwell Friends cost more than $50k a year. Vouchers have nothing to do with the type of schools where the elite send their children. However, if Indiana has to shut down AP classes, IB programs, or magnet programs to fund vouchers, then who really benefits.

          4. Nathan Avatar

            Teddy007:
            “Most of the vouchers will end up paying upper middle class families some of the costs of private schools that would never accept poor children to begin with (unless they are great athletes).”

            I demonstrated with current real numbers and household incomes that this isn’t the case, but you keep repeating the same nonsense.

          5. Teddy007 Avatar
            Teddy007

            The parents are using the voucher to get into a school that they can afford. However, that is not the college prep private schools. Probably most of them are K-6 private schools or schools attached to a church and with a speficic point of view.

          6. WayneS Avatar

            A family of four has to make less than $166k.

            And how does that cater to the wealthy ?

          7. Teddy007 Avatar
            Teddy007

            Most Americans would consider a family of four with a family income of $166K as being affluent. Most school choice programs are a way for the tiger moms and helicopter parents of the affluent to pick the school for their children and then have the state subsidize it. See the NY Times series on “Nice White Parents.”

          8. WayneS Avatar

            Most Americans would consider a family of four with a family income of $166K as being affluent.

            Right. And they need to make less than that in order to qualify for a voucher. So, again, how does the policy cater to the wealthy ?

          9. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            All I have to say about this comment thread is that it’s a little early in the morning for one of the participants to be drinking..and I’m NOT talking about you.

      3. Nathan Avatar

        Teddy007 is wrong about school choice. Look for yourself. It’s working for minorities and low income families. Here’s an example.

        https://www.in.gov/doe/files/2022-2023-Annual-Choice-Report-0504.pdf

    2. how_it_works Avatar
      how_it_works

      Pretty sure that schools were integrated well before the 1980s.

      At least they were in Manassas, VA.

      Some parts of Virginia maybe didn’t get the memo?

      1. WayneS Avatar

        No, they all got the memo – in 1959. Some systems fought desegregation well into the mid-1960s, though.

        I attended public schools in Virginia Beach from 1970 until 1982, and every year, no matter which school I attended, it was fully integrated.

        1. how_it_works Avatar
          how_it_works

          That’s kind of what I figured.

          There was a Federal ruling that required the schools to be integrated that happened in the 60s, wasn’t there?

          Not sure why anyone would think that in the 80s there would be school that aren’t integrated. (My comment about the memo was tongue-in-cheek).

          1. WayneS Avatar

            Brown v Board of education was decided in 1954.

            A subsequent Byrd-machine-sponsored Virginia law ordering integrated schools to close was found unconstitutional in 1959.

          2. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            Thanks, I didn’t remember the exact timeline, but I knew it happened well before the 1980s.

          3. Not Today Avatar
            Not Today

            The end of massive resistance did not occur judicially until 1968. In practice, it took far longer. Public elementary schools were the least segregated in the 80s and have grown more so since.

      2. Not Today Avatar
        Not Today

        They weren’t. Segregation academies ensured they were integrated for low-income and under resourced white kids, not all.

  4. WayneS Avatar

    I love the book title.

  5. VaNavVet Avatar
    VaNavVet

    This whole “wokeism” thing is long dead and buried. It is hard to teach an old dog new tricks but it is past time to move on.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      “Credo ergo est” is easier than research.

    2. Lefty665 Avatar
      Lefty665

      This whole “wokeism” thing is long dead and buried.

      We should be so lucky. “Wokeism” is rampant and profoundly invasive in America. Like with vampires it needs to be buried with a wooden stake through its heart to keep it from arising from the dead.

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        Please define “wokeism”.

        1. Lefty665 Avatar
          Lefty665

          Ask the Vet, that’s who I was responding to. Your ignorance will not protect you.

          1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
            Dick Hall-Sizemore

            You are the one who said that “wokeism” is “rampant and profoundly invasive in America” and compared it to “vampires”. Surely, you are able to define what you find so objectionable.

