Guest Columnist

Steve Toler



 

    

A Modest Proposal

 

 

Want to solve traffic congestion? Bring in the class-action attorneys.                                


The governor, it seems, is stumping Northern Virginia and Hampton Roads in support of referenda this November to bump up regional sales taxes. Jacking up taxes to pay for road and transit projects – now, that’s an “old economy” way to address traffic congestion. I would have credited our venture capitalist-turned-governor with more imagination.

 

Virginia should take a page from the most successful tax- and revenue-generation scheme since the invention of the income tax: the successful litigation against, and blackmailing of, “Big Tobacco”.

 

Think about it: Cigarette manufacturers produce and market products that kill people and pollute the atmosphere. Trial lawyers have brought the tobacco companies to their knees, forcing them to pay billions in reparation for past and future sins. Meanwhile, smokers are paying so much for cigarettes, and the taxes on them, that they need to take out second mortgages to support their habit – if they haven’t already defaulted on the first.

 

What the governor, the General Assembly and the class-action legal profession have all missed is the true culprit in creating the traffic-related problems – the auto manufacturers.

 

What’s the largest cause of accidental death in America? Automobiles. Why has our urban air quality gone all to hell? Automobiles. What has drained our downtowns of their vitality and caused suburban/exurban sprawl? Automobiles. What about the drivers, you ask? Don’t they bear some responsibility? There you go, blaming the victim. Of course not. In our society, there’s no discernible connection between responsibility and culpability. It’s all about who has the deepest pockets.

 

The first step is to find some plaintiffs attorneys willing to file a class action suit against the automobile manufacturers for the reasons cited above. The merits of the case are irrelevant. All we have to do is pile on with enough lawsuits in enough jurisdictions that Detroit (or Toyota City, as the case may be) feels compelled to settle. Once we’ve won our billions in boodle, the General Assembly can divvy it up through everybody’s favorite form of pork barrel: road projects in their home districts.

 

The fun doesn’t end there. After we’ve sucked the auto manufacturers dry, we could re-institute the car tax. First, we’d go after the arrogant Yuppies in their Jaguars and BMWs. Then we’d move downstream to those obnoxious SUVs, and then, when people were numbed to the inevitable, to other makes and models. Within a few short years, people would start moving back to cities – at least those with bus lines. Teenagers would stop driving under the influence. Smog would roll away, birds would sing, couples would stroll hand-in-hand, and we wouldn’t have to watch any more of those odious car-dealer ads on television.

 

The path to paradise isn’t painless of course. A few people would lose their jobs – auto salesmen, car mechanics, gas pump jockeys. But with our bountiful tax proceeds, we could retrain them for the jobs of the future. Once the cars are gone, someone will have to fix all those bicycle tires and re-shoe those horses.

 

So there. That’s it. Why didn’t somebody think of this before?

 

-- September 30, 2002