Guest Column

Michael W. Thompson



 

Wanted: A Fresh Approach

For all the painful spending cuts enacted so far, Virginia's elected officials have hardly exploited all the potential budget savings. 


 

The Governor has made his case: Virginia faces a real “budget crisis” that forces painful actions to begin the process of balancing the books. Governor Warner is cutting over $850 million from the budget and firing some 1800 state employees – as starters.

 

As our elected officials struggle to balance the current two-year budget, it becomes more and more clear that it is long past time to bring real business management practices to the state budget process. 

 

Three years ago state agencies identified three 37,550 jobs that could be done in the private sector. The projected savings are about $650 million over a two-year period while the state employees would have work in the private sector. Yet, not one of these jobs has been privatized and none of the projected savings has been realized. 

 

About 10,000 people leave state government employment each year. With proper management of the vacant jobs in state government, few if any employees would need to be fired. Why can’t the state do this? Why are the employees’ heads on the block?

 

Accounts receivable to our state more than 90 days old have doubled over the past six years (to $1.1 billion) and the percentage of collections is down 14 percent. If the state’s collection process were as efficient as six years ago, $500 million more would be in the state’s bank account. No one is talking about this. It is time to bring the private sector to the table of collections in a reasonable and profitable way for all of us.

 

The state could sell excess property for tens of millions of dollars. One underused state mental hospital in Williamsburg has 900 acres of prime land! Why not sell 850 of those acres? Surplus property should be a prime target for relieving the state’s budget difficulties.

 

And Virginia’s ABC stores could be sold for what some feel would be hundreds of millions of dollars while maintaining oversight, enforcement and current liquor distribution channels. A serious effort should be made to get the state out of the liquor business while protecting the public and the current suppliers.  Former Governor Wilder has suggested this and the idea should be pursued.

 

Indeed, the Wilder Commission (on budget reform) has recommended that the state’s procurement system can be reformed and centralized with a savings to the state of something more than $500 million a year.  Hopefully, this important Commission will make more concrete suggestions before the Governor and our legislative leaders complete their budget reduction suggestions.

 

Studies show that when federal dollars go into a transportation project, the total cost of that project increases by at least 30 percent. So why doesn’t Virginia use its federal transportation dollars on a limited number of projects and take our state and local money and pump those dollars into all the other projects? By spreading our federal transportation dollars across the board, we are being most inefficient. It is past time to better manage our transportation dollars in this way.

 

But, if the Governor and the General Assembly are serious about controlling state spending over the long haul, the first step is limiting the growth of state spending. Colorado and other states have spending limitations. Still others are considering this logical budget management reform that is key to avoiding future budget crises.

 

Had spending restraints (limiting the increase of state spending to the rate of inflation and population growth) been the law when George Allen passed the baton of leadership to Jim Gilmore in 1998, the budget crisis we face today would be dramatically less, and most likely non-existent.  

 

Allen handed Gilmore a suggested two-year budget of $40 billion. A year later that budget was increased to $42 billion and the very next year the Governor and General Assembly passed a new two-year budget of more than $48 billion. That is a 20 percent increase in only two years!

 

And the two-year budget passed by the General Assembly in March of this year and signed into law by the Governor totals $52.7 billion!

 

Had the budget proposed by George Allen been followed, and if future budgets had increased by 4 percent a year (about the rate of inflation and population growth), the last two-year budget would have been $43.3 billion and not $48.7 billion. And the current two-year budget would have been $46.8 billion not $52.7 billion. That’s a savings of $5.9 billion while the state budget would still have increased at respectable 4 percent a year. 

 

The current budget crisis could have been avoided.  Best practices and better budget management are needed now. We’ll soon see if we get either.

 

-- November 11, 2002

 

Bring Home the Bacon

Help   About search

 

 

 

 

Michael Thompson is chairman of the Thomas Jefferson Institute for Public Policy, a non-partisan foundation that seeks creative and workable solutions to current government programs and policies.