          2. Lefty665 Avatar
            Lefty665

            Well there you go, wokeness is like vampires, a scourge that needs wooden stakes to protect the rest of us. It is descended from evil Dem identity politics (Repubs have their own brand of evil) that pits groups against each other in pursuit of political power. It fosters hate and grievance by disparaging commonality. A good example is Kendi’s “The remedy for past discrimination is present discrimination”. In the current context proclaiming obesity as racist is the epitome of “woke” ignorance. There are about 3 times as many obese white people as obese black people.

          3. Lefty665 Avatar
            Lefty665

            I’ll take a second shot at wokism and its evil. As I said above, much wokeness is descended from identity politics and centered on pitting people against each other, often for political advantage.

            Many woke positions are extreme exaggerations of reasonable issues that are accepted as part of our culture. I’ll call them cultural norms for the sake of argument (aka CN). Following are several examples:

            CN is accepting gender dysphoria as a legitimate but low incidence psychiatric issue as defined in the DSM IV, providing treatment for folks afflicted with it, and accommodating them as part of our society. Live and let live.

            Wokeness is demanding that everyone agree that “men” can have babies.
            Wokeness is demanding that we refer single individuals with plural pronouns.
            Wokeness is demanding that little kids be treated for gender dysphoria when we know they are too young to have the mature opinions required to make legal contracts or to be found to have criminal guilt, sometimes requiring schools to withhold knowledge of that treatment from parents.
            Wokeness is standing Title 9 on it’s head and putting post puberty genetic males in competition in women’s sports and their junk in women’s dressing rooms.
            Wokeness is putting men in women’s prisons because they “identify” as female where they then impregnate women.

            CN is criminalizing pedophilia.

            Wokeness is normalizing it as “minor attracted people”.

            CN is accepting that slavery was horrid and that our civil war nearly 160 years ago that killed 600,000 Americans put an overdue end to it.
            CN is accepting that the Civil Rights Laws of the 1960s and court rulings transformed America, finished off the demise of de jure segregation and appreciation that the nation internalized MLK’s dream that we judge people on the content of their characters rather than the color of their skins.

            Wokeness is San Francisco, a city in a state that never permitted slavery, passing a law to give $5M compensation each to people who were never enslaved taken from people who were never slavers.

            CN is accepting that affirmative action and compensatory education/training to achieve competence for people disadvantaged by past discrimination are benefits for both individuals and society.

            Wokeness is dismissing equality and demanding “equity” where racial outcomes are equal regardless of competency. This was policy at the VDoE among many other places, and still is in the Biden administration.
            Wokeness is cravenly trying to redefine “equity” as equality of opportunity.
            Wokeness is university, corporate, and gov’t DIE bureaucracies that among other things require racial DIE statements from students, employees, professors, and prospects while selectively ignoring other disparities.
            Wokeness is reducing admissions of brighter more accomplished asian students in favor of less bright and less accomplished black students.

            CN is believing that cops should not be killing unarmed people.

            Wokeness is convicting one cop of 3 murder charges for leaning on the neck of one man. 1 murder conviction was appropriate.
            Wokeness is turning a career criminal (8 felony convictions – including holding a pistol to the belly of a pregnant woman) into a martyr.
            Wokeness is ignoring that he had enough Fentanyl in his system to kill 3 people, that his symptoms were consistent with fatal Fentanyl overdose, a history of taking all drugs in his possession when confronted by police, and that his dealer was in the car with him.
            Wokeness is precipitating nationwide riots, looting. arson and murder as justice.

            CN is believing in free speech.

            Wokeness is censoring Facebook discussion, and other opinion, that Covid may have been a lab leak as racist misinformation.

            There’s more, but that should be enough to get the idea. Wokeness has divided the country as badly as Vietnam. Its propagation by the Dems is disgraceful and a threat to the future of our country.

          4. Nathan Avatar

            Mr. Pierre Poilievre from Canada explained the woke movement about as well as anyone. Take a listen.

            https://twitter.com/LloydLegalist/status/1664738692315922434

          5. Lefty665 Avatar
            Lefty665

            “You are the one who said that “wokeism” is “rampant and profoundly
            invasive in America” and compared it to “vampires”. Surely, you are
            able to define what you find so objectionable.”

