Another Reliable Energy Provider Abandons VA

Artist rendering of now-terminated Chickahominy Power. Click for larger view.

By Steve Haner

First published this morning by the Thomas Jefferson Institute for Public Policy.

A long-embattled plan to build a natural gas-fueled generating plant not owned by Dominion Energy has become the latest victim of Virginia’s patent hostility toward fossil fuels.  Environmental opponents and the incumbent utility will probably join in popping the corks.

Chickahominy Power in Charles City County has posted a notice on its website that the project, once scheduled to start construction in 2019 and begin operation in 2022, is terminated.   Investors are seeking a location in Ohio or West Virginia, and the scope of the project has grown.

Irfan Ali of Herndon, who uses the title managing member and who is the principal investor, now plans to develop data centers to use power from the plant, which is also designed to use hydrogen for fuel if that becomes available and economical.  He also plans to couple it with a carbon capture and storage system.

“And I would have done that in Virginia, so Virginia is losing out in a big way,” Ali said.

Neither Ohio nor West Virginia imposes a carbon tax comparable to the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative extracted from Virginians.  Dominion won’t mind having one less competitor bidding against it for those RGGI allowances. Another auction last week set a new record, adding $74 million more in costs mostly passed on to consumers.

But Dominion may also be breathing a sigh of relief because the independent competitor to it would have used the latest turbine technology to produce 1,650 megawatts of power at 65% efficiency and thus a very low cost, about 2.8 cents per kilowatt- hour, with a healthy profit.  Had Chickahominy become a supplier to the regional electricity marketplace PJM, “we would have forced Dominion’s coal plants offline sooner.”

The death of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline, the Virginia Natural Gas Header Project and the continued struggles of the Mountain Valley Pipeline to finish construction have given Virginia quite a reputation.  Ali said his decision, reached last week, will be noticed, and will further damage that reputation around the world.

Environmental opposition was relentless from the start, as was hostility from Governor Ralph Northam (D), who pushed through several bills to eventually end fossil fuel use in Virginia.  The 2021 election changed nothing.  “I am deeply disappointed in Glenn Youngkin,” Ali said. There had been discussions during the election, but “since he got elected I did not hear from one person on the Youngkin team.”  Perhaps they couldn’t have helped, but he didn’t even get a sympathetic ear for his $2 billion investment.

Chickahominy Power was one of two merchant (non-utility owned) power plants proposed for Charles City County that were expected to take advantage of a proposed upgrade in Virginia Natural Gas’s existing pipeline connection between the Transco main trunk in Prince William County and its main service area in Hampton Roads.  The State Corporation Commission imposed financial conditions on the application which VNG later claimed led it to scrap that expansion in 2020.

The other gas generation project, C4GT, terminated right away. It couldn’t secure financing without guaranteed supply, and the SCC wouldn’t allow the expanded supply without secure financing.  Ali, who has financing, called it a classic chicken and egg problem for that other company.

Chickahominy Power then tried another route to secure gas. It sought to build its own 83-mile-long pipeline to connect to Transco near Charlottesville, buying rather than condemning the needed easements and rights of way.  The SCC denied his request to waive regulating it as a public utility, despite its having only one customer.  The final straw came when PJM kicked the project out of its supplier application queue for lack of progress, pushing it back to square one.

West Virginia and Ohio are also in PJM territory, but Ali no longer plans to work through that market. Its hostility to fossil fuel and favoritism toward wind and solar is growing.  It dreams of “LaLa Land where wind and solar meet all the needs,” he said.  His new plan also needs no approvals from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, which took a strong anti-gas turn recently under the new Biden Administration regime.

The Virginia proposal enjoyed quite a bit of local support in a rural county in need of tax-paying development, which helped in securing its early state permits.  Local native tribal leaders and the local government spoke up in favor.  But the very poverty of the area was used as a weapon by environmentalists, who claimed building the plant violated economic justice.

Ali chose the location because it is adjacent to a Dominion Power Virginia substation and an existing VNG pipeline compressor station. Exactly which deleterious effects would be created by adding his facility with its tight air permit to the neighborhood were never detailed, as Bacon’s Rebellion reported.  Despite many battles, his state permits held up. He just couldn’t get gas.

