Readers Respond



Don't Look Behind You,

GMU Research is Coming on Strong

 

Thank you for your insightful and accurate article on the condition of research in Virginia's universities and the governor's recent actions in support of research ("It's a Start," January 05, 2004). It is rare to read a news article on the arcane subject of research funding that gets things even close to correct, so it was most refreshing to read this one. Let me indulge in a bit of special pleading...

 

You note that the four strongest research institutions -- Virginia Tech, University of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University and the College of William & Mary -- got the smallest general fund increases in the budget. I'd like to point out, however, that for FY2001 (the most recent year for which data are available from a standard source, the National Science Foundation), William and Mary reported spending $35.8 million and ranked #158 nationally. George Mason, which did not "make the cut" as a "strong" institution, reported $32.9 million and ranked #162. I think that's close enough to warrant being the fifth strong institution. Furthermore, unless I miss my guess, we will comfortably pass William & Mary in the next ranking as our internal estimates of expenditures show that ours grew by 19 percent percent annually over the past two years.

 

It is also important to recognize that one reason Mason has been recommended for a greater spending increase is that we are one of the very few Virginia institutions that have committed to enrollment growth to help accommodate the rapid rise in the population of college-age students anticipated in Virginia this decade. It is my understanding that William & Mary has decided not to grow in response to this demographic challenge. That's a perfectly legitimate institutional choice, but it has different consequences for each institution.

Let me turn to the governor's challenge to the universities to grow externally supported research to $1 billion by 2010, from $577 million in 2000. When he first articulated that challenge in public at the Higher Ed summit in Newport News last May, my fellow university chief research officers and I exchanged comments to the effect that this challenge will be easy to meet and, in fact, could be met even if we

slacked off our current growth path. I think I reflect the consensus view that we will reach $1 billion well before the end of the decade.

 

At the same time, we do, in fact, face a rapidly moving target. To illustrate, one of GMU's deans recently advocated internally that we seek to become a "top 100" research university by 2010. If the pack we are following stood still for the next seven years, we could probably get there from our current #162 spot and at our current growth rate, which has averaged about 14 percent annually over the past six years. A quick examination of the rate of progress of the #100 institution over the past decade, however, shows that the pack is not standing still and that

we'd have to make a radical change in what we do to get to #100. Old #100 is growing at something less than 14 percent, so we are catching up, but it's going to take a long time. Nevertheless, we're going to give it all we can to try to get there.

 

Chris Hill

Vice Provost for Research

George Mason University

chill2@gmu.edu

 

How Are You So Sure that University R&D is a Good Investment?

 

In your article, "It's a Start," (January 5, 2004) you wrote favorably about pouring $1 billion in R&D expenditures at the state universities. Have you ever evaluated the return on investment of taxpayer dollars spent for research at State universities?

 

My employment experience includes nine years in industry, 10 years as a faculty member in the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department at the University of Delaware, and 28 years back in industry after I abandoned my tenured position at Delaware. I have been involved with and an observer of research and development in industry and in academia. I have not met one company representative that expects a significant return on investment from academic research.

 

Companies will fund academic research only to have a pipeline to the students. The pressure to publish is so great that academic research concentrates on small incremental advances that produce many papers over many years at a rate too slow to keep up with industrial needs. Industry relies on industrial research and development.

 

Fredrick A. Costello, Ph.D.

Oak Hill

President

Frederick A. Costello Consulting Engineers

fac@facinc.com

 


 

Tax Cigarettes... And Liquor, and High-Fat Foods

 

I really appreciated the tax analysis in "The 65 Percent Solution" (December 15, 2003) and the "reluctant fairness" attributed to the Warner analyst. I do not understand your reluctance to raise money by raising cigarrette taxes, as their consumption is by choice and results in HUGE medical costs, largely defrayed by the non-smoking majority of taxpayers who bear the burden of medicare and medicaid payments.

 

Anything that can be done to discourage smoking, and to shift the cost of the diseases caused by smoking to the smokers themselves (rich or poor) should be applauded. If the tax is born disproportionately by the poor, the cost of the diseases are born disproportionately by non-smokers, it seems to be the fairest example of a "use" tax that I can imagine. We should further tax liquor and luxury items as well, and if it could be devised, tax fat in foods -- the most expensive foodstuffs are the lowest in fats and nutrition and the cheapest staples are those that are the most highly processed and highest in fat. We aren't thinking clearly about this.

 

But thank you for your magazine...I love it!

 

Wendy C. Ault, M. D., M.A.(Ethics)

WCAult@aol.com

 


 

More Dirt on Unpaved Roads

 

Edwin Clay’s very good article on unpaved roads ("The Dirt on Unpaved Roads," January 5, 2004) brought back lots of memories. When I was VDOT Commissioner (1986-1994) unpaved roads in Virginia got a lot of attention.

 

At the time, there were about 10,000 miles of unpaved roads in Virginia. One fact surprising to me was that the county with the most unpaved roads was, and I guess still is, Loudoun County in Northern Virginia. The county with the least unpaved miles was Wise County in the far southwest -- about a half mile that the resident engineer wanted to preserve as a historic artifact. 

 

In Loudoun, it was nearly impossible to get agreement from residents along the roads to pave them. Pavement was too hard on horses and there were too many old stone walls. My first involvement with an unpaved road was a Loudoun County Board proposal to pave a road that carried a fairly high volume of local traffic. As I recall, it functioned as a connector between two active commuter routes. 