            I have defined and illustrated what I find so objectionable, and at some length. But nothing, crickets, from you. Curious.

            Here’s a post on the sorry state of vitriol, ugliness and dangerous invective we in the US descend to on a daily basis. It is present in some of the posts here on BR too,

            https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/community-family/something-is-very-wrong-with-us

        2. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          It’s a gibberish word like gollygoops. It has whatever meaning as is necessary to fit and/or avoid context.

          Republicans support gollygoops in K-12 education and women’s reproductive healthcare.

      2. VaNavVet Avatar
        VaNavVet

        Like Trump said the term “woke” is now meaningless.

  6. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Bacon finds an acorn,… or some other kind of a nut.

    “The Woke Revolution’s takeover of K-12 schools, the criminal justice system, higher ed, the media, the military, the C-suite, museums other cultural institutions has been highly visible, playing out in blogs and the media for all to see….” and yet oddly, not in schools, nor any other institutions mentioned.

    https://blogs.jwatch.org/hiv-id-observations/index.php/a-former-medical-school-dean-invents-a-false-dichotomy-in-curriculum-content-and-advises-physicians-to-stay-in-their-lane/2019/09/15/

    “Please know that the views expressed by Dr. Goldfarb in this column reflect his personal opinions and do not reflect the values of the Perelman School of Medicine. We deeply value inclusion and diversity as fundamental to effective health care delivery, creativity, discovery, and life-long learning. We are committed to ensuring a rigorous and comprehensive medical education that includes examination of the many social and cultural issues that influence health, from violence within communities to changes in the environment around us.”

    1. WayneS Avatar

      …We are committed to ensuring a rigorous and comprehensive medical education that includes examination of the many social and cultural issues that influence health, from violence within communities to changes in the environment around us.

      Thereby making Mr. Bacon’s point for him…

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        His point is, offered without data or proof, that considering such is detrimental to the practice of medicine. Half of medicine is in the head.

        Jim proves the adage that for the hypochondriac a placebo is a cure all.

        1. Nathan Avatar

          It’s not detrimental to the practice of medicine to blame obesity on structural racism which an individual cannot control rather than diet and exercise which can be improved?

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Ever live in a food desert?

          2. Nathan Avatar

            Yes.

            Now answer my question. How does blaming racism improve the health of obese people?

          3. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            By recognizing that high profit, low nutrition foods cause obesity and racism contributes to the exclusion of other foods.

          4. Nathan Avatar

            I live in a rural area far from grocery stores. Everyone shops at the same places, young or old, rich or poor, white or minority.

            Potatoes cost less per pound than potato chips, but people can buy whatever they choose.

            Virtue signally helps people to think they are superior to others, but it doesn’t improve anyone’s health.

          5. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Okay. So, you’re rural. That’s some 20% of the population, max.

          6. Nathan Avatar

            I’ve also lived elsewhere with much of the same experience.

            And I’ve worked at entry level labor jobs for minimum pay. I brought my own lunch. Others brought whatever they wanted to, or got in their cars and bought fast food.

            Ever been to a buffet in a low income area? I have. Nutritious and not so nutritious food is available. People put whatever they want on their plate and then go back for more. Some people go back several times.

            https://www.goldencorral.com/

            In the USA, people make choices. Medical professionals should encourage ALL of us to try to make better choices, because we could all do better.

            And we would do better if that were the focus, rather than this stupid, divisive and unproductive blaming of others.

          7. Nathan Avatar

            Why do some people smoke cigarettes? Has the fact that smoking causes cancer and numerous other health problems been hidden from people?

            Is it cheaper to smoke or not to smoke?

            People make choices. That’s true no matter what their skin color or income level.

            Current Cigarette Smoking Among Adults in the United States

            https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/adult_data/cig_smoking/index.htm#:~:text=In%202021%2C%20nearly%2012%20of,with%20a%20smoking%2Drelated%20disease.

          8. WayneS Avatar

            26% in Virginia.