Ali is finding a much more welcoming climate in the other states, which are home to the gas from shale operations that the Atlantic Coast and Mountain Valley pipelines were designed to bring to Virginia.

Opponents claim the pipelines were mainly about bringing the gas to export, but this project and C4GT proved otherwise. The death of VNG’s project and the Atlantic Coast project have left Hampton Roads short of gas supply.  It will hinder future economic development in that region. Ironically, it will interfere with plans to make the region a hub for wind turbine manufacturing, which requires the use of gas.

A Virginian since 1980, Ali moved to the U.S. from Pakistan when his father was appointed its United Nations ambassador in 1971.  His father’s family was prominent in Pakistani politics, having had leadership roles during the separation from Great Britain and then the partition into India and Pakistan.

He is the kind of energetic entrepreneur Virginia should be welcoming and listening to. He is instead going away mad, kicking our dust from his shoes.  Whether this loss spurs a change of direction in Richmond only time will tell.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

49 responses to “Another Reliable Energy Provider Abandons VA”

  1. Kathleen Smith Avatar
    Kathleen Smith

    I have been following you on the natural gas concerns over the past General Assembly. I live in Petersburg and most of the homes in my area are heated with natural gas. In fact, this is why I purchased my home built in 1960’s, one of the newer homes in my subdivision. I don’t think my neighbors know the importance of the legislation passed during this and the previous GA. I have no desire to solar. My daughter who lives on a rural farm in western NC 10 miles from the TN line went solar. It is costing her more than her gas/oil – and oil is high. She had to buy all new energy efficient appliances to get the solar panels to even begin lowering her costs and this is still higher than gas. When she doesn’t have solar working, which is often, she is forced to rely on electricity, bought and paid for at a price that is high.

    Please keep up the good work. People need to know how bad this really is going to be.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Thanks. I need the encouragement because the headwinds are hurricane strength. The usual suspects will be piling on here next.

      https://www.baconsrebellion.com/app/uploads/2021/10/Charles-City-Chickahominy-Letter.pdf

      I linked to that local government endorsement in the story but want to highlight it. That level of local support will never be mentioned by the RTD or Virginia Mercury, who will focus only on the NIMBYs and EJ poseurs.

  2. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Wait. Wasn’t the plan to condemn and build on disadvantaged properties?

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Use your name. That is false and malicious to the point of being actionable. I would love to see him sue you.

      1. John Harvie Avatar
        John Harvie

        Maybe, hopefully sooner than later, Jim will disallow pseudonym use. Why display comments from anyone without the stones to say who they are. Two or three of the most prolific leftist commenters are guilty parties.

        1. DJRippert Avatar
          DJRippert

          Exactly right!

      2. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        The plant, not the lines.

        Don’t think outside the grid. Just think of a different grid…
        https://spectrum.ieee.org/packetized-power-grid

        As they say, “Bring it.”

        Maybe Henrico would want it?

        1. Lefty665 Avatar

          Interesting article. Looks like the REC operated load management switch on my water heater is just the start of what is possible. Duh, scheduling demand is another tool to use to balance intermittent generation and variable loads.

          Tks, the paper IEEE journal was coffee table fodder when I was growing up. I haven’t seen one in awhile:)

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Electrons. Of course, paper is green.

  3. It is disappointing to hear that Ali could not get the Youngkin administration to focus on his project. This is a big loss.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Yes, you would think a $2 billion investment in a tax-producing project would be on somebody’s radar. Of course, the previous governor was trying to kill it, so it was not in the pile of “hot prospects” waiting on the desk. We lose a 1.6 GW merchant project (no profits for Dominion) on 185 acres of land, with power on demand and probably an 80% capacity factor. We gain at the same time 1 GW of unreliable solar, covering thousands of acres, killing millions of trees, with at best a 25% capacity factor, no control over timing of output, and a fat guaranteed profit for the utility. That’s our future in a nutshell.

