<?php $nav = "http://" . $_SERVER['HTTP_HOST'] . "/du_includes/navigation.php"; include($nav); ?>

Articles


 

Stop and START

 

The Senate transportation task force, START, has explored some interesting ideas but it is still struggling to find consensus on a legislative package for 2006.

 

By Bob Burke

 

With just a few weeks before a new governor takes office and the General Assembly opens, a special Senate committee working on transportation-related legislation is still figuring out what it wants to do.

 

At their fourth meeting yesterday in Richmond, members of the Statewide  Transportation Analysis and Recommendation Task Force (START) ran through a long list of ideas but it wasn’t apparent which ones will emerge as legislation. In fact, that process now moves behind the scenes: the group’s staff members are going to draft a package of legislation over the next few weeks and give panel members a last chance to comment before going public with the proposals.

 

Whatever the group comes up with will have a tough time getting through the General Assembly. With transportation funding issues expected to dominate the coming legislative session there’s little agreement so far among key parties. Gov.-elect Timothy Kaine has said he won’t back tax increases for transportation unless lawmakers agree to not use existing transportation funds for other purposes. Members of the House of Delegates have flatly ruled out any tax increases.

 

It’s widely expected the START group will propose some kind of funding increase and probably some policy changes on land use. “It’s going to end up being what we can all live with,” said Mark Rubin, a mediator with the McCammon Group in Richmond, who led the panel’s discussion.

 

Whatever comes out may not have the momentum that its leaders would like. The state senators on the START panel seemed unable to agree on some key points.

 

Sen. Charles Hawkins, R-Pittsylvania, has pushed panel members to produce innovative ideas but Sen. Martin Williams, R-Newport News, urged them to focus on funding and remember the political realities of the House’s opposition on some key issues. “I do believe that the Senate should legislate on its own, but I do believe we should stay within the realm of what’s possible,” he said.

 

Sen. Edd Houck, D-Spotsylvania, rejected that approach. “If we’re going to base this on what the House is going to do, we might as well pack up and go home,” he said. “Because we know they’re not going to do anything.”

 

Responded Williams:  “I’m just trying to be realistic. I want to come home with something.”

 

The group agreed that the state needs a long-term funding source dedicated to transportation, whether it comes from tolls or raising any of a handful of state taxes, such as the motor vehicle titling tax. One option, to implement a statewide sales tax on gasoline, would have raised $334 million in 2004, according to staff figures.

 

The panel has shown fairly broad support for linking local land-use decisions with the state’s transportation planning. That’s a hot issue that Kaine used effectively in Northern Virginia’s crowded suburbs during the campaign, but the panel struggled with specifics. A proposal to force localities to add zoning and transportation plans to their comprehensive plans seemed too complicated and Hawkins suggested a legislative study first. “We’re trying to bite off more than we’re able to chew, I’m afraid,” he said.

 

The panel also talked about reorganizing the Virginia Department of Transportation and the Commonwealth Transportation Board. Members of the CTB are appointed by the governor but the START group might propose letting the General Assembly appoint some board members to strengthen its connection with the legislature.

 

“This may end up in a study as well, because this is a major departure from what we’ve been doing,” Hawkins said.

 

Panel members also talked about requiring developers to interconnect street networks between subdivisions so that traffic from a new project isn’t all forced on to a single connector road.

 

That was a little too much detail for Sen. William Mims, R-Fairfax. “What is the state’s interest in a subdivision cul de sac?” he asked. The big issue is, “We have to focus on how we can pay for a transportation system when we have 10 million people.”

 

Bacon's Rebellion News Service

December 13, 2005

 

 

 

 

Contents

 

Road to Ruin page

 

About Road to Ruin

 

Archived articles