Virginia Energy Policy: Electricity Production & the Nuclear Option
By Joe Nash • Dec 2nd, 2009 • Category: Energy, Feature, State GovernmentOn September 12, 2007 Governor Kaine released the Virginia Energy Plan (VEP), a proposal that promotes the Commonwealth’s energy independence and educates consumers on energy conservation and efficiency. As required by the 2006 General Assembly, it seeks to reduce the rate of growth in energy use by 40 percent, reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 30 percent and increase in-state energy production by 20 percent.
The VEP states:
Virginia is at the southern end of the Mid-Atlantic area which is projected to violate electric reliability standards as early as 2011. With no increase in conservation, Virginia would need to add an additional 5,098 megawatts of capacity through a mix of electric generation or imports. If the 10 percent energy-efficiency and conservation goal set in 2007 legislation is met, the state would still need to add an additional 2,358 megawatts of capacity. Additional electrical infrastructure growth will be needed if any current capacity must be retired. This capacity will need to serve electric growth in the northern Virginia, Hampton Roads, and central Virginia areas.
The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) reported that Virginia’s fuel use in 2005 for electricity was 44 percent coal, 34 percent nuclear, 10 percent petroleum, 8 percent natural gas, 2 percent hydroelectric and 2 percent renewable. On average about 80 percent of the electrical energy used by Virginia was generated in-state, while about 20 percent was imported.
As the numbers indicate Virginia will need to add significant capacity based on growth and reducing imports even if energy conservation works. Add to this a 30 percent reduction in GHGs and you have an interesting dilemma: how clean can you make coal production, how much can renewables contribute, what is the nuclear option and when can these various alternatives come on-line?
Coal
Coal fired power plants emit GHGs (among other pollutants). Carbon sequestration, when proven, will make coal a viable power source under the VEP. The big question is when will that technology be available? That is a tough question but I predict it will be toward the end of the near-term (5-15 years) to have a proven technology.
Renewables
The Virginia Center for Coal and Energy Research (VCCER) prepared a report in 2005 entitled Increased Use of Renewable Energy in Virginia. VCCER defines renewable energy is as the energy derived from sunlight, wind, falling water, sustainable biomass, waste, wave motion, tides, and geothermal power. The report concludes that while there is significant renewable potential, only 930 MW could be economically developed in the near-term (5-15 years). The report identified a number of significant impediments including the lack of class 3 (<14 mph) or better wind areas in Virginia and the concerns about intermittency and land intensity of solar power. Also, because renewable technologies such as solar and wind power rely on variable and uncontrollable sources for energy affected by the weather, they are generally viewed as inappropriate for base-load or peaking generation.
Nuclear
Nuclear power generation started in the late fifties with the so-called Generation I reactor (early prototype and power reactors). The industry has organized reactors by design classification of Generation I, II, III and IV. Generation II are commercial reactors built up to the end of the 1990’s. Generation III reactors incorporate evolutionary improvements in design which have been developed during the lifetime of the generation II reactor designs. Generation IV reactors are theoretical designs currently being researched and generally not expected to be available for commercial construction before 2030. The goals of Generation IV are to improve nuclear safety, improve proliferation resistance, minimize waste and natural resource utilization and to decrease the cost to build and run such plants.
Virginia obtains 34 percent of its electric energy from 4 units located in the Dominion Virginia Power (DVP) Surry and North Anna systems. Both Surry and North Anna were planned for 4 units. DVP is currently in the licensing process for unit 3.
Virginia needs to plan and implement now to provide adequate and reliable electrical energy well into the twenty first century. For economic growth to continue Virginia needs to expand energy production. Virginia also needs to add 20 percent additional capacity to free itself from having to import energy from other states.
What actions should Governor-elect McDonnell take in reference to using nuclear power to attain needed electrical power production to ensure continued economic growth and energy independence for Virginia?