  4. walter smith Avatar
    walter smith

    The Greenies are systemic racists, aren’t they?
    And tools of Dominion Power/Energy/VaPower, whatever…which has thrown in as a Dem public company, and the CEO and GC should have been forced out for the dirty trick PAC. Where’s Hollerin’ Henry when you need him?
    Besides CRT and DEI, everybody needs to wake up to the ESG governance which is the same thing, wrapped in different terms to obscure what they are doing. It is really suppression of speech (you must adopt Leftist social things, like friendly LGBTQ+ stupidity, like saying Lia Thomas is a girl and Rachel Levine (is it ironic to anyone that the NCAA Woman of the Year swimmer is a man, and the woman doc of the year is a man – sorry – Leftists are crazy – why does anybody listen to them?) or else the activist funds like BlackRock will vote against your Board). Same with “sustainability” – Green stupidity aimed a little differently. The only point of a public company should be to make a product customers want and earn a great return for owners of the company. A public utility like Dominion should have an ever more fiduciary aspect to the citizens of the Commonwealth. I haven’t quite worked out my thoughts there due to the hybrid nature. But Blue’s and Brown’s hackery would have gotten them fired in a better day. Now, Dems just go ho hum…

  5. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    so, apparently there WAS available gas via pipeline if it was approved?

    also – did the “greenies” kill it through Federal lawsuits or did the local NIMBY’s kill it?

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      No. VNG initially could provide 145K decatherms at that site but he needed 265K. So the header expansion was needed. They threw all the arguments at it, but the SCC was concerned about the financials. I think it really was the chicken-egg problem for the other plant, it couldn’t get money without guaranteed gas and vice versa. It failed to materialize and the expansion cost falls on general ratepayers. (Can’t be stockholders, heaven forbid!)

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        And That capacity WAS available in Louisa? Why not build in Louisa then?

      2. Lefty665 Avatar

        One of the other incidentals that was curious was that Ali refused to disclose the other principals in the project. From some of the filings apparently there were several. All in all (or Ali in Ali) it was handled terribly.

        I kept wondering, what were these guys thinking, did they really want the project to fail?

  6. Thanks for keeping up informed. Is anyone looking for other endangered projects before the developers move elsewhere? Meanwhile, Dominion was crowing on the 16th about “Significant Expansion of Solar and Energy Storage Approved for Dominion Energy Virginia Customers.”

    “New projects total nearly 1,000 megawatts, enough to power about 250,000 homes. Projects will support 4,200 jobs and $880 million in economic activity.” No clue as to how much of that stays in Virginia or lasts beyond construction.

    What puzzles me is what kind of storage are they talking about?

    ” The Virginia State Corporation Commission (SCC) approved on Tuesday a significant expansion of new solar and energy storage projects for Dominion Energy Virginia customers. … will add approximately $1.13 to the typical residential customers’ monthly bill.”

    1. Lefty665 Avatar

      Yeah, storage of power from intermittent sources is a separate and fundamental issue. Doesn’t seem it has been addressed substantially.

      Additional pumped storage as Dominion does in Bath county could be one method. Acceptance of peak fossil fueled generation could be another. I’m sure there are more in addition to batteries, but there has not been much discussion of the issue.

  7. So rural Virginians, who need economic development, get AOCed by the leftist liberal eco-wackasses who supposedly want to help them. Such a disappointment for those smelly Wal*Mart, Dollar Store deplorable people. So Animal Farmish…. the haves keeping the have-nots down.

  8. Irene Leech Avatar
    Irene Leech

    Gov. Northam was supportive of these projects. Yes he signed legislation to go in a different direction but he did all he could to push through anything anyone proposed. He refused to meet with opponents and went to great lengths to avoid pipeline folks – would not even entertain concerns, much less do anything to address them.

    Do you really believe the air and water permits would allow little to no pollution? And that they’d be strictly enforced? The track record doesn’t prove that. Whether it’s safety or pollution, landowners and communities are at the mercy of the companies and are largely ignored in decision processes. Information is withheld. Landowners get no compensation for costs associated with dealing with infrastructure someone decides to put through our property. If a landowner even seeks information there are unreimbursed costs. Projects are so far in development before landowners are made aware of them that developers ignore landowner requests. Our system condemns landowners. Even local government ignores landowners – failing to help us get fair compensation and safety.

    Underlying oversight of these projects essentially sacrifices the landowners and immediate communities unfortunate enough to be chosen for these projects. Risk management focuses on the company’s risks, not the people forced to accept the infrastructure without sharing of any benefits. Safety is not guaranteed to those who live on land taken for these projects. Industry slows progress toward regulations for years even after Congress finally acts. Companies are not motivated to use the most effective technology or to improve once facilities are built. Problems are brushed under the rug in favor of company profits.