 

One group of residents wanted it paved and convinced the Board of Supervisors to put it in their six-year improvement program. Our resident engineer agreed.  When the horse owners and preservationists learned it was to be paved, they started a very vocal protest.  For a variety of reasons — personality and procedural — the issue was raised to my office. I made about a half dozen trips from Richmond to the neighborhood, met with both groups, toured the road, asked for information on traffic growth, accidents, and right of way needs — and concluded it should be paved. Not so said the opposition and they made it a pretty visible political issue! To make a long story short, the road is still unpaved and I learned that all dirt roads are not unpopular. 

 

At the end of my first term, I visited a family in Penhook, a very rural community in Southside Virginia.  It was my practice to visit every 1,000th group that adopted a road for trash pick-up and help clean up their adopted section to promote the “Adopt a Highway” program. Several of my staff went with me.  We started to pick up trash on an unpaved road. On one side, in the ditch line, we found hundreds of glass bottles — so many we used up all the trash bags we had brought with us.  bout a month or two later, law enforcement raided what was then the largest illegal still every found in Virginia. I guess we had cleaned up their unusable bottles.

 

Roads certainly do serve lots of purposes — and driving on them is only one. Sometimes it is not the most important one.

 

Ray D. Pethtel

University Transportation Fellow

Virginia Tech

Blacksburg

rpethtel@vt.edu

 


 

Inner Suburbs Offer Opportunity, Too

 

I have a comment or two on your Op/Ed entitled "Inflection Point," (January 19, 2004). Recently, in September, the Richmond chapter of the Urban Land Institute had Bill Lucy as one of two guest speakers on the subject of inner ring decay. The other speaker was the Bill Hudnut, former congressman, four-term mayor of Indianapolis and now a resident fellow and ULI/Joseph C. Canizaro Chair for Public Policy at the Urban Land Institute. He wrote a fine book on the subject of inner ring decline called "Halfway to Everywhere". I wish you had checked this book out before writing this op/ed.

 

It is a reality that decline is occurring in many US cities' inner suburbs. While these two intellectuals didn't disagree, the difference in their approach was interesting. Lucy seemed to present a half empty glass, predicting doom in Richmond's inner rings, his premise primarily based on income statistical analysis.

Hudnut was more optimistic and served a wake up call to the opportunities these areas present for redevelopment and revitalization. He showed example after example around the nation where decline existed and why. Then he showed us examples of municipalities capitalizing on the opportunities presented by such decline. Finally he demonstrated key elements and factors to consider in redevelopment strategies.

 

Lucy's comments and predictions sparked quite a reaction from the public sector attendees and members of ULI. So, we had a follow up program in December that permitted the planning directors from Chesterfield and Henrico to present their perspectives on the issue facing their older suburban areas. ... I can personally vouch for efforts made by Chesterfield County to proactively stem the tide of decline as I participated in a very intense planning exercise on Cloverleaf Mall that helped set the stage for the county developing and acting on a strategy to bring about the upgrading, redevelopment of the area.

 

David M. Smith, CCIM

Thalhimer

 Cushman & Wakefield Alliance
Richmond
david.smith@thalhimer.com

The Case for Regional Cooperation

 

Great article! ("Inflection Point," January 19, 2004). I have been preaching for months that the City was on the way back, but had only a few examples to point to as proof.  Your statistic makes the case. Your article also makes the case for regional cooperation.

 

Last decade's city problems are next decade's county problems. We can only solve them by working together. Despite political boundaries, our community is one organism. Until we start thinking of and treating it like one, we cannot effectively address the problems of low-income housing, crime, education and the other social ills of our community.

 

John W. Bates, III

jbates@mcguirewoods.com

 


 

Got Farm?

 

I was glad to see Barnie Day's "Got Milk?" column (January 5, 2004). This really hits home for me, as my best friend’s dairy was sold this year and her cows were sold over many tears. But the bottom line was, my friend could not turn a profit.

 

First poultry and now dairy. Our poultry farm is currently up for sale for the very same reason... Tears, but not for the turkeys! The bad news is that 70 percent of Virginia farms will change ownership in the next 15 years because of the aging population of farmers. Their children see the situation and don’t want to farm because it is not profitable.

 

Next thing you know we’ll be saying… Got food? Scary!

 

Joan Hollen

Bridgewater

hollenjs@jmu.edu

 

 


 

Will You Guys Ever Get Over the Civil War?

 

As a former journalist and national consultant who has, over the decades, immensely liked my 400-plus trips to Virginia, and who numbers close friends among your fellow Virginians, I consider your remarks about "300,000 dead Yankees," ("God, Guns and the American Flag," December 15, 2003) in recent reference to your pride in Southern Culture, extremely tasteless

Back off from your alarming fervor. The war is over.

Judson LaFlash
Eagle, Idaho

-- February 2, 2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Letter Writers

 

Chris Hill: Don't Look Behind You, GMU Research is Coming on Strong

Fredrick A. Costello: How Are You So Sure that University R&D is a Good Investment?

Wendy C. Ault: Tax Cigarettes... And Liquor, and High-Fat Foods

Ray D. Pethtel: More Dirt on Unpaved Roads

David M. Smith: Inner Suburbs Offer Opportunity, Too

John W. Bates, III: The Case for Regional Cooperation

Joan Hollen: Got Farm?

Judson LaFlash: Will You Guys Ever Get Over the Civil War?