- Make the expansion of nuclear power to 50 percent of Virginia’s electricity needs by 2025 and 75 percent by 2050 a Virginia energy policy (North Anna 3&4 get production to 50 percent)
- Act as an advocate with DVP to expedite the process (in Virginia and federally) of approval and getting unit 3 on-line
- Take action to have DVP start the process for unit 4
- Have a study completed to look for potential Virginia locations for future nuclear power plants to meet the 50 percent and 75 percent goals (include both DVP and AEP areas)
- Have DVP conduct a feasibility study to expand Surry and North Anna and to extend the useful life of the current reactors
- Work with other like minded governors to fast track nuclear development and approval
The window of opportunity may appear quite extensive looking at 2025 and 2050 as production dates. However, the system for planning through construction and startup is a multiyear process that can easily last 10 to 15 years. Thus if Virginia wants to produce 50 percent of our electricity using nuclear power by 2025 we need to start in 2010 to ensure that North Anna 3 is far enough along to make a 10-year window and start the process for North Anna 4 to make a 15-year window. At the same time it is important to perform studies for more potential sites or the expansion of Surry and North Anna to meet the 2050 date. Governor-elect McDonnell will need to act quickly to produce and implement an energy policy that can be one of the premier achievements during his administration.
Joe Nash Joe Nash has over 40 year’s experience as both a technical manager and policy analyst at EPA, DOE and the private sector. During that time he has been involved with the implementation and analysis of TSCA, FIFRA, FQPA, SDWA, CWA, CERCLA and RCRA. Mr. Nash has also provided support and policy input to five EPA projects involving rule-making on: engineered nano materials, hazardous air pollutants (HAPs), TSCA Section 8 (a) and (d), priority testing of chemicals, and the implementation of the endocrine disrupter screening program (EDSP). Mr. Nash is currently consulting with a company to develop a business plan for advising Boards of Directors and CEOs of large and mid-size companies on strategies for attaining “GREEN” company excellence using the triple bottom line (TBL) approach of economic, environmental and social value. He was, for the last four years, President of the College of William and Mary's Advisory Board for the Thomas Jefferson Program for Public Policy. He was a member of the Board of Directors for an ISO 9000 & 14000 training company from 1979 to 1999. He has been a member of the Occoquan Watershed Coalition Board of Directors since 1999 and was a founding member of the Fairfax County Environmental Quality Advisory Council.
Email this author | All posts by Joe Nash
Excellent analysis, Joe. Bravo!
Excellent analysis of the base issue. If we can lower dependence on fossil fuels for base electricity which will help with both plug-in cars, rail electrification and high tech jobs we will secure a future for our children and maybe eliminate our importing electricity from other states.
Joe – Great analysis. Hopefully John Q. Public will wake up to the fact that the mid-Atlantic region is fast approaching the day when the lights start going out because the infrastructure does not exist to generate power or transmit power into the region.
I run into people every day that believe that we can conserve our way out of this or that wind and solar are the answer. As you point out wind and solar are not viable sources of power for base or peak load due to their inherent unreliability power sources because the wind doesn’t always blow and on average the sun only shines 12 hours a day. People also tend to forget that in spite of conservation we will consume more power this year than we did last year. Do you have any information or know of articles that project the increase in demand for electrical power over the next 15 to 25 years?
Jack I thought that there would be an easy answer for energy demand in VA. But the only thing I have come across is the VEP that only goes to 2016. I can only assume both VA & the power companies (DVP & AEP) have a detailed analysis of potential demand. I have no idea how far out they predict. They will need it. See next weeks article on Generation IV reactors & their potential to make VA electricity independent.
I couldn’t agree more, Joe. Not only do we need nuclear, but we need to expand our gas, oil and renewables as well. It frustrates me to no end to see us cripple ourselves nationally and at a state level by restricting the use of our natural resources and indebting ourselves to our enemies. I hope we will wake up, before it is too late, to the fact that we must produce products in this country to stay strong economically and by extention to benefit the rest of the world. I am very aware of this as a businessman, and specifically, as a farmer. Producing our food, and other products, requires large amounts of energy. We can always improve efficencies, etc., and should do so. But you don’t have to look further than your own electric bill to see that we use more electricity than we use to.