            But Nathan is correct about choices. Healthier, and less expensive, alternatives can be found, even in “food deserts”, if one is looking for them. And if there was no demand for junk food, even convenience stores would stop selling it.

            It’s the choices people that determines whether primarily eat healthy foods or junk.

          9. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            Taco Bell is supposedly one of the healthiest fast food restaurants.

            https://www.tasteofhome.com/article/healthiest-fast-food-chain-taco-bell/

            Who doesn’t have a Taco Bell nearby?

            https://www.shape.com/healthy-options-taco-bell-7091972

          10. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            I can go into a minimart within one mile of my house and buy prepared salads, yogurt and fruit parfaits, even Marie Calendar meals, not great, but healthy enough.

            Drive 4 miles south and it’s chips, cakes and candies.

            It’s money (nonperishable, long shelf life) and race driven.

            BTW, go there once every couple of months because they carry Andy Capp’s Hot Fries in the two-serving bag. Guilty pleasure.

          11. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            All of the Sheetz and Wawa stores have the same healthy options.

            I can’t speak to what the independently owned convenience stores have, I never go to those.

          12. Lefty665 Avatar
            Lefty665

            Not to be white rational racist, but just due to population numbers there are a lot more obese white people in America than black.

            With 42% of America obese and 12% of America black that means if every black person was obese (obviously not so) there are 2.5 times more non black obese people than obese black people.

            Now about innumeracy…

          13. Nathan Avatar

            None of that is relevant.

            Everyone would be better off if people in the medical profession focused on their area of expertise rather than dividing people by race and virtue signaling.

  7. Lefty665 Avatar
    Lefty665

    With 40+% of America a clinically obese I guess it is not a surprise we have a “fat acceptance” movement. A couple of years ago Scientific American published an article claiming that physicians routinely weighing patients was racist because black Americans tended to be heavier than white. I saw a report the other day that using BMI as a measure of healthy weight was racist for the same reason.

    Crazy, just plain crazy and denial that excess weight has bad health consequences, black, white or otherwise. I personally choose Docs by excellence, not equity. They come in all shades and ethnic backgrounds, but they have excellence in common. No lessors need apply.

  8. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    There are numerous studies that document that a large percentage of medical students harbor false beliefs about Black patients, such as ” Black people’s nerve endings are less sensitive than white people’s.” This implicit belief carries over to their practices. “A meta-analysis meta-analysis of 20 years of studies covering many sources of pain in numerous settings found thatblack/African American patients were 22% less likely than white patients

    to receive any pain medication.” https://www.aamc.org/news/how-we-fail-black-patients-pain

    Dr. Goldfarb is definitely in the minority.

    1. For what it’s worth, Goldfarb addresses that claim in his book. Not that you’d agree with his argument.

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        I would be interested in how he addresses it. I can’t say now whether or not I would agree with him.

        1. Lefty665 Avatar
          Lefty665

          It is pretty simple. Read the book.

      2. Nathan Avatar

        I haven’t read Goldfarb’s book, but the medical profession has made some significant mistakes with respect to black people. An examination of them tells me several things.

        When confronted with issues, doctors and researchers deflect from their own shortcoming and blame slavery, systemic racism, etc.

        Doctors and researchers have also shown themselves to lack critical thinking and the ability to challenge prevailing thought. They unquestioningly used bogus science for black people and I fear they are doing the same with respect to gender dysphoria.

        But instead of recognizing the need to challenge assumptions and listen to people with opposing views, they are doubling down, and tripling down to enforce prevailing opinions.

    2. WayneS Avatar

      In this case, what is the “large percentage” ?

    3. Dick, note whom the study surveyed: “white medical trainees.” Trainees, not practicing doctors, not medical school faculty. Trainees. If med school students believe that Blacks have thicker skin or less sensitive nerve endings than Whites (a finding that, frankly, I find questionable) when they complete their medical training, then it represents a failure on the part of medical schools. Show me what practicing doctors think.