    Carbon capture and hydrogen remain largely unproven. We don’t have safe systems to move carbon from where it is created to facilities such as these. Risks are huge.

    Look at what it really means to be personally forced to live with these projects. Those who support them should live with them instead of forcing others, whom they typically are willing to sacrifice, to do so. There are good reasons why people oppose projects like this. Society can’t keep forcing them on the same people – people who typically lack resources to stand up for themselves. Our current framework for doing these things is severely flawed.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Irene, plenty of people are just as unhappy with the solar projects, and their footprints are massive in comparison.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Smaller blast radii though,

      2. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        but not the property owners trying to use their own land productively instead of taking others land via eminent domain and minimal impacts to others when vegitatively and earth-berm shielded.

        1. Irene Leech Avatar
          Irene Leech

          Right. Landowners benefit instead of only being sacrificed and generally, it’stheir choice – not someone else’s.

          I believe that if we put more solar on roofs, etc. we’d not need so many huge acreage of panels and not need to build as much new transmission. Our utilities want more control than real distributed solar allows and thus large solar and more transmission are required.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            There is so much unused land in Va, a lot of it farms that are no longer viable in the economy. People that own that land need for it to provide income for them and to pay taxes.

            Most solar farms are easy to hide/shield , it’s virtually zero impact to others, certainly less than spreading sludge (which is legal) or putting up a cell-tower (which you cannot hide) or clear-cutting a forest (which is also legal).

            The more solar we have, the less gas we have to burn.

            some day, we could have enough solar that we don’t need to burn gas at all on some days and nuclear will easily power the night.

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      It’s not so much the polution or the loss of potential power or draw on aquifers, but the flight of all those good lobbying dollars…

      But, as I always say, “Just because it’s self serving doesn’t mean it’s not also the right thing to do.”

  9. Lefty665 Avatar

    Some of us have a different opinion on this project.

    Disclosure, my house would have been in the blast zone if something went wrong with the Chickahominy pipeline. That did not make us very comfortable.

    Ali approached the pipeline badly.

    The first anyone knew of it was when land owners along the proposed route received letters asking for permission to survey. There was no pr done beforehand or contact with local government to let any one know what was planned.

    Then Ali refused to talk to County governments asserting that they had no regulatory jurisdiction. Following that Ali’s rep stiffed a scheduled appearance with the Louisa County BOS. An assistant later announced that the rep who had scheduled the appearance had “forgotten” to put it on his calendar.

    Months later Ali’s reps appearances at Louisa and Hanover BOS meetings were unresponsive, again asserting that localities had no jurisdiction over the pipeline.

    Ali then appealed to the SCC to declare that it had no jurisdiction either.

    The assertion was that there was no public applicable regulation, and that all Ali needed was to purchase pipeline easements from land owners.

    I do not agree with all the tactics that have been used to stop pipelines, but equally do not believe there is no applicable public authority or regulatory responsibility.

    The existing gas supplier for the proposed power plant asserted it had sufficient capacity to supply the plant. Ali’s appeal to the SCC indicated that the proposed pipeline was needed only to provide cheaper gas.

    In addition, the proposed power plant was not going to supply Virginia customers, the electricity was going elsewhere.

    It is my understanding that the power plant permit was cancelled because in the years (5 +/-) since it was issued that there had been no progress on construction.

    In all the issue was not as simple and clear as the initial post portrayed. Ali approached the project badly and never recovered. With a little luck he learned something from this failure and will do better and be more responsive with his next adventure in another state.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      That they…? Good god man, finish that!

      1. Lefty665 Avatar

        Sorry, I fumble fingered and hit the enter key. My DUH!

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Uh… but you… never mind. Reading replys in DisQuick is a reverse stack from those on BR. Must remember to read bottom up.

    2. How many have died from explosions along the 3,000,000 miles of NG pipelines? Compared to, say, deaths from bath tubs?

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        I can put a rubber mat in my bathtub.
        “In 2019, there were 614 reported pipeline incidents in the United States, resulting in the death of 10 people, injuries to another 35, and about $259 million in damages.”

        1. Lefty665 Avatar

          Thank you.

          The numbers are not high, but that is not much consolation to the dead and injured.

