Reforming
Higher Ed
The
"chartered university" proposal has
morphed into a comprehensive overhaul of higher
education in Virginia. Many of the changes are
good ideas -- but they're no substitute for more
state support.
We
cannot let ourselves be distracted by the changing
shape and structure of Virginia's system of higher
education. No matter how you look at it, no matter
the shape, a half-empty glass is still half empty.
All the restructuring, reshaping, and
decentralizing in the world will not replace the
$500 million in cuts from higher education over
the past few years.
As
Virginia moves forward with structural reform, we
should remember that changing the shape of higher
education may provide a number of important and
tangible benefits, but it will not solve all the
problems. What was once the "Chartered
University" proposal of three schools is now
a comprehensive, statewide reform act supported by
all of Virginia's higher-education institutions.
Reforming the system for 21st-Century competition
has received initial approval from the General
Assembly. These reform proposals include
much-needed efficiency benefits, improved tuition
predictability, and advancement opportunities from
two-year to four-year institutions.
Our
institutions of higher education must compete in
the global 21st-Century economy. A decade ago, UVa
and VCU were competing with UNC and the University
of Maryland. Now Virginia is competing for the
best students, companies, and jobs with Germany,
India, and China. It's a fight we cannot afford to
lose.
Decentralizing
higher education will make our schools more
competitive and the Virginia economy stronger
while saving money. No longer will a college have
to wait 18 months for state approval to build a
new dorm or sign a lease for needed classroom
space. All that waiting costs money, and all the
money comes straight out of the taxpayers'
pockets.
Predictable
tuition rates will be one tangible benefit of
higher-education reform. Each school will develop
a six-year financial plan, laying out best- and
worst-case scenarios for tuition levels. This
means families will have a better idea of how much
they will be paying to send their children to
college. Rather than being hit with significantly higher tuition a few months before
the bill is due, parents will be able to plan for the
cost. Finding thousands of dollars in a few short
months is nearly impossible for a family already
strapped with loans, grants, and a second job to
afford the bill. The reform proposals will help
prevent this from happening.
One
reform returns fairness and equity to the way the
state handles tuition and fee money. Currently, the
interest earned on the tuition paid by students
and their families goes into the state's coffers
to be spent on other programs. Under the reform
proposals that money, over $20 million, will be
put back where it belongs: at our schools to
protect our students.
Virginia's
community college system is often referred to as
the onramp to higher education. One of the most
important aspects of higher education reform is a
new set of agreements between two-year and
four-year institutions that will make it easier to
move from a community college to one of the
state's universities. The benefits to our economy
and quality of life from higher education are so
important that we cannot allow students to lose
that opportunity because of bureaucratic hurdles.
Reform
proposals may make tuition more predictable, but
only the General Assembly's funding commitments
can determine if it's predictably high or
predictably low. Likewise, reform proposals can
streamline the process for new construction on
campus, but without funding we cannot break ground
in the first place.
Last
year, responsible, pro-education leaders in the
Virginia House of Delegates and Senate, along with
Gov. Mark R. Warner, brought us halfway back from the
cuts to education made in recent years. Now that
we're halfway back, we can't afford to stop. With
so much of our future depending on an educated
workforce and a knowledge economy, shortchanging
our future should never be an option. All the
reshaping in the world might make it easier to
drink the water, but it doesn't refill the
half-empty glass.
--
February 28, 2005
|