      It may be an empirical fact that physicians prescribe Whites more pain killers than Blacks in response to symptoms of pain. If so, has that been adjusted for level of education and/or social-economic status? Are we really seeing a racial disparity or a class disparity? Are more educated patients more likely to be more assertive in demanding treatment for pain?

      When you’re a carpenter, every problem looks like a nail. When you’re an “anti-racist,” every problem looks like racism.

      1. Nathan Avatar

        If the trainees believe bogus science, and nonsense about African Americans, who’s at fault there? They’ve just spent, what, at least 16 years or more in formal education? (k-12 plus bachelors degree?)

        Or maybe, the subjects are woke and gave the researchers what the researchers wanted to find? Not saying that happened, but the test methodology didn’t mask what was being tested very well.

        I’m currently examining a pain study that appears to have been conducted by UVA. The study has issues, but it will take time to examine it thoroughly, as I am looking at the raw data.

      2. Not Today Avatar
        Not Today

        Trainees, apparently, never become medical practitioners.

    4. WayneS Avatar

      In this case, what is the “large percentage” ?

      1. Nathan Avatar

        I’m looking at the raw data for one of the studies. More to come, but it will take time to pour through.

    5. Nathan Avatar

      Mr. Hall-Sizemore:
      The problems are all too real and go WAY beyond pain. But instead of addressing the actual problems, universities, researchers, and many in the medical profession are doing the exact opposite of what’s needed.

      Within the VOX article below you will find references to some genuine problems, along with a few gems of wisdom. (The rest is CRT and the counterproductive measures Dr. Goldfarb appears to be fighting against.)

      Read the article and you will see that in many cases, the real problem is treating Black people differently, including using different algorithms and thresholds to determine when a health problem is present, and recommended treatment. That’s wrong.
      That’s the problem.

      And here’s a gem taken from the Vox article:

      Jones, like many scholars and scientists, argues that humans are more similar than they are different — that all walking Homo sapiens came from a pool of ancestors who lived in East Africa and that humans are 99.9 percent identical in their genetic makeup.

      “The argument I would make is that differences certainly exist but are relevant in very rare and specific circumstances,” Jones said. “We’re much better off most of the time assuming similarity.”

      I couldn’t agree more!

      So what do the woke plan to do? They suggest treating black people differently from whites by sending them to different doctors, etc. That’s not the problem, and not the solution.

      It also is counterproductive to ignore obesity or other health issues that are killing people by the 10s of thousands every year. Black, white or whatever, people are people, and they should all receive the best medical care possible.

      UPDATE: 6/29/23
      Upon further research, I now see that there are more problems with the VOX article than I previously realized. The actual science is much more complicated than presented within this article and readers should take EVERYTHING presented within the article with more than a grain of salt.

      https://www.vox.com/22528334/race-norming-medical-racism

      1. Not Today Avatar
        Not Today

        The woke suggest recognizing these painful experiences with medical professionals and compensating for them by acknowledging them first and foremost. That’s not something most are willing to do. Although I absolutely agree with you about working to eliminate the inherent biases built into standard practice health assessments.

        1. Nathan Avatar

          Focus and effort should be on fixing problems and improving healthcare for everyone, not using all available resources to paint the country and everyone in it as a racist.

          1. Not Today Avatar
            Not Today

            Good thing no one said or implied that, yeah?

          2. Nathan Avatar

            What I know is the doctors have a difficult dilemma.

            If they prescribe narcotics too freely, they may contribute to addiction and all the horrible things that stem from that.

            If they follow strict guidelines designed to prevent abuse, they might find themselves in even more hot water as racists.

            If you look carefully at the guidelines for preventing addiction and abuse, these guidelines may very well impact certain segments of the population more than others. That doesn’t mean they were designed to be racist.

          3. Not Today Avatar
            Not Today

            Narcotics haven’t been over proscribed to anyone but white folks. Hence deaths of despair in rural America. Pain management is about more than drugs. It’s about trusting pregnant women when they say something’s wrong, not assuming marginally high blood pressure or period pain is ‘normal’ and intervening. Medical racism is real and it costs people their lives. Coupled with inadequate access to care, justifiable skepticism over historical and lived experiences with medical professionals, and environmental hazard concentrations in redlined communities and you have a sure fire recipe for higher mortality regardless of income.