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Dead and injured? $260 MILLION… uh wait. That sounds too insensitive, or Republican or something.

          2. Lefty665 Avatar

            Perish the thought:) I’m profoundly Indy. Probably means I get the worst of both Repubs and Dems.

          3. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Oh gosh no. Everybody loves an Indy. Your vote is getable, everyone courts you, and most of the time you’re satisfied with your choice. It’s Libertarians they hate for exactly the opposite of the reasons.

          4. Lefty665 Avatar

            I like your optimism.

            3rd party voting in the last 2 presidential elections was not particularly satisfying beyond not voting for the Repubs or Dems. OTOH, I didn’t like McA even long ago when I was a Dem, so that was satisfying, but that’s another story.

        2. Stop driving on roads —- so many deaths!

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Especially in Texas with a 13-yo driving daddy’s pikemup. Golg isn’t suppose to kill.

    3. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Well, there was no new pipeline on his first proposal as he would hook into the existing VNG line like 1 mile away. All the upgrades would be in existing rights of way and frankly the old pipes should worry you more than any new ones. But when he moved to the 83-mile private alternate, that would have been fresh lines. Did he handle the PR well? I can see where some might say no, but I’m distrusting of the MSM accounts.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        I thought RTD said they were proposing a pipeline to an existing Transco /Columbia pipeline in Louisa?

        Notice that no one went to the 4th circuit to contest it. Not crossing Federal or state lands, right?

      2. Lefty665 Avatar

        Although I share your distrust of the MSM, my account is first person, looking at the maps myself, based on local reporting, statements from County Supervisors about County BOS meetings, reading the appeal to the SCC and reading the subsequent judicial opinion.

        The existing pipeline was NIMBY, the new one was IMBY, so my selfish concern was with the new one. Before the pipeline controversy blew up I had no idea there even was a proposed power plant in Charles City County.

        Again the biggest affront was Ali’s arrogance that there was no public regulation of the pipeline. None, nada, zip. I do not like much of the gov’t over reach we have today, but I do believe that there is a legitimate role for government in public safety. It could be as simple as inspection of pipeline construction and welds.

      3. Irene Leech Avatar
        Irene Leech

        The report Lefty665 gave above fits what I heard from those involved as things happened.

  10. James C. Sherlock Avatar
    James C. Sherlock

    Good report, Steve. There is, of course, every reason to use natural gas to replace coal in the generation of power. And to use gas rather than electricity for home and industrial uses. There are no rational reasons not to do so.

    If you want to see irrational, go to https://350.org. You will read what the green left wing feels. I would say thinks but it does not apply.

  11. Suzanne Avatar

    If Ali had the financing why didn’t he build the plant? He never had the financing, he couldn’t get it because he had no gas and no water even though the DEQ had bent over backwards to facilitate this unneeded and costly project for the citizens downwind. Good riddance to Ali and his dirty project.

  12. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
    energyNOW_Fan

    They say only 25% of proposed solar projects are actually built. That’s because some projects make less sense. I assume the same is true of pipelines and nat gas plants. It is hard for us mere mortals to understand if this project failed due to its own faults or unfair treatment by greens and residents. For starters, building a long new pipeline is going to be problematic for many landowners.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      A fair and equitable way to build pipelines would be to offer the landowners to be investors of the project. Fair and appropriate.

      If Walmart or a developer like Til Hazel or even a solar farm company wanted to use eminent domain – all heck would break loose.

      The claim from the pipeline proposals is that they “serve” a critical public need – but almost none of them provide the proof that they really are. Instead they really are at-will private sector investor proposals – that seek to force other property owners to sell to them for their own economic benefit.

      Supporters blame the “greenies” and play boogeyman politics spreading FUD about ‘taking your gas” to the gullible.

  13. […] With the full cooperation and participation of the General Assembly over several years, helped by several compliant governors in a row, Dominion Energy Virginia has grown into a gigantic, expensive behemoth of guaranteed profits and massive excess supply. It is growing reliant on intermittent sources with plans on the books to explode consumer costs with an even less reliable generation mix.  Low-cost competitors are driven out. […]

  14. […] add some context for comparison. Virginia has driven off and said good riddance to a privately financed merchant generation plant that would cover less than […]

Leave a Reply