          4. Not Today Avatar
            Not Today

            The doctors made choices in this vein long ago and erred on the side of racism (in favor of white people). Medication abuse (IN THE FORM OF CRACK OR OPIODS) is a medical scourge/problem, not a cultural one. That seems only recognizable when it’s victims are melanin challenged. Guidelines don’t have to be intentionally DESIGNED to be ‘racist’, a meaningless term. If the effect is that they minimize the pain/hardships/risks faced by black and brown folks, and lead to significantly disparate health outcomes (and they do) they need to change.

          5. Nathan Avatar

            Saying something is designed to be racist doesn’t make it so.

          6. Not Today Avatar
            Not Today

            Good thing I didn’t say THAT either.

          7. Nathan Avatar

            I misread your last comment and see that now. My apology.

            I nevertheless am finding that many accusations of erring “on the side of racism” by doctors and researchers, at least in modern times, are not true.

            Additionally, when agenda driven research takes precedence over science, the outcome for minorities is not improved. Quite the contrary.

            I am currently reading Dr. Goldfarb’s book and recommend it.

          8. Nathan Avatar

            “Good thing no one said or implied that, yeah?”

            The comment I made that you are responding to in this instance was not a criticism of you. I’m sorry that was not clear.

    6. Nathan Avatar

      Mr. Hall-Sizemore:

      While I may not always agree with you, I do read your comments and links.

      I often find that reading the text of a study (and raw data when available) is much more informative than just grabbing a headline from it. That’s very true here. I think you may be surprised by what this study actually shows, and does not. More on that later.

      I just ordered Goldfarb’s book. If you have an interest in the topic, you might consider getting one. The paperback is only $17 on Amazon.

    7. Nathan Avatar

      I have already shared this with Mr. Bacon, so I thought I should make you aware of it as well. It paints a somewhat different picture. Risk factors are not evenly distributed across all segments of society.

      Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks

      Charles V. Preuss; Arun Kalava; Kevin C. King.

      Last Update: April 29, 2023.

      https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537318/

  9. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    ““All they need to do is find time for a prenatal visit,” says Goldfarb.”

    Yeah! Buck up!

    “Why are poor Black women less likely to make their appointments? Perhaps they find it harder to get off work. Perhaps they have trouble finding a ride to the doctor’s office. Perhaps they forget their appointments. Those tangible obstacles do not stem from racism, Goldfarb says.”

    Many of these issues do indeed stem from systemic racism.

  10. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    This is where this “anti-Woke” argument ultimately goes…

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2023/06/22/george-mason-professor-anti-male-bias-lawsuit/

  11. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
    energyNOW_Fan

    I heard a recent news story that Black women tend to have many more complications in child birth (low birth weights etc) and that this trend seems to be true for even middle class and affluent cohorts. The root cause is suspected by some to be the racism experienced during growing up.

    Of course liberals probably say exposure to infinitesimal low levels of trace pollution (from cars) is the cause. Pick your favorite causal factor.

    1. WayneS Avatar

      The root cause is suspected by some to be the racism experienced during growing up.

      How would that work?

      1. Lefty665 Avatar
        Lefty665

        Well, don’t you know anything? It’s systemic racism birthing persons experienced growing up. Pregnancy in ‘birthing persons’, whatever their sex, is a system and therefore an oppressed casualty of systemic racism.

    2. Not Today Avatar
      Not Today

      Not growing up…as adult women stressed by racists and misogynists of all stripes who discount real, lived experiences and downplay symptoms of real distress.

  12. Nathan Avatar

    From Goldfarb’s book:

    “If academic medical centers want to improve Black lives, they should open spacious and well-staffed outpatient facilities in inner-city neighborhoods in addition to their multimillion-dollar units placed in affluent suburbs. It may be cheaper, of course, to launch highly publicized virtue signaling anti-racist campaigns, but I suspect most Black patients would prefer good outpatient care to good intentions.”

    Hard to argue with that.

Leave a Reply